What's new

The Confessions of Dr Moeed Pirzada

.
This is Khan.....Facing all these

View attachment 847004

What about the neutral generals?

The bald thief in London is not innocent. We don't need compromised journalists to tell us they made a mistake and who cares if they did? Was he a judge?
The judges ruled correctly since Ganja never showed proof how he bought the apartments in London. He has looted Pakistan many times and even got an NRO from Musharraf and started looting again with a fresh slate.

That's the truly incredible thing. The disconnect from reality is so severe, the moral compass so skewed, that they don't even realize their sins. They repeat them even when they got opportunities to mend their ways and gain respect. Truly astonishing.
 
. . . . .
. .
Simple reality in Pakistani politics is this, military for too long has been the guiding hand of Pakistani politics, they have brought those people in power who can serve them, and serve the society which they have created.

They dont care about stronger judicial system, stronger and corruption free police as that will make them the target.

Just look how they have dealt with these so called group that after fighting for a decade Pakistan with a standing force of 700K soldiers is forced to ask ceasefire and agree and hand back terrorist you gota see something is wrong somewhere.

Because of social medias power naked truth is out, Pakistani people blindly supported establishment but now they are openly watching what they have been doing in past and what did with a elected leader.
 
.
He loves Shahbaz sharif too ...(call him workaholic)
Which to me shows something is wrong in his head
 
. .
All sell-outs. Changing tune with the times. "We were mislead"? Really? This is your intellectual capacity that you were so easily mislead?
 
.
For all those basing their opinions on the twitter clip, please watch the video attached. Mati did a cut and paste job and it does not capture Moeed’s opinions.

The point that Peerzada is making, and I agree with him, is that the judiciary has always been suspicious and functions to protect elite capture. They are not actually interested in curbing corruption- which is not an issue for them.

Moeed makes the point that the JIT wrote 10 volumes, 1000 pages of hard evidence against NS and in the end, the SC knew that Nawaz had no money trail (for they asked for it numerous times), and yet they disqualified him on the job he had in Dubai. And then referred his case to NAB to make the judgement. The judge there, that we now know was meeting NS, and was getting blackmailed by him, passes a judgment finding him guilty on the case for which there was less evidence and letting him go on the case where there was more evidence against NS. And then he gets exposed by the video for meeting with NS and then he releases his statement on blackmail and then he suspiciously falls dead.

As they say, something is wrong in the state of Denmark. Additionally, the point that the judiciary is shady, is in no way to reduce the argument that NS and his brother, PML-N leaders, are guilty as hell.

That is without a shadow of a doubt. But the judiciary seemed to have set aside hard evidence against NS when it wanted to. That’s the bullshit in this.
 
.
For all those basing their opinions on the twitter clip, please watch the video attached. Mati did a cut and paste job and it does not capture Moeed’s opinions.

The point that Peerzada is making, and I agree with him, is that the judiciary has always been suspicious and functions to protect elite capture. They are not actually interested in curbing corruption- which is not an issue for them.

Moeed makes the point that the JIT wrote 10 volumes, 1000 pages of hard evidence against NS and in the end, the SC knew that Nawaz had no money trail (for they asked for it numerous times), and yet they disqualified him on the job he had in Dubai. And then referred his case to NAB to make the judgement. The judge there, that we now know was meeting NS, and was getting blackmailed by him, passes a judgment finding him guilty on the case for which there was less evidence and letting him go on the case where there was more evidence against NS. And then he gets exposed by the video for meeting with NS and then he releases his statement on blackmail and then he suspiciously falls dead.

As they say, something is wrong in the state of Denmark. Additionally, the point that the judiciary is shady, is in no way to reduce the argument that NS and his brother, PML-N leaders, are guilty as hell.

That is without a shadow of a doubt. But the judiciary seemed to have set aside hard evidence against NS when it wanted to. That’s the bullshit in this.

How have I not come across you on the forum before?

So glad to have new(ish) members who actually 'get' things. Thanks for pointing all of this out.

Pakistanis are low on integrative complexity, and therefore tend to think in black-and-white / binary terms and often miss out on critical aspects that require nuance to appreciate.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom