What's new

The Russian Army Doesn’t Have Enough Trucks To Defeat Ukraine Fast

aziqbal

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
7,403
Reaction score
-10
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
The Russian Army Doesn’t Have Enough Trucks To Defeat Ukraine Fast

uncaptioned

Russian army trucks near Ukraine in April 2021.

RUSSIAN SOCIAL MEDIA

The Kremlin has used trains—hundreds of them with many thousands of cars, in total—to stage along the Russia-Ukraine border weapons, vehicles and supplies for an army of around 100,000 troops.

If Russian President Vladimir Putin pulls the proverbial trigger and orders that army to roll west into Ukraine’s restive Donbas region, those same trains will haul supplies to forward depots and haul away from the war zone any damaged vehicles in need of deep repair.


That dependency comes with risk that, more than any tank-on-tankor artillery-on-artillery match-up, could define a wider war in eastern Ukraine. Trains can’t roll all the way to the front line. For that, Russia needs trucks. But it’s woefully short.

Russia is vast and its roads are poor compared to roads in Western countries. That helps to explain why the country, and its army, leans so heavily on rail for logistics. State-owned Russian Railways owns 20,000 of the country’s 21,000 locomotives. Private firms own most of the roughly 1.2 million freight cars, including 66,000 flat cars for hauling vehicles.

PROMOTED




Those 66,000 cars, handled by unique army railway troop brigades, are “more than enough to transport the equipment of the entire Russian ground force units,” according to Konrad Muzyka, an analyst for Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.

But railheads aren’t always close to the front line. To reach battalions rolling west toward Kiev, supplies must travel scores or hundreds of miles by road.

That’s where the Russian army’s logistics are weakest. “The Russian army does not have enough trucks to meet its logistic requirement more than 90 miles beyond supply dumps,” U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Alex Vershinin wrote at War on the Rocks.https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoin...ivate-equity-firms-is-transforming-investing/

The Russian army has 10 “material-technical support” brigades. Each operates around 400 trucks. Even if every support brigade mobilized and all of their vehicles remained operational throughout a campaign, the available trucks wouldn’t stretch very far, Vershinin explained.


“Although each army is different, there are usually 56 to 90 multiple launch rocket system launchers in an army,” he noted. “Replenishing each launcher takes up the entire bed of [a] truck. If the combined arms army fired a single volley, it would require 56 to 90 trucks just to replenish rocket ammunition.”

“That is about a half of a dry cargo truck force in the material-technical support brigade just to replace one volley of rockets. There is also between six to nine tube artillery battalions, nine air-defense artillery battalions, 12 mechanized and recon battalions, three to five tank battalions, mortars, anti-tank missiles and small-arms ammunition—not to mention, food, engineering, medical supplies and so on.”

The Kremlin can supplement the army’s trucks with helicopters and civilian vehicles. But that’s just tinkering around the margins of an enormous logistical problem. All that is to say, trucks—more than tanks or artillery—could dictate the pace and extent of a deeper Russian invasion of Ukraine.

That truism should also inform the Ukrainian army’s own thinking. As Ukrainian gunners select targets for their tube artillery and rockets, they should always prioritize the seemingly most boring targets. The trucks the Russians can’t fight without.

 
. .
The Russian Army Doesn’t Have Enough Trucks To Defeat Ukraine Fast

uncaptioned

Russian army trucks near Ukraine in April 2021.

RUSSIAN SOCIAL MEDIA

The Kremlin has used trains—hundreds of them with many thousands of cars, in total—to stage along the Russia-Ukraine border weapons, vehicles and supplies for an army of around 100,000 troops.

If Russian President Vladimir Putin pulls the proverbial trigger and orders that army to roll west into Ukraine’s restive Donbas region, those same trains will haul supplies to forward depots and haul away from the war zone any damaged vehicles in need of deep repair.


That dependency comes with risk that, more than any tank-on-tankor artillery-on-artillery match-up, could define a wider war in eastern Ukraine. Trains can’t roll all the way to the front line. For that, Russia needs trucks. But it’s woefully short.

Russia is vast and its roads are poor compared to roads in Western countries. That helps to explain why the country, and its army, leans so heavily on rail for logistics. State-owned Russian Railways owns 20,000 of the country’s 21,000 locomotives. Private firms own most of the roughly 1.2 million freight cars, including 66,000 flat cars for hauling vehicles.

PROMOTED




Those 66,000 cars, handled by unique army railway troop brigades, are “more than enough to transport the equipment of the entire Russian ground force units,” according to Konrad Muzyka, an analyst for Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.

But railheads aren’t always close to the front line. To reach battalions rolling west toward Kiev, supplies must travel scores or hundreds of miles by road.

That’s where the Russian army’s logistics are weakest. “The Russian army does not have enough trucks to meet its logistic requirement more than 90 miles beyond supply dumps,” U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Alex Vershinin wrote at War on the Rocks.https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoin...ivate-equity-firms-is-transforming-investing/

The Russian army has 10 “material-technical support” brigades. Each operates around 400 trucks. Even if every support brigade mobilized and all of their vehicles remained operational throughout a campaign, the available trucks wouldn’t stretch very far, Vershinin explained.


“Although each army is different, there are usually 56 to 90 multiple launch rocket system launchers in an army,” he noted. “Replenishing each launcher takes up the entire bed of [a] truck. If the combined arms army fired a single volley, it would require 56 to 90 trucks just to replenish rocket ammunition.”

“That is about a half of a dry cargo truck force in the material-technical support brigade just to replace one volley of rockets. There is also between six to nine tube artillery battalions, nine air-defense artillery battalions, 12 mechanized and recon battalions, three to five tank battalions, mortars, anti-tank missiles and small-arms ammunition—not to mention, food, engineering, medical supplies and so on.”

The Kremlin can supplement the army’s trucks with helicopters and civilian vehicles. But that’s just tinkering around the margins of an enormous logistical problem. All that is to say, trucks—more than tanks or artillery—could dictate the pace and extent of a deeper Russian invasion of Ukraine.

That truism should also inform the Ukrainian army’s own thinking. As Ukrainian gunners select targets for their tube artillery and rockets, they should always prioritize the seemingly most boring targets. The trucks the Russians can’t fight without.


Come on Aziqbal ....... you are getting desperate by opening these cheap street threads.
:lol: ...... Russian and Chinese chics refusing to date you doesn't mean you should go around with revenge threads against the Russians and Chinese . :lol:
 
.
I find it hilarious how Western propaganda is dichotomously showing Russia and still this schizophrenic patterns coexists in some weak minds:
1. Russia is unbeatable dark empire. We need all the NATO and dozens of non-NATO countries combined to defeat it and save the world.
2. Russia is a joke. Its economy is so weak, its technology is backward, its weapons are rust.
 
.
I find it hilarious how Western propaganda is dichotomously showing Russia and still this schizophrenic patterns coexists in some weak minds:
1. Russia is unbeatable dark empire. We need all the NATO and dozens of non-NATO countries combined to defeat it and save the world.
2. Russia is a joke. Its economy is so weak, its technology is backward, its weapons are rust.
And the simple reason behind that is US want a complete supremacy and control all over the word and china and Russia are still major powers stopping US to fulfill it's dream.
 
. .
David Axe.... one of the worst jingoists out there.
US and UK are living in a parallel universe.

Empire nostalgia in UK is a real thing even thought many reasonable British people deny that such attitudes exists. British parliament was in shock when US left Afghanistan and many mp's were asking why can't Brits stay behind even if US leaves... they relized in late 2021 that Britain is not an superpower.

It still persists and I've seen many conservatives asking why can't British armed forces simply take back Hong Kong. Crazy stuff.
 
Last edited:
. .
I find it hilarious how Western propaganda is dichotomously showing Russia and still this schizophrenic patterns coexists in some weak minds:
1. Russia is unbeatable dark empire. We need all the NATO and dozens of non-NATO countries combined to defeat it and save the world.
2. Russia is a joke. Its economy is so weak, its technology is backward, its weapons are rust.

Pretty much agree with it.

I think it's because Russian people don't have a strong hardworking culture like people from the rest of the world.

The more time passed, the more Russia will be left behind by the rest of the world.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom