Koovie
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 20, 2012
- Messages
- 8,288
- Reaction score
- 6
It was War.
Butchering civilians for the sake of it is never acceptable and is to be condemned
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was War.
Condemn all you want. But in war, $hit happened, happens and will happen.Butchering civilians for the sake of it is never acceptable and is to be condemned
Condemn all you want. But in war, $hit happened, happens and will happen.
No no. Condemned.So because of that, we should stop condemning it? Should we just say nothing when women and children get butchered?
Shit happens in everday life as well... in every society and nation. Should we stop condemning murder in peace as well then?
dont kill me pls but i think it was in common man's benefit if we would have never revolted for independence from uk i mean look how they are treating their minorities it better then india and pakistan. most of u guys would agree our daily life would have been lot better our country in better shape our systems in better condition we would be first world citizen of a proper first world country where hindus muslims and sikhs would have be living peacefully.
Well not actually Brahmins but Bhumihar Brahmins( land owning brahmins who usually leave priestly works and learn art of war at those times)No.. they were mostly rajput n brahmans from awadh n bihar.. and some from the sultans forces.\
You don't know anything about my ancestors. If the mughals had kept their house in order, then british would never have conquered india.Your ancestors didnt sympathise with them... these were the same people who help the british colonise you.. and the "independence" started due to political reason mostly n not for the love of freedom..
Mughals were already out of the equation before the the British domination in 1757......You don't know anything about my ancestors. If the mughals had kept their house in order, then british would never have conquered india.
Marathas in Delhi and Peshawar, Karachi, Sikh Empire in Lahore.You don't know anything about my ancestors. If the mughals had kept their house in order, then british would never have conquered india.
You don't know anything about my ancestors. If the mughals had kept their house in order, then british would never have conquered india.
I am Bhumihar Brahmin and member of Ranvir Sena militia.Well not actually Brahmins but Bhumihar Brahmins( land owning brahmins who usually leave priestly works and learn art of war at those times)
Bhumihar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
what weapons do you have ...... i mean except the obvious ones??I am Bhumihar Brahmin and member of Ranvir Sena militia.
Hello EPIC troll.I am Bhumihar Brahmin and member of Ranvir Sena militia.
Are you stupid? No Bengali midget mussalman was in Bihar. Bihar was ruled by Bhumihar feudal landlords and some Rajasthani immigrant gangs in the northThose areas were Bengal too, that time. That is what I said. Check Bengal presidency. Bengal was divided into pieces in 1905. Only BD left as the true independent descendant of Bengal today.
Mainly bolt actions and other assortments of various rifles. Senior members have automatics but I'm not sure which models.what weapons do you have ...... i mean except the obvious ones??
so what your next plan??Are you stupid? No Bengali midget mussalman was in Bihar. Bihar was ruled by Bhumihar feudal landlords and some Rajasthani immigrant gangs in the north
Mainly bolt actions and other assortments of various rifles. Senior members have automatics but I'm not sure which models.