Get Ya Wig Split
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2017
- Messages
- 2,585
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
The U.S. Military Wants to Buy 10,193 Surface-To-Surface Rockets (And China Is the Reason Why)
The Pentagon is looking to procure 10,193 surface-to-surface rockets for the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System, a 26% increase over the 8,101 procured in fiscal year 2019 and 47% increase over the 6,936 requested in fiscal year 2018.
The Pentagon’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2020 contains a reversal of that old chestnut from Top Gun: When it’s too far for guns, then switch to missiles.
The Pentagon is looking to procure 10,193 surface-to-surface rockets for the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System, a 26% increase over the 8,101 procured in fiscal year 2019 and 47% increase over the 6,936 requested in fiscal year 2018.
The purchase, primarily focused on bolstering Army arsenals for the stated purpose of “neutraliz[ing] or suppress[ing] enemy field artillery and air defense systems and complements cannon artillery fires,” would cost the DoD around $1.4 billion.
This pivot, which follows the Army’s stockpiling of artillery shells under last year’s budget request, is framed by the Pentagon as a critical part of its continued reorientation towards ground-based precision fires in response to increasing ‘Great Power competition’ with Russia and China following the relative 'defeat' of ISIS in Iraq and Syria.
(This article originally appeared at Task & Purpose. Follow Task & Purpose on Twitter. This article first appeared on March 14, 2019.)
Indeed, the Army's top modernization priority is focused on “improv[ing] the range and lethality of cannon artillery, and increas[ing] missile capabilities to ensure overmatch at each echelon,” according to a Pentagon release accompanying the FY2020 budget request.
It’s worth noting that the GMLRS, normally fired from the M270A1 Multiple Launch Rocket System, is also employable from the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) that's seen increasing use in unusual configurations by both the Army and Marine Corps amid a push for additional unit-level long-range precision-fires capabilities with an eye towards contested maritime environments.
In October 2017, Marines from the 5th Battalion, 11th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division successfully fired rockets from a HIMARS system aboard the USS Anchorage amphibious transport dock operating off the coast of southern California.
The following year, the Corps more than doubled its expenditures on the HIMARS, from $60 million to $134 million while embracing the “HIMARS Rapid Infiltration” shoot-and-scoot method (or HIRAIN) rapidly deploying and repositioning rocket artillery systems with the help of a C-17 Globemaster III, a practice pioneered by the Army in recent years.
“The deep-water ports and high-throughput airfields we once relied upon are also increasingly vulnerable to attacks with long-range fires,” as Marine Commandant Gen. Robert Neller wrote in a 2016 operating concept document, per Military.com. “These challenges will only grow as competitors pursue concepts for holding our forces at bay at greater distances and denying our ability to maneuver in both littoral and landward areas.”
Translation: Artillery units can shove a rocket down your throat from miles away, on land or sea — and yes, China, we’re talking to you.
@beijingwalker @Char @Two @ZeEa5KPul @TaiShang @Galactic Penguin SST @Feng Leng
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...ce-surface-rockets-and-china-reason-why-51592
The Pentagon is looking to procure 10,193 surface-to-surface rockets for the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System, a 26% increase over the 8,101 procured in fiscal year 2019 and 47% increase over the 6,936 requested in fiscal year 2018.
The Pentagon’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2020 contains a reversal of that old chestnut from Top Gun: When it’s too far for guns, then switch to missiles.
The Pentagon is looking to procure 10,193 surface-to-surface rockets for the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System, a 26% increase over the 8,101 procured in fiscal year 2019 and 47% increase over the 6,936 requested in fiscal year 2018.
The purchase, primarily focused on bolstering Army arsenals for the stated purpose of “neutraliz[ing] or suppress[ing] enemy field artillery and air defense systems and complements cannon artillery fires,” would cost the DoD around $1.4 billion.
This pivot, which follows the Army’s stockpiling of artillery shells under last year’s budget request, is framed by the Pentagon as a critical part of its continued reorientation towards ground-based precision fires in response to increasing ‘Great Power competition’ with Russia and China following the relative 'defeat' of ISIS in Iraq and Syria.
(This article originally appeared at Task & Purpose. Follow Task & Purpose on Twitter. This article first appeared on March 14, 2019.)
Indeed, the Army's top modernization priority is focused on “improv[ing] the range and lethality of cannon artillery, and increas[ing] missile capabilities to ensure overmatch at each echelon,” according to a Pentagon release accompanying the FY2020 budget request.
It’s worth noting that the GMLRS, normally fired from the M270A1 Multiple Launch Rocket System, is also employable from the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) that's seen increasing use in unusual configurations by both the Army and Marine Corps amid a push for additional unit-level long-range precision-fires capabilities with an eye towards contested maritime environments.
In October 2017, Marines from the 5th Battalion, 11th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division successfully fired rockets from a HIMARS system aboard the USS Anchorage amphibious transport dock operating off the coast of southern California.
The following year, the Corps more than doubled its expenditures on the HIMARS, from $60 million to $134 million while embracing the “HIMARS Rapid Infiltration” shoot-and-scoot method (or HIRAIN) rapidly deploying and repositioning rocket artillery systems with the help of a C-17 Globemaster III, a practice pioneered by the Army in recent years.
“The deep-water ports and high-throughput airfields we once relied upon are also increasingly vulnerable to attacks with long-range fires,” as Marine Commandant Gen. Robert Neller wrote in a 2016 operating concept document, per Military.com. “These challenges will only grow as competitors pursue concepts for holding our forces at bay at greater distances and denying our ability to maneuver in both littoral and landward areas.”
Translation: Artillery units can shove a rocket down your throat from miles away, on land or sea — and yes, China, we’re talking to you.
@beijingwalker @Char @Two @ZeEa5KPul @TaiShang @Galactic Penguin SST @Feng Leng
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...ce-surface-rockets-and-china-reason-why-51592
