What's new

🚨🇺🇸 TRUMP WAR PLANS LEAKED IN SIGNAL GROUP—TO A JOURNALIST?

HaiderAfan

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 7, 2024
Messages
1,207
Reaction score
0
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
Introduction to the Leaked Trump War Plans
In a shocking incident, top Trump administration officials inadvertently included Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, in a Signal group chat discussing sensitive military plans for airstrikes against Houthi targets in Yemen, the group, which included Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, shared detailed information about the operation, including target lists, weapon systems and attack sequencing.

1742852582760.png


Background on the Incident
A user posing as national security adviser Michael Waltz friend-friended Goldberg on Signal, which led to the leak. Goldberg, who was first dubious, agreed to the request and was later added to a group chat called the Houthi PC small group, over the course of the following few days, he kept an eye on conversations among senior leaders about the impending military operation in Yemen.

Details of the Leaked Plans
Operational Details:
The discussion included detailed details regarding the military operation, such as the targets to be targeted, the timing and order of the strikes, and the kinds of weapons to be employed.

1742852667527.png


Internal Debates: Vice President JD Vance voiced concerns about the timing and possible backlash, arguing that postponing the operation could help better prepare public messaging. Officials also talked about more general strategic issues, such as the possible effect on oil prices and the perception of US actions in the region.

1742852632428.png


European Relations: The group also touched on issues related to European relations, with Hegseth and Vance criticizing what they termed "European freeloading," referring to perceived imbalances in defense contributions.

Reaction and Confirmation
The operation commenced as predicted, with airstrikes beginning on March 15, 2025, the National Security Council later confirmed that the Signal chat was authentic, stating that they were reviewing how Goldberg was inadvertently added to the group, President Trump claimed he was unaware of the incident, while the administration emphasized that the operation success indicated no significant security risks were posed by the leak.

1742852698383.png


Implications and Concerns
The use of a commercial messaging app like Signal for classified discussions is viewed as a serious breach in national security standards and the incident raises serious concerns about the security protocols used by high-ranking officials for sensitive communications, the leak also highlights the dangers of using unsecured channels for military planning and the potential for adversaries to take advantage of such vulnerabilities.

Future Prospects
The American government will probably impose more stringent guidelines for safe communication amongst national security personnel in the future, stricter access controls and improved encryption techniques may be necessary to stop future occurrences of this kind, event serves as a reminder of how crucial it is to keep military strategy discreet in order to guarantee operational security and safeguard soldiers.

Conclusion
An important weakness in the Trump administration communication strategies has been revealed by the unintentional inclusion of a journalist in a Signal group discussion about American military plans for Yemen, the event highlights the need for better secure communication channels to safeguard sensitive information and national security concerns, even though the operation itself was successful.
 
Introduction to the Leaked Trump War Plans
In a shocking incident, top Trump administration officials inadvertently included Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, in a Signal group chat discussing sensitive military plans for airstrikes against Houthi targets in Yemen, the group, which included Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, shared detailed information about the operation, including target lists, weapon systems and attack sequencing.

View attachment 1037207

Background on the Incident
A user posing as national security adviser Michael Waltz friend-friended Goldberg on Signal, which led to the leak. Goldberg, who was first dubious, agreed to the request and was later added to a group chat called the Houthi PC small group, over the course of the following few days, he kept an eye on conversations among senior leaders about the impending military operation in Yemen.

Details of the Leaked Plans
Operational Details:
The discussion included detailed details regarding the military operation, such as the targets to be targeted, the timing and order of the strikes, and the kinds of weapons to be employed.

View attachment 1037209

Internal Debates: Vice President JD Vance voiced concerns about the timing and possible backlash, arguing that postponing the operation could help better prepare public messaging. Officials also talked about more general strategic issues, such as the possible effect on oil prices and the perception of US actions in the region.

View attachment 1037208

European Relations: The group also touched on issues related to European relations, with Hegseth and Vance criticizing what they termed "European freeloading," referring to perceived imbalances in defense contributions.

Reaction and Confirmation
The operation commenced as predicted, with airstrikes beginning on March 15, 2025, the National Security Council later confirmed that the Signal chat was authentic, stating that they were reviewing how Goldberg was inadvertently added to the group, President Trump claimed he was unaware of the incident, while the administration emphasized that the operation success indicated no significant security risks were posed by the leak.

View attachment 1037210

Implications and Concerns
The use of a commercial messaging app like Signal for classified discussions is viewed as a serious breach in national security standards and the incident raises serious concerns about the security protocols used by high-ranking officials for sensitive communications, the leak also highlights the dangers of using unsecured channels for military planning and the potential for adversaries to take advantage of such vulnerabilities.

Future Prospects
The American government will probably impose more stringent guidelines for safe communication amongst national security personnel in the future, stricter access controls and improved encryption techniques may be necessary to stop future occurrences of this kind, event serves as a reminder of how crucial it is to keep military strategy discreet in order to guarantee operational security and safeguard soldiers.

Conclusion
An important weakness in the Trump administration communication strategies has been revealed by the unintentional inclusion of a journalist in a Signal group discussion about American military plans for Yemen, the event highlights the need for better secure communication channels to safeguard sensitive information and national security concerns, even though the operation itself was successful.


THE ATLANTIC STRIKES BACK: FULL SIGNAL CHAT REVEALED

After days of downplaying from Trump officials, The Atlantic dropped the whole damn chat log.

No spin, no summaries—just raw messages showing exactly who said what before the Yemen strikes.

Jeffrey Goldberg wasn’t just lurking—he was added by Mike Waltz himself, then watched Pete Hegseth post strike targets and timing in real time.

Trump’s team swears it wasn’t “war planning.” The Atlantic’s receipts say otherwise.

 
This is an unbelievable joke
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom