What's new

Syrian crisis

i am not worry abut muslims they are killing each other since ages i am worry abut EU . this flood of Muslims to EU will destroy EU one day . those whom can't live in peace in their own countries how they will live in west ? this massive refugee mess to EU is real danger to civilized world

Wow, you're talking exactly like those islamophobic ...
Choosing only Christian refugees would meet your wishes I think (some have done that).

The west has participated in flaming the crisis in Syria and other Arab countries by toppling their governments , training and arming the militants (so called moderate opposition!) .

Let the west face some outcomes of their polices in the region.
 
. . .
When innocent muslims are killed, THEN it is an issue for all muslim countries... We should be ashamed all of us

Where were you when 90,000 Kashmiris were slaughtered?

This has nothing to do with the rest of us.

When Kashmiris die most Muslims joke it off and say India and Pakistan are arguing like children bla bla bla.

But when savage Syrians are killing each other in a stupid civil war it suddenly becomes a Muslim problem.

Don't lump your barbarity on the rest of us.
 
.
Well I think its matter of leadership quality a leader who is bold and brave , stands up in these moments

There is enough man power and stable muslim governments to come to table to resolve this crisis in a meaningful way and lets not create another safe heaven in Syria for future terrorism incubation

Kashmir is something we can handle on our own , this is for a region that is suffering due to rouge elements on toyota pickups ...

If nations in region come together , the problem makers can be wiped clean and refugees can return back
 
.
When Syrian government killed this British Pakistani doctor in custody for trying to treat children I lost all interest. Syrians can go to hell.

article-2525221-0649610100000514-37_634x487.jpg
 
.
all this civil war started in Arab countries for change presidents lolzzz what a civilized ways to change gov
 
.
Well precisely I think my argument is that we don't need West in this case , this can be solved by regional countries who have necessary financing

I was thinking along the lines that may be have a meet up of all the regional leaders and bring this issue on to table like we used to do in King Faisal's days solidarity on Islamic issues , bring a bit of that courage Sadat brought in from Egypt
and some core strength Pakistan brought into the mix

Also , west is already burdened with so many refugees they are probably going to get heart attack

I mean logically , the Muslim nations in region are rich and they have enough military strength to control the migration and form proper temporary sanctuaries for refugees

And may be a force should be sent to control ISIS. So they are pushed back into Iraq


Why are Muslim nations waiting for

Turkey - Military force of millions
Pakistan - Military force of million
Saudia - Loaded with money and Military force of millions
Iran - Loaded with 200 cobra helicopter and millions armed me
Egypt- Loaded with F16 , Apache good knows what else
Kuwait - Qatar - Bahrain - Can help with monetary help
Malaysia - Secular country , lot of people
Indonesia - larges population great people

What is the reason that these countries can not sit down on table and say look we are stopping this NOW and send in troops 2-3 Months mission , ISIS is no more and stability is restored in Syria

I don't understand the failure of colossal proportions

We need that solidarity spirit back like in King Faisal's day
qaddafi-and-leaders-of-palestine-saudi-arabia-and-kuwait-were-hosted-by-pakistani-prime-minister-zulfikar-ali-bhutto-left-of-gaddafi-here-they-attend-prayers-at-a-mosque-in-lahore-pakistan-feb-23-1974.jpg


The leaders need to develop some ..... balls and sit down on table and tackle the issue
These days it's impossible to do that. Every time someone like King Faisal shows up they get assassinated or killed somehow (CIA). At this point Pakistan can't really afford to help any one. We need to help ourself first.
 
.
Well if someone unilaterally goes into conflict zone its difficult as anything could happen , I think what is needed is a formal , solution that involves 20,000 units contributed from each major Muslim army to neutralize the area a combined force of 100,000k soldiers to bring order. Supported by Strong Helicopter support from above

Turkey : 20,000 Soldiers , 20 Tanks , 10 Helicopters
Pakistan : 20,000 Soldiers , 20 Tanks , 10 planes
Saudia : 20,000 Soldiers, 20 Tanks , 10 Hecliopters
Egypt : 20,000 Soldiers , 20 Tanks , 10 helicopters
Iran : 20,000 Soldiers , 20, Tanks , 10 helicopters
Qatar/UAE/Kuwait: 20,000 Soliders, 20 Tanks , 10 helicopter
Malasia / Bangladesh 5,000 Soldiers, 5 Tanks, 2 helicopters
Indonesia : 5,000 Soldiers , 5 Tanks , 2 helicopter

This kind of security force is enough to build a stoppage to civil war

After a joined council meeting of Islamic nations on matter or MOU signed

After such a force is on ground only then its safe for civilian doctors or support groups to go in to conflict zones
 
Last edited:
.
Where were you when 90,000 Kashmiris were slaughtered?

This has nothing to do with the rest of us.

When Kashmiris die most Muslims joke it off and say India and Pakistan are arguing like children bla bla bla.

But when savage Syrians are killing each other in a stupid civil war it suddenly becomes a Muslim problem.

Don't lump your barbarity on the rest of us.

Whether it's Syria, Kashmir or another place if innocent ppl er dying, we must act. Our muslim leaders should be united in these situations and solve these issues ASAP.

I am personally being angered and feel helpless not to do anything to help the syrian ppl...

these ppl are well educated and now as refugees, are being treated as third class here in Europe

These days it's impossible to do that. Every time someone like King Faisal shows up they get assassinated or killed somehow (CIA). At this point Pakistan can't really afford to help any one. We need to help ourself first.
And that's why OIC should have been much stronger today. You can kill one person, but not an entire organisation.
 
.
Well if someone unilaterally goes into conflict zone its difficult as anything could happen , I think what is needed is a formal , solution that involves 20,000 units contributed from each major Muslim army to neutralize the area a combined force of 100,000k soldiers to bring order. Supported by Strong Helicopter support from above

Turkey : 20,000 Soldiers , 20 Tanks , 10 Helicopters
Pakistan : 20,000 Soldiers , 20 Tanks , 10 planes
Saudia : 20,000 Soldiers, 20 Tanks , 10 Hecliopters
Egypt : 20,000 Soldiers , 20 Tanks , 10 helicopters
Iran : 20,000 Soldiers , 20, Tanks , 10 helicopters
Qatar/UAE/Kuwait: 20,000 Soliders, 20 Tanks , 10 helicopter
Malasia / Bangladesh 5,000 Soldiers, 5 Tanks, 2 helicopters
Indonesia : 5,000 Soldiers , 5 Tanks , 2 helicopter

This kind of security force is enough to build a stoppage to civil war

After a joined council meeting of Islamic nations on matter or MOU signed

After such a force is on ground only then its safe for civilian doctors or support groups to go in to conflict zones

What you are proposing is an invasion of multiple countries officially into a destabilized area which they are already taking part in unofficially. Civil war was what was happening 3 years ago. Now its a full blown proxy war against Syria aimed towards regime change. Have you ever seen the BLA or the TTP picking off tanks and trucks with TOW missiles? How would you feel if the indian consulates started supplying more potent weapons systems through a huge porus border? The scope of a proxy war is determined by countries who through local intermediaries provide in man and material with $'s. When the flood of weapons,money and extremists stops so shall this massacre. So instead asking those countries to give men and tanks ask them to stop giving money and buying weapons.
 
.
How can one destabilize a country already destabilized

There is no cvil war one group was given weapons , planes were dropping supplies in planes so these rebels could go up against Syrian military

After they started the invasion the groups supporting pulled back from forefront.

I completely see it proper that Military forces intervene , its done in Africa for peace purpose so not sure what is the problem here ?
 
.
Just some real negative publicity
Wealthy Gulf States Have Accepted ZERO Syrian Refugees | Egyptian Streets

On western media as well

thestatistics-e1441385976766.jpg


gulfarabs-e1441385903133.jpg



Egypt: 133, 000. Lebanon: 1.2 million. Turkey: 1.8 million. Jordan: 628,427. Iraq: 247, 861.

These figures denote the number of Syrian refugees that have been taken in by neighbouring Arab countries. Despite many facing their own political, social and economic crises, these nations have – to at least some extent – recognised the refugee situation for what it is: a humanitarian crisis on a considerable scale, that must be attended to immediately – both politically and in terms of material relief.

However, it appears a few Arab nations have counted themselves out of this collective effort to provide some immediate support. According to Amnesty International, “the six Gulf countries – Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain – have offered zero resettlement places to Syrian refugees.


Author is "Egyptian" lady
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom