First..English Please...
and 2nd,with this specs,it will be multi times better than AN/APG-77 and AN/APG-81 Radars which is in service with F-22 and F-35 Lightning II(I read somewhere AN/APG-77 can track a small fighter jets 230 km away,which i think should have RCS > .1 m^2)..so,I doubt this specs..though some more knowledgeable can clarify it more..
No, it will not.
The issue is
GRANULARITY or refinement of such 'tracking'. So it looks like back to basics...
The above is not to true physical scales but to give comparison between different wavelengths.
Here is where granularity comes in...
The shortest pulse you can create is one cycle, which is too short to do any good. A typical radar pulse transmission is composed of many cycles, as illustrated above. The longer the wavelength used, the higher the energy level. The longer the pulse, the higher the energy level. So if you use the meters long freq band (HF) and create pulses from this freq, your transmission will have a very high energy level at the moment of impact on the target.
A pulse have two timestamps: leading edge and trailing edge. This create what is called 'finite pulse length'. A radar computer uses these timestamps to create virtual spatial locations for a target over time.
A pulse hit the target. Then it bounced off the target. Its leading edge is naturally followed by its trailing edge. The radar computer detect the reflected pulse's leading edge's timestamp and the trailing edge's timestamp and create
ONE virtual location at
ONE moment of time. And it does it for the next pulse. And so again for the next pulse. The longer the timestamps between leading and trailing edges, the less refined the target's location over space and time.
This is why missile targeting uses very short wavelengths in the X-band. Short pulses have very narrow timestamps between leading and trailing edges, creating many more virtual location points than longer wavelengths.
It is:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compares to:
..............................................
Where each point represent one pulse.
Against a highly maneuverable target, we want as many distinct points in as closely spaced as possible because the gaps in the first example are where the target could maneuver out of our radar view. The top line would be the L-band. The bottom line is how an X-band would see our target.