What's new

Threat to Muslim World

CIS-TRANS

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 19, 2015
Messages
727
Reaction score
-1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Threat to Muslim World
Ever since Soviet Union disintegrated following Afghan War, the balance that once existed when there were two superpowers has been disturbed. The Muslim World in particular has suffered innumerable miseries, humiliation and sufferings. It is perhaps the biggest cardinal sin of former military dictator Zia ul Haq, who played a vital role in fighting this proxy war to appease USA and help them avenge their Viet Nam defeat.
Afghanistan has been engulfed in an endless war, its cities and towns bombed mercilessly by NATO allies in their quest to regain control of this country, which for centuries has fought every invader. Pakistan continues to suffer at hands of terrorists, most of them remnants of Zia’s legacy. Zia offered sanctuary to foreign fighters to fight US proxy war and they raised private militias, violating centuries old dictum, that State alone must have sole monopoly to use force, through disciplined professional militia, working under a constitutional government.

Had there existed two superpowers, countries like Iraq, Libya, Syria etc would never have been disintegrated, nor Palestinians suffered humiliation and miseries that they are being subjected to. As for Pakistan it would have continued to receive ammunition required for its defense from USA, as long as India remained in Soviet camp. The disorder that World is undergoing will continue as long as balance is not restored and either Russia or China emerges as an effective super power to counter hegemony by USA. Who could have imagined that strong allies in Europe or Canada would have strained relations with USA, or right wing nationalists reemerge reminding us of Hitler. This is the bitter reality.
https://nation.com.pk/20-Sep-2018/threat-to-muslim-world
 
.
Bit of a disingenuous article. Let's not forget Russia invaded Afghanistan, and were in prime position to then strike us. Russia and India were allies, we were never allies with Russia.

Of the two superpowers, we were closer to America (Christian) than Russia (Atheist). Considering the Communist's hate of religions, it was obvious who we should ally with at the time. Especially with India getting in good with Russia.

That was a very dangerous time, and Zia did very, very well at the time. He got aid, he managed to get rid of a huge enemy at our border. Had he stayed alive a few more years, we were in prime position to be influential in Afghanistan, who had, up to then, not even been close to our government. But a hostile Afghan government can't do anything, but a hostile Russian army could try and invade us. Afghanistan never had the capability to do so.

Had 9/11 not happened, we'd have been praising Zia for his work in getting us a friendly neighbour right now. Not helping US could very well mean that we wouldn't be here talking about this decision, but talking about how Communism is the best. We were next after Afghanistan.

And as for Iraq/Iran, once Russia had Afghanistan, you can bet both countries would have worked to destabilise everyone aorund them.
 
.
Bit of a disingenuous article. Let's not forget Russia invaded Afghanistan, and were in prime position to then strike us. Russia and India were allies, we were never allies with Russia.

Of the two superpowers, we were closer to America (Christian) than Russia (Atheist). Considering the Communist's hate of religions, it was obvious who we should ally with at the time. Especially with India getting in good with Russia.

That was a very dangerous time, and Zia did very, very well at the time. He got aid, he managed to get rid of a huge enemy at our border. Had he stayed alive a few more years, we were in prime position to be influential in Afghanistan, who had, up to then, not even been close to our government. But a hostile Afghan government can't do anything, but a hostile Russian army could try and invade us. Afghanistan never had the capability to do so.

Had 9/11 not happened, we'd have been praising Zia for his work in getting us a friendly neighbour right now. Not helping US could very well mean that we wouldn't be here talking about this decision, but talking about how Communism is the best. We were next after Afghanistan.

And as for Iraq/Iran, once Russia had Afghanistan, you can bet both countries would have worked to destabilise everyone aorund them.
Am I supposed to laugh at this joke or feel pity of your stupidity?
 
. .
So you think that a person who has spent 20-25 years in a job has taken wrong decisions and you think that you can make right decisions by spending sometimes behind a screen
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom