What's new

Tejas Mk2 MRCA’s R & D Effort Gathers Pace

GORKHALI

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Messages
3,689
Reaction score
-9
Tejas Mk2 MRCA’s R & D Effort Gathers Pace

Tejas+LCA+Mk2.jpg

The full-scale engineering development efforts of India’s Tejas Mk2 multi-role combat aircraft (MRCA) recently took a significant step forward when the Bangalore-based Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), in consultation with the Indian Air Force (IAF), froze the MRCA’s design, which will now have a length of 14.2 metres (1-metre more than that of the Tejas Mk1 for incorporationg a stretched nose section and a modified fuselage section aft of the cockpit for housing an expanded complement of mission avionics LRUs), height of 4.6 metres (as opposed to 4.4 metres of the Tejas Mk1) to accommodate an enlarged vertical tail-section, and a wingspan of 8.2 metres—same as that of the Tejas Mk1—that, however, will feature an increased wing area. External stores capacity will be boosted to 5,000kg :woot:(as opposed to 3,500kg for the Tejas Mk1), while the twin internal air-intake ducts will be minimally enlarged to cater to the increased airflow requirements of the 98kN thrust F414-GE-INS6 turbofan built by GE Aero Engines. The Ministry of Defence had, last January, sanctioned US$542.44 million (Rs2,431.55-crore) for ADA to develop the IAF’s Tejas Mk2 variant and the Indian Navy’s LCA Mk2 (Navy) variant so that the first Tejas Mk2 prototype can take to the skies by September 2013 and make this prototype fly by December 2014, following which the MoD-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) would begin series-producing the MRCA by 2016. While the IAF is committed to procuring an initial 83 Tejas Mk2s, the Navy has expressed its firm requirement for 46 LCA Mk2 (Navy). Just like the Tejas Mk1, the airframe of the Tejas Mk2 will incorporate 13 major composites-built structures fabricated by TATA Advanced Materials Ltd (TAML), which was awarded the contract after the state-owned National Aerospace Laboratory (NAL) expressed its failure to deliver the structures on time. Structures to be produced by TAML for each aircraft will include a rudder assembly, fin assembly, 60 carbon-fibre reinforced (CFC) wing spars, 38 wing fuselage fairing skins, 20 wing fuselage fairing blocks, 41 CFC centre fuselage components, two forward undercarriage doors and two aft undercarriage doors.

Vendor selection by the IAF for supplying various sub-systems for the Tejas Mk2 too is gathering pace. What has been confirmed thus far is that the two-way airborne operational data-links (ODL) will be supplied by HAL, which, among other systems, will be supplying a newly-designed mission computer (to cater to the increased processing requirements of the new fire-control system and IDAS), the RAM-1701AS radio altimeter, TACAN-2901AJ and DME-2950A tactical air navigation system combined with the ANS-1100A VOL/ILS marker, CIT-4000A Mk12 IFF transponder, COM-1150A UHF standby comms radio, UHF SATCOM transceiver, and the SDR-2010 SoftNET four-channel software-defined radio (working in VHF/UHF and L-band for voice and data communications), and the Bheem-EU brake control/engine/electrical monitoring system, all of which have been developed in-house by the Hyderabad-based Strategic Electronics R & D Centre of HAL. SAGEM Défense Sécurité will supply the Sigma-95N ring laser gyro-based inertial navigation system coupled to a GPS receiver (which is also on board the Su-30MKI and Tejas Mk1). The open-architecture integrated defensive aids suite (IDAS), which has been under joint development by the DRDO’s Bengaluru-based Defence Avionics Research Establishment (DARE) and Germany-based Cassidian since 2006, will include the AAR-60(V)2 MILDS F missile approach warning system, the EW management computer and Tarang Mk3 radar warning receiver (all to be built by Bharat Electronics Ltd), countermeasures dispenser built by Bharat Dynamics Ltd, and Elettronica of Italy’s Virgilius directional jammers (now being installed on the IAF’s MiG-29UPGs), which make use of active phased-array transmitters for jamming hostile low-band (E-G) and high-band (G-J) emitters. The redesigned digital flight-control computer will be built by BEL, while the HMD chosen is the Dash Mk5 from Elbit Systems. For tactical strike missions, the ‘Tejas’ Mk2 will be equipped with the Litening-3 LDP, supplied by RAFAEL Advanced Defence Systems of Israel. The actuated retractable aerial refuelling probe, mounted on the Tejas Mk2’s starboard cockpit section, will be supplied by UK-based Cobham Mission Equipment. :):)The same vendor will also supply the pneumatic air-to-ground stores ejection systems like release units, practice bomb carriers, multiple stores carriers, AGML-3 triple-rail launchers, and high-velocity ejection launchers, almost all of which are already operational on the IAF’s fleet of BAE Systems Hawk Mk132 lead-in fighter trainers. Cobham will thus join a growing list of foreign vendors associated with both the Tejas Mk1 and Mk2, which include Intertechnique SA, SAFRAN Group’s SAGEM Défense Sécurité subsidiary and IN-LHC ZODIAC of France; US-based GE Aero Engines, Hamilton Sunstrand, EATON Aerospace, MOOG, and Goodrich Aerospace; UK-based CHELTON Avionics, Penny + Giles, and Martin Baker (supplier of Mk 16LG zero-zero ejection seats); Italy’s Secondo Mona; and Germany’s Cassidian and Faure Herman. Indian companies involved include HAL, TAML, Data Patterns Pvt Ltd, Government Tool Room and Training Centre (GT & TC), and SLN Technologies Pvt Ltd.

By the year’s end, the IAF is expected to select the foreign vendor for supplying the integrated fire-control system (including an infra-red search-and-track sensor, or IRST, integrated with an AESA-based multi-mode radar), and a frameless canopy actuation system. The former, which will, in essence, dictate the Tejas Mk2’s combat capabilities, is likely to keenly contested by vendors from the US, France, Israel and Italy. US-based OEM Raytheon intends to offer its RACR AESA-based MMR along with a chin-mounted IRST sensor, while THALES Avionics is likely to propose a scaled-down variant of its RBE-2 AESA-based MMR integrated with the nose-mounted Optronique Secteur Frontal (OSF) IRST, which comprises two optical modules. The right-side module has a long-wave (8-12 micron) infra-red sensor used for target search and track out to 90km in ideal conditions. The left-side module carries a CCD TV camera for daytime target identification. The system also includes a laser rangefinder for use against airborne targets. The OSF is primarily an air-to-air search, track, identification, and localisation sensor, with a limited air-to-ground localisation and identification function as of now. A future enhancement of the OSF will include a night target-identification function (for precision air-to-ground strikes and anti-ship operations) based on a mid-wave IR sensor that would replace the CCD TV camera. The ELTA Systems subsidiary of Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) is expected to proposed its EL/M-2052 AESA-based MMR integrated with an in-house nose-mounted IRST sensor, while Selex Galileo of Italy will most likely propose its Vixen 1000ES AESA-based MMR integrated with its 55kg Skyward nose-mounted IRST. Choice of the optimum combination of air combat missiles (both within-visual-range and beyond-visual-range) will be totally dependent on which fire-control system is finally selected, with the principal contenders being Raytheon (AIM-9X/AIM-120C AMRAAM), RAFAEL of Israel (Python-5/Derby), MBDA (MICA family) and Russia’s Vympel JSC (RVV-MD/RVV-SD combination), which IAI/ELTA Systems will likely propose in case the Python-5/Derby solution is rejected by the IAF.—Prasun K.
Sengupta



How true but still there are some points in article that even we were aware off after AERO India 2011:agree::agree::agree:

TRISHUL
 
.
I have a question how can u develop or start developing a new block when even the first is not ready/in service?
No pun intended....


Prasun gupta...:disagree: hes in the same league as zaid hamid.
 
.
Stop posting PS BS.


I have a question how can u develop or start developing a new block when even the first is not ready/in service?
No pun intended....

Keep these in your mind every time such question come to you mind.

1) Tejas is ready, IOC given.

2) If we don't wanna have delay in Mk 2 we should have started it already, than it can be inducted by 2015/16. it will take 5/6 years.

Prasun gupta...:disagree: hes in the same league as zaid hamid.

No one can be in the league of that clown hate monger hamid.
 
.
I have a question how can u develop or start developing a new block when even the first is not ready/in service?
No pun intended....


Prasun gupta...:disagree: hes in the same league as zaid hamid.

Not in service does not mean that the aircraft is incomplete..
 
.
I have a question how can u develop or start developing a new block when even the first is not ready/in service?
No pun intended....



Prasun gupta...:disagree: hes in the same league as zaid hamid.

You know what is IOC(Initial operation clearance ) means and Its already developed all it doing is testing and opening its flight envelop with lots of inputs coming from IAF pilots . LSP 6,7 & 8 simultaneously lining up and wait for LCA navy too this july.
While SP 1,2,3 and 4 will handover by next march 2012 to form 1st squadron ..

HAL, which has spent the last two decades building 15 Tejas developmental prototypes, is now making the crucial transition to commercial production. Even as it builds the last two developmental aircraft, which will be given to the IAF for user evaluation, the first production fighter is already taking shape in HAL’s older facilities. Over the next year and a half, the entire manufacture will shift to the new production line.

“By March 2012, the first four fighters from the Tejas production line will be handed over to the IAF”, promises Ashok Nayak, Chairman and Managing Director of HAL. “And from then onwards we will step up production to 8 fighters per year.”

This involves a radical change in the way that HAL builds aircraft. Benji Mammen, HAL’s manager for the Tejas production line, explains that each developmental Tejas incorporated multiple improvements, which meant that each aircraft was significantly different from its predecessor. Now, having obtained operational clearance, HAL would build a standardised fighter, using automated assembly line processes that would speed up the process, as well as improve precision and build quality.Five Tejas fighters to light up Aero India

Ontopic well what ever he said in this article is nufing new to us ..
 
.
Prasoon has made a joker out of himself...
 
.
Stop posting PS BS.




Keep these in your mind every time such question come to you mind.

1) Tejas is ready, IOC given.

2) If we don't wanna have delay in Mk 2 we should have start it already because by that mean it can be inducted by 2015/16. it will take 5/6 years.



No one can be in the league of that clown hate monger hamid.

See this guy again gonna come up with same post......
 
. .
Oh come on guys,left that poor fellow aside.
REGARDS ....
 
.
Okay what does the word "Tejas" means in India or Hindu language (just curious)? Here in the U.S. and the state of Texas the word Tejas actually means the name of the state of Texas in Spanish during the time when Texas was a part of Spain and later Mexico before becoming independent and annexed by the U.S.
 
.
Okay what does the word "Tejas" means in India or Hindu language (just curious)? Here in the U.S. and the state of Texas the word Tejas actually means the name of the state of Texas in Spanish during the time when Texas was a part of Spain and later Mexico before becoming independent and annexed by the U.S.

Means radiance in "sanskrit"
 
. .
So will Mk.2 completely replace the IAF's Mk.1 when it comes into service or will the operate alongside one another? As despite the Mk.1 being a formidable a/c it has fallen short of the IAF's incredibly high standards in some areas which is what Mk.2 is meant to solve. And as there are some structural changes the Mk.1 can't just be UPG to the Mk.2 in a MLU. I suppose avionics and some hardware can be though to make it as similar to Mk.2 as possible.
 
.
So will Mk.2 completely replace the IAF's Mk.1 when it comes into service or will the operate alongside one another?
They will be operating side by side. I think IAF will transfer mk1 back to the south ones Mk2 will start operating...
 
.
So will Mk.2 completely replace the IAF's Mk.1 when it comes into service or will the operate alongside one another? As despite the Mk.1 being a formidable a/c it has fallen short of the IAF's incredibly high standards in some areas which is what Mk.2 is meant to solve. And as there are some structural changes the Mk.1 can't just be UPG to the Mk.2 in a MLU. I suppose avionics and some hardware can be though to make it as similar to Mk.2 as possible.

MK2 will not replace the MK1, they will work besides each other at the same time as angeldemon_007 said it, but while the MK1s will be deployed in the south and are mainly meant for training puropses (pilots and ground crews), with air defence and possibly maritime attack roles. The MK2s on the other hand will be a frontline fighter for the western and north eastern borders, serveing alongside of MKIs and MMRCAs.
Regarding the upgrade of MK1, radar, avionics from MK2 could be upgraded without much problems and the last articles suggested that the Kaveri - Snecma engine could replace the GE 404 engine during the MLU. To integrate the GE 414 engine of the MK2 means changes at the fuselage for sure, possibly even to stretch airframe and I think they would do it only if they go for a complete overhaul of the airframe, like they do it with the Mirage 2000 now.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom