What's new

The Rafale has proven in Mali pleads French Air Force

DrSomnath999

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
2,428
Reaction score
4
Country
India
Location
India
Bangalore (India): The Rafale has demonstrated the extent of its capabilities in Mali, said in an interview with AFP Chief of Staff of the French Air Force, came to share his experience with the Army Air India wants to acquire this aircraft multi-role combat.

5207925-7771233.jpg


Operate in a complex environment over very long distances, "this is how we measure the ability of the aircraft," said General Denis Mercier, on the sidelines of Airshow Bangalore which ends Sunday .

On January 13, at 7:00 local four Rafale took off from Saint-Dizier (Haute-Marne, north of France) to knock over 20 goals in the region of Gao in northern Mali, after six hours flight, he said.

They then placed in N'Djamena, after a mission to 9 hours and 35 minutes in total and five in-flight refueling.

Such complex mission, "where you have everything up because that there is no ground radar, "which involves AWACS radar planes, aircraft refueling, ground operators and systems of complex network is of interest to Indians, continued the general.

The Indian Air Force, which also has radar and refueling planes, wanted to know what kind of operation was conducted over what distances and how it was mounted. In Mali, the staff was first planned and conducted flight operations from France, "which requires exceptional measures," he said.

Another feature of this operation, "he was attacked complete autonomy "while in Libya, the operations were conducted in a coalition. "The complete independence shows all the means you have and that, that interested India too," he added.



advantage of the Rafale Mirage 2000 prepositioned in Africa and led the first strike against the jihadists in Mali, this is what the military calls "open architecture" which allows it to communicate with other devices and with both Snowy drones based in Niger.

"Aircraft can talk, transmitting information directly. The real added value of this aircraft, it is there, "said the Chief of Staff.


Rafale, built by Dassault Aviation, has long been regarded by critics as an expensive and unsaleable plane to abroad. India has, however, preferred in January 2012 to U.S. and European rivals and negotiate an order of 126 units. The Indian counterpart General Mercier, NAK Browne, on Thursday expressed the hope that the contract is concluded in mid-2013.

Mali has however highlighted the lack of airlift and refueling modern and France had to seek help from its European allies, U.S. and Canada.

"Looking forward to the arrival of the A400M," the European tactical transport aircraft built by Airbus, General Mercier said. The first A400M must be delivered to France "late May, early June and I'm aiming for entry into service in early 2014 Operational," he said.

France has also announced plans to order 14 Airbus this year in transport aircraft and MRTT refueling.

"With two A400 MRTT and two in eight hours, we planned the entire project we wanted" Africa for the operation in Mali, late Chief of Staff.

Le Rafale a fait ses preuves au Mali, plaide l'armée de l'air française
 
.
what proved?

They have been bombing countries who dont have even decent army leave aside airforce.

This is like if i go n shoot hands tied person and say look at my gun,this is best :blah: :blah:

and i feel,since french plane have been selected in mmrca,they are bombing here n there using rafale and wants to make it battle proven.
 
. .
what proved?

They have been bombing countries who dont have even decent army leave aside airforce.

This is like if i go n shoot hands tied person and say look at my gun,this is best :blah: :blah:

and i feel,since french plane have been selected in mmrca,they are bombing here n there using rafale and wants to make it battle proven.
Hmmm!!

cynical people only see the negative part of everything not the postive part.:lol:

anyways Back to topic

they are many things which rafale had proved in mali which is itself written in bold

1) operate independently without any coalition or any allied airforce support.

2) demonstrated it's use of foreign bombs like GBU 12 bombs through rafale which is much cheaper than Sagem's hammer AASM missiles

20130203tchad44opfevrie.jpg


3)abilty to operate in open architecture i.e to communicate with other devices & snowy drones based in Niger
Harfang.jpg

The French Air Force’s Cassidian Harfang (snowy owl in niger)

4) for the 4th time AREOS reco ng pod was used in this operation for electronic surveilance
Le mamouth: Les yeux du Serval brillent, même en plein jour

REGARDS
 
.
So they are saying that our rafales can perform admirably well, if we are invited by a country to go use their territory to bomb their rebels.

If Pakistan invites us to go there and bomb their talibunnies, the rafales can do well.

It's idiotic on their part to advertise capabilities which a WW-2 plane could have done. Rafales are capable of a lot more - they are capable of penetrating dense air defenses, using their EW suites and jamming equipment (if used by skilled pilots in well formed tactics). Of all the non stealthy aircrafts in the world today, Rafales perhaps have the best survivability in heavily defended airspace.

This is like the makers of a main battle tank boasting about having run someone over to death.
 
. .
which WW-2 plane can locate precisely on it's own the terrorist location in realtime & bomb their location so accurately plz let me know .:drag:

The location of terrorists wasn't some super secret hiding base. It was well known buildings, whose location and coordinates could be supplied by Malian or French forces on the ground. They weren't located by aerial reconnaissance.

It is true that rafales used PGMs and scalp missiles, but the point is that WW-2 era dumb bombs could just as easily have done the job. These are rag tag militias with AK-47s and nothing more. With zero ability to do any damage to any flying machine.

Let me invert your question. What did the rafales do that the jags, mirages or mig 27s in our force could not have done?
 
. .
The location of terrorists wasn't some super secret hiding base. It was well known buildings, whose location and coordinates could be supplied by Malian or French forces on the ground. They weren't located by aerial reconnaissance.

says who?? u sweet dreams !!those satellite imagery makes a jack sense

realtime intelligeince is the most important part of carrying out those strikes ,as the terrorists keep on changing their location.

RECO NG pod surveillance was tested realtime there and IAF personal were really interested how effectively did it perform in MALI.

It is true that rafales used PGMs and scalp missiles, but the point is that WW-2 era dumb bombs could just as easily have done the job. These are rag tag militias with AK-47s and nothing more. With zero ability to do any damage to any flying machine.

true & thats what the french demonstated through use of GBU -16 bombs which is much cheaper compare to SAGEM hammer missiles which is too costly for such missions .



Let me invert your question. What did the rafales do that the jags, mirages or mig 27s in our force could not have done?

what happened to the Mig 27 jets during the kargil operation plz do inform yourself .

& why did they use miage instead of mig 27 in kargil plz tell:coffee:
 
. . .
Open your eyes dude,dream is over...........we don't want you to loose the deal..................It can only demonstrate against Mali,on other case you will find Rafale in spare parts.....................:butcher::enjoy:
 
. .
says who?? u sweet dreams !!those satellite imagery makes a jack sense

realtime intelligeince is the most important part of carrying out those strikes ,as the terrorists keep on changing their location.

RECO NG pod surveillance was tested realtime there and IAF personal were really interested how effectively did it perform in MALI.



true & thats what the french demonstated through use of GBU -16 bombs which is much cheaper compare to SAGEM hammer missiles which is too costly for such missions .





what happened to the Mig 27 jets during the kargil operation plz do inform yourself .

& why did they use miage instead of mig 27 in kargil plz tell:coffee:

mig 27 didn't have MAW ?

This proves nothing much any 4 gen fighter could have done the job just as rafale..may be rafale's situation awareness and self protection suit lowers the risk level.that's all I can see.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom