What's new

This too was Pakistan (1947-71): A response to Nadeem Paracha’s “Also *****

Status
Not open for further replies.

ajtr

BANNED
Joined
May 25, 2010
Messages
9,357
Reaction score
0
This too was Pakistan (1947-71): A response to Nadeem Paracha’s “Also Pakistan”

Nadeem F. Paracha’s (NFP) history of Pakistan in the four part series in daily Dawn suffers from an error of exclusion. It is the history of Pakistan’s upper-middle classes in an urban setting where lifestyle choices imply that somehow Pakistan was more liberal in the past. It also reduces Pakistan to a (mainly) Punjabi-Muhajir urban upper-middle class landscape – like the plays of Fatima Surayya Bajia, Hasina Moin and Ashfaque Ahmed or romantic writings of Shafique-ur-Rehman and Nasim Hijazi.

The pictures in NFP columns tell a story of an upper middle class whose “liberal” membership has shrunk. Simultaneously, it also reinforces the myth that there is a tiny bulwark of upper-middle class activists who are protecting Pakistan from complete Talibanisation - as long as their literary festivals, social media melas and fashion shows are well funded by foreign consulates and donor agencies.

In terms of strategy, “liberals” tactics are very similar to the post-9/11 strategy of General Musharaf. In the first half of the last decade, this strategy was employed to the hilt by Musharaf in trying to convince the West that he and the army under him represent the last stand against the Taliban. Of course, now the whole world knows the dual policy of Pakistan’s military establishment of officially opposing the Taliban but protecting and sponsoring them and their local ****** affiliates at the ground level. Plausible deniability was taken to a new level by Pakistan’s military establishment. Similarly, it is commonly known that several of Pakistan’s “noted liberals” including but not limited to Najam Sethi, Ejaz Haider and their predecessors in the past have played a questionable role in undermining democratic governments in Pakistan.

What NFP has presented in this series is only a limited remembrance of Pakistan from an elitist, upper-middle class perspective. If a narrow window of Pakistani society can be described as Pakistan, rest assured such Pakistan exists even today within its typical confines, e.g., five star hotels, private beaches, civil society melas, literary festivals, aman ki asha events etc in secluded luxury hotels or private residences.

What NFP did not describe is how the country was shaping itself right from its inception when Jinnah and his close comrades authorized military take over of Balochistan, despatch of Pashtun and Punjabi mercenaries to Kashmir, dismissal of Dr. Khan’s government in NWFP and suppression of Bangla language. In 1948 and beyond we saw a repeat of similar events, e.g., when Jinnah’s funeral was refused to be led by a Shia cleric, when Objectives Resolution was passed by Pakistan’s first legislative assembly thus formalizing the ascendancy of Sunni Islam, when anti-Ahmadiyya riots took place in streets of Lahore and other cities of Pakistan. NFP also did not mention the fact that long before General Zia’s Islamization, one of the bloodiest massacres of Shias took place in Terhi Sindh in 1963. That too was Pakistan.

Romanticizing of Pakistan from an upper-middle class lens is a great thing to write and read and we are not challenging the fact that confines of the upper-middle class lifestyle have relatively reduced in the past few decades courtesy General Zia, Zakir Naik, Farhat Hashmi, Imran Khan etc, however, that lifestyle featuring several elements of social hedonism is still available and enjoyed by the select elite.

The photos and narrative also reinforce the upper-middle class narrative that the seeds of extremism, intolerance and hypernationalism were sown during Bhutto’s time and harvested by Zia ul Haq. Unfortunately, this selective narrative excludes the role of Pakistan’s urban elites (eg Rana Liaquat Ali Khan, Qudratullah Shahab, Altaf Gauhar etc) who silently watched the destruction of a pluralist society and the resulting rampant extremism while their own socio-economic interests were taken good care of.

The seeds of extremism in Pakistan were not planted by Zia or Bhutto but were there much earlier and should be highlighted. Today, Pakistan’s Shia Muslims are undergoing a slow-motion genocide which is deliberately being misrepresented or ignored by the urban elites who have positioned themselves as the “Endangered Liberal Species”. Such elites have largely participated in inexplicable silence on the massacre of at least 19000 Shia Muslims in Pakistan in the last few decades.

1947: A country created on the basis of communal hatred and othering

Pakistan was a country created on the basis of communal hatred and exclusion. The bloodshed was only natural in 1947-48 at the time of partition.

partition1.png

Millions of Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs etc were killed by violent Muslim, Hindu, Sikh mobs at the time of Partition.

partition2.png


Pre-1947: Founder of a communal state is evasive about his own communal identity

The country’s founder was a Shia but it was Mr. Jinnah himself who was evasive about his Shia Muslim identity.

The founder of the state, Mohammed Ali Jinnah, although himself a Twelver Shia after conversion from the Ismaili sect, was wont to describe himself in public as neither a Shia nor a Sunni. His stock answer to a query about his sect was: was Muhammad the Prophet [pbuh] a Shia or a Sunni? (Source)

prayer.jpg


The Founder of Pakistan Jinnah with GOC East Pakistan Ayub Khan in 1948. Not yet Field Marshal, Ayub Khan was barely a Brigadier at that time. In 3 years he would be the C-in-C and 7 years more the Head of State. The person recieving the military cross is Mohammed Ahmed who became a Brig. and subsequently military sec to Ayub Khan.

1947: Jinnah dismisses an elected government in NWFP Province

Khan Abdul Jabbar Khan popularly known as Dr. Khan Sahib was a pioneer in the Indian Independence Movement and a Pakistan politician. On 15th August 1947 Mr. Jinnah took oath as Governor General of Pakistan and on 22nd August, just after a week dissolved the elected government of Dr. Khan. In 1958, Dr Khan was assassinated in Lahore.
dr-khan.jpg

Dr. Khan

The-Founder-with-GOC-East-Pakistan-Ayub-Khan-in-1948.png

Jinnah with future military dictator

1948: Bacha Khan remains in intermittent house arrest from 1948 to 1964
Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan (Bacha Khan) was always presented as a traitor of Pakistan and an Indian agent. Ghaffar Khan was placed under house arrest without charge from 1948 till 1954. He was re-arrested in 1958 until an illness in 1964 allowed for his release.

300px-Badshah_Khan.jpg

Bacha Khan

1948: At least 150 Pashtuns massacred in Babhara village, Charsadda

On August 12, 1948, while Jinnah was at deathbed, the security forces opened fire on a protest rally of Khudai Khidmatgars in Babhara village, resulting in the killing of more than 150 people and injuries to over 400 men and women. Some reports, however, put the death toll at 602 while the number of wounded was stated to be in thousands.

1948: First military operation in Balochistan
The rebellion against Pakistan’s forced occupation of Balochistan was led by Mir Ahmad Yar Khan. In April 1948 the central government sent the Pakistan army to harass and force Mir Ahmed Yar Khan to give up his state (Kalat). Mir Ahmed Yar Khan signed an accession agreement ending Kalat’s de facto independence. His brother, Prince Karim Khan, decided to carry on with the struggle. Basing himself in Afghanistan he conducted guerrilla warfare against the Pakistan army. Abdul Karim organized a rebellion against Pakistan in the Jalawan area. He received assistance from Mir Gohar Khan Zahrri, an influential tribal leader of the Zarkzai clan. Major General Akbar Khan, who was in charge of the Pakistani army’s Seventh Regiment, was ordered to attack the insurgents and force them to surrender. Prince Karim and his 142 followers were arrested and imprisoned in the Mach and Quetta jails. Many Baloch insurgents were killed and others served rigorous imprisonments.
 
1948: State funeral for Jinnah cannot be led by a Shia cleric

Both Jinnah sahib and his sister Fatima Jinnah were given private Shia burial rituals initially before the State they created swung into motion and made a sectarian issue of their burials.

funeral.png

State funeral

Jinnah’s state funeral was not allowed to be led by a Shia cleric. That was a formal declaration that Pakistan is a Sunni State. Mufti Shabbir Usmani was an uncle of Mufti Taqi Usmani and Mufti Rafi Usmani, the mentors and apologists of the Taliban and Sipah-e-Sahaba in Pakistan.

Shahbir-Ahmad-Usmani-at-Quaid-e-Azam-Funeral.jpg


funeral3.jpg

Fatima Jinnah organized a private Shia funeral for Jinnah inside the house.

1949: Islamisation of Pakistan begins. Objectives Resolution passed by PM Liaquat Ali Khan

The Speech of Mr Sris Chandra Chattopadhya in Opposition to Objectives Resolution, Constitutent Assembly of Pakistan, 12 March 1949
The Speech of Mr Sris Chandra Chattopadhya in Opposition to Objectives Resolution, Constitutent Assembly of Pakistan, 12 March 1949 | LUBP

objectives.png


1951: A Jihad-e-Kashmir mercenary kills PM Liaquat Ali Khan

kashmir.png

A Pashtun mercenary used by Pakistan for Jihad in Kashmir later killed Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan

1952: Bangla language riots in East Pakistan

On 21 February 1952, a demonstration in the Language movement demanding equal and official status to the Bengali language turned bloody, with many fatalities caused by police firings.

bangla.jpg

Bangla Language Day procession in Dhaka University in 1952

The seeds of Bangladeshi liberation and independence were laid when Jinnah denied Pakistan’s largest ethnic group the right to their rich language. From 1947-1971, the Bengladeshis were subject to constant persecution and discrimination – an element that is missing from the happier times pictures in NFP’s collection.

Socialism Today - The birth of Bangladesh

Lets Start Thinking - Pakistan Timeline: 1947-1956
 
1953: Anti-Ahmadiyya riots in Punjab

1953.png

General Azam Khan with Sardar Nishtar

In 1953, a religious movement began to agitate for the removal of the Ahmadiyya Muslims from power positions, and demanded a declaration of Ahmadis as a non-Muslim minority groups. Due to government’s lack of action, mass rioting broke out in the Punjab against both the government and followers of Ahmadis. Several dozens were killed by violent mobs of Jamaat-e-Islami and other Sunni Deobandis, Wahhabi and Barelvi groups.

General Azam Khan – the first Martial Law Administrator having hard talk with Sardar Nishtar. With the government failing to contain anti-Ahmadi riots in Lahore, property of civilians being destroyed and truoble spreading to other major cities of the Punjab in 1953, Prime Minister Khwaja Nazimuddin, an ineffective administrator while presiding over a cabinet meeting in Karachi kept saying what should I do, what should I do. Lahore was on fire and the Governor of Punjab had just confirmed the fact. Defense Secretary Iskander Mirza was asked to find out the exact situation. He went to the ante room and called GOC Lahore General Azam Khan who confirmed the reports. ‘How long will it take you to control the situation?’ Mirza asked him. ‘One hour’ quipped Azam. ‘Then go ahead’ Mirza advised him. He returned to the Cabinet room and announced that he had declared Martial Law in Lahore. True to his word Azam restored law and order, arrested Maulana Maudoodi and Maulana Abdul Sattar Khan Niazi, tried them in a summary military court, sentenced them to death and sent them to the black cell for hanging the next morning. A call from King Saud however got them a reprieve. But with the carte blanche given to Gen Azam, military supremacy had been ensured in Pakistan for all times to come. Also Saudi hegemony in protecting and sponsoring Wahhabi-Deobandis of Pakistan was also established.

Pakistan was co-opted by a powerful civil-military bureaucracy immediately after coming into existence. This establishment ensured that Deobandi clerics and organizations e.g., Shabbir Ahmed Usmani, Maulana Maududi were given a prominent place in a non-democratic setup. The Objectives Resolution followed quickly and a large scale pogrom against the Ahmadi Muslims took place in Pakistan in 1953. None of this is reflected in the pictures selected in NFP’s collection – incidentally, that is not Stewart Granger and Ava Gardner either – although both of them were here for the filming of Bhowani junction. The most abiding memory of them isn’t Ava Gardner’s ethereal beauty or Granger’s rackish charms. Rather is the pride felt by the urban elites when Stewart Granger was slapped by an army officer (Suo Moto anyone)

In terms of presenting an alternate history and point of view, it is important to appreciate some of Nadeem’s earlier anti-establishment work. However, it is also important to highlight the limitation of these views as an urban reflection which do not delve deeper into the historical roots of the problems currently facing Pakistan. Unwittingly, this presentation reinforces the selective elite narrative which works overtime to shift the blame from the establishment and the liberal class to convenient scapegoats (generals and politicians).

1955: One unit system adopted in West Pakistan

one-unit.jpg

One Unit System adopted
One-Unit System Adopted Sep 30, 1955. West Pakistan adopts a one-unit government system, with Lahore as its capital, in an attempt to ease tensions between provinces over their representation in the National Assembly. In practice, this meant Punjabi dominance over Sindhis, Pashtuns, Balochs and other minority ethnic groups. It also means that Bengali majority was undermined by equating them with a much smaller ethnic group, Punjabis. Ayub Khan is appointed as Chief Minister of the One-Unit system.

1956: Islamic name for Pakistan

iskandar.jpg

Islamic name!

Islamic Republic of Pakistan Mar 23, 1956. Pakistani leaders dissolve the Dominion of Pakistan and establish the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, with Iskander Mirza — a vocal advocate of “controlled democracy” (including an electoral college) — as president.

1959: Baloch leaders betrayed by Pakistan army

nawab-naurooz-khan.jpg

Betrayed and killed

Nawab Babu Nauroz Khan waged an armed struggle along with thousands of Baloch tribesman for the liberation of Balochistan. But on May 15, 1959 the Pakistani wicked rulers betrayed the Babu Nauroz through an oath on the holy Quran that Pakistan will settle all the Baloch grievances. However,when Nawab Nowroz Khan came down from the hills, he and about 150 of his followers, including his sons and nephews, were arrested for armed rebellion against the state. On July 15, 1960 five of the leaders were executed by hanging in Hyderabad Jail. Nawab Nauroz Khan was spared execution on account of his age, but died in Jail in 1964.

gas.png


ayub.png
 
1963: Shia massacre in Therhi, Sindh

At least 116 Shia Muslims were massacred in district Khairpur’s village Therhi (Sindh) on June 6, 1963. Police stood by while radical Deobandis and Wahhabis massacred Shias. This was the first major incident of Shia genocide in Pakistan. Justice was not done to the martyrs of Therhi and the anti-Shia terrorists and their masterminds were not awarded exemplary punishment. Lack of due action against the ferocious killers encouraged them to continue the genocide of Shia Muslims in Pakistan.

Shaheed Foundation Pakistan


The 1963 Theri massacre of Shia was a landmark event but does not seem to merit a space in the photographical history presented by Nadeem Paracha. Of course such pictures and also those of the 1953 anti-Ahmadi riots would disturb the romanticized, liberal-baptized version of Pakistan which never was!

1965: Operation Gibraltar and the Pakistan India war
Operation Gibraltar was the codename given to the strategy of Pakistan to infiltrate Jammu and Kashmir, the northernmost state of India, and start a rebellion against Indian rule. Launched in August 1965, Pakistan Army’s 50th Airborne paratroopers and Pakistan Army’s guerrillas, disguised as locals, entered Jammu and Kashmir from Pakistan with the intention of fomenting an insurgency among Kashmiri Muslims. However, the strategy went awry from the outset as it was not well-coordinated and the infiltrators were soon found. The debacle was followed by an Indian counterattack that resulted in the 1965 Indo-Pakistani War.

1971: Bangladesh Liberation War and the genocide of pro-freedom Muslims and Hindus of East Pakistan

The Bengali people in East Pakistan had long felt exploited and underrepresented by the Pakistani government, and for valid reason: despite a purportedly democratic election which the Bengali leader Sheikh Mujibur Rahman had clearly won, the new military President Yahya Khan refuse to surrender power. East Pakistanis are outraged and begin agitating non-violently for autonomy. West Pakistani forces try to put down the demonstrations in a brutal campaign to execute East Pakistan’s intellectuals, political leaders, and other civilians. Western Pakistan soldiers terrorize the East with methods including the rape of Bengali women and girls. Western Pakistan’s Army Chief Tikka Khan became known as “The Butcher of Bengal.”

But the western Pakistan militias are repulsed by an ad-hoc force made up of Bengali soldiers, paramilitary, and civilians, all backed militarily and economically by neighboring India. In an attempted end-around, the West Pakistani forces launch pre-emptive strikes into India, but are soundly defeated by the Indian Army. Pakistan’s surrender in December 1971 marked the birth of Bangladesh (the former East Pakistan).

Liberation War of Bangladesh: NBC News Footage


bd2.jpg

Executed intellectuals in the Dhaka Rayerbazar, 1971.

The-Fall-of-East-Pakistan.jpg

Bangalis win freedom



surrender.png


Text of the Instrument of Surrender, 16 December 1971

The Pakistan Eastern Military High Command agree to surrender all Pakistan Armed Forces in Bangla Desh to Lieutenant-General Jagjit Singh Aurora— General Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Indian and Bangla Desh Forces in the Eastern Pakistan. This surrender includes all Pakistan land, Air Force and Naval forces as also all paramilitary forces and civilian armed forces. These forces will lay down their arms and surrender at the places where they are currently located to the nearest regular troops under the command of Lieutenant-General Jagjit Singh Aurora.

The Pakistan Eastern High Command shall come under the orders of Lieutenant-General Jagjit Singh Aurora as soon as this instrument has been signed. Disobedience of orders will be regarded as a breach of the surrender terms and will be dealt with in accordance with the accepted laws and usages of war. The decision of Lieutenant-General Jagjit Singh Aurora will be final, should any doubt arise as to the meaning or interpretation of the surrender terms.

Lieutenant-General Jagjit Singh Aurora gives a solemn assurance that personnel who surrender will be treated with dignity and respect that soldiers are entitled to in accordance with the provisions of the Geneva Conventions and guarantees the safety and well-being of all Pakistan military and paramilitary forces who surrender. Protection will be provided to foreign nationals, ethnic minorities and personnel of Pakistan origin by the forces under the command of Lieutenant-General Jagjit Singh Aurora.

Signed at Ramna Course in Dacca, East-Pakistan at 1701Hrs (6:01pm PST) on the Sixteenth day of December, 1971, by J.S. Aurora (India and Bangla Desh) and A.A.K. Niazi (Pakistan) on behalf of Republic of India and State of Pakistan, in the interests of succession of East Pakistan as Bangladesh, at war with Pakistan.

Lieutenant-General Jagjit Singh Aurora
Supreme Commander of Indian Eastern Command and Bangla Desh Forces in the Eastern Theatre.

Amir Abdullah Khan Niazi
Unified Commander of Pakistan Eastern High Command

Vice-Admiral Mohammad Shariff
Commander of Pakistan Eastern Naval Command.

Vice Admiral R.N. Krishna
Commander, Eastern Navy Command

Air Vice Marshal Patrick D. Callaghan
Commander of Eastern Air Force Command, Pakistan Air Force

Lieutenant-General Jacob Farj Rafael Jacob
Chief of Staff, Indian Eastern Command

Several pictures in this post have been cross-posted with thanks from the on-line collection of Dr Ghulam Nabi Kazi. Several paragraphs in this post have been contributed by a fellow editor. This post is a quick compilation of several articles taken from web to present a picture of a much larger, bigger and more real Pakistan than what was presented in NFP’s collection of happy times.

We cannot move forward until we reconcile with our past. For a progressive, pluralist and secular Pakistan, we cannot be selective of our either our history or our genesis. By perpetuating a selective and concocted version of history, we are doomed to repeat our follies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wow!! extremely well researched by the author of the article!!
 
Good article and good thread
 
Ahhhh....the usual cauldron of half-truths, exaggerations and out-right lies ! Well researched indeed ! It takes a special breed of journalists out there to lie, exaggerate and twist and turn half-truths as well as this guy did that is of course if the readers aren't Pakistanis or even remotely versed in Pakistani history ! Killed by a Pashtoon mercenary hired to take Kashmir; right...! I'm sure the fact that he was an Afghan with no connection to the Mehsud tribes who formed the irregulars in '48 would have any bearing on the truth !
 
I'm sure the fact that he was an Afghan with no connection to the Mehsud tribes who formed the irregulars in '48 would have any bearing on the truth ! Nor would Jinnah Sahib's own insistence in his will that his funeral be led by the named Sunni cleric to bring about greater sectarian harmony would be worth mentioning !
1. Not true.
2. Not sure.
 
Who is the author and where is the link? Its an art to turn half truths and exaggerations and to create divisions where none exist.

Nadeem Farooq Paracha's only problem is that alcohol is not available publicly. The response to his article is equally sad. A country cant go forward if it does not build on positives and I believe Pakistan today has more positives than negatives.

A really good job at digging the $hit of the past. not that we must not learn from it. The thrust of the article is to shame Pakistan and thats what I dont like in it.
 
Facts mixed with lot of lies- create drama and sensalism- that totally describes this article-
 
atleast indians had some fun! but the writer lost me when he said that shias have been persecuted! and sidelined!

Zardari,zulfiqar bhutto,benazir,iskander mirza & finally yahya khan were all shias! OOOPSSSSSSS talk about sidelined. rest is just apologatic nonsense that indians enjoy forgetting that partition along with the annexation of kashmir & hyderabad were bloody events far larger than anything written about balochistan or nwfp!


so i don't know what is the point that indians are jumping at? are they trying to imply both countries have had an extremist past. along with indian having a communist past!
 
AJTR. Objective resolution was prepared by both Sunni And Shia Scholars.
 
1. Not true.
2. Not sure.

Point 2 - Conceded ! Though it is mentioned by the cleric himself in his book and a civil servant's books whilst quoting letters by Jinnah himself and the cleric exchanged, though because it tends to have an air of too much nascent recording of it with respect to some of the earlier records I'd agree ! Having said that the line of argument (if a one-liner can be called that !) taken by the author is equally if not more unsubstantiated for there is nothing to suggest from the earlier records that such was the case; whether its Ms.Jinnah's biography of the Quaid, or Hector Bolitho's biography of the Quaid (the first ever written I think !), the one written by the Quaid's ADC or any of the work that have gone before my eyes whether its the works of Zaidi or of Akbar Ahmed, remotely point towards a conspiracy by the State to make Sunni Islam as the dominant dogma in '48. If anything these things have popped up in the last few years and are based on eye-witness accounts that cannot be cross-verified !

Point 1 - This is what 'GlobalSecurity' mentions about the Azad Kashmir Regiment : When the Pakistan Army tried to capture Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) in 1947-48, it first sent into the state a large number of Mehsuds, Wazirs and other tribes recruited by it in the Federally-Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and trained and armed by it.

Either way whether it were the Mehsuds, the Wazirs, the Uthmakhels, the Yousafzais or the Khattaks, its immaterial - they were Pakistani Tribals ! It is insulting to suggest that they were hired mercenaries when this isn't substantiated by any record from that time nor through common sense that a bankrupt Pakistani government would be able to give them anything ! Nor is the aspersion that Liaquat Ali Khan was killed by the same Pakistani Tribals who we hired as mercenaries substantiated ! If anything the facts that have gone before my eyes suggest that he was killed by Saad Akbar Babrak - an Afghan assassin ! I don't think his Zardan Tribe played any part in the war either or are present in large numbers on our side of the Durand Line !
 
Well researched but will not be taken positively....

we will wait till all the well researched articles on india make any effect, only then we might take these kind of article positively. Just out of curiosity whatever is in that article, why does it interest Indians, it has nothing to do with India.

Indian think just condemning everything makes it alright, we think condemnation is only done by wussies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom