What's new

Top 10 Worst Firearms in History

Foo_Fighter

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
981
Reaction score
-1
10

Colt Revolving Rifles

images-11.jpg


While these rifles were a good increase in firepower for the people of the Old West starting in the 1830s, they had some very noticeable drawbacks. For all variants, there was a leak of the gases of firing at the front of the cylinder and a corresponding drop in muzzle velocity. For the double-action variants, as the cylinder cycled for each shot the just-fired tube had a tendency to send hot gas at the hand of the firer. This only ranks a 10 on the list because the problems were tolerable in comparison to the benefits of more firepower.




9


The Liberator

images-1-4.jpg


The Liberator was a single-shot pistol stamped out of sheet metal for dropping behind enemy lines into the hands of resistance movements during WWII. It was lacking because you only got a single .45 ACP shot at an enemy who probably had a semi-automatic pistol/rifle or a fully automatic submachine gun. Also reloading was extremely troublesome as you had to push a stick down the barrel to push the spent cartridge out.


8


Gyrojet

images-2-2.jpg


The Gyrojet was a hand-held rocket launcher developed in the 1960s. It fired 13mm rockets. Differing from most firearms in that the velocity increased after the projectile left the barrel. One major problem though was that it often lacked the power to kill at close-range which is really not good for a pistol design. On some occasions the projectile just fell out the end of the barrel.


7


Boys Anti-tank Rifle

images-3-2.jpg


The Boys Anti-tank rifle was an early anti-tank weapon unsuccessfully used at the beginning of WWII. It was a five-shot rifle that weighed 16.33kg (36lb) and fired a 13.97mm (.55) caliber armor-piercing round capable of penetrating 21mm of armor at 300m. It was under-powered at the start of WWII as it could not cope with German panzers armor. It was also a bit heavy for a soldier to lug around and its recoil was ferocious.


6


Nock Volley Gun

images-4-2.jpg


The Nock Volley gun first appeared around 1780 and fired seven .50 caliber slugs at the same time. It was good in repelling boarders in navel combat but its recoil could break the firer’s shoulder. It also had a tendency to set ships rigging on fire from the muzzle blast.







5


Cochran Revolvers

images-5-2.jpg


Perhaps one of the least well-known firearms on the list, the Cochran revolvers had a cylinder that revolved horizontally. Basically it meant that every time you fired it you had a loaded round pointed at you. Everything had to have been machined precisely because if a tube was bored just a fraction of an inch too deep it meant that the round pointed at you would fire as well.


4


Nambu (94 Shiki Kenju)

images-6-2.jpg


A Japanese pistol design of WWII that fired 8mm Taisho 14 rounds. It was underpowered, cumbersome, awkward to use, and extremely unsafe. Since the firing sear projects from the sides, it is easy to fire by accident. It was possible to fire a cartridge before it was fully in the chamber, and was considered more dangerous to the user than its target.


3


Pepper Box Revolver

images-7-2.jpg


The pepper box revolver was used mainly before the colt style of revolver caught on. It was heavy because of the multiple barrels, sometimes all of the shots would go off at once because of chain-firing and break one’s wrist, sometimes it would explode, and it was widely inaccurate. According to some wits the safest place to be when it went off was right in front of it.


2


Grossflammenwerfer

1625170_f520.jpg


This pick is more literally a firearm than the other ones on the list as it is a German WWI era flamethrower. It was manned by a 2 person team and was only operated by convicts because of extreme danger. Basically it was a bomb with a guaranteed 2 people in close proximity. It was large and heavy and made an ideal target. Also since the Allied soldiers found it to be barbaric, they were very unlikely to let the operator surrender alive.


1


Chauchat

images-8-2.jpg


A French light machine gun that was so bad that soldiers issued it threw it away in favor of rifles. Issued during WWI it was so shoddily constructed that the parts were not interchangeable from one chauchat to another. The magazine with its big holes in the sides begged for dirt and mud to mix with the cartridges which resulted in immediate jamming, leaving the weapon useless especially since trench warfare is all about mud and dirt. The main reason the Chauchat is at the top of the list of worst firearms is that there were so many decent light-machine guns around at the time of issue, and they still issued this piece of junk instead.
 
.
The Liberator is the only one on this list that I have a problem with, from an inclusion standpoint. Yes, it sucked bad, but it was designed to be a mass-producible weapons that can be given to partisans in large numbers. Similar in concept to the weapons the Chechens and Hamas have been using during their fights (though both have high quality weapons too). A weapon for resistance fighters who would engage in hit-and-run attacks and not prolonged firefights that would see the liberator be a death-sentence for those wielding it. It wasn't designed to be pretty, or accurate, or expensive, and it wasn't.

The boys anti-tank rifle wasn't bad either, it could achieve a mobility kill on most tanks and a penetration kill of early armored vehicles, but its heavy recoil could break a man's shoulder.

1.jpg


4.jpg


6.jpg


*These are a few the Chechens made during their wars with Russia. Chechen Self-Made Weapons | English Russia

IDF_2-Copy.jpg


Image00081.jpg


123njilhjilhjilji-390x219.jpg

*These belong(ed) to Hamas. Hand built submachine guns seized in Israel / Palestinian territories - The Firearm Blog

The Chauchat was every bit of a nightmare as it was said to be. While most of the design is fine, the biggest issues were the weight and the magazine's poor design. Who the hell though a military firearm should have holes drilled into the mag?
 
Last edited:
.
The Liberator is the only one on this list that I have a problem with, from an inclusion standpoint. Yes, it sucked bad, but it was designed to be a mass-producible weapons that can be given to partisans in large numbers.

Also, partisans armed with this pistol were meant to sneak up an occupier, kill him and then capture his weapon. The Liberator was intended to be concealed easily, hence its rather tiny size, eh?
 
.
Also, partisans armed with this pistol were meant to sneak up an occupier, kill him and then capture his weapon. The Liberator was intended to be concealed easily, hence its rather tiny size, eh?

Yep, but you'd better not miss as you've only got one shot and a very poor, slow and cumbersome reloading sequence and this was really, really hard with the Liberator as it was very inaccurate even at close range. The good news was that if you hit your target they are probably going to die or at least be injured or stunned enough to drop their weapon. The .45 is a great man-stopper, just a bit to heavy for practical battlefield use.
 
. . . . . .
Back
Top Bottom