What's new

Soviet Tsar bomb compared to Hiroshima.

I thought that ATBIP like bombs would be a alternative for using nuclear bombs.

Using CBU is offense in war scenario even Kargil war we didn't used cluster that bombs. I having a query may be silly , the father or mother bombs would give same yield in normal grounds/place as well as in high attitude like Siachin or Kargil hills , deprivation of oxygen is really matters for bombs?.

I don't think that as these bombs use conventional explosive just like conventional bombs.though you should try more senior members for this query..


and CBU-105 is awsome weapon as it can destroy entire armoured column via 2/3 of these...and todays Cluster bomb is way ahead of previous gen Cluster bombs...what issues raised against Cluster bombs is few bomblets don't blust and stay active and blust later when somebody touches it.many innocents died/injured like this.but these versions are way too advanced as it self destructs if they failed to find the target..


The 40 Skeets scan an area of 1,500 feet (460 m) by 500 feet (150 m) using infrared and laser sensors, seeking targets by pattern-matching. When a Skeet finds a target it fires an explosively-formed penetrator to destroy it. If a Skeet fails to find a target, it self-destructs 50 feet (15 m) above the ground; if this fails, a back-up timer disables the Skeet. These features are intended to avoid later civilian casulaties from unexploded munitions, and result in an unexploded-ordnance rate of less than 1%.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBU-97_Sensor_Fuzed_Weapon
 
.
These are very ugly nuclear bombs.
Those who survives, It creates unwanted skin cancer.
Need to disable/eliminate them otherwise future is very dark for the world.
1900 is a evil century.
There was no such thing in 100,000+ years of life.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom