What's new

Sikhs protest in Srinagar, raise pro-Khalistan slogans

.
Clashes in Kashmir as Trucker Targeted Over Beef Rumours Dies

SRINAGAR: Clashes broke out in Kashmir today within hours of the news that Zahid Ahmad -- the trucker driver who was attacked with a petrol bomb in Udhampur following beef rumours around 10 days ago -- has died at a hospital in Delhi.

Angry protesters hurled stones at the police, who used tear gas and batons to drive back the protesters at a village in Anantnag district, where Zahid was from.


Zahid had suffered over 60% burns injuries when his truck was attacked with a petrol bomb and set on fire on October 9. The attack was carried out in Jammu's Udhampur after rumours that three cows were killed in the area. At the time, Zahid and his helper, Showkat, were on their way to Srinagar. Both had been moved to Delhi for treatment.

Officials said tests had revealed the cows had died because of food poisoning and the rumours of slaughter were created to create communal tension in the Hindu-majority area.

The attack had rocked Jammu and Kashmir assembly, with the opposition National Conference blaming the BJP and targeting the government for not disclosing political affiliation of attackers.

The controversy over beef has rocked the state with massive protests held in September.

Earlier this month, the state's independent lawmaker Engineer Rashid was thrashed by a group of his BJP colleagues for hosting a beef party, leaving the People's Democratic Party - which is ruling the state in alliance with the BJP - red-faced.

The trouble had started with a High Court order to enforce a decades-old law banning cow slaughter and the sale of beef in the state. It had worsened after the September 28 incident in Dadri, in which a man was lynched after rumours of cow slaughter and beef consumption. On Friday the court set aside its earlier order and asked the government to review the laws which have become redundant.

But Mr Rashid dubbed the attack on Zahid "Dadri 4," in which "someone reportedly poisoned a few cows and they got after these people and butchered them".

"The government has shown untter carelessness from Day 1," he added.

"Why did they not punish the accused? I returned the compensation to Mufti saheb (chief minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed). Nobody from administration or government approached us," said Zahid's cousin.

Officials say seven men were arrested for the attack on Zahid -- five of them were booked under Public Safety Act. The kingpin, however, is still at large, they said.


Clashes in Kashmir as Trucker Targeted Over Beef Rumours Dies

@SarthakGanguly 's home town. We are coming to liberate you sarthak. :D
 
.
@SarthakGanguly 's home town. We are coming to liberate you sarthak. :D
The best way you can get hands on me (not kidding) is as a half burnt body with a self inflicted bullet wound in my skull. I won't leave Kashmir. This is not a joke. I have fired gun before and I know what's in store for me if I fall.
 
.
I think the path India is on is very dangerous. It is a path where minorities are treated as second class citizens.
Do let us know the path of Pakistan whether it is dangerous or safe. How are minorities treated in Pakistan, I mean the Hazaras, Shias, Ahmedias, Christans, Sikhs and Hindus.

Just see the video


 
.
You mean Iranian have rights over Punjab?

Also the Germans

Do let us know the path of Pakistan whether it is dangerous or safe. How are minorities treated in Pakistan, I mean the Hazaras, Shias, Ahmedias, Christans, Sikhs and Hindus.

Just see the video



But they cannot demand their own country but the Sikhs and Kashmiris can.
 
. .
The best way you can get hands on me (not kidding) is as a half burnt body with a self inflicted bullet wound in my skull. I won't leave Kashmir. This is not a joke. I have fired gun before and I know what's in store for me if I fall.
No one wants to kick you out. Many muslims thought the same way. A change of government is all that will happen. Ideally no people of any religion should have to move out of their homes. I am still loyal to Lucknow though more to Pakistan. You do not abandon your home easily.

Do let us know the path of Pakistan whether it is dangerous or safe. How are minorities treated in Pakistan, I mean the Hazaras, Shias, Ahmedias, Christans, Sikhs and Hindus.

Just see the video


You are off topic. Why bring Pakistan to a debate about Kashmiris and Sikhs?
 
.
BBC presenter Sian Williams threatens to have guest Jagmeet Singh thrown out after on-air protest about Sikhs in Punjab disrupts show
Appearing on Sunday Morning Live, Jagmeet Singh obstructed cameras and protested against media coverage of violence against Sikhs

bbc-sikh-sian-willaims.jpg


A BBC presenter threatened to eject a panellist live on-air after he attempted to protest about the lack of media coverage of violence against Sikhs in the Punjab.

Appearing on Sunday Morning Live, Jagmeet Singh, from the educational charity Basics of Sikhi, stood up in front of the camera and interrupted presenter Sian Williams.


Mr Singh said: “I have to say Sikhs are being killed in Punjab and nobody is reporting it. Please report it.”

Visibly frustrated by the disruption to the show, Williams hit back: “Jagmeet I will have to get you taken out unless you allow polite and respect for guests here and our audience at home.”

After the altercation – which lasted just under a minute – Williams diverted viewers' attention to an unrelated clip. When cameras returned the panel, Mr Singh was no longer there.

Basics of Sikhi, an educational charity based in the UK which aims to spread the Guru’s wisdom, accused the presenter of belittling Mr Singh.

The charity said on Facebook: “So disappointed by the BBC’s treatment of Jagmeet Singh on Sunday Morning Live this morning. The presenter shut down Singh and repeatedly belittled him from bringing up the issue of violence against Sikhs in Punjab."

The charity also linked to a petition, boasting 70,000 supporters, urging the BBC to cover violence in the Punjab.

The petition states: “Despite the BBC having large presence in India with many reporters stationed there – it has not picked up this story. There is no mention of this on any of the their news media outlets in India or here in the UK”.

Others praised Singh for bringing the issue up. One Twitter user, Rupinder Kaur, posted: “Fair play to Jagmeet Singh – I am outraged that the BBC and others are not reporting the killing of Sikhs in Punjab.”

A BBC Spokesperson said: "On live TV unplanned things happen and this was dealt with professionally and appropriately by Sian."
 
.
Soon sikhs of india will stand against india .



We just have to wait and watch or ho sakay to thora masala bi lagao ISI .
 
.
The best way you can get hands on me (not kidding) is as a half burnt body with a self inflicted bullet wound in my skull. I won't leave Kashmir. This is not a joke. I have fired gun before and I know what's in store for me if I fall.
As you wish . how about a slaughtered throat ?
 
. .
The Khalistan movement is a nationalist[4] political liberation movement, which seeks to create a separate country called Khalistān(Punjabi: ਖਾਲਿਸਤਾਨ, "The Land of the Pure") in the Punjab region of South Asia. The territorial definition of the proposed country ranges from the Punjab state of India to the greater Punjab region, including the neighbouring Indian states.

The Punjab region has been the traditional homeland for the Sikhs. Before its conquest by the British it had been ruled by the Sikhs for 82 years; the Sikh Misls ruled over the entire Punjab from 1767 to 1799,[8] till their confederacy was unified into the Sikh Empire byMaharajah Ranjit Singh. However, the region also has a substantial number of Hindus and Muslims, and before 1947, the Sikhs formed the largest religious group only in the Ludhiana district of the British province. When the Muslim League demanded a separate country for Muslims via the Lahore Resolution of 1940, a section of Sikh leaders grew concerned that their community would be left without any homeland following the partition of India between the Hindus and the Muslims. They put forward the idea of Khalistan, envisaging it as a theocratic state covering a small part of the greater Punjab region.

After the partition was announced, the majority of the Sikhs migrated from the Pakistani province of Punjab to the Indian province of Punjab, which then included the parts of the present-day Haryana and Himachal Pradesh. Following India's independence in 1947, The Punjabi Suba Movement led by the Akali Dal aimed at creation of a Punjabi-majority state (Suba) in the Punjab region of India in the 1950s.[9] Concerned that creating a Punjabi-majority state would effectively mean creating a Sikh-majority state, the Indian government initially rejected the demand. After a series of protests, violent clampdowns on the Sikhs, and the Indo-Pak War of 1965 the Government finally agreed to partition the state, creating a new Sikh-majority Punjab state and splitting the rest of the region to the states of Himachal Pradesh, the new state Haryana.[10] Subsequently, the Sikh leaders started demanding more autonomy for the states, alleging that the Central government was discriminating against Punjab. Although the Akali Dal explicitly opposed the demand for an independent Sikh country, the issues raised by it were used as a premise for the creation of a separate country by the proponents of Khalistan.

KLF:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalistan_Liberation_Force
 
.
Back
Top Bottom