What's new

South Korea says Trump pledged commitment to its defense

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump pledged his commitment to defending South Korea under an existing security alliance during a phone call with South Korean President Park Geun-hye on Thursday, her office said.

Trump had said during the election campaign he would be willing to withdraw U.S. military stationed in South Korea unless Seoul paid a greater share of the cost of the deployment. There are about 28,500 U.S. troops based in South Korea in combined defense against North Korea.

Park said the alliance between the two countries had grown as they faced various challenges over the past six decades, adding she hoped the ties would develop further.

She asked Trump to join in the effort to help minimize the threat from the North, which has carried out a series of nuclear and missile tests in defiance of UN Security Council resolutions and sanctions.

Trump agreed with Park and said: "We will be steadfast and strong with respect to working with you to protect against the instability in North Korea," the presidential Blue House said.

The official newspaper of the North's ruling Workers' Party said on Thursday the U.S. wish for North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons program "is only a fantasy of a bygone era" and the policy of pressure and sanctions had failed.

"The only accomplishment of the Obama administration is that it is leaving behind for the new administration coming next year the burden of having to deal with a strong nuclear power," Rodong Sinmun said in a commentary.

It did not mention Trump by name. But Choson Sinbo, a pro-North newspaper published in Japan and controlled by Pyongyang, said: "Trump is well advised to learn the lesson of history from Obama's failure.

"Otherwise, the new owner of the White House will be met with the ashes of the calamity started by the previous owner."

The call between Park and Trump lasted about 10 minutes and Park said she hoped Trump would be able to visit South Korea soon, according to the Blue House.

There has been concern in South Korea that a Trump presidency will demand that Seoul sharply raise its share of the cost of maintaining the U.S. military presence in the country.

Trump said earlier this year in various media interviews that he would be willing to withdraw U.S. forces from South Korea and Japan but "would not do so happily".

"We get paid nothing, we get paid peanuts" for deploying the troops to South Korea," he said in an interview with CNN.

Under a five-year cost-sharing accord reached two years ago, Seoul agreed to contribute $867 million toward U.S. military costs in 2014, about 40 percent of the total. The deal called for the amount to rise annually at the rate of inflation.

South Korea believes its share of the cost is much higher when the vast amount of land occupied by the U.S. forces including a large area in central Seoul are considered.

Some members of parliament have suggested that the country has little choice but to consider nuclear armament if U.S. forces are withdrawn while North Korea continues to develop nuclear weapons and missiles that could carry them.

South Korea's Defence Ministry spokesman Moon Sang-gyun said on Thursday the country has paid for its share of the cost of maintaining the U.S. military and the contribution has been recognized by the U.S. government and Congress.

South Korea and the United States have also agreed to deploy a Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) anti-missile system with the U.S. military to counter missile threats from North Korea.

South Korea has consistently said it had no plan to buy the THAAD system, which is built by Lockheed Martin Corp and costs an estimated $800 million a piece, that will likely add to the cost of maintaining the U.S. military presence.

The two Koreas remain in a technical state of war after their 1950-53 conflict ended in a truce, not a peace treaty.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-southkorea-idUSKBN13508O
 
.
Some members of parliament have suggested that the country has little choice but to consider nuclear armament if U.S. forces are withdrawn while North Korea continues to develop nuclear weapons and missiles that could carry them.

Trump has already said that Japan and South Korea should have nuclear weapons. If South Korea doesn't pay its dues it will consider going nuclear. Fantastic development I say.
 
.
IMO we should remove our troops from SK and Japan, but pledge to use nuclear weapons if NK attacks them. I just can't see China ever green lighting a NK attack.
 
.
Israel is ready to contribute from it's own nuclear arsenal and give few warheads to Japan and SK
 
. . . .
Then u must want china to provide thermonuclear war heads to Syria, Palestine, Iran etc..
North Korea is china and I didn't know? NK threaten SK every single day to use their nuclear warheads and it's clearly the aggressor in the area. Either china contain them or U.S should
 
.
North Korea is china and I didn't know? NK threaten SK every single day to use their nuclear warheads and it's clearly the aggressor in the area. Either china contain them or U.S should
China doesn't have to do sh!t and if you think Israel giving nukes to SK or JP will not affect China's relations with Israel you should tell your leader to do that. Most likely they are not that crazy enough to anger China. You can say this or that but at the end of the day DPRK will end up having nukes without using them on SK,JP or USA. Why? Because Kim is not suicidal to use them first, if he does he knows he's dead meat. What good does it do for Kim if he starts nuking SK,JP or US? SK is attached to them, it would be foolish to drop some nukes next door. The radiation will even spread to DPRK if you haven't noticed how close Seoul is to DPRK. Secondly why would DPRK want to nuke Japan in the first place? Revenge? Get real, should Germany now be afraid Israel gonna nuke Germany? Or what about China now nuking Japan for revenge? The idea is totally absurd. Last but not least sending a nuke to USA will mean complete destruction of DPRK.
Sorry but your purpose of painting Kim as the next Imperial Japan or German Empire is totally unconvincing. It is purely for defensive purpose against the US after seeing what happened to Libya,Iraq,Syria and many more countries torn down by the US.
 
.
China doesn't have to do sh!t and if you think Israel giving nukes to SK or JP will not affect China's relations with Israel you should tell your leader to do that. Most likely they are not that crazy enough to anger China. You can say this or that but at the end of the day DPRK will end up having nukes without using them on SK,JP or USA. Why? Because Kim is not suicidal to use them first, if he does he knows he's dead meat. What good does it do for Kim if he starts nuking SK,JP or US? SK is attached to them, it would be foolish to drop some nukes next door. The radiation will even spread to DPRK if you haven't noticed how close Seoul is to DPRK. Secondly why would DPRK want to nuke Japan in the first place? Revenge? Get real, should Germany now be afraid Israel gonna nuke Germany? Or what about China now nuking Japan for revenge? The idea is totally absurd. Last but not least sending a nuke to USA will mean complete destruction of DPRK.
Sorry but your purpose of painting Kim as the next Imperial Japan or German Empire is totally unconvincing. It is purely for defensive purpose against the US after seeing what happened to Libya,Iraq,Syria and many more countries torn down by the US.
Threatening in preemptive nuclear strike is clearly a defensive move, jk.
 
. .
Okay when will Kim throw nukes at these countries smart*ss? Tell me since you are convinced his words must be taken as offensive in nature. Now that's a joke
Threatening to nuke other countries isn't an offensive move now? are you serious?
 
.
IMO we should remove our troops from SK and Japan, but pledge to use nuclear weapons if NK attacks them. I just can't see China ever green lighting a NK attack.

I agree, US should withdraw its troops and perhaps even shrink some of its forces in Japan. That will save you some cash and help your economy. But instead your :ph34r: government wants more increase in defense spending, increase costs of health care, increase tax, more robbery. US debt is reaching unprecedented level in history. I hope Trump can save you guys. Hillary sure won't, she is part of the establishment herself.

Threatening to nuke other countries isn't an offensive move now? are you serious?
Like i said if he shoots either SK,JP or US he is gonna die. Now tell me who is not afraid to die? You think he's not intelligent enough to figure that once he starts throwing nukes he and DPRK will be totally destroyed? I'm very sure he's much smarter than you are. When he's the ruler who is worshipped by his citizens and enjoy all the luxury he can get his hands on you think he wants to lose everything including his own life just to drop nukes for revenge? Seriously? you must be the scaremongering type then.
 
.
S. Korea and Japan are technologically advanced nations. With decades of knowledge on Nuclear technology and not to forget their own state of the art reactor designs. Both nations have enriched uranium to high levels but after public/economic pressure and political/military assurances they ended such programs.

A quick google search would be better than making ridiculous claims.

I wouldn't be surprised if they already have designs of weapons. Japan has been reported to need a month to field a functional weapon. Imagine the hast by S. Korea.

But instead your :ph34r: government wants more increase in defense spending, increase costs of health care, increase tax, more robbery. US debt is reaching unprecedented level in history.

http://www.military.com/daily-news/...-to-stop-buying-equipment-it-doesnt-need.html

Ear-marks:
Pork barrel is a metaphor for the appropriation of government spending for localized projects secured solely or primarily to bring money to a representative's district.
Non-Military related spending that comes under the fiscal policies of that year's military spending budget is recognized as "Military Spending". Which inflates the Defense slice of the pie by a few $billion. Not to mention all the stuff the Pentagon neither requests but has stuffed down it's throat.

There are USAF planes, new ones overstocked, parked on the side because there isn't enough pilots to fly them. And the same with Tanks, IFV, MRVs, list goes on.
 
.
I agree, US should withdraw its troops and perhaps even shrink some of its forces in Japan. That will save you some cash and help your economy. But instead your :ph34r: government wants more increase in defense spending, increase costs of health care, increase tax, more robbery. US debt is reaching unprecedented level in history. I hope Trump can save you guys. Hillary sure won't, she is part of the establishment herself.

Like i said if he shoots either SK,JP or US he is gonna die. Now tell me who is not afraid to die? You think he's not intelligent enough to figure that once he starts throwing nukes he and DPRK will be totally destroyed? I'm very sure he's much smarter than you are. When he's the ruler who is worshipped by his citizens and enjoy all the luxury he can get his hands on you think he wants to lose everything including his own life just to drop nukes for revenge? Seriously? you must be the scaremongering type then.
we defiantly need to shut down the bases in Okinawa. the Island is just too small and crowded.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom