What's new

The DRDO report card

pm modi

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
87
Reaction score
-2
CGDA secret audit blows the lid off several other projects

Nirbhay missile

Aeronautical Development Establishment (ADE BANGALORE): In December 2010, a project for ‘additional development flight trials of Nirbhay’ was sanctioned costing Rs 18.1 crore . This was overlapping with an ongoing project codenamed Nirbhay sanctioned in 2004 at a cost of Rs 48 Crore.

“Old projects PDC has not been extended nor has it been successfully closed. The sanction of Rs 18.1 crore as a new project was inappropriate,” the audit said.

In one of its observation on the same project, the audit said “The case also raises questions on the way project proposals are put up for sanction. How original proposal to develop NIRBHAY exclude its trial? No research and development project can be sanctioned without inclusion of trial of the developed products.”

Arjun tank

Integrated Arjun tank program was sanctioned to CVRDE in November 2010 at a cost of Rs 69.90 crore. However, several small projects have been sanctioned under ‘buildup’. Audit reports reveal that it was done to avoid going through competent financial authority, which is contrary to financial regulations.

NAG missile

DRDO sanctioned another project at a cost of Rs 28.35 crore while cabinet committee on security approved programme to develop NAG missile is still going on.

UAV Aerostat project

It was sanctioned by DRDO at a cost of Rs 49.82 crore by reducing the cost proposed by the lab (Rs 70 crore) so as to bring it just under Rs 50 crore, which is its sanctioning power.

Facet

Facility for Electro-Optical System Testing (FACET) was sanctioned at a cost of Rs 35 crore by DG DRDO to create a facility, which is essentially required to meet the objectives of an already sanctioned project. However, the old project’s cost was not revised with the approval of appropriate CFA.

Flop show

Akash, NAG & Trishul missiles

The troika of integrated Guided Missile Development Plan (IGDMP) failed to fire after burning thousands of crore taxpayer’s money for almost 30 years. Akash which started in 1983 failed to meet requirements of army but after some hard bargaining Air force inducted it in its arsenal.

NAG, failed the 53rd test in August 2012. The project was started at an original cost of Rs 388.83 Crore in 1983, which was later revised to Rs 1,771.43 Crore. Indian army was forced to buy costly Javelin missile from USA in 2009 after DRDO failed to develop the project even after 29 years. After successive failures, Trishul was officially shelved in 2008. It is now reduced as a technology demonstrator by the DRDO.

AGNI

The AGNI project was launched in 1983. The DRDO borrowed ISRO’s PSLV rocket to enhance firepower after it failed the initial tests before 1994. AGNI series of Missiles AGNI I and AGNI II with a range of 700 km and 2,500 km were inducted in the armed forces after successful tests. AGNI III with a range of 3,500 km is expected to be inducted in the army soon.

Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence in its report in March 2012 observed that the maximum range of the missiles that have been handed over to the army is 25 km only. Government in its reply to the committee had stated that the Indian army is currently in the process of procurement of advanced long range missile system and upgradation of certain existing weapon platform.

LCA

The LCA project, launched in 1983,is still waiting for final flight. The DRDO failed to develop promised indigenous engine even after spending over Rs 17,000 crore. It is expected to achieve the lasted deadline by December 2013.

Consider the three biggest projects: developing a Main Battle Tank (MBT), a nuclear-powered submarine, and an advanced Light Combat Aircraft (LCA). The MBT project was launched in 1974. But the tank has failed to meet service-requirement tests. It is reportedly too heavy and undependable to be used in combat. The Indian Army prefers Russian tanks and says it will use MBTs for training, not operations. The nuclear submarine project, launched 31 years ago, is not yet finished despite an estimated Rs 3,000 crore spent on it. The reactor is apparently ready, but not tested with the vessel’s hull.

Kaveri Engine

The CAG in its annual report 2010-11 noted that government had already spent Rs 1,892 crore on Kaveri Engine development programme launched in 1986 to power the Light Combat Aircraft, Tejas. In 2005, the GTRE had indicated that it would not be able to develop the Kaveri engine on its own. Defence Minister AK Antony has told Parliament that the DRDO still has no time-frame to fully develop its Kaveri engine. He also said that the engine will be used in UAVs and marine applications.
http://newindianexpress.com/magazine/article599007.ece
 
.
Akash, NAG & Trishul missiles


NAG, failed the 53rd test in August 2012. The project was started at an original cost of Rs 388.83 Crore in 1983, which was later revised to Rs 1,771.43 Crore. Indian army was forced to buy costly Javelin missile from USA in 2009 after DRDO failed to develop the project even after 29 years. After successive failures, Trishul was officially shelved in 2008. It is now reduced as a technology demonstrator by the DRDO.



The DRDO report card - The New Indian Express

something fishy in this article, as the recent media report indicate, we have no javelin ATGM'S
 
. .
Govt PSUs like DRDO,ISRO,HAL,ADA.OFB etc are just another MGNREG(Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee) type welfare scheme to provide the employment to engineers/scientists/and other educated illiterates churned out by indian universities who are not employable anywhere.Its generally the GoI's gift to educated illitrate indian middle class of india.Above scathing article about PSUs posted by OP confirms this view.

But these same middle class howl when govt provide welfare schemes like MGNREG to poor people.
 
.
A bull sh!t report produced by illiterates.
1.Akash MkI has secured 5+ billion $ worth of order with MkII under development.

2.Nag was cleared for production but the NAMIKA was not ready.
And how can Nag be replaced by Javeline when both are different systems meant for different methods of operation.

And so called recent 'failure' of Nag was attributed to the inexperience of the soldiers.In both cases,they fired the missiles prematurely before the lock on data received by the thermal imager could be fed to the Nags' seekers.No wonder the missiles failed to hit their targets.But this ignorant author missed everything.
 
. .
:rofl: so the maximum range of missile which army oprates is just 25 km? even ''pinka'' have longer range( 40km). :hitwall: so CAG is coming of fire brahmosh which hv range of 290 km? akash failed ? :P last i checked indian armed forces have ordered 3000 missiles. :cheesy: this report card couldn't get more stupid.;) but ajtr seems to enjoying india bashing aka trolling.
 
.
What is the title of the report.

Trying to find it in CGDA website

Besides no other news source seems to be reporting this.
 
.
CGDA secret audit blows the lid off several other projects

Nirbhay missile

Aeronautical Development Establishment (ADE BANGALORE): In December 2010, a project for ‘additional development flight trials of Nirbhay’ was sanctioned costing Rs 18.1 crore . This was overlapping with an ongoing project codenamed Nirbhay sanctioned in 2004 at a cost of Rs 48 Crore.

“Old projects PDC has not been extended nor has it been successfully closed. The sanction of Rs 18.1 crore as a new project was inappropriate,” the audit said.

In one of its observation on the same project, the audit said “The case also raises questions on the way project proposals are put up for sanction. How original proposal to develop NIRBHAY exclude its trial? No research and development project can be sanctioned without inclusion of trial of the developed products.”

Arjun tank

Integrated Arjun tank program was sanctioned to CVRDE in November 2010 at a cost of Rs 69.90 crore. However, several small projects have been sanctioned under ‘buildup’. Audit reports reveal that it was done to avoid going through competent financial authority, which is contrary to financial regulations.

NAG missile

DRDO sanctioned another project at a cost of Rs 28.35 crore while cabinet committee on security approved programme to develop NAG missile is still going on.

UAV Aerostat project

It was sanctioned by DRDO at a cost of Rs 49.82 crore by reducing the cost proposed by the lab (Rs 70 crore) so as to bring it just under Rs 50 crore, which is its sanctioning power.

Facet

Facility for Electro-Optical System Testing (FACET) was sanctioned at a cost of Rs 35 crore by DG DRDO to create a facility, which is essentially required to meet the objectives of an already sanctioned project. However, the old project’s cost was not revised with the approval of appropriate CFA.

Flop show

Akash, NAG & Trishul missiles

The troika of integrated Guided Missile Development Plan (IGDMP) failed to fire after burning thousands of crore taxpayer’s money for almost 30 years. Akash which started in 1983 failed to meet requirements of army but after some hard bargaining Air force inducted it in its arsenal.

NAG, failed the 53rd test in August 2012. The project was started at an original cost of Rs 388.83 Crore in 1983, which was later revised to Rs 1,771.43 Crore. Indian army was forced to buy costly Javelin missile from USA in 2009 after DRDO failed to develop the project even after 29 years. After successive failures, Trishul was officially shelved in 2008. It is now reduced as a technology demonstrator by the DRDO.

AGNI

The AGNI project was launched in 1983. The DRDO borrowed ISRO’s PSLV rocket to enhance firepower after it failed the initial tests before 1994. AGNI series of Missiles AGNI I and AGNI II with a range of 700 km and 2,500 km were inducted in the armed forces after successful tests. AGNI III with a range of 3,500 km is expected to be inducted in the army soon.

Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence in its report in March 2012 observed that the maximum range of the missiles that have been handed over to the army is 25 km only. Government in its reply to the committee had stated that the Indian army is currently in the process of procurement of advanced long range missile system and upgradation of certain existing weapon platform.

LCA

The LCA project, launched in 1983,is still waiting for final flight. The DRDO failed to develop promised indigenous engine even after spending over Rs 17,000 crore. It is expected to achieve the lasted deadline by December 2013.

Consider the three biggest projects: developing a Main Battle Tank (MBT), a nuclear-powered submarine, and an advanced Light Combat Aircraft (LCA). The MBT project was launched in 1974. But the tank has failed to meet service-requirement tests. It is reportedly too heavy and undependable to be used in combat. The Indian Army prefers Russian tanks and says it will use MBTs for training, not operations. The nuclear submarine project, launched 31 years ago, is not yet finished despite an estimated Rs 3,000 crore spent on it. The reactor is apparently ready, but not tested with the vessel’s hull.

Kaveri Engine

The CAG in its annual report 2010-11 noted that government had already spent Rs 1,892 crore on Kaveri Engine development programme launched in 1986 to power the Light Combat Aircraft, Tejas. In 2005, the GTRE had indicated that it would not be able to develop the Kaveri engine on its own. Defence Minister AK Antony has told Parliament that the DRDO still has no time-frame to fully develop its Kaveri engine. He also said that the engine will be used in UAVs and marine applications.
The DRDO report card - The New Indian Express



What a shitty report. I doubt the intentions of the author. The arguments of the reports are baseless and questionable.

1. Nirbhay : Nirbhay is scheduled to have it's first flight test in the month of december,2012 but due to some changes made in the laucher it might get delayed by 2-3 months.
Questioning DRDO for giving the proposal of the project cost without the inclusion of trial can also be counter question by where on earth a new missile system is given to build with just $ 9.8 million sanction amount.

2. Arjun Tank : DRDO were given to build a third gen tank to counter M1 Abram. Thus, they had to jump to third gen tank by skipping 2 gen & 2.5 gen tanks which take time. M1 Abram also is a heavy weight tank. And adding to that a requirement of four persons inside a tank compared to 3 on lighter weight T-90 needs inner space to be made bigger which automatically rises weight.
And weight is a **** of a issue which army is putting to favour T-90. Arjun has already outgun T-90 on every parameter and as far as weight is concerned, it is not the weight but the ground pressure which matters for a tank to move freely where again arjun's ground pressure is lesser.

3. Nag missile : Nag missile is ready from last one year but the problem is with NAMICA. And in the recent test held in the month of August, army mistakenly fired the missile before locking it on to the target which resulted in a failure. Thus DRDO can't be blame for the fault of the army.

4. Akash : Akash has already been inducted and a total of 2846 Akash missiles is on order(2000 by IA & 846 by IAF).
Army is highly impressed by the performance of Akash.

5. Agni : Agni is one of the most successful programme of DRDO for which the world lauds DRDO. Agni III can only be inducted if produced in sufficient number and not one or two. All the test parameters are positive, only the infrastructure is not in placed to produce 10 missiles a year. Successful launch of agni-iv and agni-v has proved DRDO's ability to produce world class BM.

6. LCA : It is a questionable project for DRDO where DRDO has to take the blame for the delays. LCA mk-1 should have been inducted by now but now we can't see it getting inducted before late 2014 or early 2015. But again IAF also has to take the blame for not being closely associated with the project and changing it's requirement several times.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom