Time magazine sees Narendra Modi as 'America's other India problem'

[Guynextdoor2]

They clearly have good standards of citizens too. Anti India Islamic snakes that are bred in India under 'secularism' are usually squashed at birth in the US. All their citizens are patriotic and do not go around bombing and killing their other citizens under "Islamic jihad". Nor do their citizens fraternize with their enemies to undermine the US.



Is that a threat ? ...guess what. India refuses to self destruct and those wish its destruction for religious reason will die frustrated.

Who asked you to quote me faggot?

 

[Manvantaratruti]

Who asked you to quote me faggot?

@WebMaster post reported for Insulting other Members.

 

[Indo-guy]

The unwritten rule of the American presidency is- screwing the rest of the world is ok, but you don't screw at home.

It seems otherwise to me ...all their presidents have screwed them some or other way ...

George Bush's War on Terror left 8 trillion dollar hole in American economy ...

Bill Clinton screwed very office of presidency ...

Obama is screwing Americans through NSA spying even without their knowing that they are being screwed ...

 

[Manvantaratruti]

It seems otherwise to me ...all their presidents have screwed them some or other way ...

George Bush's War on Terror left 8 trillion dollar hole in American economy ...

Bill Clinton screwed very office of presidency ...

Obama is screwing Americans through NSA spying even without their knowing that they are being screwed ...

You are talking to a potential terrorists. This american *** kisser is the kind of scum who will write to the US congress begging them to deny visa to Modi.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

It seems otherwise to me ...all their presidents have screwed them some or other way ...

George Bush's War on Terror left 8 trillion dollar hole in American economy ...

Bill Clinton screwed very office of presidency ...

Obama is screwing Americans through NSA spying even without their knowing that they are being screwed ...

GB's war on terror is ACCEPTABLE to americans. After 9/11 they gave him the mandate to do it as bad as he wanted. Americans REALLy wanted revenge (and I guess he gave it to them). Bill Clinton, in the end will be considered a private issue and not a public one. Shaming him would have been considered enough punishment. In any case, all these people had near squeaky clean images until they got office right? That's the question here.

 

[indiatester]

that's fine when defining Linux/FOSS issues. not fine if used outside of that context. reserved for microsoft the evil corporation - that is!

I believe it is blind worshipping and huge expectations. I respect your belief on Modi and BJP(and it's umpteen radical organizations) magically resolves all the problems of India as I assume you living in a religious society. wherever religion and theocracy gains momentum, it is the start of downfall, not limited alone to Islamic countries.

I don't vote BJP. I'm not a member of RSS.
I don't believe that they will destroy India either.

I believe India's problems stem from the fact that the leadership is more interested in their gain rather than national gains. We have myopic leaders with delusions of grandeur. This has trickled down to all of us (or we already had it for ages). That is the reason why we see every one breaking even the simplest of traffic rules and have total disregard for their fellow citizens in any aspect of their dealings (I'm speaking of a vast majority of them).

Now if you are saying that BJP or its radical organizations can modify that and create a theocratic society.... You must be joking.
My view is that both Congress and BJP are bad. Congress is more bad because they have been in power for longer.

If you are afraid that BJP will come to power and destroy India, I can assure you that they are going to destroy only to the extent that Congress can. Vice-versa is true too.

 

[Indo-guy]

GB's war on terror is ACCEPTABLE to americans. After 9/11 they gave him the mandate to do it as bad as he wanted. Americans REALLy wanted revenge (and I guess he gave it to them). Bill Clinton, in the end will be considered a private issue and not a public one. Shaming him would have been considered enough punishment. In any case, all these people had near squeaky clean images until they got office right? That's the question here.

GB was elected by sheer fraud first time ....He won Presidency by mere 36 votes in florida .His brother- governor of Florida helped him manage those votes ...

If GB's war is acceptable to America then whole nation is guilty of War crime besides their president.

Sitting US president committed adultery right in office with one of the white house intern misusing his position as President and you tell me that this remains a private affair ???

If we go by your logic , even people with Squeaky clean images can turn out to be real monsters !!!

so what is the use of relying on those squeaky clean images .....???

 

[Android]

In AAP ministers midnight raid, woman made to urinate in public


TEN COMMANDMENTS BROKEN BY HIS HOLINESS ARVIND KEJIRIVAL

 

[Android]

 

[cloud_9]

This is Americas problem not ours.....as far as Indians are concerned,Supreme Court has dismissed any charges against him.

 

[kurup]

It is standard practice to give Visa to all heads of state. Modi is the kind of person who will get a visa only if he becomes head of state- like several african dictators. The US screws everyone in the world, but they will never elect one that screws their own people as their president. They've got very high standards on who leads them.

India lost those high standard of choosing who leads them when we elected the culprits of Anti-Sikh riots to rule our country .

 

[Guynextdoor2]

India lost those high standard of choosing who leads them when we elected the culprits of Anti-Sikh riots to rule our country .

Two wrong don't make a right. In any case I don't see you supporting people without such taint, like AAP for instance.

 

[kurup]

Two wrong don't make a right. In any case I don't see you supporting people without such taint, like AAP for instance.

Supporting AAP for what . All this mockery in Delhi .

 

[Chronos]

Two wrong don't make a right. In any case I don't see you supporting people without such taint, like AAP for instance.

 

[Sashan]

Supporting AAP for what . All this mockery in Delhi .

AAP should declare its economic policy and other policies before it can be seen as a proper alternative for Congress or BJP. Till now they have showed themselves as another socialist business unfriendly party.(though their manifesto is restricted to Delhi alone)

Edit: I take back my statement as an alternative to Congress. AAP can be a better version of Congress but can't replace BJP at this time.