What's new

The philosophy behind Hizb ut- Tahrir

Nav

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
1,089
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
With the arrest of the Brig. Gen. Ali
Khan for his alleged links to the "Party
of Liberation", Hizb ut-Tahrir has once
again made headlines. Founded in
Jordan in 1952 by Taqiuddin al-
Nabhani, party's origins lie in the heart of Arab anti-colonialism movement.
Instead of Arab unity, however, it now
calls for Muslim unity and has
expanded its operational capabilities
to more than 40 countries worldwide.
Pakistan, and in particular Pakistani army, has been a special focus of Hizb
ut-Tahrir's activities since the
mid-1990s. According to Abdul
Qadeem Zallum, a former leader of the
organization, Hizb ut-Tahrir's focus on
Pakistan stems from its possession of nuclear weapons. Hence, it is not
surprising that the Pakistani
government pursues a "zero tolerance
policy" toward Hizb ut-Tahrir.
What is
surprising though is the British
government's "sanguine view" on the organization. The Government has
repeatedly claimed that it has "yet to
see convincing evidence that Hizb ut-
Tahrir as an organization advocates
violence or terrorism", and so it is not
banned in the UK.. On 9th July, Hizb ut-Tahrir held its
annual conference in London where
its followers gathered to hear the
senior leadership repeat the party's
message that, whether the issue is the
world economic crisis or the Arab Spring, "the only solution to problems
of Muslims is the creation of an Islamist
state". As it was expected, speakers
refrained from using inflammatory
language. Nevertheless, they
promoted their 'Western strategy' with vigour which, briefly stated,
encourages Muslims to live amidst, but
apart from, Western populations in
their own communities.
Obviously there are certain benefits in
allowing the party to conduct its activities in the UK. At a minimum, it
enables the government to penetrate
its ranks with more ease, especially as
the organization's recruitment efforts
are heavily focused on young, Muslim
university students. However, advertising Islam as the remedy of all
socio-economic ills at a time of
economic hardship might have some
unforeseen domestic consequences
further weakening social cohesion in
cities with a large Muslim population. As such, set out below is a summary of
the party's view on state and society
as explained in its manifesto – The
Ummah's Charter. The key objective is
to enable and hopefully encourage
readers to develop a better understanding of a party that not only
has a solidified presence in Britain's
Muslim communities, but is also certain
to continue to make headlines in the
coming years.
 
.
continue...
Society
Society is defined as a group of people who are bound together via permanent relationships. Permanent
relationships are believed to be only possible if/when there are common thoughts, common emotions, and a common system so there can be a
common view on the group/society's
interests.
An Islamic society, in turn, is one in
which all relationships are based on Islamic thoughts, emotions and systems. Hence, relationships that
currently exist, or might arise,
between Muslims as well as Muslims
and 'others' must adhere to and be
informed by Islamic
"aqeedah" (beliefs) and the sharia rules. This is why the mere presence of
Muslims does not make a society an Islamic entity. According to article 51,
"it is not enough for people to be
Muslims; rather the thoughts, emotions
and systems must also be Islamic since society is comprised of thoughts,
emotions and systems. Consequently,
societies in which Muslims live today,
in all regions of the world, are not
Islamic [even] though people are
Muslims" Having established what the nature of
societal relations in an Islamic society
ought to be, the constitution then
proceeds to encourage believers to seek to convert, and if necessary force, a non-Islamic society into an Islamic one through the use of "radical methods and not gradualism"
.
Article 52 explains that "this takes place by abolishing all present
relationships and replacing them with Islamic relations all in one go.
This will begin with the ruling system and then
at the same time move to the rest of the systems. The first action should be to completely destroy the existing ruling structure, replacing it with the
Islamic ruling structure. The criteria for judging matters will be the Halal and the Haram. It proceeds in generating this change through direction and implementing punishments".
Unsurprisingly, in response to those
who refuse to follow Islamic rules
state should "resort to force" and seek the punishment of Kuffar (non- believers) in order to ensure
"compliance".
 
. .
What is
surprising though is the British
government's "sanguine view" on the organization. The Government has
repeatedly claimed that it has "yet to
see convincing evidence that Hizb ut-
Tahrir as an organization advocates
violence or terrorism", and so it is not
banned in the UK.

These extremist organizations serve a useful purpose for Western governments.
Please try and understand the bigger picture. ;)
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom