What's new

Story of Bravery and Betrayal !! _ Revolt of 1857

13 komaun

BANNED
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
696
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
On 27 June 1857 in Cawnpore in India, a British garrison of men, women and children, under siege, were offered safe passage and sanctuary. Instead, they were betrayed and butchered, an atrocity that shocked Victorian Britain to its core. The surviving women and children were later hacked to death. Retribution, when it came, was unrelentingly severe.

Background

In 1857, the British, through the East India Company, directly ruled two thirds of India. The remaining third was overseen by Indian princes who paid tribute to the British. On 10 May, a group of sepoys (Indian soldiers) ran amok in the town of Meerut, killing several men and women of the British garrison based there, before heading to Delhi, 40 miles away. The Indian Mutiny had begun.

The name ‘Indian Mutiny’, as it was taught to generations of British schoolchildren, has a very Eurocentric ring to it; Indians prefer to call it the First War of Independence or the First Nationalist Uprising. But independence was not the ultimate aim of the mutineers and, confined mainly to the north-west of the country, in particular Bengal, neither was it of a national character. It was an outbreak of violence without leader and without objective beyond being motivated by a string of grievances.

The Siege of Cawnpore

siege of cawnpore Among the many sieges during 1857, was the siege and massacre at Cawnpore (now Kanpur), 250 miles from Delhi within the district of Oudh. Home to a large British garrison, the British, under Sir General Hugh Wheeler, a 67-year-old with 54 years of army service in India, had barricaded themselves within their barracks and prepared for the worse. The worse came in the form of one Nana Sahib, a man apparently on friendly terms with Wheeler and his Indian wife, promising him his loyalty in the conflict due to engulf them.

But Nana was a bitter man. His father, a prince, had been retired off by the British with a generous pension but on the old man’s death the payments stopped and his territory annexed, depriving Nana of an income. Now, in late May 1857, Sir Wheeler, believing Nana’s promises of assistance, offered him possession of the garrison’s ammunition store to arm him for the anticipated siege.

On 4 June, the Cawnpore sepoys mutinied. The few that refused to mutineer took refuge with the British bringing the number within the barracks to 240 men and 375 women and children. To Wheeler’s horror, he realised that the man leading the mutineers was none other than Nana Sahib, generously endowed with the general’s ammunition.

After three weeks of siege, with the summer at its hottest, the British, already desperately short of ammunition and with their supplies dwindling, were facing starvation. Under a continual barrage of gunfire, deprived of medical supplies and with precious little food or water, the situation was desperate and disease rife. Many went insane. Wheeler’s son had been one of the victims, decapitated by artillery fire. Wheeler smuggled out a plea to the British garrison at Lucknow, the capital of Oudh, 50 miles away, ‘Surely we are not to die like rats in a cage?’ But the Lucknow garrison, also under siege, was faring little better.

Safe passage or betrayal?

On 24 June, Nana in an apparent show of mercy, permitted the evacuation of the women, children and sick under safe conduct down the River Ganges to Allahabad. Wheeler suspected subterfuge but with only a couple days of rations left, he had little choice but to accept the offer.

On 27 June, Wheeler’s bedraggled garrison, many too sick to walk unaided, climbed upon a number of thatched-roof boats, guided in by helpful mutineers. But then, as the boats prepared to depart, the British were shot at. Flaming arrows set the thatched roofs ablaze and soon bodies, shot or beheaded, clogged up the shallow waters. Those who tried to swim to the opposite shore were caught and hacked to death. Among those killed was Sir Wheeler, three days short of his 68th birthday.

The ‘House of Ladies’

The surviving women and children, 210 in number, were spared to later face an even worse ordeal. They were marched back to town and incarcerated in a single-storey house, the Bibighur, the ‘House of Ladies’, built by an Englishman for his Indian mistress. Deprived of sustenance and suffering in the July heat, the prisoners weakened. After over two weeks of torment, on 15 July, Nana Sahib received news that a relieving force of British troops was on its way. Panicked, Nana ordered the women and children killed.

The sepoys dispatched to murder their captors found the task too distasteful, and so Nana ordered in professional butchers who, wearing aprons, showed no qualms in wielding their meat cleavers and swords. Amid the screams and blood, their sword blades broke from overwork. An hour later, they had finished their pitiless task, leaving over 200 dead and dismembered women and children. The following morning, they found three women and three children, aged under seven, covered in blood, quivering beneath the piles of dead bodies. They were thrown, one-by-one, down a 50-foot deep mine shaft, and there suffocated under the weight of corpses and body parts thrown in on top of them.

Retribution

Two days later, a company of British soldiers, under the command of General Sir Henry Havelock, captured the city (Havelock’s statue can be found in London’s Trafalgar Square). On finding the scenes of murder, and inflamed with anger, they extracted revenge. Most of the perpetrators had made good their escape but no matter the British made captured Indians, whether involved or not, lick the blood stains of the dead. Hindus were forced into eating beef, Muslims pork. The latter were tied up in pigskin before being executed. Many inhabitants of Cawnpore who had played no part in the violence were summarily executed for having failed to do anything to prevent the killings. The preferred method of execution was to blow the perpetrator from the guns – hanging seemed too easy a death. The victim was tied to the muzzle of an artillery gun and blown to pieces.
 
Last edited:
. . . .
True but Balauchis and Pathan's fought more then other Indians..

I said mostly,not solely.In most part of the subcontinent,the strugle was non violent in nature (not implying it was futile) except the eastern parts and a few other parts in the west.
 
.
I said mostly,not solely.In most part of the subcontinent,the strugle was non violent in nature (not implying it was futile) except the eastern parts and a few other parts in the west.
But it did gave brits a look that while Indians will shake one hand with them but there other hand will be ready as fist...
 
.
Paly Khan !
800px-Jamal_Shah_and_Hayat_Durrani_in_PTV_Palay_Shah_Series,.JPG
4d2653baf604b69164365bff33f59461_ls_t.jpg
Pally_khan_Khosti.jpg
 
.
.
Most (like 95%) Punjabis,Pashtuns etc didnt give a shit... coz of obvious reasons..

Read "The Sepoy And The Raj" by David Omissi.



Palay Khan was from Zhob district right?

P.S: Which drama is the first pic from?

I know it already bro.In fact they were instrumental in quelling the rebelion that was started by the soldiers of the then Bengal regiment,most probably it all started in the Barakpore army garrison if my memory serves me correct.
 
. .
I know it already bro.In fact they were instrumental in quelling the rebelion that was started by the soldiers of the then Bengal regiment,most probably it all started in the Barakpore army garrison if my memory serves me correct.

Hatred for "Hindustanis" ... was the main reason for that...

P.S: Some people think the Bengal Army consisted of Bengalis.. but in reality... it comprised of men from Awadh and Bihar... Rajputs,Brahmins and soldiers who served the Sultans..
 
.
Interestingly Nana Sahib disappeared to some unknown fate after 1857 and despite great efforts the British never captured him or so I heard.
 
.
Interestingly Nana Sahib disappeared to some unknown fate after 1857 and despite great efforts the British never captured him or so I heard.
Rumour had it that he went to Nepal.
 
.
Rumour had it that he went to Nepal.
Yes...but nothing is known of his later life or the time and circumstances of his death.
Btw he was the adopted son of Baji Rao, the article did not mention it or did I miss it?
 
.
Yes...but nothing is known of his later life or the time and circumstances of his death.
Btw he was the adopted son of Baji Rao, the article did not mention it or did I miss it?
just like Mir Qasim.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom