What's new

The Times of Ayub Khan!

his time were great mostly but our people like lies and false promises some idiots at the time used socialism as a weapon against him and succeeded because our dictators are too democratic
i have a problem with what he did with fatimah jinnah
if she had won the presidential election of 1965 east pakistan would have still existed
some people call him liberal to disgrace his legacy but they dont know anything

Exactly, it should also not go unnoticed that Ayub was the very first (local) Army chief and he opted to rule himself and set an example which is followed till now.

As for people liking false promises the blame still goes squarely on Ayub. He had all the means to market himself to the public and he failed in that. Lets not forget every dictator himself started with false promises which were never fulfilled.
 
.
Ayub really never wanted any war with India. We had great relations with US, flourishing industry and economy, why would a leader do all that only to destroy everything he built on war?

Its Wierd, just after Independence Pakistan wanted to work with India against China lol
 
.
Its Wierd, just after Independence Pakistan wanted to work with India against China lol
This mess was started by Kashmir Dispute. Remember, Pakistanis had no desire to fight with their former homeland if it was not for Kashmir.
 
. .
Muhammad_Ayub_Khan-2-1728x800_c.jpg


When we talk about the times of Ayub Khan today, we generally talk about the ‘Decade of Development’. The decade which saw growth at ~ 5.82%.

This was the decade during which Pakistan’s manufacturing base became sizeable. It was this decade when Pakistan established an automobile industry, a cement industry and some other heavy manufacturing industries.

It was this decade when manufacturing growth, standing at 8.51%, outpaced any other time in the history of Pakistan.


If you understand the mechanics of manufacturing growth you will know that the more industry you establish (especially manufacturing) the more jobs you create, in turn making the common man’s life better.

Ayub Khan – the Dictator

Ayub Khan was involved in politics when he was inducted into Muhammad Ali Bogra’s Federal Cabinet in 1954, and given the portfolio of Defense.

In 1958 however, the then President, Iskander Mirza, enforced Martial Law for the first time and Ayub Khan was designated as the Chief Martial Law Administrator.

It wasn’t a bloody coup, in fact it was welcomed by the common man who was till then frustrated at the unstable political situation that was persistent in the country since 1947.

Ayub Khan – the Progressive Leader

After the takeover, Ayub began taking measures to eradicate corruption and several social problems that dogged the society. These measures increased his popularity among the people of Pakistan.

As mentioned earlier, Ayub’s time is known for its industrialization. During this time the private sector was encouraged and supported to start SME’s in Pakistan.

His other endeavors included efforts to raise the education standards by introducing educational reforms. He also tried to bring in land reforms but the idea failed due to issues with implementation. Certain Labor, law and administrative reforms were also brought about in this time.

And last but not the least, Islamabad was planned as the new capital of Pakistan and this high status was shifted from Karachi to Islamabad in 1962.


It is said that the Ayub’s martial law was not severe. The army’s role was limited and by 1959 most army units were back to their regular duties. Ayub Khan, most of the time left administration for the civil bureaucracy, with a few exceptions.

But not everything was so rosy…

Ayub Khan’s era is also known for its increase in income inequality and creating an oligopolistic structure of the economy which exists to this date in some form.

One of the biggest mistakes that Ayub Khan made was to fan the already seething anger among the Bengalis of West Pakistan by treating them like a step child.

A prime example of this was when East Pakistan was made to pay tariffs on sending products to West Pakistan, but the same was not the case when things moved from the West to the East.

Double standards and inequality issues such as these culminated in the partition of the country soon after Ayub’s resignation.

Then came the downfall

Things were fine till the war of 1965. The war triggered an economic slowdown and although Pakistan emerged victorious in the battlefield, Ayub Khan was criticized for failing on the negotiation table when signing the Tashkent Declaration.

Towards the end of 1968, the public sentiment was at the peak of its hatred towards Ayub Khan. A movement was launched against him by students, teachers, lawyers, doctors and engineers. The movement also had the Joint Labor Council calling for labor strikes.

The whole country was swept by demonstrations leading to a breakdown of law and order.

Finally, Ayub had to resign and on March 25, 1969, he handed over his powers to the then Commander-in-Chief of Pakistan Army, General Muhammad Yahya Khan….. Surprise! Another dictator.
The Times of Ayub Khan | Pakistan Insider

@BDforever @Luffy 500 @idune @A.Rafay @Ahmad1996 @Akheilos @Armstrong @arushbhai @AstanoshKhan @AZADPAKISTAN2009 @balixd @batmannow @Bilal. @chauvunist @Crypto @Dr. Stranglove @Evil Flare @EyanKhan @Fahad Khan 2 @GIANTsasquatch @graphican @Green Arrow @Guleen Ahmed @HRK @Jazzbot @Junaid B @Jzaib @Khalidr @khawaja07 @Leader @Luftwaffe @Marshmallow @mr42O @Muhammad Omar @nomi007 @Pak123 @Pakistani shaheens @Pakistanisage @Peaceful Civilian @pkuser2k12 @Pukhtoon @PWFI @raazh @Rafael @Rashid Mahmood @RescueRanger @Saifkhan12 @Sedqal @SHAMK9 @Spy Master @Stealth @Strike X @SUPARCO @sur @syedali73 @Tameem @Tayyab1796 @Zarvan @waleed3601 @AdeelFaheem @Rajput_Pakistani @Men in Green @IceCold @LoveIcon @razahassan1997 @Dil Pakistan @asq @junaid hamza @Pukhtoon @jamahir @Strigon @Rafi @Ulla @HughSlaman @420canada @sathya @slapshot @raza_888 @hacsan @SBD-3 @cb4 @AsianUnion @Aether @Proudpakistaniguy @WishLivePak @Waffen SS @FaujHistorian @Fracker @Ranches @ghoul @Jf Thunder @GreenFalcon @genmirajborgza786 @orangzaib @Pakistani Exile @KURUMAYA @Irfan Baloch @ali_raza @Syed.Ali.Haider @dexter @Patriots @muslim_pakistani @W.11 @Meengla @zaid butt @ajpirzada @Shoaib Rathore @OrionHunter @CHARGER @Major Sam @yesboss @TheNoob @Bratva @ghazaliy2k @Viny @StormShadow @suresh1773 @SOHEIL @venu309 @danish_vij @Force-India @faisal6309 @SpArK @S.U.R.B. @vsdave2302 @jarves @WAJsal @pursuit of happiness @Winchester @janon @pak-marine @AgNoStiC MuSliM @Donatello



No one is perfect. Ayub Khan did mistakes but he also delivered Pakistan a lot.

As I always say Pakistan actually grew in 3 dictator tenures Musharraf, Zia ul Haq and Ayub Khan
 
.
No one is perfect. Ayub Khan did mistakes but he also delivered Pakistan a lot.

As I always say Pakistan actually grew in 3 dictator tenures Musharraf, Zia ul Haq and Ayub Khan

This country can only be run by the dictator.
 
.
His biggest mistake was not striking in 1962 when the Chinese held the door open. Had he done so you would perhaps still be a Nepali national today instead of calling yourself kashmiri. :pleasantry::lol:

Most of the divisions of India are located in North Western parts of India. India can wage a defensive war against Pakistan. But 1962 is a different scenario, India is not prepared, some misinterpretation and confusion.

China is not a big power at that time. In 1987 Chinese ware give a fitting reply, the same would have happened if the leadership is not caught sleeping in 1962.

Pakistan emerged victorious in the battlefield? Really? If Pakistan was victorious, then Kashmir would have been part of Pakistan. Unfortunately, both Operation Gibraltar and Operation Grand Slam launched in 1965 for capturing Kashmir were spectacular failures.

Just to put the record straight.

Pakistan wins the war because they are martial , do not spoil that.
 
.
One of the biggest mistakes that Ayub Khan made was to fan the already seething anger among the Bengalis of West Pakistan by treating them like a step child.

A prime example of this was when East Pakistan was made to pay tariffs on sending products to West Pakistan, but the same was not the case when things moved from the West to the East.


Towards the end of 1968, the public sentiment was at the peak of its hatred towards Ayub Khan.

Two things stand out in dictators world wide.

1. They never realise when their ' best before' has been reached.

2. Their inability to govern , life as a civilian is no where close to the regimented military way of life that threw them up.

The parts in red undid whatever good Ayub may have done.

Pakistan has forever needed someone to victimize / hate . India being a constant while internally, it began with the Bengalis later followed by the Baloch.
 
. .
.
@Norwegian by saying this, you are de-railing the democracy :D

Muslim nations, apart from few, like Malaysia, Indonesia, Malaysia and Azerbaijan, haven't got a clue what democracy even means. Yet alone, Western one. Free and Fair Elections alone do not bring democracy, as Imran puts it. You need an educated majority to implement, that is clearly lacking in Pakistan!
 
.
Muslim nations, apart from few, like Malaysia, Indonesia, Malaysia and Azerbaijan, haven't got a clue what democracy even means. Yet alone, Western one. Free and Fair Elections alone do not bring democracy, as Imran puts it. You need an educated majority to implement, that is clearly lacking in Pakistan!

Your point is valuable but you should not forget what IK has done in KPK and what he did for Pakistan without being in govt. I hope you know what has has done and he is doing @Norwegian
 
.
Your point is valuable but you should not forget what IK has done in KPK and what he did for Pakistan without being in govt. I hope you know what has has done and he is doing @Norwegian
Look, I am not a pessimist, and I believe in IK's leadership qualities. Only problem is that he is not affirmed and confident like our great Quad-e-Azam.
 
. .
Look, I am not a pessimist, and I believe in IK's leadership qualities. Only problem is that he is not affirmed and confident like our great Quad-e-Azam.

No one is like our Quaid-e-Azam but atleast you will agree that he is better then others?

We both will definitely have a discussion right here whenever IK come in federal govt and complete his 1 year
 
.
Back
Top Bottom