What's new

Supreme Court upholds establishment of military courts

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
932537-SupremecourtAFP-1438749961-492-640x480.jpg

PHOTO: AFP

ISLAMABAD: In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed petitions against establishment of military courts with majority.

The apex court, in an 11-6 decision, dismissed a slew of petitions against the 21st constitutional amendment wherein military courts have been established to try militants.

A 17-judge full benchalso dismissed petitions against the incumbent procedure of appointment of judges in a wide 14-3 decision.

The two-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Nasirul Mulk and comprising of Justice Dost Muhammad Khan announced the judgement early on Wednesday morning.

Read: Supreme Court ruling on amendments today

On January 28, a three-judge bench accepted pleas against 21st Constitutional amendment for regular hearing and sought concise statements from federal and provincial governments.

Later on, a 17-judge full court of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice Nasirul Mulk, clubbed the 18th and 21st constitutional amendment cases and heard the arguments for several weeks.

During lengthy legal battle the Supreme Court examined petitions challenging the procedure of judges appointment under the 18th Amendment and the establishment of military courts under the 21st Amendment to try militants in the wake of last year’s bloody Peshawar school rampage.

Read: SC reserves ruling on 18th, 21st amendments

The full court on June 26 reserved its ruling on the case. A total of 35 constitutional petitions were before the court of which 20 challenged the 18th amendment and 15 challenged the 21st amendment.

After intense legal wrangling, the apex court is expected to announce ruling on three questions: (i) whether the Constitution has a basic structure or not; (ii) if it has a basic structure then whether a constitutional amendment can be struck down on the basis of it; and (iii) whether the parliament has the power to alter the basic structure of the Constitution.

@Horus @Oscar @Jango @Jungibaaz @nair @ajpirzada @Abu Zolfiqar @Arsalan @Irfan Baloch @waz @Slav Defence @Areesh @A.Rafay @Pakistanisage @Gazi @KURUMAYA @stark13 @Sulman Badshah @Pakistanisage @syedali73 @TankMan @WAJsal @Secur @Manticore @fatman17 @Side-Winder @GURU DUTT @Tipu7 @Hakan @Neptune @cabatli_53 @Spring Onion @Jf Tunder @Akheilos @Bratva and others
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
Hey Guys Where are you this is the biggest news of this week No body writing on the thread.
 
.
Great, now can we please start putting all those blood thirsty SOB's on speedy trials. They need to be sent to meet their makers ASAP.:pakistan:
 
.
Month of August seems to be Blessed for Pakistan as usual. I still cant believe it they did so. Asma Jahangir Camp would b on :flame:. Just watch today's talk shows and enjoy.
Pakistan Zindabad :pakistan:.
 
.
Month of August seems to be Blessed for Pakistan as usual. I still cant believe it they did so. Asma Jahangir Camp would b on :flame:. Just watch today's talk shows and enjoy.
Pakistan Zindabad :pakistan:.
They would be on fire by the where are all the senior members ?
 
.
Lo fir deshat gardo mal lo tel,
Arrangements for their meet with 72 have been made express.
 
.
Oh finally . good move. Military courts deal only with the act of terrorism?
 
. .
Happy to see that they have located their
images
afterall
 
.
Where r all those people who think our courts are helping terrorists?? Told ya there is political and administrative gap which help terrorists not the courts. They r just interpreting law and constitution!!
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom