What's new

The 12 countries that spend the highest proportion of GDP on their military

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
gettyimages-74417865.jpg

A US soldier.Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The United States regularly has the world's highest military expenditure, and upped its budget to $603 billion (£467 billion) this year.

But when military spend is looked at as a percentage of a country's gross domestic product (GDP), the picture is different.

This measurement looks at the relative size of a country's miltary spending, rather than comparing budgets.

Keep scrolling for the top 12 countries.


12. Yemen — 4.02% of GDP
12-yemen--402-of-gdp.jpg

Forensic experts investigate the scene at the community hall where Saudi-led warplanes struck a funeral in Sanaa, the capital of Yemen, October 9, 2016. Khaled Abdullah/Reuters
Population: 27.4 million (48th in the world)

18 is the legal minimum age for voluntary military service, but over 40% of Yemen's population is 14 or younger, and the median age is 19.2.

Yemen has been gripped by civil war since 2014, when Houthi rebels took much of the country by force. In response, Saudi Arabia and its Arab allies — with assistance from the United States and the UK — launched a drone strike campaign in an attempt to retake territory from the rebels.

Yemen is currently suffering a famine, which the UN has called the world's largest hunger crisis, and an outbreak of cholera.

11. Lebanon — 4.04% of GDP
11-lebanon--404-of-gdp.jpg

Hundreds of Syrian families wait to register at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees headquarters in Beirut, Lebanon, on Jan. 30, 2017.AP/ Hassan Ammar
Population: 6.2 million (108th in the world)

The legal minimum age for voluntary military service is between 17 and 30, and there is no conscription.

Parts of Lebanon are still controlled by Hezbollah — a Shi'a Islamist military group and political party, named as a terrorist organisation by the European Union. Hezbollah was involved in a war with Israel in 2006.

Meanwhile, in 2012 the Syrian conflict spilled into Lebanon, and tensions and violence in the country escalated. According to the UN refugee agency, there are now over one million Syrian refugees in Lebanon.

10. Armenia — 4.1% of GDP
10-armenia--41-of-gdp.jpg

Protesters gesture as a riot police vehicle sprays a jet of water to disperse them during a rally against a recent decision to raise public electricity prices in Yerevan, Armenia, June 23, 2015. The protest started on Monday, when about 5,000 demonstrators marched to the presidential headquarters, as they rallied against a recent decision to raise public electricity prices, but were stopped by riot police. The protesters began a sit-in protest, blocking traffic on a central boulevard. Police asked demonstrators to leave the road but they refused. Reuters/Vahram Baghdasaryan/Photolure
Population: 3.1 million (136th in the world)

People between the ages of 18 and 27 are eligible to volunteer for military service, and there is a two-year mandatory conscription period for men.

On Tuesday the Azerbaijani Defence Ministry reported that Armenia's military forces had violated a ceasefire between the two nations 128 times in 24 hours.

This conflict began in 1988 when Armenia tried to take Azerbaijani territory. The ceasefire was agreed in 1994 following peace negotiations, but tensions remain in the Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh region, which has an ethnic Armenian majority.

Last year, violent protests erupted in Armenia's capital, with armed protestors demanding the resignation of President Serzh Sarkisian and the release of opposition leader Jirair Sefilian.

9. USA — 4.35% of GDP
9-usa--435-of-gdp.jpg

TAJI, IRAQ - APRIL 12: U.S. Army trainers speak with Iraqi Army recruits at a military base on April 12, 2015 in Taji, Iraq. Members of the U.S. Army's 5-73 CAV, 3BCT, 82nd Airborne Division are teaching members of the newly-formed 15th Division of the Iraqi Army, as the Iraqi government launches offensives to try to recover territory lost to ISIS last year.Getty Images
Population: 324 million (4th in the world)

The legal minimum age for voluntary military service in the United States is 18, or 17 with parental consent. In 2011, the US Department of Defence said the country had active military troops stationed in nearly 150 countries.

Most recently and most prominently, US forces have been involved in airstrikes and raids in Yemen,, Syria and Iraq. US forces have been criticised for civilian deaths in all three countries.

The election of President Donald Trump has caused concerns that US military intervention in the Middle East is set to increase. In May, the US budget increased military spending by $15 billion, below the $54 billion Trump called for in March.

8. Algeria — 4.48% of GDP
8-algeria-448-of-gdp.jpg

President Abdelaziz Bouteflika.Thomson Reuters
Population: 40.3 million (34th in the world)

The legal age for military service is 17, and men are conscripted for 18 months between the ages of 19 and 30.

Algeria suffered a civil war beginning in 1992, sparked by a military coup against the Islamic Salvation Front. The war led to the deaths of more than 100,000 people, with thousands more missing. In 1999 President Abdelaziz Bouteflika, who still rules Algeria, agreed a peace deal with the rebels and banned the Islamic Salvation Front party.

In June, Algeria joined Egypt and Tunisia in calling for political dialogue to end the crisis in neighbouring Libya, rejecting a military solution.

7. Jordan — 4.65% of GDP
7-jordan--465-of-gdp.jpg

A Jordanian soldier carries a Syrian refugee child to help him board a Jordanian army vehicleThomson Reuters
Population: 8.2 million (97th in the world)

Jordanians must be 17 to join the military, and conscription for men was reintroduced in 2007.

In 2014 Jordan's national airline introduced new restrictions on travel for men of military age, in preparation for military action against Islamic jihadists in Iraq and Syria. The biggest age group in the country is 0-14, and the median age is 22.3.

In June, Germany announced it would move its military forces from Turkey to Jordan following a diplomatic dispute.

Jordan is a close military ally of the US and holds a strategically important position between Iraq and Syria.



6. Azerbaijan — 4.7% of GDP
6-azerbaijan--47-of-gdp.jpg

A house which was damaged during clashes between Armenian and Azeri forces is seen in Nagorno-Karabakh region, which is controlled by separatist Armenians, in this still image taken from video provided by Nagorno-Karabakh region Defence Ministry April 2, 2016.REUTERS/Nagorno-Karabakh Military Handout via Reuters TV
Population: 9.9 million (92nd in the world)

Men between 18 and 35 are required to perform military service for 18 months, or for 12 months if they are university graduates.

The landlocked region of Nagorno-Karabakh remains disputed territory between Azerbaijan and Armenia.

A ceasefire, brokered in 1994, was violated severely last year when troops marched on the region and hostilities heated up. Azerbaijan also said Armenia had broken it 128 times in 24 hours on Tuesday.

5. Israel — 5.69% of GDP
5-israel--569-of-gdp.jpg

Two Israeli Border Police officers detain Palestinian photographer Shadi Hatem, during a protest organized by activists in support of Palestinian prisoners in the Israeli jails, in front of the Israeli Ofer prison, near the West Bank city of Ramallah, Wednesday, August 3, 2016.Nasser Shiyoukhi/AP
Population: 8.2 million (99th in the world)

Both men and women must do military service, although men must serve for longer (32 months compared to women's 24 months).

Israel has been locked in a conflict over territory with neighbouring Palestine for years, despite numerous attempts by international forces to broker a peace agreement. Israelis have ruled over Palestinians in the West Bank, in the east of Israel, and eastern Jerusalem since 1967, and low-level fighting between the two sides are ongoing.

US President Donald Trump boasted before his election that he could help broker a peace deal between the two nations, but reports from June suggested he may be considering pulling out of the process.

4. Saudi Arabia — 7.98% of GDP
4-saudi-arabia--798-of-gdp.jpg

Saudi youths demonstrate a stunt known as "sidewall skiing" (driving on two wheels) in the northern city of Hail, in Saudi Arabia March 30, 2013.Reuters
Population: 28.2 million (47th in the world)

The minimum legal age for men (women are not permitted) to join the military in Saudi Arabia is 17, and there is no conscription.

In May, oil-rich Saudi Arabia signed a $110 billion weapons deal with the United States, which included items that had been put on hold under the Obama administration due to concerns about civilian deaths in Saudi's attacks on Yemen.

The British government has also been criticised for continuing to sell arms to Saudi, despite civilian deaths in Yemeni raids.

Saudi and its allies in the Middle East cut diplomatic ties with and imposed sanctions on Qatar earlier in June, after accusing the country of supporting extremism. After issuing an ultimatum last week, Saudi announced on Wednesday that it had received a response, and would reply in due course.



3. Oman — 8.61% of GDP
3-oman--861-of-gdp.jpg

Oman's leader Sultan Qaboos bin Said.REUTERS/Fadi Al-Assaad
Population: 3.4 million (134th in the world)

The legal age for voluntary military service is between 18 and 30, and there is no conscription.

The UK sold £2.5 billion worth of weapons to Oman, a close ally, in 2013, and the UK government has a military base in Oman's Duqm Port complex. But human rights campaigners have criticised the UK's support for the country: Human Rights Watch says Oman does not permit freedom of expression, discriminates against women and allows the abuse and exploitation of migrant workers.

2. Iraq — 8.7% of GDP
2-iraq--87-of-gdp.jpg

A member of the Counter Terrorism Service walks past the ruined Grand al-Nuri Mosque in the Old City in MosulThomson Reuters
Population: 38.1 million (37th in the world)

The median age in Iraq is 19.9, and military service is open to those aged between 18 and 40. There is no conscription.

Military spending in Iraq has increased considerably since 2011, when it stood at 3.18% of GDP.

Iraq was ravaged by war between 2003 and 2011, that began following an invasion by a United States-led coalition to topple Saddam Hussein. The UK's Chilcot inquiry has since condemned the war as unnecessary since Hussein did not pose an immediate threat to the UK and intelligence reports that he had weapons of mass destruction were false.

The governments that have held power in Iraq since Hussein have battled to keep order, and the country is still suffering violence and instability. In 2014, ISIS seized large parts of the country. Much of this territory has since been regained, but thousands of people have been displaced in the conflict.

1. South Sudan — 10.32% of GDP
1-south-sudan--1032-of-gdp.jpg

A South Sudanese man holds a gun in his village.Flickr/Steve Evans
Population: 12.3 million (75th in the world)

The median age in South Sudan is 17.1, and over 44% of the population is between the age of 0 and 14. However, charity UNICEF estimates that more than 17,000 child soldiers have been used to help fight the country's civil war, which began in 2013. Despite this, 18 is the legal minimum age for both compulsory and voluntary military service.

The war erupted after President Salva Kiir accused his former vice-president of plotting a coup. Although a ceasefire was brokered in 2014, it has been repeatedly broken.

The war has caused over one million people to be displaced, and reports suggest civilians are being routinely targeted. In December 2016, the UN said ethnic cleansing was occurring in some parts of the country.

In February, the UN formally declared a famine in parts of South Sudan, warning that 100,000 people were facing starvation and over a million were on the brink of famine. In May, the President declared a ceasefire, but the violence has continued.


http://www.businessinsider.com/12-c...rcentage-of-gdp-2017-7/#12-yemen-402-of-gdp-1
 
.
The thing with 'as per cent of GDP is' that it is x/y . So, to get a large outcome, you either make X large in comparison to a given Y (i.e lets compare countries with a similar Y to see how they differ in X e.g. what are the policy choices made by rich countries in this respect) or you're stuck with a certain minimum level of spending X necessary to maintain some level of defence, related to what may be a small or a large GPD (this is how poor countries end up in the above article) .

In short, you need both the absolute and the relative measure. Not sure where the above got their data!

800px-2014_militrary_expenditures_absolute.svg.png


2017 Fact Sheet (for 2016)
SIPRI Military Expenditure Database
Country / US$ Billion
1 United States 611.2
2 China 215.7
3 Russia 69.2
4 Saudi Arabia 63.7
5 India 55.9
6 France 55.7
7 United Kingdom 48.3
8 Japan 46.1
9 Germany 41.1
10 South Korea 36.8
11 Italy 27.9
12 Australia 24.3
13 Brazil 22.8
14 United Arab Emirates 22.8
15 Israel 17.8
16 Canada 15.5
17 Spain 14.9
18 Turkey 14.9
19 Iran 12.3
20 Algeria 10.6

800px-Countries_by_Military_expenditures_%28%25_of_GDP%29_in_2014_v2.svg.png


2017 Fact Sheet (for 2016)
SIPRI Military Expenditure Database
Country / Percent of GDP
1. Oman 16.7
2. Saudi Arabia10
3 Algeria 6.7
4 Kuwait 6.5
5 Israel 5.8
6 United Arab Emirates 5.7
7 Russia 5.3
8a Singapore 3.4
8b Pakistan 3.4
8c Colombia 3.4
9 United States 3.3
10 Iran 3.0
11 South Korea 2.7
12 India 2.5
13 France 2.3
14a Australia 2.0
14b Turkey 2.0
14c Poland 2.0
15a China 1.9
15b United Kingdom 1.9
15c Republic of China 1.9

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures
 
.
2017 Fact Sheet (for 2016)
SIPRI Military Expenditure Database
Country / US$ Billion
1 United States 611.2
2 China 215.7
3 Russia 69.2
Above data on most other nations are from official sources, but data on China is SIPRI own estimate. China 2016 defence expenditure (DoD only; Excluding Ministry of State Security, intelligence agencies, CNSA or any non-military functions) was ¥954.354 billion, that's roughly US$140 billion, far lower than SIPRI estimate. For apple-to-apple comparison, let's stay with official data.

http://www.cankaoxiaoxi.com/china/20160305/1092377.shtml
http://www.southmoney.com/redianxinwen/201701/1022872.html
15a China 1.9
Accordingly, China 2016 defence expenditure should be as low as 1.28% of GDP, the nation is running a peace time economy, not war time economy nor gearing towards it.
 
Last edited:
.
The thing with 'as per cent of GDP is' that it is x/y . So, to get a large outcome, you either make X large in comparison to a given Y (i.e lets compare countries with a similar Y to see how they differ in X e.g. what are the policy choices made by rich countries in this respect) or you're stuck with a certain minimum level of spending X necessary to maintain some level of defence, related to what may be a small or a large GPD (this is how poor countries end up in the above article) .

In short, you need both the absolute and the relative measure. Not sure where the above got their data!

800px-2014_militrary_expenditures_absolute.svg.png


2017 Fact Sheet (for 2016)
SIPRI Military Expenditure Database
Country / US$ Billion
1 United States 611.2
2 China 215.7
3 Russia 69.2
4 Saudi Arabia 63.7
5 India 55.9
6 France 55.7
7 United Kingdom 48.3
8 Japan 46.1
9 Germany 41.1
10 South Korea 36.8
11 Italy 27.9
12 Australia 24.3
13 Brazil 22.8
14 United Arab Emirates 22.8
15 Israel 17.8
16 Canada 15.5
17 Spain 14.9
18 Turkey 14.9
19 Iran 12.3
20 Algeria 10.6

800px-Countries_by_Military_expenditures_%28%25_of_GDP%29_in_2014_v2.svg.png


2017 Fact Sheet (for 2016)
SIPRI Military Expenditure Database
Country / Percent of GDP
1. Oman 16.7
2. Saudi Arabia10
3 Algeria 6.7
4 Kuwait 6.5
5 Israel 5.8
6 United Arab Emirates 5.7
7 Russia 5.3
8a Singapore 3.4
8b Pakistan 3.4
8c Colombia 3.4
9 United States 3.3
10 Iran 3.0
11 South Korea 2.7
12 India 2.5
13 France 2.3
14a Australia 2.0
14b Turkey 2.0
14c Poland 2.0
15a China 1.9
15b United Kingdom 1.9
15c Republic of China 1.9

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures

Above data is wrong, Pakistan spend 2.6% on defence.

Pakistan defence budget 2016-17 $8 billion which is 2.62% of $305B GDP.
 
.
Above data on most other nations are from official sources, but data on China is SIPRI own estimate. China 2016 defence expenditure (DoD only; Excluding Ministry of State Security, intelligence agencies, CNSA or any non-military functions) was ¥954.354 billion, that's roughly US$140 billion, far lower than SIPRI estimate. For apple-to-apple comparison, let's stay with official data.

http://www.cankaoxiaoxi.com/china/20160305/1092377.shtml
http://www.southmoney.com/redianxinwen/201701/1022872.html

Accordingly, China 2016 defence expenditure should be as low as 1.28% of GDP, the nation is running a peace time economy, not war time economy nor gearing towards it.
Yes, but it is 'common knowledge' China has a degree of hidden expenditure, i.e. hidden in other budgets than the defence budget. Sipri doesn't do this for no good reasons.

Above data is wrong, Pakistan spend 2.6% on defence.

Pakistan defence budget 2016-17 $8 billion which is 2.62% of $305B GDP.
See the commentary about the Chinese defence budget: I'm sure, when you go look up, Sipri has a good reason for putting that number.
 
.
See the commentary about the Chinese defence budget: I'm sure, when you go look up, Sipri has a good reason for putting that number.

I don't know about China budget but know about Pakistan.
 
.
Yes, but it is 'common knowledge' China has a degree of hidden expenditure, i.e. hidden in other budgets than the defence budget. Sipri doesn't do this for no good reasons.
Whatever SIPRI intentions are we can guess but only they know best, about 45% of SIPRI's annual budget came from Swedish government but not sure where the rest came from, you have details about who are backing them? Please share if there's any, thanks.

Yes, indeed it's common knowledge that nations carry out military activities through departments like intelligence agencies (e.g. CIA), outsourcing to BlackWater, cyber-warfare agencies (e.g. NSA), foreign affairs (e.g. foreign “aid”), space agencies, energy admin (e.g. DOE) or even anti-narcotics agencies. If SIPRI uses "estimate" on China military spend, I wonder what how much will that be in same measurement of US? That's why let's compare apple-to-apple, DoD to DoD.
 
Last edited:
.
Whatever SIPRI intentions are we can guess but only they know best, about 45% of SIPRI's annual budget came from Swedish government but not sure where the rest came from, you have details about who are backing them? Please share if there's any, thanks.

Yes, indeed it's common knowledge that nations carry out military activities through departments like intelligence agencies (e.g. CIA), outsourcing to BlackWater, cyber-warfare agencies (e.g. NSA), foreign affairs (e.g. foreign “aid”), space agencies, energy admin (e.g. DOE) or even anti-narcotics agencies. If SIPRI uses "estimate" on China military spend, I wonder what how much will that be in same measurement of US? That's why let's compare apple-to-apple, DoD to DoD.
Funding: See for yourself at https://www.sipri.org/about/funding
Method: See for yourself at https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex/sources-and-methods

If anyone can suggest anything better (more reliable data, better methods, greater independence) as a source than e.g. Sipri, please do. If you can't, don't question them.

Also, please provide the motivation for Sipri to 'exaggerate' data for one country and 'make smaller' that for another (keeping in mind it is an institution that sinks or swims on being perceived as professional and neutral).
 
.
China spends $450 Billion on defense for $12 Trillion GDP which translates to 3.75% of their GDP
 
.
Funding: See for yourself at https://www.sipri.org/about/funding
Method: See for yourself at https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex/sources-and-methods

If anyone can suggest anything better (more reliable data, better methods, greater independence) as a source than e.g. Sipri, please do. If you can't, don't question them.

Also, please provide the motivation for Sipri to 'exaggerate' data for one country and 'make smaller' that for another (keeping in mind it is an institution that sinks or swims on being perceived as professional and neutral).
So SIPRI is indeed heavily funded by Sweden, say MFA, SIDA and Gelba Mgmt AB, the three already made up of 92.35% of all, rest almost entirely funded from a few western states. The largest global org in the list, World Bank, constituted only 0.28% of 2016 funding. Good link, now we all know who are funding SIPRI.

Suggest something better? Sure I can: Official defence budgets across the board. All official sources, no method required, no UN org is even needed let alone any "greater independence" party. In fact I have suggested the same since my 1st post here, "let's stay with official data", perhaps you can read again?

It's an observation not motivation: SIPRI itself uses official DoD data for most nations, but uses own estimate on China. Motivation? I'd like to know too, it should be "common knowledge" that US has many spending "hidden" outside DoD, perhaps even NSA alone rivals defence budgets of many countries, why such a knowledge became uncommon to SIPRI?
 
Last edited:
.
Suggest something better? Sure I can: Official defence budgets across the board. All official sources, no method required, no UN org is even needed let alone any "greater independence" party. In fact I have suggested the same since my 1st post here, "let's stay with official data", perhaps you can read again?

It's an observation not motivation: SIPRI itself uses official DoD data for most nations, but uses own estimate on China. Motivation? I'd like to know too, it should be "common knowledge" that US has many spending "hidden" outside DoD, perhaps even NSA alone rivals defence budgets of many countries, why such a knowledge became uncommon to SIPRI?
I see no reason to doubt Sipri. They are far more expert than any of us here.

As for the US budget, please explain why e.g. NSA funding should be included in defence spending. What (if any) indication is there that similar budget items are included in the Chinese case?

When I (not SIPRI) used the 'common knowledge' phrase, I offered that as a possible explanation for the difference between 'their' numbers and some numbers mentioned by people here, not as explanation actually given by Sipri.

So, I suggest to study SIPRI documentation, rather than question SIPRI data to begin with.

I'm not having Chinese censorship up front on this forum thank you.

Sipri's reputation since its inception in 1966 is quite good. SIPRI has built its reputation and standing on competence, professional skills, and the collection of hard data and precise facts, rendering accessible impartial information on weapon developments, arms transfers and production, military expenditure, as well as on arms limitations, reductions and disarmament.

What credentials do you bring to question internationally, professionally recognized Sipri?

(I'ld sooner question https://www.businessinsider.nl)
 
Last edited:
.
I see no reason to doubt Sipri. They are far more expert than any of us here.

As for the US budget, please explain why e.g. NSA funding should be included in defence spending. What (if any) indication is there that similar budget items are included in the Chinese case?

When I (not SIPRI) used the 'common knowledge' phrase, I offered that as a possible explanation for the difference between 'their' numbers and some numbers mentioned by people here, not as explanation actually given by Sipri.

So, I suggest to study SIPRI documentation, rather than question SIPRI data to begin with.

I'm not having Chinese censorship up front on this forum thank you.
What credentials do you bring to question internationally, professionally recognized Sipri?

Futile buddy. Have you ever managed to convince anyone that they MIGHT just be wrong and have them go 'Ohh! yeah you're right maybe, just maybe SIPRI might know more about defence budget spending than me.'

Also, most democratic countries have the tendency to count ex armed forces' pensions and wages as a part of their budget which is not the norm for most people's republic countries.
 
.
So SIPRI is indeed heavily funded by Sweden, say MFA, SIDA and Gelba Mgmt AB, the three already made up of 92.35% of all, rest almost entirely funded from a few western states. The largest global org in the list, World Bank, constituted only 0.28% of 2016 funding. Good link, now we all know who are funding SIPRI.

Suggest something better? Sure I can: Official defence budgets across the board. All official sources, no method required, no UN org is even needed let alone any "greater independence" party. In fact I have suggested the same since my 1st post here, "let's stay with official data", perhaps you can read again?

It's an observation not motivation: SIPRI itself uses official DoD data for most nations, but uses own estimate on China. Motivation? I'd like to know too, it should be "common knowledge" that US has many spending "hidden" outside DoD, perhaps even NSA alone rivals defence budgets of many countries, why such a knowledge became uncommon to SIPRI?
If China was transparent why would countries rely upon SIPRI ?
 
.
As for the US budget, please explain why e.g. NSA funding should be included in defence spending. What (if any) indication is there that similar budget items are included in the Chinese case?

When I (not SIPRI) used the 'common knowledge' phrase, I offered that as a possible explanation for the difference between 'their' numbers and some numbers mentioned by people here, not as explanation actually given by Sipri.

So, I suggest to study SIPRI documentation, rather than question SIPRI data to begin with.
SIPRI uses own estimate on China, let me quote examples:

"Actual PAP spending can be found in the Chinese version of the published expenditure figures up to 2015, while the figures for 2016 is estimated based on the rate of change of the Public Security budget."

"Estimates for additional military RDT&E from 2007–2016 are based on a share of total Central Government appropriations for Science & Technology (S&T). The share is based on information for 2011–14 on the proportion of the S&T budget that is allocated to civilian agencies that disclose their spending in annual reports. The remainder is assumed to be allocated to the agencies that do not disclose annual reports, with military and security significance, and it is estimated that 90% of this is for military purposes. The estimates for 1997–2006 are based on a slightly smaller share of a previous series for Central Government S&T appropriations, which used a different classification system, giving somewhat higher figures than the new system. The estimatesup to 1996 are Professor Wang’s estimates, and are based on a share of overall government Research and Development and Science and Technology budget"

"Estimates for additional military construction are based on a share of the government's capital infrastructure budget. As these figures are not published beyond 2006, estimates for 2007–2016 are based on the average economic growth rate; estimates for arms imports use figures provided by Russia for the value of arms transfers to China for the years where this information is available, as Russia accounts for the vast majority of Chinese arms imports. For the years where these figures are not available, the estimates are based on the rate of change of China's arms imports as measured by the SIPRI Trend Indicator Value (TIV)."

They make a lot of assumptions, say including internal security spending (PAP; People's Armed Police) as military spending. Say assuming a % of Government appropriations for Science & Technology (S&T) is "defence expenditure". They count arms imports, when these expenditures should be CAPEX procurement in PLA official defence budgets. They even counts infrastructure, just assume a % of it is defence spend, seriously? If such SIPRI rationale holds, then why NSA - which is in charge of cyberwarfare - is excluded from total US defence expenditure? US DOE is heavily involved in supercomputer, should they be included in US defence expenditure? NASA? How about CIA operations, or outsourcing monies to BlackWater?

SIPRI make so many assumptions on top of China DoD expenditure but does not apply this "common knowledge" on US, it's a cold hard fact, is it not? So much for a "reputable" predominantly west-funded org, when it comes to US defence expenditure, they report only DoD spend, where is the "common knowledge"?
 
Last edited:
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom