What's new

The top U.S. commander in the Middle East, General David Petraeus, warned

waraich66

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
4,641
Reaction score
-2
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
Petraeus: Israel Might Attack Iran

The top U.S. commander in the Middle East, General David Petraeus, warned today that Israel might attack Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons, Bloomberg reports.


Army General David Petraeus told Congress that "the Israeli government may ultimately see itself so threatened by the prospect of an Iranian nuclear weapon that it would take preemptive military action to derail or delay it."


While Iran insists its nuclear program is intended for peaceful power generation, Petraeus, the head of U.S. Central Command, said "Iranian officials have consistently failed to provide the assurances and transparency necessary for international acceptance and verification."

Iran refuses to suspend uranium enrichment, in defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions, and won't give international inspectors full access to its nuclear facilities.


Petraeus' warning comes a day after Israel's new prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, threatened to force Iran to halt its nuclear weapons program if the United States did not do so first.



In an interview conducted shortly before he was sworn in today as prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu laid down a challenge for Barack Obama. The American president, he said, must stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons--and quickly--or an imperiled Israel may be forced to attack Iran's nuclear facilities itself.


I think Israel is doing preparation to attack on Iran,US and Israel are also developing Arrow 3 MDS.
 
Iran is already surrounded on the two side of his border (Iraq and Afghanistan). Baluchistan will be the key to completely surround Iran. That why we saw map of new of Pakistan with free Baluchistan. that the key for US to take baluchistan and are making efforts to destabilize Pakistan .
 
Wrong on both counts. US is working hard to bring Iran into it's sphere of influence and Iran is open to a "honorable" deal -- if Ahmadinejad loses the election, then this rapproachment can be made to work.

Israel already is under the gun and must deliver on the Palestinian issue.

In Afghanistan, the U.S is seeking an exit, that is what the civilain surge is about, on that Pakistan seem onboard with the idea that the Taliban cannot be the vehicle of influence, clearing of Waziristan, it's holding, that is to say, it's Pakistani-ization and economic development, is a real plan.

Of course the islamist information operation is all about how Pakistan is in constant danger from the outside, where as the real danger is inside. And then of course there are conspiracy theories to keep Pakistanis occupied with half truths.

Don't fall for this, keep the focus on a Pakistan with a economy 3 times the present size, this is possible in 15 years of peace and political calm - boring yes, but ultimately a better, stronger Pakistan that can speak truth from power to power.
 
Iran is already surrounded on the two side of his border (Iraq and Afghanistan). Baluchistan will be the key to completely surround Iran. That why we saw map of new of Pakistan with free Baluchistan. that the key for US to take baluchistan and are making efforts to destabilize Pakistan .

Oh wake up just a bit.
As the saying goes, 'you are old enough and ugly enough to know better'.

If there was total ban on conspiracy theories you would have nothing to write about.
 
Wrong on both counts. US is working hard to bring Iran into it's sphere of influence and Iran is open to a "honorable" deal -- if Ahmadinejad loses the election, then this rapproachment can be made to work.

Israel already is under the gun and must deliver on the Palestinian issue.

In Afghanistan, the U.S is seeking an exit, that is what the civilain surge is about, on that Pakistan seem onboard with the idea that the Taliban cannot be the vehicle of influence, clearing of Waziristan, it's holding, that is to say, it's Pakistani-ization and economic development, is a real plan.

Of course the islamist information operation is all about how Pakistan is in constant danger from the outside, where as the real danger is inside. And then of course there are conspiracy theories to keep Pakistanis occupied with half truths.

Don't fall for this, keep the focus on a Pakistan with a economy 3 times the present size, this is possible in 15 years of peace and political calm - boring yes, but ultimately a better, stronger Pakistan that can speak truth from power to power.

Hmm..
US is working hard to bring Iran into it's sphere of influence and Iran is open to a "honorable" deal -- if Ahmadinejad loses the election, then this rapproachment can be made to work.

This may be a big if, depends on how well or poorly he does outside of Tehran.

muse you are making noises that smack of ending the ability of creating conspiracy theories. That must not happen. :disagree:
The place will collapse, journalists will have to write real stories, politicians will have to function correctly. :frown:

Oh the anguish, the pain.

The TRUTH!!..:yahoo:

:cheers:
 
Without full open support from US Israel would never attack on Iran. The consequences will be unpredictably severe.

In Washington, too, are not idiots. I hope.
 
June 12, 2009
News Analysis
As Iran Votes, Talk of a Sea Change
By ROBERT F. WORTH


TEHRAN — Less than two months ago, it was widely assumed here and in the West that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran’s hard-line president, would coast to another victory in the elections on Friday. Many of the reformists who sat out the vote in 2005 seemed dejected and unlikely to raise a strong challenge.

That picture has been transformed. A vast opposition movement has arisen, flooding the streets of Iran’s major cities with cheering, green-clad supporters of Mir Hussein Moussavi, the leading challenger. Mr. Ahmadinejad, seemingly on the defensive, has hurled extraordinary accusations at some of the Islamic republic’s founding figures, but the tactic has served to unify a diverse and passionate body of opponents of his populist economic policies and confrontational approach to the West.

Some Iranians believe that the unruly democratic energies unleashed over the past few weeks could affect this country’s politics no matter who wins. Mr. Ahmadinejad’s radical policies and personal attacks, they say, have galvanized powerful adversaries who will use his own accusations of corruption and mismanagement against him. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, who has the final say in affairs of state and prefers to avoid open conflict, may force Mr. Ahmadinejad to steer a more moderate course if he is re-elected.

“The elite will not let go of Ahmadinejad’s neck” if he wins, said Muhammad Atrianfar, a journalist and former government official who supports Mr. Moussavi. “The official institutions will be in conflict with him, including the Parliament.”

But hope has often outpaced reality in Iran, and similar democratic movements have been stifled in the past by the country’s clerical leadership. In 1997, a burst of student demonstrations was followed by mass arrests, and a broader crackdown has taken place since Mr. Ahmadinejad succeeded his reformist predecessor, President Mohammad Khatami, in 2005.

And for all the hopes placed in him, Mr. Moussavi is no liberal. Another candidate, Mehdi Karroubi, is more closely associated with the core causes of the Iranian reformist movement, including the freeing of political prisoners and women’s rights.

Moreover, there are limits to what any Iranian president can do. Although Mr. Ahmadinejad has tried to augment the powers of the presidency, it is Ayatollah Khamenei, as supreme leader, who controls the direction of foreign policy.

Still, Mr. Moussavi would clearly push for a less confrontational stance toward the West. He implicitly criticized Iran’s support for militant groups like Hezbollah and Hamas, saying the government should focus on domestic problems instead.

Perhaps more important to Iranians, Mr. Moussavi would change economic policy; Mr. Ahmadinejad has been criticized for economic stagnation, including rising inflation and unemployment. A former prime minister in the 1980s, Mr. Moussavi is given great credit for managing Iran’s economy effectively during the war with Iraq.

Much of Mr. Moussavi’s popularity derives from support by Mr. Khatami, the charismatic reformist cleric who was president from 1997 to 2005. But in some ways he could be more effective as president, analysts say. He is more pragmatic than Mr. Khatami, and because he is less distasteful to the hard-line clerical elite, he could have more success than Mr. Khatami did in promoting his agenda.

Moreover, opposition leaders say Mr. Moussavi, if elected, would have the advantage of a powerful popular movement behind him, and not just because the street demonstrations of the past weeks have been bigger than those of earlier elections. Women have become a potent force in this campaign for the first time in the Islamic republic’s 30-year history, with all three opposition candidates making major efforts to win their votes.

Mr. Moussavi broke with precedent by campaigning alongside his wife, Zahra Rahnavard, a prominent professor and artist who was famous before he was. Other candidates have promised to extend women’s rights as well. Campaign rallies for Mr. Moussavi often seem to include more women — who make up half the voters in Iran — than men.

Some say this is another aspect of the campaign that could remain important regardless of who wins. In April, a number of secular and conservative women’s groups joined forces and submitted a list of demands for greater rights from Iran’s next president.

Political and economic factors could also play a role. Iran’s oil revenue has dropped precipitously over the past year. The country is facing political challenges in Iraq and Afghanistan, and its allies in Lebanon lost an important election there on Sunday. All these things could moderate Mr. Ahmadinejad’s aggressive, free-spending style if he is re-elected, analysts say.

Mr. Moussavi’s supporters say they are confident that change is coming. Mr. Ahmadinejad sounded defensive during his last allotted television spot on Wednesday night, repeating again and again that he was not a liar, as his opponents have claimed. One of his final campaign rallies was canceled Wednesday afternoon after the university where it was to be held unexpectedly refused to delay exams to accommodate the president. A large crowd of students chanting anti-Ahmadinejad slogans forced him to change his plans again, and he ended up speaking to a much smaller group of supporters.

Opposition leaders say they expect a huge turnout on Friday, with many of the reformists who sat out the vote in 2005 saying they will take part this time, to help unseat Mr. Ahmadinejad.

Mr. Moussavi’s supporters say they remain concerned about the possibility of fraud, but a determined campaign — led in part by Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, an influential former president — has kept that issue in the public eye. Mr. Rafsanjani urged Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, to prevent any fraud in an extraordinary public letter on Tuesday, and on Thursday he met with the ayatollah for three hours.

For all the confidence of the opposition, it would be wrong to count Mr. Ahmadinejad out. He has the strong support of most of Iran’s rural voters, and his populist economic policies have won the loyalty of many pensioners and state employees, as well as the pious poor.

If he wins a second term, many here are now asking what will become of the “green wave” — the name given to the vast crowds of people who have filled the streets in recent weeks dressed in the signature color of the Moussavi campaign, demanding change.

“It depends on us,” said Mr. Karroubi, the reformist cleric who is running against Mr. Ahmadinejad, in an interview at his campaign offices. “What sort of action shall we take? Shall we continue on our way, or shall we go into a coma?”


Nazila Fathi contributed reporting.
 
The outcome may be affected by matters like the Revolutionary Guard, which is pro Ahmadinejad.

Underlying all his is the fact the clerics have the power still. The president is not that powerful.

If Ahmadinejad wins the reaction in Tehran may be interesting. Most of Tehran is anti Ahmadinejad.
 
Without full open support from US Israel would never attack on Iran. The consequences will be unpredictably severe.

In Washington, too, are not idiots. I hope.

Israel is capable of doing anything at present.
They have West Bank and Gaza to resolve but that assumes they want to resolve that.
They can get more milage out of the Iran issues before Obama does a bit of diplomacy. That scares them more.
 
The outcome may be affected by matters like the Revolutionary Guard, which is pro Ahmadinejad.

Underlying all his is the fact the clerics have the power still. The president is not that powerful.

Negative, we are not talking Algeria here - the guard will not effect any kind of coup against the Faghi. Ahmadinejad will be constrained even if he wins - iranians are rather a practical peoples, the supreme leader cannot afford to allow internal legitimacy to be seen as having failed. And this is an election for President, not some kind of color revolution, thank God.

Israel wants to do Iran, yeah, sure, and people in hell want ice water - Israel will do Palestine, like those in hell will do fire and brimstone - It will allow israel to grow up, undercut hebzollah and Hamas and Islamist ideas in general - all of which will allow the American to concentrate at home while she rebuilds herself.
 
Oh wake up just a bit.
As the saying goes, 'you are old enough and ugly enough to know better'.

If there was total ban on conspiracy theories you would have nothing to write about.

Well according to what happening around the conspiracy theories you called is already excited 80% by landing military in Afghanistan and Iraq and about baluchistan US already try drone attacks in baluchistan but was stop due to Pakistan pressure.
 
Wrong on both counts. US is working hard to bring Iran into it's sphere of influence and Iran is open to a "honorable" deal -- if Ahmadinejad loses the election, then this rapproachment can be made to work.

Israel already is under the gun and must deliver on the Palestinian issue.

In Afghanistan, the U.S is seeking an exit, that is what the civilain surge is about, on that Pakistan seem onboard with the idea that the Taliban cannot be the vehicle of influence, clearing of Waziristan, it's holding, that is to say, it's Pakistani-ization and economic development, is a real plan.

Of course the islamist information operation is all about how Pakistan is in constant danger from the outside, where as the real danger is inside. And then of course there are conspiracy theories to keep Pakistanis occupied with half truths.

Don't fall for this, keep the focus on a Pakistan with a economy 3 times the present size, this is possible in 15 years of peace and political calm - boring yes, but ultimately a better, stronger Pakistan that can speak truth from power to power.

apparantly ahmadineajad has won! gets more difficult!
 
The results are definitely interesting considering the pre election parades..

Thousands protest election | The Australian

June 13, 2009
Article from: Agence France-Presse
MAHMOUD Ahmadinejad has won Iran's most hotly contested presidential election with 62.63 per cent of the vote, Interior Minister Sadeq Mahsouli said.

In second place behind the hardline incumbent was moderate ex-premier Mir Hossein Mousavi with 33.75 per cent vote, he said.

Meanwhile, thousands of angry supporters of defeated presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi massed in Tehran to protest at the election result, with some pelting stones at baton-wielding police.

"Down with the dictator'' shouted the crowd as they streamed into one of the capital's main squares after latest results showed incumbent hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had secured a landslide win.

Hundreds of other people also gathered near the interior ministry in central Tehran shouting "Death to the dictator''.

The crowd rose in numbers after Mr Mousavi said in a statement saying he would not bow to the "dangerous scenario'' created in Iran by the results of the closely fought election.

Mr Mousavi said he "protested vigorously against the numerous and blatant irregularities'' in Friday's vote after officials said Ahmadinajad had secured about 63 per cent of the vote with counting in most districts over.

Latest results showed Mr Mousavi with 11.7 million votes against 21.8 million for Mr Ahmadinejad
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom