What's new

The epic eye roll that exposed the sham of China’s biggest political gathering

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
The near-unanimous approval of a constitutional amendment to abolish term limits for president Xi Jinping, and a journalist rolling her eyeballs over an obsequious question, are the two most memorable incidents that happened at this year’s Two Sessions meetings, China’s biggest annual political gathering.

Both events highlight the extent to which a meticulous control of information and intolerance of dissent are used to maintain China’s political image.

At a news conference on the sidelines of a legislative meeting yesterday (March 13), Chinese journalist Liang Xiangyi, a reporter for domestic TV network China Business News, was caught on camera doing a dramatic eye-roll as journalist Zhang Huijun asked a softball question next to her. Zhang, who introduced herself as the operating director of a US-based broadcaster, cheerfully asked an official a question relating to China’s “One Belt, One Road” infrastructure plan. Rather than directly asking a question, Zhang used most of her 44 seconds (video) to summarize China’s achievements in the area.

Footage of Liang rolling her eyes and turning her head backwards in apparent displeasure instantly went viral, and inspired a series of GIFs, video parodies, and other memes on China’s internet. Censors moved quickly to block people from searching Liang’s name on Weibo, China’s most popular microblogging service. A report from Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post said that Liang’s media accreditation to cover the legislative meetings was revoked, citing one of her colleagues.

Still, support continued to pour in for Liang on her Weibo account, which quickly accumulated more than 190,000 followers and counting. “You are the only thing I remember since the beginning of the Two Sessions,” one blogger wrote under one of Liang’s Weibo posts. “A slap in the face to formalism,” another person said.

The eye roll and the tame question serve to remind the public that the biggest political gathering in China is merely for show. The country’s top legislative body has never rejected any proposal from the ruling Communist Party, and this year passed a constitutional change that paves the way for Xi to remain as president beyond his original retirement date of 2023, and perhaps for as long as he desires. 2,958 delegates voted for the measure, and only five voted against or abstained.

News conferences are a major component of China’s political facade, mostly used as platforms to air views that present China in a favorable light. Officials usually cherry-pick questions from publications that are affiliated with or have close relations to the party, while avoiding calling on journalists from mainstream foreign outlets. Zhang, who was supposed to represent foreign media, hails from American Multimedia Television USA in Los Angeles, which has partnered with China’s state broadcaster in the past. When asking her long-winded question, Zhang chose to refer to China as “our country” in an elevated tone.

The BBC’s China correspondent, Stephen McDonell, complained in a column yesterday (March 13) about Chinese journalists who pose softball questions during “the one opportunity each year” the media gets to face foreign minister Wang Yi during the Two Sessions. According to McDonell’s account, none of the questions this year had anything to do with contentious issues including North Korea, the South China Sea, and US-China trade tensions.

The climax of the Two Sessions will come on March 20, when the political meetings wrap up with a news conference held by China’s premier, Li Keqiang. Authorities pre-approve every question asked on this occasion, and foreign journalists in particular must submit questions in advance and often have to negotiate the wording with officials.

Li, for his part, is expected to stick to the Communist Party’s script, while occasionally marveling at foreign reporters’ Mandarin skills as a show of cordiality.

https://qz.com/1228714/a-chinese-re...m-of-chinas-two-sessions-political-gathering/
 
.
Censors moved quickly to block people from searching Liang’s name on Weibo, China’s most popular microblogging service. A report from Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post said that Liang’s media accreditation to cover the legislative meetings was revoked, citing one of her colleagues.
At least -- for now -- we can be grateful that she is not executed.

But this 'epic eyeroll' begs the larger question of the fragility of the Chinese system. Or if that fragility is real or not. Censorship is in place for a reason: Because the State believes that certain things expressed in certain ways threatens the stability of the system.

Is the State correct that the system is that fragile? Or is the people, represented by this rebellious reporter and her supporters, correct, that the system is not that fragile?

Finally, are some gestures universal? In semiotics -- the study of symbols as forms of communication -- the more sophisticated a society the greater the need for symbols, especially simple ones to quickly communicate. A national flag is one such example of that need.

The middle finger is unique to Western cultures as a gesture of insult. The backhanded V is also a gesture of insult but unique to the Brits and former colonies. I use it in the States and not many recognize it. US Prez B41 unknowingly used it in Australia in 1992.

A raised fist is always recognized by any culture at any time as a symbol of strength, defiance, power, and authority. Both shoulders shrugged are also universal as a sign of surrender to a situation, often accompanied by both palms up.

A raised open right palm is always recognized as a sign of peace, as in no weapons wielded.

There is not much you can do with your eyes. They are physically constrained to only 2D movements. So why is rolling them up recognized as a sign of exasperation at a situation?

jdDbOhu.jpg


In the context of the situation, it was indeed 'epic'. :lol:
 
.
At least -- for now -- we can be grateful that she is not executed.

But this 'epic eyeroll' begs the larger question of the fragility of the Chinese system. Or if that fragility is real or not. Censorship is in place for a reason: Because the State believes that certain things expressed in certain ways threatens the stability of the system.

Is the State correct that the system is that fragile? Or is the people, represented by this rebellious reporter and her supporters, correct, that the system is not that fragile?

Finally, are some gestures universal? In semiotics -- the study of symbols as forms of communication -- the more sophisticated a society the greater the need for symbols, especially simple ones to quickly communicate. A national flag is one such example of that need.

The middle finger is unique to Western cultures as a gesture of insult. The backhanded V is also a gesture of insult but unique to the Brits and former colonies. I use it in the States and not many recognize it. US Prez B41 unknowingly used it in Australia in 1992.

A raised fist is always recognized by any culture at any time as a symbol of strength, defiance, power, and authority. Both shoulders shrugged are also universal as a sign of surrender to a situation, often accompanied by both palms up.

A raised open right palm is always recognized as a sign of peace, as in no weapons wielded.

There is not much you can do with your eyes. They are physically constrained to only 2D movements. So why is rolling them up recognized as a sign of exasperation at a situation?

jdDbOhu.jpg


In the context of the situation, it was indeed 'epic'. :lol:
A eye roll threat the stability of the system? lol how desperate you guys are? If they caught her farting, is that means China system will collapse?:rofl:
 
Last edited:
. . .
That eye rolling was indeed funny as hell because the question the lady in red asked was rather boring. :lol:

Next time, I would like to suggest her to ask some tough questions such as why Chinese railways derail every few weeks and why Chinese navy vessels get hit by snail pace commercial vessels so often.

Errr, wait a minute ... sorry, wrong country. :partay:
 
.
what? China's political gather is a sham? I thought kicking Tillerson out of the White House and the majority of the initial staff exposes the instability of US politics. :lol: Damn even Tillerson's aide is now out on the street looking for a new job for being honest. :rofl:
 
. . .
That eye rolling was indeed funny as hell because the question the lady in red asked was rather boring. :lol:

Next time, I would like to suggest her to ask some tough questions such as why Chinese railways derail every few weeks and why Chinese navy vessels get hit by snail pace commercial vessels so often.

Errr, wait a minute ... sorry, wrong country. :partay:

making excuses for your masters
 
.
That eye rolling was indeed funny as hell because the question the lady in red asked was rather boring. :lol:

Next time, I would like to suggest her to ask some tough questions such as why Chinese railways derail every few weeks and why Chinese navy vessels get hit by snail pace commercial vessels so often.

Errr, wait a minute ... sorry, wrong country. :partay:
:rofl:
 
. .
Oh the usual hyenas and jelly diaspora grapes are trying to spin the meme into China bashing "on behalf of the Chinese people". Who would have tought :rolleyes:
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom