What's new

Tank Battles In The Himalaya Mountains? Indian T-90 Tanks Face Chinese Armor

Clutch

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
17,023
Reaction score
-3
Tank Battles In The Himalaya Mountains? Indian T-90 Tanks Face Chinese Armor

Michael PeckContributor
Aerospace & Defense
I cover defense issues and military technology.

960x0.jpg
960x0.jpg

A T-90 tank rolls down Rajpath during rehearsals[+]
ASSOCIATED PRESS

India has deployed its Russian-made T-90 tanks against Chinese forces in the disputed border region of Ladakh.

But moving 45-ton tanks in a mountainous region with poor roads and bridges comes with its own challenges.

The Indian armor has been stationed at the desolate outpost of Daulet Beg Oldi, which lies at an altitude of 16,000 feet and features one of the world’s highest airfields. The outpost is a few miles from the Chinese border and just south of the strategic Karakoram pass, which India fears could be an invasion route for Chinese troops occupying the Aksai Chin area.

“With the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) deploying close to 50,000 troops in Aksai Chin, the Indian Army for the first time has deployed a squadron (12) T-90 missile firing tanks, armored personnel carriers (APCs) and a full troop brigade (4,000 men) at Daulat Beg Oldi to prevent any Chinese aggression from the Shaksgam-Karakoram pass axis,” according to the Hindustan Times, citing top Indian military commanders.

, a 30-ton vehicle armed with a 105-millimeter cannon that can fire shells and anti-tank guided missiles. China claims that its 1000-horsepower diesel, coupled with the Type 15’s relatively light weight, will make the tank handy in mountainous terrain.

“With a powerful engine, the Type 15 lightweight main battle tank can effectively operate in plateau regions difficult for heavier tanks, and with its advanced fire control systems and 105-millimeter caliber armor-piercing main gun, it can outgun any other light armored vehicles at high elevations,” said China’s state-controlled Global Times.

Though lighter than the 70-ton U.S. M1A2 Abrams, Russia’s 45-ton T-90 main battle tank – essentially a modernized Cold War T-72 — is significantly heavier than the Type 15. Its 125-millimeter cannon can fire shells as well as AT-11 anti-tank guided missiles. Its defensive gear includes Kontakt-5 explosive armor and the Shtora infrared jamming system to stop incoming anti-tank rockets. While Chinese Type 15s have yet to see combat, Russian T-90s have fought in Syria, with at least one being badly damaged by a U.S.-made TOW anti-tank missile fired by Syrian rebels.

India has customized its variant, the T-90S Bhishma, with non-Russian gear such as a French thermal imaging system. The Type 15’s light weight may enable it to use roads and bridges that the T-90 can’t. One the other hand, India’s 1,000 T-90s have superior firepower and armor protection.

Arzan Tarapore, a non-resident fellow at the U.S.-based National Institute of Asian Research thinktank, believes the Indian T-90s are there as a warning to Beijing that Chinese territory is vulnerable to an Indian counteroffensive. “They are not there to defend Indian territory, but to threaten Chinese territory,” Tarapore tells me. “This is and has long been Indian doctrine: to threaten a punishing riposte against China – ideally to strengthen India’s hand in disengagement negotiations; or in the worst case, to actually try to seize Chinese territory as a bargaining chip to reverse China’s incursions.”

Chinese and Indian troops engaged in several mass fistfights in June in the disputed Galwan River valley, resulting in 20 Indian deaths and dozens of Chinese casualties. Both nations fought in a brief war over Ladakh in 1962, in which China defeated poorly prepared Indian forces. Chinese now appears to be pushing against the demarcation line in response to India building a new highway to sustain its forces in the area.

This isn’t the first time that India has deployed tanks to Ladakh. During the 1962 war, India airlifted French-made AMX-13 light tanks aboard Soviet-made An-12 transport planes, and T-72s were sent in 2016. In 1962, “the tank crews quickly acclimatized itself to the freezing temperature and ratified air at 15,000 feet,” noted one Indian news account. “The machines, however, faced more problems than the men. Low operating pressure and ratified air created problems in the cooling systems of the tanks and the freezing temperature affected the efficiency of their engines.”

Which raises the obvious question of how useful tanks will be in a mountainous area with very poor roads. During the Korean War, for example, U.S. tanks were invaluable during combat in the flatlands: once the fighting shifted to the mountains, American tanks became mobile howitzers, lobbing shells from inclined ramps at Communist troops in the hills.

And Ladakh itself is one of the most difficult places on Earth for tanks to operate. The thin air and temperatures in the region can plunge to 50 degrees below zero Fahrenheit, an Indian Army colonel told India’s NDTV in 2016. Indian tanks must use special fuel and lubricants at least twice every night, and the engines must be revved-up to keep the tank’s systems from freezing.

But even in the mountains, tanks still offer something unique: a big, heavily armored, mobile cannon that can deliver far more firepower than what a foot soldier can carry on his back. Modern vehicles like the T-90 also have thermal sights and other advanced sensors to spot targets at night and in fog. While there will be no armored blitzkriegs in the Himalayas, tanks can provide invaluable fire support to infantry. On the other hand, in restricted terrain, tanks will need the infantry to protect them from man-portable anti-tank rockets.

Should more clashes erupt in Ladahk, Type 15s may occasionally battle T-90s. But in the Himalaya mountains – nicknamed “the roof of the world” – the biggest danger to Chinese and Indian tanks isn’t the enemy. It’s the climate.

Should China Fear India’s New Rafale Fighters?

China Makes Another Enemy? Now Chinese Warships Are Confronting The Australian Navy
 
.
whatsapp-image-2019-09-04-at-17-1567599807-1596462025.jpeg

The Indian Army has responded to the troop build-up by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) on the Chinese side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC), by buffing up its own presence near the Daulat Beg Oldi and Depsang plains area. As per latest reports, on top of ramping up the infantry presence in the area, the Indian Army has deployed tanks and other heavy armour weapons to act as a deterrent against any Chinese misadventure.
Government sources have told ANI that T-90 tank regiments have been mobilised in the area as part of an armoured division.
“We have done a very heavy deployment of troops and tanks in the DBO and Depsang plains area including the T-90 regiments which are part of an armoured division,” ANI quoted government sources as saying.
The new deployments ramp up the Indian Army presence from Patrolling Point 1 near the Karakoram pass all the way to the Depsang plains where the Chinese have reportedly amassed over 17,000 troops since the face off first began in April-May.
ANI has reported that the sources have claimed that the Chinese would find it difficult to operate there in case they try out any misadventure.
Earlier, when the build up had not happened in the PLA ranks in the area, the region was looked after by a mountain brigade and an armoured brigade but today more than 15,000 troops and several tank regiments have been mobilised in the area.

https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/in...in-the-area-chinese-pla-india-vs-china-639289
 
.
In response to China’s deployment of more than 17,000 troops and armoured vehicles opposite Daulat Beg Oldi (DBO) and Depsang plains in Ladakh, India has made heavy deployment of troops and tank regiments in the area to counter any misadventure by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) there.
“We have done a very heavy deployment of troops and tanks in the DBO and Depsang plains area including the T-90 regiments which are part of an armoured division,” government sources told ANI.
Deployments have been made from the Patrolling Point 1 near the Karakoram Pass (PP-3) to the Depsang plains where the Chinese have amassed more than 17,000 troops since April-May time frame and have been blocking Indian patrols from PP-10 to PP-13, sources said.
The armoured deployment is such that the Chinese would find it difficult to operate there, in case, they try out any misadventure, they said.
Before the Chinese started build-up opposite the DBO and Depsang, the entire area was looked after by a mountain brigade and an armoured brigade but today more than 15,000 troops and several tank regiments have been moved there both by road and by air to tackle the threat from China, sources said.
One of the major intentions of the Chinese in this area has been to build a road from its TWD battalion headquarters opposite the DBO sector to the Karakoram pass area and connect the battalion there.
The connectivity plan, which has been foiled in the past, will allow the two Chinese units to reach other in a matter of a couple of hours against the 15-hour drive through the Highway G219 in their territory, sources said.
A small bridge was put up by the Chinese inside Indian territory on a nala (drain) near PP-7 and PP-8 but it was broken by Indian soldiers a few years ago, sources said.
At present, India and China are engaged in a dialogue focusing on disengagement from Finger area and other friction points but Chinese build up along the LAC in Depsang plains and DBO area has not yet been taken up in the military talks.
At present, we are in a position of strength in the Depsang Plains and DBO area now and we are not in a hurry to discuss that with the Chinese. Let the disengagement first take place and then we can talk about de-escalation there also, sources said.
On Sunday, India and China held Corps Commander-level talks at Moldo on the Chinese side of LAC to discuss disengagement.
The Chinese had earlier agreed for complete disengagement at Galwan valley, PP-15, Hot Springs and Gogra along with Finger area near Pangong Tso lake.
However, China stopped honouring their commitment after initial disengagement in Finger area and is now wanting to build an observation post at Finger 5. This has been rejected by India which has clearly stated that it will have to disengage completely and restore the status quoted existing in April/May 2020.

http://newsmobile.in/articles/2020/...ladakh-heavy-tank-deployment-to-tackle-china/
 
.
Sprut is the best solution for Indian in the mountain. Takes too long to develop other solutions.
 
. . . .
Of course ATGMs will play a crucial role for a defensive role. While T90 & T72 will form the offensive attack, IA's requirement for just 45 Spruts is absurd given the length of Indo-China border
 
.
Poor planning by IA here. They issued a requirement for 45 light tanks which most probably will be the Sprut

What'll they do against hundreds of chinese VT5's?

It is not the planning but execution that failled.


Army: How Red Tape Delayed the Procurement of Lightweight Tanks Until After Ladakh Faceoff
A handful of desultory indigenous attempts were initiated from the 1980s to locally develop a light tank, all regrettably stillborn.

Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-6.48.17-PM-1057x600.png

Representative image. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh poses for a group photo with troops who took part in para dropping and other military exercises at Stakna, in Leh, Ladakh, Friday, July 17, 2020. Photo: PTI


Rahul Bedi
SECURITY
SECURITY
17/JUL/2020

Chandigarh: The Indian army’s recently announced emergency procurement of light, air-transportable tanks to augment its firepower in Himalayan regions like Ladakh, was first mooted in 2009. This happened soon after the country’s military planners shifted their strategic focus from Pakistan to the security threat posed by China.

Consequently, the army had issued a global request for information (RFI) for 200 wheeled and 100 tracked light tanks, weighing 22 tons each, which no doubt will now be dusted and recycled in an attempt to fast-track this long-proposed acquisition.

The tank numbers, however, are expected to vary, senior armoured corps officers told The Wire.

The 2009 light tank RFI had required the modularly constructed platforms to be ‘highly manoeuvrable’ with surveillance and communication capability, to provide the tanks flexibility for multi-purpose operations.

Also watch | ‘Government Misleading Media on Chinese Disengagement Along LAC

According to the Preliminary General Staff Qualitative Requirements (PGSQRs) formulated by the army’s Mechanised Forces Directorate at the time, both the 8×8 wheeled and tracked light tanks were to be 2.8m high and 7.8m long and needed to possess a low silhouette and amphibious capability.

The PGSQR’s further stated that they were required to be fitted with a 105mm or 120mm gun, capable of firing an assortment of projectiles. High ground clearance, defensive aid suites offering protection against laser, thermal and radar guided munitions and nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) protection completed the projected tanks’ specifications.

In 2009 the light tanks were envisaged as part of the two mountain divisions that were then under raising – and have since been commissioned for deployment along the 3,488-km-long disputed Line of Actual Control (LAC) with China in the northeast and in Ladakh.

Also read: LAC Tension Means Indian Army’s Advanced Winter Stocking for Ladakh Needs Major Rejigging

They were also aimed at providing firepower to the proposed 90,270-strong 17 Mountain Strike Corps (MSC) to counter the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) that has been shelved due to an enduring financial resource crunch.

A proportion of the light tanks were also being inducted as force multipliers to India’s ‘cold start’ doctrine against Pakistan of going on the offensive in a limited war scenario under the nuclear umbrella to achieve ‘bargainable’ military gains. Alongside, these platforms could also be deployed in urban and semi-urban environments and in riverine terrain and marshy ground along India’s eastern borders.

Screen-Shot-2020-07-09-at-4.41.09-PM-1024x526.png

Indian army soldiers walk past their parked trucks at a makeshift transit camp before heading to Ladakh, near Baltal, southeast of Srinagar, June 16, 2020. Photo: Reuters/Stringer

Responses to the RFI were received, but thereafter no formal tender was issued as the entire proposal like many others was shelved because of the army’s indifference, disputes over indigenising the programme and, above all, competing financial claims by existing T72, T90 and Arjun main battle tank (MBT) ventures.

Also read: Four Years After Modi’s ‘Act East’ Promise, India No Closer to Selling BrahMos to Vietnam

But a handful of desultory indigenous attempts were initiated from the 1980s to locally develop a light tank, all regrettably stillborn.

In the mid-1980s, for instance, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) replaced the turret of the Soviet-designed BMP infantry combat vehicle (ICV) with a 105 mm gun, but the project was eventually terminated in 1994 due to indifference by the army. The latter declared the light tank to be superfluous, an assessment that would come to haunt it decades later in 2020.

Undaunted, the DRDO designed another light tank based on the same licence-built ICV chassis, by mounting it with a French GIAT TS-90 turret and a 105 mm gun. Firing and stability trials were conducted, but once again due to army indifference, the project was shelved.

It was temporarily revived in 2009 with the RFI, but this too got lost in the bureaucratic maze of army headquarters and was abandoned till the ongoing standoff with the PLA in Ladakh erupted in early May.

For, much as a testament to the Indian Army’s flawed assessments, backing the PLA formations in the face-off was the Chinese Type 15 light tank, also known as the ZTQ-15 that can be airlifted and even paradropped by China’s Y 20 military cargo aircraft.

Also read: Explainer: Why Is the Indian Army’s 61 Cavalry Regiment Being Downsized?

Designed and manufactured by China’s North Industries Group Corporation Limited or NORINCO and unveiled during the Zhuhai Air Show in 2016 (and publicly at a military parade in late 2019) the 30-33 tonne highly agile Type 15 tanks are fitted with a 105 mm rifled gun with a thermal sleeve and fume extractor that has a maximum firing range of 3,000m. The tanks also have an automatic loading system and empty shells are ejected via a small hatch located at the rear of the turret.

The tanks can carry a total of 38 rounds of assorted ammunition, that includes tungsten-alloy armour piercing fin stablished discarding sabot (APFSDS) and high explosive (HE) rounds. Additionally, they can fire a guided missile with High Explosive Anti-Tank (HEAT) warheads with a 5,000m range which can penetrate the explosive reactive armour of the Indian Army’s T72M1s and T90S that are presently deployed against the PLA offensive in Ladakh.

Powered by a 1,000hp electronically controlled diesel engine, mounted at the rear of the hull and coupled to a hydro-mechanical full automatic transmission, the Type 15 tanks are also NBC-protected and air conditioned and fitted with inertial navigation and satellite communication systems. Interestingly, Bangladesh is possibly the only country to which China has exported around 40 Type 15 tanks. It reportedly has another 150 on order from Dhaka.

Meanwhile, the Indian army’s 130-150 mostly upgraded licence-built Soviet-era T72M1 and T90S MBT are more suited to operating in the Rajasthan desert region and the Punjab plains. And though they do bring formidable fire power with their 125 mm guns that can fire varied ammunition, neither MBT has missile firing capability.

Also watch |‘Chinese Are on Indian Territory in Depsang and Pangong; LAC Has Shifted Westward’

Besides, navigating their bulk in the Himalayan regions too poses problems, while their engines need to be started for 10-20 minutes every four hours in a 24-hour cycle to ensure their availability when operationally needed. A tank detail is deputed to execute this recurring chore, whose frequency increases during the winter months, when temperatures drop to around – 35°C.

“Inducting light tanks along the LAC in Ladakh will provide the army greater flexibility in the difficult terrain,” said former Major General A.P. Singh. But it will take a while to acquire these platforms and till then we have no choice but to manage with the armour we have in Ladakh, conceded the retired armoured corps officer.

Earlier, the Indian Army operated French AMX13 light tanks, and its successor, the amphibious Soviet-era PT-76s till the 1970s, that were deployed effectively against East Pakistan, later Bangladesh. During the 1962 war with China some AMX-13s were airlifted to the Chinese border aboard the Antonov An-32 transport aircraft, but were unable to halt the PLA.

Both light tank types were deployed during the 1971 operations in the eastern and western sector and performed moderately well, but were phased out soon after, giving way to heavier platforms.

Ironically, over four decades later, light tanks are poised to make a comeback once again.

https://thewire.in/security/light-tanks-ladakh-army-procurement
 
.
Of course ATGMs will play a crucial role for a defensive role. While T90 & T72 will form the offensive attack, IA's requirement for just 45 Spruts is absurd given the length of Indo-China border

True 45 is a very small number but Tanks can be used only in few locations on the Indian side of the border with China.

On the other hand China can use large numbers of tanks in Tibet.

Light Artillery guns like M777 are far more use full for India to defend than Tanks.
 
.
OMG.. The indians are sooo crazy scared of China now, that if a "China man" coughs, Indians will flip over scarred and will run for the plains of punjab ...
 
.
It is not the planning but execution that failled.


Army: How Red Tape Delayed the Procurement of Lightweight Tanks Until After Ladakh Faceoff
A handful of desultory indigenous attempts were initiated from the 1980s to locally develop a light tank, all regrettably stillborn.

Screen-Shot-2020-07-17-at-6.48.17-PM-1057x600.png

Representative image. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh poses for a group photo with troops who took part in para dropping and other military exercises at Stakna, in Leh, Ladakh, Friday, July 17, 2020. Photo: PTI


Rahul Bedi
SECURITY
SECURITY
17/JUL/2020

Chandigarh: The Indian army’s recently announced emergency procurement of light, air-transportable tanks to augment its firepower in Himalayan regions like Ladakh, was first mooted in 2009. This happened soon after the country’s military planners shifted their strategic focus from Pakistan to the security threat posed by China.

Consequently, the army had issued a global request for information (RFI) for 200 wheeled and 100 tracked light tanks, weighing 22 tons each, which no doubt will now be dusted and recycled in an attempt to fast-track this long-proposed acquisition.

The tank numbers, however, are expected to vary, senior armoured corps officers told The Wire.

The 2009 light tank RFI had required the modularly constructed platforms to be ‘highly manoeuvrable’ with surveillance and communication capability, to provide the tanks flexibility for multi-purpose operations.

Also watch | ‘Government Misleading Media on Chinese Disengagement Along LAC

According to the Preliminary General Staff Qualitative Requirements (PGSQRs) formulated by the army’s Mechanised Forces Directorate at the time, both the 8×8 wheeled and tracked light tanks were to be 2.8m high and 7.8m long and needed to possess a low silhouette and amphibious capability.

The PGSQR’s further stated that they were required to be fitted with a 105mm or 120mm gun, capable of firing an assortment of projectiles. High ground clearance, defensive aid suites offering protection against laser, thermal and radar guided munitions and nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) protection completed the projected tanks’ specifications.

In 2009 the light tanks were envisaged as part of the two mountain divisions that were then under raising – and have since been commissioned for deployment along the 3,488-km-long disputed Line of Actual Control (LAC) with China in the northeast and in Ladakh.

Also read: LAC Tension Means Indian Army’s Advanced Winter Stocking for Ladakh Needs Major Rejigging

They were also aimed at providing firepower to the proposed 90,270-strong 17 Mountain Strike Corps (MSC) to counter the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) that has been shelved due to an enduring financial resource crunch.

A proportion of the light tanks were also being inducted as force multipliers to India’s ‘cold start’ doctrine against Pakistan of going on the offensive in a limited war scenario under the nuclear umbrella to achieve ‘bargainable’ military gains. Alongside, these platforms could also be deployed in urban and semi-urban environments and in riverine terrain and marshy ground along India’s eastern borders.

Screen-Shot-2020-07-09-at-4.41.09-PM-1024x526.png

Indian army soldiers walk past their parked trucks at a makeshift transit camp before heading to Ladakh, near Baltal, southeast of Srinagar, June 16, 2020. Photo: Reuters/Stringer

Responses to the RFI were received, but thereafter no formal tender was issued as the entire proposal like many others was shelved because of the army’s indifference, disputes over indigenising the programme and, above all, competing financial claims by existing T72, T90 and Arjun main battle tank (MBT) ventures.

Also read: Four Years After Modi’s ‘Act East’ Promise, India No Closer to Selling BrahMos to Vietnam

But a handful of desultory indigenous attempts were initiated from the 1980s to locally develop a light tank, all regrettably stillborn.

In the mid-1980s, for instance, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) replaced the turret of the Soviet-designed BMP infantry combat vehicle (ICV) with a 105 mm gun, but the project was eventually terminated in 1994 due to indifference by the army. The latter declared the light tank to be superfluous, an assessment that would come to haunt it decades later in 2020.

Undaunted, the DRDO designed another light tank based on the same licence-built ICV chassis, by mounting it with a French GIAT TS-90 turret and a 105 mm gun. Firing and stability trials were conducted, but once again due to army indifference, the project was shelved.

It was temporarily revived in 2009 with the RFI, but this too got lost in the bureaucratic maze of army headquarters and was abandoned till the ongoing standoff with the PLA in Ladakh erupted in early May.

For, much as a testament to the Indian Army’s flawed assessments, backing the PLA formations in the face-off was the Chinese Type 15 light tank, also known as the ZTQ-15 that can be airlifted and even paradropped by China’s Y 20 military cargo aircraft.

Also read: Explainer: Why Is the Indian Army’s 61 Cavalry Regiment Being Downsized?

Designed and manufactured by China’s North Industries Group Corporation Limited or NORINCO and unveiled during the Zhuhai Air Show in 2016 (and publicly at a military parade in late 2019) the 30-33 tonne highly agile Type 15 tanks are fitted with a 105 mm rifled gun with a thermal sleeve and fume extractor that has a maximum firing range of 3,000m. The tanks also have an automatic loading system and empty shells are ejected via a small hatch located at the rear of the turret.

The tanks can carry a total of 38 rounds of assorted ammunition, that includes tungsten-alloy armour piercing fin stablished discarding sabot (APFSDS) and high explosive (HE) rounds. Additionally, they can fire a guided missile with High Explosive Anti-Tank (HEAT) warheads with a 5,000m range which can penetrate the explosive reactive armour of the Indian Army’s T72M1s and T90S that are presently deployed against the PLA offensive in Ladakh.

Powered by a 1,000hp electronically controlled diesel engine, mounted at the rear of the hull and coupled to a hydro-mechanical full automatic transmission, the Type 15 tanks are also NBC-protected and air conditioned and fitted with inertial navigation and satellite communication systems. Interestingly, Bangladesh is possibly the only country to which China has exported around 40 Type 15 tanks. It reportedly has another 150 on order from Dhaka.

Meanwhile, the Indian army’s 130-150 mostly upgraded licence-built Soviet-era T72M1 and T90S MBT are more suited to operating in the Rajasthan desert region and the Punjab plains. And though they do bring formidable fire power with their 125 mm guns that can fire varied ammunition, neither MBT has missile firing capability.

Also watch |‘Chinese Are on Indian Territory in Depsang and Pangong; LAC Has Shifted Westward’

Besides, navigating their bulk in the Himalayan regions too poses problems, while their engines need to be started for 10-20 minutes every four hours in a 24-hour cycle to ensure their availability when operationally needed. A tank detail is deputed to execute this recurring chore, whose frequency increases during the winter months, when temperatures drop to around – 35°C.

“Inducting light tanks along the LAC in Ladakh will provide the army greater flexibility in the difficult terrain,” said former Major General A.P. Singh. But it will take a while to acquire these platforms and till then we have no choice but to manage with the armour we have in Ladakh, conceded the retired armoured corps officer.

Earlier, the Indian Army operated French AMX13 light tanks, and its successor, the amphibious Soviet-era PT-76s till the 1970s, that were deployed effectively against East Pakistan, later Bangladesh. During the 1962 war with China some AMX-13s were airlifted to the Chinese border aboard the Antonov An-32 transport aircraft, but were unable to halt the PLA.

Both light tank types were deployed during the 1971 operations in the eastern and western sector and performed moderately well, but were phased out soon after, giving way to heavier platforms.

Ironically, over four decades later, light tanks are poised to make a comeback once again.

https://thewire.in/security/light-tanks-ladakh-army-procurement
IA was never serious about light tanks in the first place. In fact, most countries don't really consider investing in light tanks...not even the Russians despite having developed the Sprut
 
. .
True 45 is a very small number but Tanks can be used only in few locations on the Indian side of the border with China.

On the other hand China can use large numbers of tanks in Tibet.

Light Artillery guns like M777 are far more use full for India to defend than Tanks.
M777 is not an anti-tank weapon
 
.
Artillery guns can't fill in the role for tanks. You can't take the offensive to your adversary just by possessing stationary artillery platforms

I don't think India ever had the intention of going offensive against China.

The plan has always been to be Defensive against China and be Offensive against Pakistan.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom