What's new

Turkey faces tough call on NATO missile shield

Machoman

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
1,521
Reaction score
0
Ankara: Turkey's Islamist-rooted government faces making a difficult decision that pits maintaining good relations with its neighbours against joining a NATO missile shield directed against Iran.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has sought in recent years to boost Turkey's ties in the region -- raising suspicions he is moving the country out of the West's orbit -- and will now have to make a decision that will be viewed as a test of its commitment to its NATO partners.

The US plan to build a network of ballistic missile interceptors in Europe has been taken up by NATO, partly in order to convince reluctant members of the alliance to join the project.

The Turkish government will have to stop fence-sitting soon as NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen wants a final decision on the missile shield to be made at a summit of the alliance's leaders on November 19 and 20 in Lisbon.

The United States says the shield is meant to protect against an eventual missile strike from Iran, but has been vociferously opposed by Moscow, which fears it could undermine its nuclear deterrent.

This poses a problem for Ankara, which fears joining the missile shield will damage relations with Moscow and Tehran, which have improved considerably in recent years, according to analysts.

"It is a dilemma for Turkey. On one hand you have a policy of maintaining friendship with our neighbours, and on the other you are going to be deploying arms which target them," said Sinan Ogan, director of the Turksam think tank in Ankara.

When the defence and foreign ministers of Turkey and the United States met Thursday in Brussels on the sidelines of a NATO summit, the missile shield was at the centre of the talks, Turkish media reported, with Turkish officials still "reserved" about joining the project.

Upon his return to Ankara, Turkish Defence Minister Vecdi Gonul rejected that term, saying Turkey welcomed the discussions within the alliance on the shield that could be operational by 2015.

US Defence Secretary Robert Gates was also quoted by Turkish media as saying that Washington was not putting pressure on Ankara to join the project, but was continuing to hold discussions.

Erdogan also said Friday there had been no pressure on his country.

"No demands have been made of us on this matter, so there is no question of us being given a fait accompli" in Lisbon, he said.

"Turkey has not come to a decision yet, there are technical problems to surmount," a Turkish diplomat told AFP on condition on anonymity, saying Ankara was trying to figure out a way to minimise the impact of a "yes" decision, particularly for its relations with Tehran.

Ankara is in particular opposed to the shield being seen as targeting one country, and wants that it protects all of Turkey against a missile attack, not just areas near the Iranian border, said the diplomat.

The question is even more difficult given the suspicions that Erdogan has been trying to move Turkey out of the West's orbit.

Turkey's refusal to allow US troops to cross its territory to invade Iraq in 2003, to support UN sanctions against Iran, and the ferocity of its dispute with Israel over the raid on a humanitarian aid flotilla to Gaza have all raised concerns about where Erdogan intends to take Turkey.

"A 'no' would only serve to confirm the idea that Turkey is in effect moving away from the West," said Ogan, who believes that the Turkish government will in the end likely decide to join the missile shield project.

The decision is also delicate as Washington remains an important ally for Ankara, particularly its support for Turkey's battle against the PKK Kurdish rebels, said Deniz Zeyrek of the Radikal newspaper.

Washington has been providing intelligence to Ankara about the movements of PKK rebels in northern Iraq, which they have been using as a rear base.
 
turkey must decide, whether its on the east or on the west soon... these double standards will not work, aik bar mun china main marna, aik bar mun middle east main, aik bar mun europe aur america main marna, pretending turkey is in east for oil gain and pretending its on the west side for weapon and immigrant gain will not work..
 
I say we join for the time being. We have no missile shield to begin with. It can't hurt to get this implemented.
 
turkey must decide, whether its on the east or on the west soon... these double standards will not work, aik bar mun china main marna, aik bar mun middle east main, aik bar mun europe aur america main marna, pretending turkey is in east for oil gain and pretending its on the west side for weapon and immigrant gain will not work..

Tell me more about your childhood, maybe we can find the problem in you...
 
Last edited:
when i was child your mom had not met your dad in istanbul

In our culture talking about someones parents like that is an enough cause for homicide... If you come to our country some day dont talk anybody like that(especially about someones mother). I'm saying this for your good. No offence...
 
Oh sorry! My mistake... I misunderstood your message, I thought you said something about his mom.(I wont say it here)

I'm so sorry, my apologies.

My fast reading habit troubles me these days. %100 my fault! Please accept my apologies.
 
Last edited:
turkey must decide, whether its on the east or on the west soon... these double standards will not work, aik bar mun china main marna, aik bar mun middle east main, aik bar mun europe aur america main marna, pretending turkey is in east for oil gain and pretending its on the west side for weapon and immigrant gain will not work..

Why does Turkey have to choose and could you clarify what you mean by choosing sides in the first place? We are accusing them of double standards when they are the only country who stood up to Israel?:what:
 
Oh sorry! My mistake... I misunderstood your message, I thought you said something about his mom.(I wont say it here)

I'm so sorry, my apologies.

My fast reading habit troubles me these days. %100 my fault! Please accept my apologies.

i know what you understood lolzz :devil::devil:, its met past tense of meet

you should not be appointed ambassador at any chance :rofl: and legionaire get him, he has some bad imagination :D
 
Last edited:
when i was child your mom had not met your dad in istanbul

Your acts make me feel like Im babysitting here, damn boring...

Whatever im preparing to leave pdf theese days, you wont see me anymore so feel happy..
 
well there is nothing wrong in joining this program!
if u think for a second, its a defensive move.........those weapons wont be use to attack the enemy but it will be use to protect the nation! i dont think there is anything wrong with it!
 
The missile shield is a defensive but also a political move. Turkeys reservations against it stems from one sole thing, and that is the "pointing finger" at which country poses a risk.

I understand that and agree, if you are having a missile defensive shield it should be against any missile attack aimed at your or other NATO countries in your area.

I know that there are many who thinks in terms of "east" and "west", and many divided opinions on what works best. Well my stance on this is clear. Elhamdulillah I am a muslim, allahasukur that I am born a turk.

I want my Turkey to be a free nation of all the religious interference in politics. We have Diyanet to take care of the religious stuff. If any country in the world needs assistance they need only request it from Diyanet.

We do have our own challenges to balancing things, but imo that's because some people are easier to sway than others either because of religion or because of emotions.

I believe that being pragmatic in politics is the best way to deal with things, you should always think of what's best for your country and its people. Playing on the emotions can be an advantage at times, but not always.

Standing up against inhumanity is natural and in a world mostly dominated by western media you'll undoubtly appear as an outsider who's moving towards east. Something is wrong with this world if they're trying to paint you East or West based on your belief.

I believe in peace, and I believe that Turkey doesn't need a missile shield, also if the missile shield is managed by the turkish military without any external force being able to operate it, then I don't mind Turkey joining the missile shield program.

Just keep in mind one thing, the virus that attacked the Iranian nuclear facility was the first of its sort, which has escalted and shown what can be done, thus I believe implementing programs like the missile shield is may be target for future abuses...
 
you should always think of what's best for your country and its people.
I don't entirely agree with that. That's an arrogant and selfish western attitude. We should always be just and fair. For example, if the U.S. sanctions Venezuela or Bolivia, we should make it clear to the U.S. administration that they are wrong and hold them responsible. We should not be subservient to anyone because of our "national interests". I really hate the term "national interests", I want every country to prosper and be independent and free of oppression and foreign intervention.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom