What's new

Sushma Swaraj is lying, India should get ready for a military confrontation: Chinese media

ashok321

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
17,942
Reaction score
4
Country
Canada
Location
Malaysia
india_china_ap.jpg


http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...tation-chinese-media/articleshow/59698800.cms

NEW DELHI: A day after External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj's said in Parliament that "all countries are in India's support" over Doklam issue and "both sides should withdraw troops", China today called Swaraj a liar and said India should get ready for a military confrontation if it didn't withdraw troops from Doklam.

"She (Sushma Swaraj) is lying to the parliament. India's invasion of Chinese territory is a plain fact. New Delhi's impetuous action stuns the international community. No other country will support India's aggression," an op-ed piece published in Global Times said.

The article said Doklam is a "Chinese territory and Indian should withdraw its troops for any talks and China will not compromise on this stance".

It went on to the extent to warn India of a possible defeat if situation gets escalated into a military conflict.

"India's military strength is far behind that of China. If the conflict between China and India escalates to the intensity where their row has to be resolved through military means, India will surely lose," the article said.

"India should abandon the fantasy of a long-term standoff at Doklam. China has shown utmost tolerance and patience toward India. If Indian troops continue trespassing into China's territory, what Beijing may do next is to get prepared for a military confrontation against New Delhi and resolve the conflict through non-diplomatic means," it added.

The article continues its war mongering by saying, "People's Liberation Army has deployed troops near the China-India border and transported materials and supplies to the area. PLA is also reportedly conducting drills for mountain operations. These are certainly not for show."

"If New Delhi remains stubborn, India should get prepared for all possibilities from a potentially grave escalation of tension in the future,"
it said.

In an apparent reference to Indian media reports that India has military might to take the Chinese challenge, the op-ed piece said the comparison between India and Chinese military strength is 'extremely comical'.

"They (media) bragged that India has more troops in the area but they fail to realize that the PLA's strong capability to deploy troops can reverse the balance of power at the border within a day," it said. "China's military spending is four times that of India where its GDP volume is five times that of India. The great gap will shape the actual pattern of power balance between the two countries at the border."

"Back in 1962, India underestimated China's resolution to safeguard its territory. We hope India won't repeat this mistake," the article said.
 
. . . .
Doklam Standoff in a nutshell
1- Doklam Territory dispute is between Bhutan and China.
2- India claims that her army is there on Bhutan request and they are defending their small neighbor's sovereignty.
3- Bhutan is silent over indian claim.
4- India neglecting repeated warnings of china to lay off.
 
.
Doklam Standoff in a nutshell
1- Doklam Territory dispute is between Bhutan and China.
2- India claims that her army is there on Bhutan request and they are defending their small neighbor's sovereignty.
3- Bhutan is silent over indian claim.
4- India neglecting repeated warnings of china to lay off.

More, there is no written security agreement between India & Bhutan, something that China claims and India is deliberately silent.

For any contract are agreement to be enforced, there has to be a document in black & white or set of documents to proceed upon. Verbal/oral or handshake agreement has no legal basis because they are very difficult, time consuming and challenging to prove and therefore it is deemed invalid in most courts of law.

And India has none.
 
.
China is giving the phrase 'paper tiger' a whole new literal meaning.

One article a day with war mongering. This will end up as one massive embarrassment for all the lil princelings.

Lhasa, here we come. Looks like Dalai will be reinstated to Potala Palace after all.
 
.
More, there is no written security agreement between India & Bhutan, something that China claims and India is deliberately silent.

For any contract are agreement to be enforced, there has to be a document in black & white or set of documents to proceed upon. Verbal/oral or handshake agreement has no legal basis because they are very difficult, time consuming and challenging to prove and therefore it is deemed invalid in most courts of law.

And India has none.
Doklam Standoff in a nutshell
1- Doklam Territory dispute is between Bhutan and China.
2- India claims that her army is there on Bhutan request and they are defending their small neighbor's sovereignty.
3- Bhutan is silent over indian claim.
4- India neglecting repeated warnings of china to lay off.

Some joker refer me to this document as a security pact between India & Bhutan. :partay::lol:

http://carnegieendowment.org/newsletters/SAP/pdf/march07/india_bhutan_treaty.pdf
 
Last edited:
.
Another day another drama by the dragon.
 
.
.
Indians are trying to deceive you by giving you an unsigned Indian document that is archived in carnegieendowment.org data base. Which is not even ratified by both governments.

What a BJP photo shop treachery.

Doesn't matter if it's signed. It's NOT a security/defense pact. Can't help them if indians don't even know what they signed. At least Bhutan knows, that's why they've felt embarrassed & kept quiet about the whole affair.
 
.
China is giving the phrase 'paper tiger' a whole new literal meaning.

One article a day with war mongering. This will end up as one massive embarrassment for all the lil princelings.

Lhasa, here we come. Looks like Dalai will be reinstated to Potala Palace after all.

From the mouth of the famous British >>> "THE ECONOMIST" ....

Last week's magazine cover:

temtimes.png
 
. . .
The economist makes as much sense as my used toilet paper. Try again jackass false flagging turd.

And yea, it's spelt BritShit these days.

You dig this:

tem5tgbn.png


In how many countries your TOI or others (such) have any offices?

Anyone, irrespective of any country, one who reads this (THE ECONOMIST) weekly magazine, does not need a bachelor's degree.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom