What's new

The US just quietly challenged China on something Beijing promised to go to war over

Feng Leng

BANNED
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
4,355
Reaction score
-21
Country
China
Location
China
The US just quietly challenged China on something Beijing promised to go to war over

President Donald Trump has engaged China in a trade war that has global markets holding their breath, but his administration recently challenged Beijing on an issue Chinese officials have promised to go to war over.

The US military's recent Indo-Pacific Strategy paper, published last Saturday, goes further than perhaps any US document ever issued in how it might provoke China's rage over what it sees as the most sensitive issue.

Buried in the paper, which charts China's efforts to build up a military fortress in the South China Sea and use its growing naval might to coerce its neighbors, is a reference to Taiwan as a "country."

"As democracies in the Indo-Pacific, Singapore, Taiwan, New Zealand, and Mongolia are reliable, capable, and natural partners of the United States," the strategy said. "All four countries contribute to US missions around the world and are actively taking steps to uphold a free and open international order."

China views Taiwan as a breakaway island province that has its own democratic government. Beijing sees this as an existential threat and the factor most likely to upset the Communist Party's absolute hold on power in the mainland.

In July, China threatened to blacklist airlines that referred to Taiwan as a country. US airlines fell in line, but the White House protested the strong-arm tactic as "Orwellian nonsense."

But now the US itself has clearly said it: Taiwan is a country, and the US will treat it as such.

'The Chinese military has no choice but to fight at all costs'

In another unprecedented step, a high-ranking Taiwanese minister was allowed to meet with Trump's national security adviser, John Bolton, in May. This move predictably enraged China.

At the Shangri La Dialogue, the top defense summit in Asia, Chinese Defense Minister Gen. Wei Fenghe made clear the stakes of China's Taiwan problem.

"Any interference in the Taiwan question is doomed to failure," Wei said, according to Channel Asia News. "If anyone dares to split Taiwan from China, the Chinese military has no choice but to fight at all costs."

Taiwan is "the hot-button issue" in US-China relations, John Hemmings, the director of the Asia Studies Centre at the Henry Jackson Society, told Business Insider.

China has always maintained that it would prefer to reunify with Taiwan peacefully but would do so by force if needed. Additionally, China's navy has increasingly patrolled the waters around the island and flown nuclear-capable bombers nearby.

But the US has also sailed warships through the narrow strait separating China and Taiwan and has gotten allies to pitch in.

The arms are already moving

The US's rhetorical escalation follows the Trump administration normalizing arms sales to Taiwan and the news that it will sell $2 billion in tanks, anti-tank weapons, and air defenses to the island.

According to Hemmings, these weapons have a clear purpose: to fight back against a Chinese invasion of the island.

Bonnie Glaser, a senior adviser for Asia and the director of the China Power Project at Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Business Insider that the US had now entered "uncharted territory" by acknowledging Taiwan.

The US under Trump has been the most pro-Taiwan administration in decades, Hemmings said. Trump demonstrated this during his presidential transition period when he had a call with Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-Wen.

For years, China has slowly stepped up pressure on the US in areas like forcing companies to transfer technology, building up military sites on artificial islands in the South China Sea, and naval challenges.

Hemmings mentioned a popular anecdote in China, in which a frog is cooked by putting it in a pot of cold water and then slowly turning up the heat. The frog doesn't realize it's getting cooked until it's too late. China's gradual pressure campaign against the US has been compared to this practice.

With the US now quietly acknowledging Taiwan in a strategy document, it may have found its own small way to turn up the heat on Beijing.


It's time for Beijing to drop the charade. Cut diplomatic ties with the US and launch tactical nuclear strikes against DPP forces in Taiwan!
 
Last edited:
. . . .
It's time for Beijing to drop the charade. Cut diplomatic ties with the US and launch tactical nuclear strikes against DPP forces in Taiwan!
Relax,if ever CPC is destroyed today and PRC becomes Republic of China,things won't change for West.China still would be same.If tomorrow someone from Taiwan becomes head of PRC things won't change for West.
 
.
The US just quietly challenged China on something Beijing promised to go to war over

President Donald Trump has engaged China in a trade war that has global markets holding their breath, but his administration recently challenged Beijing on an issue Chinese officials have promised to go to war over.

The US military's recent Indo-Pacific Strategy paper, published last Saturday, goes further than perhaps any US document ever issued in how it might provoke China's rage over what it sees as the most sensitive issue.

Buried in the paper, which charts China's efforts to build up a military fortress in the South China Sea and use its growing naval might to coerce its neighbors, is a reference to Taiwan as a "country."

"As democracies in the Indo-Pacific, Singapore, Taiwan, New Zealand, and Mongolia are reliable, capable, and natural partners of the United States," the strategy said. "All four countries contribute to US missions around the world and are actively taking steps to uphold a free and open international order."

So US will also be interfering against China from Mongolia too? That is a new development as they had not been mentioned much before as a ‘partner’ against China
 
.
So US will also be interfering against China from Mongolia too? That is a new development as they had not been mentioned much before as a ‘partner’ against China
None of Mongolia, New Zealand or Singapore is remotely interested in American adventures.
 
.
US forces retreated and the bases were removed in 1979. It was considered at the time to be a Chinese victory but now the Americans are back for another military conflict.

LOL!! Seems Taiwan has successfully fended off the Chinese military for the last 70 years. You guys just gave up.
 
.
None of Mongolia, New Zealand or Singapore is remotely interested in American adventures.

Yes I expect they will, but it is the first time I am reading of the US ‘working with their partner Mongolia’. It seems they are interfering there
 
. . . . . .
With stepped-up plan, US takes aim at China

The Pentagon released its first Indo-Pacific Strategy Report (IPSR) on June 1. On the same day, US Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan explained the main points of this report when he spoke at the 18th Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore which was held between May 31 and June 2. Amid an escalating trade conflict between China and the US, US President Donald Trump's administration is determined to invest more resources in implementing the Indo-Pacific Strategy, especially in the field of security, which has not only alarmed Beijing, but also unsettled most countries in the region.

The Pentagon's description of China in the IPSR is a cliché - accusing China of being a "revisionist power" and of "seeking Indo-Pacific regional hegemony in the near-term and, ultimately global preeminence in the long term." Such arbitrary and malicious accusations have become part of the new US narrative on China.

Yet the report also reveals some disturbing trends in US policy on China.

First, the Pentagon is intensively preparing for a war against China. US hawks believe that their country should have no fear of military conflict with China in the South China Sea. In addition, tensions between Beijing and Washington over Taiwan are getting increasingly fierce. While the US takes the island of Taiwan as a critical part of its Indo-Pacific Strategy, China is prepared to go to war to safeguard its sovereignty.

The Indo-Pacific region is seen as a "priority theater" by both the Pentagon and senior officials of the US Indo-Pacific Command. They are quite blunt about the possibility of a potential armed conflict with China, emphasizing that the US is not afraid of the cost of violent conflicts. The IPSR explicitly mentions that "we will not accept policies or actions that threaten or undermine the rules-based international order - an order that benefits all nations… Achieving this vision requires combining a more lethal Joint Force with a more robust constellation of allies and partners… the Joint Force will prioritize investments that ensure lethality against high-end adversaries."

Second, Washington is trying to build closer ties with Australia, India, Japan - a set of countries, including the US, known as the Quad, as well as other nations in the region, so as to create a united front to contain China. However, other countries in the region, such as Indonesia, South Korea and Singapore, have always had doubts about the Quad.

In the IPSR, the Pentagon advocated "Promotion of a Networked Region" and pledged to increase military and security assistance to countries in the region through the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act. The act is a major bipartisan legislation signed into law by President Trump on December 31, 2018. According to the IPSR, "this legislation enshrines a generational whole-of-government policy framework that demonstrates US commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific region."

This reveals that the US wishes to establish a three-ring structure in the Indo-Pacific region. The first ring is the treaty alliance among the US, Japan, Australia and other countries. The second ring consists of the new security partnerships between the US, Indonesia and Vietnam. The third ring includes the UK, France, Canada and other countries. With this, Washington hopes to promote greater involvement of Western powers in Indo-Pacific affairs.

Third, the Pentagon and other US departments are jointly promoting the enhancement of economic security, which is one of the most prominent challenges facing China-US relations in the coming years. "Our vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific recognizes the linkages between economics, governance, and security that are part of the competitive landscape throughout the region, and that economic security is national security," the report stated.

The Trump administration is concerned that the global supply chain is too dependent on China and is meanwhile trying to prevent Beijing from leveraging its economic power to bolster China's security. In order to thwart China's economic cooperation with other countries, the US will further use the pretext of so-called national security in the Indo-Pacific region.

The Pentagon believes that ports built by Chinese companies in Cambodia, Sri Lanka, Vanuatu and other countries will become Chinese naval bases in the future, even though the governments of all these countries have categorically denied such conjectures.

In the meantime, Washington is militarizing the region. For instance, the US and Australia are developing a joint naval base on Manus Island. The Pacific islands are not capable of resisting Washington's muscle flexing, even though they need Chinese investments.

At the 18th Shangri-La Dialogue, Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong delivered a thought-provoking speech on China-US relations. He stressed that the world "has to adjust to a larger role for China. Countries have to accept that China will continue to grow and strengthen and that it is neither possible nor wise for them to prevent this from happening," adding it was impossible to "create a NATO or Warsaw Pact equivalent with a hard line drawn through Asia or drawn down the middle of the Pacific Ocean." Obviously, countries in the region do not want to see China and the US engaged in fierce confrontation.

Striving to have his official position changed to US defense secretary from an acting role, Shanahan might need to act tough against China in order to gain the support of US lawmakers at congressional hearings. Yet he realizes the significance of establishing a good working relationship with the Chinese defense minister. The constructive dialogue between Chinese State Councilor and Minister of National Defense Wei Fenghe and Shanahan during the Shangri-La Dialogue is a right step to prevent the conflict between the two sides from turning into a disaster.
 
.
So those tanks and SAMs will be sold to Taiwan. Good for Taiwan. Time world recognises it's fault
 
.
Back
Top Bottom