There Will be no Pakistani “Surgical Strikes” Against New Zealand or Australia

[Passionaire]

On the 14th of February, an Indian military convoy was attacked in the Pulwama district of Indian occupied Kashmir. But rather than realise that the attack was conducted by an indigenous Kashmiri who had no links with any foreign government or military, India jumped to anoint itself judge, jury and executioner – rushing to condemn Pakistan for an incident that not only had nothing to do with Pakistani state institutions, but which was claimed by an organisation that has been banned in Pakistan since 2002.

Instead of listening to reason, India proceeded to stage a so-called “surgical strike” against Pakistan. Due to the quick intervention of Pakistan’s air force, the attacking Indian jets quickly turned around and in the process, they dropped their payload in the middle of a forest. No one was killed as a result, even though Indian media were quick to claim that hundreds of “jihadists” were eliminated. As it turns out, only a score of trees were harmed in the incident.

In the aftermath of the “surgical strike”, Indian media congratulated itself on “extracting revenge against Pakistan”.

Today, it has been revealed that Pakistani nationals were among the casualties of twin terrorist attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand. The attacks appear to be the work of a so-called lone wolf anti-Islamic terrorist. There has been no evidence at all to suggest that the terrorist had any connection to any government, just as was the case in respect of the man behind last month’s Pulwama incident.

Of course, whilst the incident in Pulwama targeted military occupiers of the most militarised disputed territory in the world, the terrorist in New Zealand attacked civilians in houses of worship.

If however, Pakistan were to twist the facts about the attack in New Zealand in the way that India twisted the facts of the Pulwama incident, one could imagine New Zealand being seen by Pakistan in the way that occupied Kashmir is seen by India and that furthermore, because the monster behind the mosque attack was an Australian, Pakistan could view Australian territory in the way that India views Pakistani territory beyond the line of control in Kashmir.

As such, if Pakistan were to behave in the way that India behaved last month, one could imagine Pakistani troops by the thousands, landing in New Zealand against the wishes of the people whilst Pakistani jets would conduct a “surgical strike” against the terrorist’s ancestral community in Australia.

Of course this will not happen and not just because of the extreme distance between Pakistan and New Zealand. More importantly, Pakistan realises that one cannot scapegoat the real causes of extremism on governments that have no legally defined or evidence based connection to a specific attack.

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan has instead highlighted the broader causes of hatred against Muslims whilst calling on people everywhere to change their mentality in order to make the world a more peaceful and safer place for all. This is an attitude that exudes dignity and calm at a time of intense frustration.

While Indian television screamed for “vengeance” against Pakistan after an attack that Pakistan had nothing to do with, today, Pakistan’s leadership is calling for answers, for reflection and for a new mentality to replace the swamp of hatred in which terrorists like the barbarian from Australia were radicalised.

This is the difference between holding the values of peace in the face of terror and reacting in an irrational manner by attacking a country that had no role in an incident that effected soldiers of one’s nation. This is why there will be no “surgical strikes” by Pakistan against New Zealand or Australia.

https://eurasiafuture.com/2019/03/1...cal-strikes-against-new-zealand-or-australia/

 

[Men in Green]

What kind of retardness is this. Writer was probably drunk.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

What king of retardness is this. Writer was probably drunk.

lol

 

[shambhu]

On the 14th of February, an Indian military convoy was attacked in the Pulwama district of Indian occupied Kashmir. But rather than realise that the attack was conducted by an indigenous Kashmiri who had no links with any foreign government or military, India jumped to anoint itself judge, jury and executioner – rushing to condemn Pakistan for an incident that not only had nothing to do with Pakistani state institutions, but which was claimed by an organisation that has been banned in Pakistan since 2002.

Instead of listening to reason, India proceeded to stage a so-called “surgical strike” against Pakistan. Due to the quick intervention of Pakistan’s air force, the attacking Indian jets quickly turned around and in the process, they dropped their payload in the middle of a forest. No one was killed as a result, even though Indian media were quick to claim that hundreds of “jihadists” were eliminated. As it turns out, only a score of trees were harmed in the incident.

In the aftermath of the “surgical strike”, Indian media congratulated itself on “extracting revenge against Pakistan”.

Today, it has been revealed that Pakistani nationals were among the casualties of twin terrorist attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand. The attacks appear to be the work of a so-called lone wolf anti-Islamic terrorist. There has been no evidence at all to suggest that the terrorist had any connection to any government, just as was the case in respect of the man behind last month’s Pulwama incident.

Of course, whilst the incident in Pulwama targeted military occupiers of the most militarised disputed territory in the world, the terrorist in New Zealand attacked civilians in houses of worship.

If however, Pakistan were to twist the facts about the attack in New Zealand in the way that India twisted the facts of the Pulwama incident, one could imagine New Zealand being seen by Pakistan in the way that occupied Kashmir is seen by India and that furthermore, because the monster behind the mosque attack was an Australian, Pakistan could view Australian territory in the way that India views Pakistani territory beyond the line of control in Kashmir.

As such, if Pakistan were to behave in the way that India behaved last month, one could imagine Pakistani troops by the thousands, landing in New Zealand against the wishes of the people whilst Pakistani jets would conduct a “surgical strike” against the terrorist’s ancestral community in Australia.

Of course this will not happen and not just because of the extreme distance between Pakistan and New Zealand. More importantly, Pakistan realises that one cannot scapegoat the real causes of extremism on governments that have no legally defined or evidence based connection to a specific attack.

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan has instead highlighted the broader causes of hatred against Muslims whilst calling on people everywhere to change their mentality in order to make the world a more peaceful and safer place for all. This is an attitude that exudes dignity and calm at a time of intense frustration.

While Indian television screamed for “vengeance” against Pakistan after an attack that Pakistan had nothing to do with, today, Pakistan’s leadership is calling for answers, for reflection and for a new mentality to replace the swamp of hatred in which terrorists like the barbarian from Australia were radicalised.

This is the difference between holding the values of peace in the face of terror and reacting in an irrational manner by attacking a country that had no role in an incident that effected soldiers of one’s nation. This is why there will be no “surgical strikes” by Pakistan against New Zealand or Australia.

https://eurasiafuture.com/2019/03/1...cal-strikes-against-new-zealand-or-australia/

leave politics today .innocent lives lost in this attack , let us mourn those killed.

 

[BATMAN]

leave politics today .innocent lives lost in this attack , let us mourn those killed.

Innocent lives are lost in Kashmir on daily basis.
Do i need to say more!

 

[shambhu]

Innocent lives are lost in Kashmir on daily basis.
Do i need to say more!

no politics today .

 

[Jaanbaz]

 

[shahbaz baig]

no politics today .

Do you mean, killing innocent kashmiri people is indian political agenda?

 

[SABRE]

Bellow is another article by the same guy & same source.
Adam Garrie is Director at Eurasia future and co-host of The History Boys with George Galloway.

============​

Did Western Mainstream Media And RSS Extremism Radicalise The Terrorist in New Zealand?
https://eurasiafuture.com/2019/03/1...mism-radicalise-the-terrorist-in-new-zealand/

Over 50 civilians at two separate New Zealand mosques were slaughtered by a barbaric terrorist who has been named as 28-year-old Brenton Tarrant. Journalists who looked through the savage’s social media pages found numerous anti-Islamic tirades alongside photos of the weapons that were likely used during today’s vicious terrorist atrocities.

Apart from the human tragedy of this terrorism, the New Zealand attacks prove that terrorism knows no race, religion, ethnicity, ideology nor nationality. Any of these qualities when amplified to their extremities can be used as an attempted justification for violence against civilians. As such, terrorism is not confined to any single group. That being said, for decades, western mainstream media and politicians have both consciously and unconsciously painted Muslims as uniquely prone to terrorism. Today, such people ought to bow their heads in shame and pause for a long period of reflection – both because they have been lying for decades and because their lies may well have radicalised the monstrous white terrorist behind today’s attacks in New Zealand.

Along with western mainstream media is the strange world of Indian mass media. The internet now allows individuals throughout the world to watch explicitly anti-Islamic “news” programmes coming out of India which openly and with virtually no subtlety, scapegoat Pakistanis and Muslims throughout the world as the root cause of all real and perceived troubles. It is no wonder that those in Indian media who openly use their platforms to fly the flag of the BJP and its paramilitary extremist sister organisation RSS are the descendants of RSS extremists of the 1930s and 1940s who openly displayed an affinity for Nazism in Europe.

In many ways, Indian media is even more dangerous than western mainstream media when it comes to systematically dehumanising Muslims. This is because the tone of modern Indian mass media is far more brazen than even western media and as such, has the power to more readily rot the minds of impressionable English speaking young men from Gujarat to Sydney.

In either case, because the Australian born terrorist who slaughtered Muslim civilians in New Zealand was under thirty, it means that he spent much of his life and all of his adult life being indoctrinated by certain global media outlets whose primary refrain is to pin the world’s woes at the feet of Muslims – often pious Muslims at that.


As such, countries like Pakistan and Turkey tend to be singled out due to their Islamic history and due to their refusal to compromise with the terrorists that their security services have had to face. Whilst Britain’s infamous Muslim hater Tommy Robinson openly supports the RAW backed BLA terror group in Pakistan’s Balochistan province and whilst many self-professed liberals in Europe rally to the cause of the ultra-leftist terror group PKK which has slaughtered over 40,000 Turks since the late 1970s, the voices speaking up on behalf of Muslim lives are far too often silenced, ignored or even ridiculed.

The result is that those attacking Muslims in the name of anti-Islamic extremism have become normalised whilst simultaneously, the thought process which automatically deems Muslims to be guilty of crimes they did not commit, has been ingrained in the psyches of far too many in western states and in India.

One can ban weapons, execute terrorists and point the finger at fringe websites and obscure social media figures, but the fact of the matter is that it is mainstream media and politics throughout the west and in India which represent megaphones of anti-Islamic extremism that can radicalise any young man with even a few screws loose. When such young men are on drugs, the potency of the big media lies become even more likely to inspire acts of violence.

Many people who have slandered Muslims and Islamic majority states should reflect on whether they can see the blood dripping from their hands on a tragic day such as this.

 

[Mahmood-ur-Rehman]

On the 14th of February, an Indian military convoy was attacked in the Pulwama district of Indian occupied Kashmir. But rather than realise that the attack was conducted by an indigenous Kashmiri who had no links with any foreign government or military, India jumped to anoint itself judge, jury and executioner – rushing to condemn Pakistan for an incident that not only had nothing to do with Pakistani state institutions, but which was claimed by an organisation that has been banned in Pakistan since 2002.

Instead of listening to reason, India proceeded to stage a so-called “surgical strike” against Pakistan. Due to the quick intervention of Pakistan’s air force, the attacking Indian jets quickly turned around and in the process, they dropped their payload in the middle of a forest. No one was killed as a result, even though Indian media were quick to claim that hundreds of “jihadists” were eliminated. As it turns out, only a score of trees were harmed in the incident.

In the aftermath of the “surgical strike”, Indian media congratulated itself on “extracting revenge against Pakistan”.

Today, it has been revealed that Pakistani nationals were among the casualties of twin terrorist attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand. The attacks appear to be the work of a so-called lone wolf anti-Islamic terrorist. There has been no evidence at all to suggest that the terrorist had any connection to any government, just as was the case in respect of the man behind last month’s Pulwama incident.

Of course, whilst the incident in Pulwama targeted military occupiers of the most militarised disputed territory in the world, the terrorist in New Zealand attacked civilians in houses of worship.

If however, Pakistan were to twist the facts about the attack in New Zealand in the way that India twisted the facts of the Pulwama incident, one could imagine New Zealand being seen by Pakistan in the way that occupied Kashmir is seen by India and that furthermore, because the monster behind the mosque attack was an Australian, Pakistan could view Australian territory in the way that India views Pakistani territory beyond the line of control in Kashmir.

As such, if Pakistan were to behave in the way that India behaved last month, one could imagine Pakistani troops by the thousands, landing in New Zealand against the wishes of the people whilst Pakistani jets would conduct a “surgical strike” against the terrorist’s ancestral community in Australia.

Of course this will not happen and not just because of the extreme distance between Pakistan and New Zealand. More importantly, Pakistan realises that one cannot scapegoat the real causes of extremism on governments that have no legally defined or evidence based connection to a specific attack.

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan has instead highlighted the broader causes of hatred against Muslims whilst calling on people everywhere to change their mentality in order to make the world a more peaceful and safer place for all. This is an attitude that exudes dignity and calm at a time of intense frustration.

While Indian television screamed for “vengeance” against Pakistan after an attack that Pakistan had nothing to do with, today, Pakistan’s leadership is calling for answers, for reflection and for a new mentality to replace the swamp of hatred in which terrorists like the barbarian from Australia were radicalised.

This is the difference between holding the values of peace in the face of terror and reacting in an irrational manner by attacking a country that had no role in an incident that effected soldiers of one’s nation. This is why there will be no “surgical strikes” by Pakistan against New Zealand or Australia.

https://eurasiafuture.com/2019/03/1...cal-strikes-against-new-zealand-or-australia/

Many Pakistanis are killed in christian terrorist attack in New Zealand by Australian we should move in security council to declare New Zealand and Australia terrorist countries and should use our right of surgical strike on New Zealand and Australia according to western philosophy