What's new

Sikh Warrior Hari Singh Nalwa Tops list of " Top Ten World Conquerors"

Sikhs are less than 1% of the subcontinent still they succeeded in establishing an empire,defeated pashtun, harassed mughals,annexed KPK and conquered Kashmir and an undecided war with China (tibet).
so you highlight the 50 years of sikh domination but you completely rule out that for 1000 years they were ruled by pashtuns and mughuls??
one thing however i admire about them is that they always carry their culture wherever they go and very strictly devoted to their faith.
 
.
Despite of the losses and huge military expenditures, Ranjeet Singh was determined to maintain the occupation of Plain areas of KPK......best defense is offense......The civil war between barakzais and sadozais also encouraged him to proceed with his plans.

Those who have read Song of ice and fire series (game of thrones), Hari Singh was like Gregore Clegane, and Ranjeet Singh was Tywin Lannister.
 
.
LOL. Apart from Nalwa Singh, all others mentioned in the list are well known

Though he was a general but Hazrat Khalid bin Walid (RA) was also a genius conquering vast areas in only a couple of years....
And many others (lots of others) , which are not included in the list were much greater warriors than Nalwa Singh.
 
.
.
so you highlight the 50 years of sikh domination but you completely rule out that for 1000 years thsince ey were ruled by pashtuns and mughuls??
one thing however i admire about them is that they always carry their culture wherever they go and very strictly devoted to their faith.
since when pashtuns and mughal ruled for 1000 year?

Effective rule of mughals 1526 - 1761 they become mere puppet after that so much so that even a mughal emperor was enslaved and blinded by nobles n marathas.

As for pashtun the most important dynasty was suris but they didn't ruled for more than 20 years.
 
.
Sikhs are less than 1% of the subcontinent still they succeeded in establishing an empire,defeated pashtun, harassed mughals,annexed KPK and conquered Kashmir and an undecided war with China (tibet).

and got humiliated by india in 1984. 1% people ruled for 50 years due to vacum of leader in sub continent. the way british defeated them clearly shows their "power". they served as british cannon fodder during the british rule.

so yes sikh's can write whatever they wish but 50 years is not enough to be compared to even mongols empire.
 
.
Sikhs are less than 1% of the subcontinent still they succeeded in establishing an empire,defeated pashtun, harassed mughals,annexed KPK and conquered Kashmir and an undecided war with China (tibet).
when arab came to Hindustan they had no one.. so please keep this 1% logic in you...
sikhs maybe are Brave but most of them worked or served under british as now they are under hindus.. they cant keep Punjab united and look what hindus did to east Punjab divided into many..
 
.
Baron Hugel, a European traveller, awrites in his book, "Travels in Kashmir & the Punjab": - " I surprised him by knowledge whence he had gained the appellation of Nalwa, and of his having cloven the head of a tiger, who had already seized him as its prey. He told the Diwan to bring some drawings and gave me his portrait, in the act of killing the beast."

450px-A-portrait-of-Hari-Singh-3 (1).jpg


The_Sword_of_Hari_Singh_Nalwa_-_kept_at_the_Sikh_Regimental_centre_Ramgarh.jpg


The twenty major battles of Hari Singh Nalwa (either participated or was in command):

Battle of Kasur (1807) Hari Singh's first significant participation in a Sikh conquest on assuming charge of an independent contingent was in 1807, at the capture of Kasur. This place had long been a thorn in the side of Ranjit Singh's power because of its proximity to his capital city of Lahore. It was captured in the fourth attempt. This attack was led by Maharaja Ranjit Singh and Jodh Singh Ramgarhia. During the campaign the Sadar showed remarkable bravery and dexterity.[9] The Sardar was granted a jagir in recognition of his services.[10]

Battle of Sialkot (1808) Ranjit Singh nominated Hari Singh Nalwa to take Sialkot from its ruler Jiwan Singh. This was his first battle under an independent command. The two armies were engaged for a couple of days, eventually seventeen year old Hari Singh carried the day.[11]

Battle of Attock (1813) The fort of Attock was a major replenishment point for all armies crossing the Indus. In the early 19th century, Afghan appointees of the Kingdom of Kabul held this fort, as they did most of the territory along this frontier. This battle was fought and won by the Sikhs on the banks of the Indus under the leadership of Dewan Mokham Chand, Maharaja Ranjit Singh's general, against Azim Khan and his brother Dost Mohammad Khan, on behalf of Shah Mahmud of Kabul. Besides Hari Singh Nalwa, Hukam Singh Attariwala, Shyamu Singh, Khalsa Fateh Singh Ahluwalia and Behmam Singh Malliawala actively participated in this battle. This was the first victory of the Sikhs over the Durranis and the Barakzais.[12][13] With the conquest of Attock, the adjoining regions of Hazara-i-Karlugh and Gandhgarh became tributary to the Sikhs. In 1815, Sherbaaz Khan of Gandhgarh challenged Hari Singh Nalwa's authority and was defeated.[14]

Abortive attempt on Kashmir (1814) The Sikhs made an attempt to take Kashmir soon after the Battle of Attock. The army was under the general command of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, who camped at Rajauri. The troops were led towards Srinagar by Ram Dayal, grandson of Dewan Mokham Chand, while Jamadar Khushal Singh commanded the van, Hari Singh Nalwa and Nihal Singh Attariwala brought up the rear. Lack of provisions, delay in the arrival of reinforcements, bad weather and treachery of the allies forced the Sikhs to retreat. The next few years were spent in subduing Muslim chiefs within the Kashmir territory, en route Srinagar Valley.[15] In 1815–16, Hari Singh Nalwa attacked and destroyed the stronghold of the traitorous Rajauri chief.[16]

Conquest of Mahmudkot (Mehmood Kot, Muzaffargarh) (1816) In preparation of the conquest of the strongly fortified Mankera, Ranjit Singh decided to approach it from its southern extremity. After the Baisakhi of 1816, Misr Diwan Chand, Illahi Bakhsh, Fateh Singh Ahluwalia, Nihal Singh Attariwala and Hari Singh Nalwa accompanied by seven paltans and the topkhana went towards Mahmudkot.[citation needed] When news of its conquest arrived, it left the Maharaja so elated at the success of Sikh arms that he celebrated this victory with the firing of cannons. Two years later, on their way to Multan, the Sikhs captured the forts of Khangarh and Muzzaffargarh.[17]

Battle of Multan (1818) The winter of 1810 saw a jubilant Sikh army stationed near Multan in the Bari Doab. They were riding high on the success of having conquered the Chuj Doab. The possession of the city of Multan was taken with little resistance; however, the fort could not be captured. The fort was bombarded and mined without effect. Sardar Nihal Singh Attariwala and the young Hari Singh Nalwa were seriously wounded. A fire pot thrown from the walls of the fort fell on Hari Singh and he was so badly burnt that it was some months before he was fit for service.[16] Ranjit Singh was disconcerted beyond measure at the length of the siege and perforce had to abandon the attempt. Multan was finally conquered under the nominal command of Kharak Singh and the actual command of Misr Diwan Chand. It was a fiercely contested battle in which Muzzaffar Khan and his sons defended the place with exemplary courage, but they could not withstand the onslaught of the Sikhs. Hari Singh Nalwa was "chiefly instrumental" in the capture of the citadel.[12]

Peshawar becomes tributary (1818) When Shah Mahmud's son, Shah Kamran, killed their Barakzai Vazir Fateh Khan in August 1818 the Sikhs took advantage of the resulting confusion and their army formally forded the Indus and entered Peshawar, the summer capital of the Kingdom of Kabul (modern-day Afghanistan), for the first time. Thereafter, Hari Singh Nalwa was deputed towards Peshawar in order to keep the Sikh dabdaba kayam — maintain the pressure.

Mitha Tiwana becomes his jagir (1818) In the beginning of 1819, Hari Singh accompanied Misr Diwan Chand to collect tribute from the Nawab of Mankera. On completion of the mission, Diwan Chand crossed the river Chenab along with his topkhana and set up his camp in Pindi Bhattian near Chiniot. He was asked to leave Hari Singh stationed in the suburbs of Nurpur and Mitha Tiwana.[citation needed] Hari Singh must have achieved significant success for soon thereafter the Maharaja bestowed all the possessions of the Tiwana chiefs in jagir on the Sardar.[16]

Kashmir becomes a part of the Punjab (1819) In April 1819, the Sikh army marched towards Kashmir. On this occasion, Prince Kharak Singh held nominal command. Misr Diwan Chand led the vanguard, while Hari Singh Nalwa brought up the rear for the support of the leading troops. The third division, under the personal command of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, expedited supplies and conveyed these to the advance troops.[18] On the morning of 5 July 1819, the Sikh columns advanced to the sound of bugles. A severe engagement took place between the two armies and the Sikhs captured Kashmir. Great rejoicing followed in the Sikh camp and the cities of Lahore and Amritsar were illuminated for three successive nights.[citation needed] Thus came to an end the five centuries of Muslim rule in Kashmir.[19] Two years later, as Governor of Kashmir, Hari Singh Nalwa put down the rebellion of the most troublesome Khakha chief, Gulam Ali.[20]

Battle of Pakhli (1819) Under the Afghans, Hazara-i-Karlugh, Gandhgarh and Gakhar territory were governed from Attock. Kashmir collected the revenue from the upper regions of Pakhli, Damtaur and Darband. Numerous attempts by the Sikhs to collect revenue from Hazara-i-Karlugh not only met with failure, but also the loss of prominent Sikh administrators and commanders. Following the Sikh conquest of Kashmir, tribute was due from Pakhli, Damtaur, and Darband. On his return to the Punjab plains from the Kashmir Valley, Hari Singh and his companions followed the traditional kafila (caravan) route through Pakhli hoping to collect tribute from the region. The Sikh request for Nazrana resulted in the usual “fighting and mulcting”; the party however, was successful in their mission.[15]

Battle of Mangal (1821) Hari Singh's most spectacular success in the region of Pakistan's Hazara came two years later. On the successful conclusion of his governorship of Kashmir, he departed from the Valley and crossed the river Kishenganga at Muzaffarabad with 7000 foot soldiers. Hari Singh Nalwa traversed the hazardous mountainous terrain successfully, however when his entourage reached Mangal (Mangli, Pakistan) he found his passage opposed. Mangal, the ancient capital of Urasa was now the stronghold of the chief of the Jaduns who controlled the entire region of Damtaur. Hari Singh requested the tribesmen for a passage through their territory, but they demanded a tax on all the Kashmir goods and treasure he was taking with him. All trade kafilas routinely paid this toll. Hari Singh's claim that the goods he carried were not for trade purposes was not accepted. When parleying produced no result, battle was the only option. A combined tribal force numbering no less than 25,000 gathered from all the adjoining areas and challenged Hari Singh and his men. Despite being completely outnumbered, the Sardar stormed their stockades and defeated his opponents with a loss to them of 2,000 men. Hari Singh then left to join forces with the Sikh army poised for an attack on Mankera, but after he had collected a fine from every house and built a fort in this vicinity.[21]

Battle of Mankera (1822) The Sindh Sagar Doab was chiefly controlled from Mankera and Mitha Tiwana. Nawab Hafiz Ahmed Khan, a relative of the Durranis, exerted considerable influence in this region. Besides Mankera, he commanded a vast area protected by 12 forts. With the weakening of Afghan rule in Kabul, the governors of Attock, Mankera, Mitha Tiwana and Khushab had declared their independence. Ranjit Singh celebrated the Dussehra of 1821 across the river Ravi, at Shahdera. Hari Singh, Governor of Kashmir, was most familiar with the territory that the Maharaja had now set his eyes on. Nalwa was summoned post-haste to join the Lahore Army already on its way towards the river Indus. The Maharaja and his army had crossed the Jehlum when Hari Singh Nalwa, accompanied by his Kashmir platoons, joined them at Mitha Tiwana. The Sikhs commenced offensive operations in early November.

Nawab Hafiz Ahmed's predecessor, Nawab Mohammed Khan, had formed a cordon around Mankera with 12 forts—Haidrabad, Maujgarh, Fatehpur, Pipal, Darya Khan, Khanpur, Jhandawala, Kalor, Dulewala, Bhakkar, Dingana and Chaubara. The Sikh army occupied these forts and soon the only place that remained to be conquered was Mankera itself. A few years earlier, the Nawab of Mankera had actively participated in the reduction of Mitha Tiwana. The Tiwanas, now feudatories of Hari Singh Nalwa, were eager participants in returning that favour to the Nawab. The force was divided into three parts—one column being under Hari Singh—and each column entered the Mankera territory by a different route; capturing various places en route all three columns rejoined near Mankera town. Mankera was besieged, with Nalwa's force being on the west of the fort.[22]

The fort of Mankera stood in the middle of the Thal. It was built of mud with a citadel of burnt brick surrounded by a dry ditch. To make the central fortress inaccessible, no wells were permitted by the Nawab to be sunk within a radius of 15 kos. During the night of 26 November Hari Singh Nalwa, together with other chiefs and jagirdars, established their morchas (batteries) within long gunshot of the place. They found old wells, which their men cleared out and fresh ones were dug. On the nights of 6–7 December, they approached closer to the ditch. The ensuing skirmish was ferocious and resulted in considerable loss of life. The siege of the fort of Mankera lasted 25 days. Finally, the Nawab accepted defeat and the last Saddozai stronghold fell to the Sikhs.[citation needed] The Nawab was allowed to proceed towards Dera Ismail Khan, which was granted to him as jagir.[23] His descendants held the area until 1836.

Battle of Nowshera (Naushehra) (1823) The Sikhs forayed into Peshawar for the first time in 1818, but did not occupy the territory. They were content with collecting tribute from Yar Mohammed, its Barakzai governor. Azim Khan, Yar Mohammed's half-brother in Kabul, totally disapproved of the latter's deference to the Sikhs and decided to march down at the head of a large force to vindicate the honour of the Afghans. Azim Khan wanted to avenge both, the supplication of his Peshawar brethren and the loss of Kashmir. Hari Singh Nalwa was the first to cross the Indus at Attock to the Sikh post of Khairabad; he was accompanied by Diwan Kirpa Ram and Khalsa Sher Singh, the Maharaja's teenaged son, besides 8,000 men.

The Kabul Army was expected near Nowshera, on the banks of the river Kabul (Landai). Hari Singh's immediate plan was to capture the Yusafzai stronghold to the north of the Landai at Jehangira, and the Khattak territory to its south at Akora Khattak. The latter was taken with out difficulty however Jehangira was a masonry fort with very strong towers and the Yusafzais offered tough resistance. Hari Singh entered the fort and established his thana there.[22] The remaining troops re-crossed the Landai River and returned to their base camp at Akora. Mohammed Azim Khan had encamped about ten miles north-west of Hari Singh's position, on the right bank of the Landai, facing the town of Nowshera, awaiting Ranjit Singh's approach. The Sikhs had scheduled two battles – one along either bank of the Landai.

After Hari Singh had successfully reduced the tribal strongholds on either side of the river, Ranjit Singh departed from the fort of Attock. He crossed the Landai River at a ford below Akora, and set up his camp near the fort of Jehangira. The famous army commander Akali Phula Singh and the no less renowned Gurkha commander Bal Bahadur, with their respective troops, accompanied the Maharaja. The Barakzais merely witnessed the main action from across the river. Hari Singh Nalwa's presence had prevented them from crossing the Landai.[24] Eventually, the inheritors of Ahmed Shah Abdali’s legacy fled the scene in the direction of Jalalabad chased by Hari Singh Nalwa and his men to the very mouth of the Khyber Pass.

Battle of Sirikot (1824) Sirikot lay less than ten miles to the north-west of Haripur. This Mashwani village was strategically placed in a basin at the top of the north-east end of the Gandhgarh Range, which made its secure location a haven for the rebellious chiefs in the entire region. Hari Singh Nalwa went towards Sirikot before the rains of 1824. It was another six months before the attempt produced conclusive results. The Sardar almost lost his life in the course of this expedition. Ranjit Singh's military campaign for the winter of 1824 was scheduled towards Peshawar and Kabul. While stationed at Wazirabad, he received an arzi (written petition) from Sardar Hari Singh[25] informing him that he and his men were overwhelmingly outnumbered – one Sikh to ten Afghans. Ranjit Singh marched to [Rohtas], from there to [Rawalpindi] and via [Sarai Kala] reached Sirikot. The news of the approach of the Sikh army led to an instant dispersal of the insurgents.

The increasing success of the Sikh arms greatly disappointed the Yusafzai and other tribes inhabiting the trans-Indus region of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The Battle of Nowshera convinced them of their extreme vulnerability. Not only had the Kabul Barakzais let them down, but their subsequent application to the British for help had also met with little success.

Battle of Saidu (1827) The redeemer of the Yusafzais came in the form of one Sayyid Ahmad [1], who despite being a 'Hindki' was accepted as a leader by them. Budh Singh Sandhanwalia, accompanied by 4,000 horsemen, was deputed towards Attock to assist in suppressing the Yusafzai rebellion. The Maharaja's brief required him to thereafter to proceed towards Peshawar and collect tribute from Yar Mohammed Khan Barakzai. Budh Singh first heard of the Sayyid after he had crossed the Indus and encamped near the fort of Khairabad. Ranjit Singh was still on the sickbed when the news of the Sayyid's arrival, at the head of a large force of the Yusafzai peasantry, reached him. The gallantry of the Yusafzai defence in the Battle of Nowshera was still vivid in his mind. On receiving this news, he immediately put into motion all the forces that he could muster and immediately dispatched them towards the frontier.

The Barakzais in Peshawar, though outwardly professing allegiance to the Sikhs, were in reality in league with the insurgents. The Sayyid marched from Peshawar in the direction of Nowshera. Sardar Budh Singh wrote to the Sayyid seeking for a clarification of his intention. The Sayyid haughtily replied that he would first take the fort of Attock and then engage Budh Singh in battle.[citation needed]

Hari Singh Nalwa stood guard at the fort of Attock with the intention of keeping the Sayyid and his men from crossing the river until reinforcements arrived from Lahore. News had reached the Sikhs that the jihadis accompanying the Sayyid numbered several thousand. The battle between the Sayyid and the Sikhs was fought on 14 Phagun (23 February) 1827. The action commenced at about ten in the morning. The Muslim war cry of Allah hu Akbar, or "God is the greatest", was answered by the Sikhs with Bole so nihal, Sat Sri Akal, or “they who affirm the name of God, the only immortal truth, will find fulfilment”. Ironically, the opposing forces first professed the glory of the very same God Almighty, albeit in different languages, before they commenced slaughtering each other. The cannonade lasted about two hours. The Sikhs charged at their opponents, routed them, and continued a victorious pursuit for six miles, taking all their guns, swivels, camp equipage, etc.[citation needed] The number of killed was not mentioned, but blood was said to have flowed in ********. The Sayyid sustained a complete defeat despite his vastly superior numbers. He was compelled to retreat to the Yusafzai Mountains. It was reported that 8,000 Sikhs had defended themselves against an enraged population of 150,000 Mohammedans.[26] A salute was fired, illumination was ordered by drumbeat in the city of Lahore in honour of the victory.[citation needed]

Occupies Peshawar (1834) The actual occupation of the great city of Peshawar and its ruinous fort, the Bala Hisar, by the Sikhs was quite a comedy and a total anti-climax. It was a reflection of Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa's formidable reputation in ‘Pashtunistan’. Masson arrived in Peshawar just in time to see the Sikhs take control of the city. His eyewitness account reports that the Afghans simply fled the place and Hari Singh Nalwa occupied Peshawar without a battle.[27]

Dost Mohammad Khan flees (1835) Hari Singh Nalwa was the governor of Peshawar when Dost Mohammed personally came at the head of a large force to challenge the Sikhs. Following his victory against Shah Shuja at Kandahar, in the first quarter of 1835, Dost Mohammed declared himself padshah (king), gave a call for jihad and set off from Kabul to wrest Peshawar from the Sikhs. Ranjit Singh directed his generals to amuse the Afghans with negotiations and to win over Sultan Mohammed Khan. He directed them that on no account, even if attacked, were they to enter into a general engagement until his arrival.[28]

Hari Singh Nalwa and the other Sikh chieftains requested Ranjit Singh to permit them to engage with the Kabul Afghans. On 30 Baisakh (10 May 1835), Sardar Hari Singh, Raja Gulab Singh, Misr Sukh Raj, Sardar Attar Singh Sandhanwalia, Jamadar Khushal Singh, the Raja Kalan (Dhian Singh), Monsieur Court, Signor Avitabile, Sardar Tej Singh, Dhaunkal Singh, Illahi Bakhsh of the topkhana, Sardar Jawala Singh and Sardar Lehna Singh Majithia were ordered to move. The troops fanned out over five kos, forming a semicircle in front of the Amir's encampment. Sardar Hari Singh proposed that the water of the stream Bara, which flowed in the direction of Dost Mohammed Khan's camp, be dammed. When the Ghazis appeared, Sardar Hari Singh commenced firing his guns. The Maharaja, however, prohibited him from indulging in battle and dispatched his Vakils to negotiate with the Amir.

Once Dost Mohammed Khan was assured that the Sikhs would affect a truce until their Vakils were in his camp, he let them know what he really felt. Harsh words were exchanged. He accused Fakir Aziz-ud-din of making “use of much language, having plenty of leaves but little fruit”. On finding both his step brothers, Jabbar and Sultan, irredeemably lost to him, Dost Mohammed decided to retire from the field with the whole of his army, armament and equipage. He left at night, making sure that the Fakir did not return to the Sikh camp until after he had gone through the Khyber Pass.[29]

Takes Jamrud (Khyber Pass) (1836) In October 1836, following the Dussehra celebrations in Amritsar, Hari Singh made a sudden attack on the village of Jamrud, at the mouth of the Khyber Pass. The Misha Khel Khyberis, the owners of this village, were renowned for their excellent marksmanship and total lack of respect for any authority. Hari Singh Nalwa's first encounter with this tribe had taken place following the Battle of Nowshera when he had pursued the fleeing Azim Khan; and once again, when he chased Dost Mohammed Khan in 1835.

The occupation of Jamrud was rather strongly contested, but it appeared that the place was taken by surprise. On its capture, Hari Singh Nalwa gave instructions to fortify the position without delay. A small existing fort was immediately put into repair. News of this event was immediately transmitted to Kabul. Masson informed Wade of the passage of events along this frontier in a letter dated 31 October 1836. With the conquest of Jamrud, at the very mouth of the Khyber,[28] the frontier of the Sikh Empire now bordered the foothills of the Hindu Kush Mountains.[citation needed]

Panjtaar defeated(1836) The defeat of the Khyberis sent shock waves through the Afghan community. However, more was to follow. Hari Singh Nalwa accompanied by Kanwar Sher Singh, now proceeded towards the Yusafzai strongholds, north-east of Peshawar, which had withheld tribute for three years. The Sikhs completely defeated the Yusafzais, with their chief, Fateh Khan of Panjtar, losing his territory.[30] It was reported that 15,000 mulkia fled before the Sikhs like a herd of goats, many being killed and the remaining taking refuge in the hills.[citation needed] After burning and levelling Panjtar to the ground, Hari Singh returned to Peshawar realising all the arrears of revenue. Fateh Khan was obliged to sign an agreement to pay tribute on which condition Panjtar was released.[citation needed] When news of the conquest of Panjtar reached the Court of Lahore, a display of fireworks was proposed.[citation needed]

Battle of Jamrud (1837) The news of the conquest of Jamrud put Dost Mohammed Khan into a state of greatest alarm. General Hari Singh's latest possession gave the Sikhs the command of the entrance into the valley of Khyber. “If this was a prelude to further aggressive measures,” the Amir “saw in the intimation and submission of the people of Khyber, the road laid open to Jelalabad.” Were the Sikhs to take Jalalabad, their next stop would be Kabul. This information was followed by the intelligence of the defeat of the Panjtaris.[citation needed]

The Maharaja's grandson, Nau Nihal Singh was getting married in March 1837. Troops had been withdrawn from all over the Punjab to put up a show of strength for the British Commander-in-chief who was invited to the wedding. Dost Mohammed Khan had been invited to the great celebration.[citation needed] Hari Singh Nalwa too was supposed to be at Amritsar, but in reality was in Peshawar (some accounts say he was ill[31]) Dost Mohammed had ordered his army to march towards Jamrud together with five sons and his chief advisors with orders not to engage with the Sikhs, but more as a show of strength and try and wrest the forts of Shabqadar, Jamrud and Peshawar.[32] Hari Singh had also been instructed not to engage with the Afghans till reinforcements arrived from Lahore.[citation needed]

Hari Singh's lieutenant, Mahan Singh, was in the fortress of Jamrud with 600 men and limited supplies. Hari Singh was in the strong fort of Peshawar. He was forced to go to the rescue of his men who were surrounded from every side by the Afghan forces, without water in the small fortress. Though the Sikhs were totally outnumbered, the sudden arrival of Hari Singh Nalwa put the Afghans in total panic. In the melee, Hari Singh Nalwa was accidentally grievously wounded. Before he died, he told his lieutenant not to let the news of his death out till the arrival of reinforcements, which is what he did. While the Afghans knew that Hari Singh had been wounded, they waited for over a week doing nothing, till the news of his death was confirmed. By this time, the Lahore troops had arrived and they merely witness the Afghans fleeing back to Kabul.[33] Hari Singh Nalwa had not only defended Jamrud and Peshawar, but had prevented the Afghans from ravaging the entire north-west frontier. The Afghans achieved none of their stated objectives. The loss of Hari Singh Nalwa was irreparable and this Sikh victory was as costly as a defeat.[34][35]

Victories over the Afghans were a favourite topic of conversation for Ranjit Singh. He was to immortalise these by ordering a shawl from Kashmir at the record price of Rs5000, in which were depicted the scenes of the battles fought with them.[citation needed] Following the death of Hari Singh Nalwa, no further conquests were made in this direction. The Khyber Pass continued as the Sikh frontier till the annexation of the Punjab by the British.[36]
 
.
since when pashtuns and mughal ruled for 1000 year?

Effective rule of mughals 1526 - 1761 they become mere puppet after that so much so that even a mughal emperor was enslaved and blinded by nobles n marathas.

As for pashtun the most important dynasty was suris but they didn't ruled for more than 20 years.

1000 year was just a mere figure but to be precise muslims ruled india for 700-800 years out of which 100 years by afghans. now you can debate with me about THE MOST IMPORTANT DYNASTY but read the history the first sultanate by afghans was formed in 1451 and went on till 1555. But again you are an indian so "ifs, evens and buts" are justified for you.
 
.
Mujahideen movement led by Syed Ahmad Bareilwi, which was against these Sikhs and their occupation of Peshawar and Hazara.
And do we treat the campaigns of Ghauri, Ghaznavi etc as the same kind of 'occupation' of Pakistani Punjabi and Sindhi territories and condemn them?
 
.
Sikh warrior Hari Singh Nalwa has topped the list of Top Ten conquerors of the History that has compiled by “Billionaires Australia”.Moreover list is followed by followed by Genghis Khan and Alexander ranked as second and third.The introductory text that was produced by Billionaires Australia on July 14, 2014.From the earliest forms of society through to the modern day,the fates of entire civilisations have been decided by the swords of soldiers and the commands of their leaders.We are going to we countdown the top 10 conquerors.

1. Hari Singh Nalwa
Here we are having the exclusive number one spot on the Billionaires Australia the man who resides atop of this list is Hari Singh Nalwa.The Greek writer Euripides’s saying is that “Ten soldiers wisely led will beat a hundred without a head” that represents a truly legendary military leader Hari singh Nalwa.

The main reason of why has topped the list that he achieved so much with so little.Hari Singh Nalwa, part of the illustrious Uppal family,relied on ingenious tactics and unparalleled courage to defeat much larger armies.His life span is from 1791-1837 also he was the commander-in-chief of the Sikh Empire’s army. There was alot of ups and downs that he has faced in his life.Besides that he became the only man in history to take the Khyber Pass – the mountain path that connects Afghanistan and Pakistan.Hari Singh Nalwa was attacked by a tiger while he was on hunt in 1804.He is the great leader tackled the beast with his bare hands and broke its jaw, killing it instantly and earning him the moniker Baagh Maar (Tiger-killer).There is not a military leader in the world that has not heard about and studied the exploits of Hari Singh Nalwa.

2. Genghis Khan
He is the man who has become the second man on the list of great conquerors.He is the founder of Mongol Empire the largest contiguous empire in history.He has created such a huge empire by uniting many of the nomadic tribes.In his lifetime he conquered 4,860,000 square miles, more than any other ruler in history.

3. Alexander the Great
He is the man who sits at number three in our countdown of great conquerors was certainly a lion-like leader.Great once remarked: “I am not afraid of an army of lions led by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion.” He took down the mighty Persian kingdom and his empire spread from Gibraltar to the Punjab.He is the the ruler revolutionised the art of war during the period of ancient history and deserves his position near the summit of this exclusive list.

4. Attila the Hun
The leader of the barbarian Huns, the fourth greatest conqueror on this Billionaires Australia list plundered and pillaged everything in his path.Attila was well known for his cruelty and took no mercy on his enemies, making him an often-vilified military leader, but an exceptional one nonetheless.

5. Julius Caesar
The man who holds the fifth place on our list: Julius Caesar.Julius Caesar led the armies of the Roman Republic to victories across Africa and Europe.Caesar had used his military nous to extend the reaches of the Roman Empire to territories far and wide.

6. Cyrus the Great
He is the man who is at six place on the countdown.It is a name perhaps not as well known as some in this exclusive collection but Cyrus’ military might ought not to be underestimated.Not only was he almost unbeatable on the field of battle, his political leadership is also evidenced by the fact that his empire, which spanned three continents, would live on for a long time after his death because of the infrastructure he put in place.Cyrus defeated the Babylonians and liberated the Jews and by the time of his death in 530BC he was the ruler of the largest kingdom the world had ever seen.

7. Francisco Pizarro
He is the man placed seventh on the list.In the story of how Spain came to rule much of South America the name Hernan Cortes has often dominated the history books, but in reality Pizarro’s exploits were far more notable.He led three expeditions across the Atlantic and on the third one he defeated much the Incan Empire with no more than 160 men on horseback.

8. Napoleon Bonaparte
He has become the man coming in at number eight on the Billionaires Australia list of greatest conquerors in the history of the world.He is just just five-and-a-half feet tall not so much physically imposing but but on the battlefield he was unmatched in his military prowess.Living from 1769 to 1821 ,Napoleon spent the best part of two decades leading his armies to war across the continent.At his peak the little man reigned over more than 70 million people.

9. Hannibal Barka

Hannibal Barka, simply known as Hannibal, stayed at ninth position.He is widely considered to be the Roman Empire’s greatest adversary, leading the Carthaginian forces against Rome in the Second Punic War.He fought the Romans with smaller, poorly equipped armies but constantly came out on top.

10. Timur aka Tamerlane
Taking the number 10 spot on the Australia list of great conquerors is Timur, otherwise known as Tamerlane, a Turkish ruler from the 14th century.He was a revered military leader and conquered large parts of West, South and Central Asia to become the most powerful ruler in the Muslim world.his army was feared across the continent and historians have estimated that his military campaigns were responsible for the deaths of 17 million people, earning him a barbaric reputation.

Sikh Warrior Hari Singh Nalwa ,number one spot on the Billionaires Australia list. - Punjabup films

Sikh Warrior Hari Singh Nalwa tops list of “Top Ten World Conquerors” compiled by Billionaires Australia | Sikh Siyasat News

Haha; is this a joke or what...?
 
.
Legend has it that he was horrified at hearing the stories of women from the area regarding the atrocities that the Sikh's were committing against the locals which triggered his wish to go and fight.
Bin Qasim also came to Sub continent after hearing a woman's cry. I believe it's just a myth propagated years after to justify wars. The way captured women were treated after defeat is an example in itself how much they cared for women dignity and honor.
 
.
Bin Qasim also came to Sub continent after hearing a woman's cry. I believe it's just a myth propagated years after to justify wars. The way captured women were treated after defeat is an example in itself how much they cared for women dignity and honor.
Yup, them Sikhs had no honour.
 
.
@ranjeet @Oscar @Samandri
Historically the territorial expansion of an empire/kingdom through conquest and occupation by aggressive monarchs and generals was par for the course. Some were more brutal than others (the Mongols for example) and even the so called 'civilized Romans' were only 'civilized' when it came to the elite of the Roman empire.

My earlier point was that Pakistani Punjabi, Pakistani Pashtun, Pakistani Sindhi, Pakistani Balochi etc. history needs to be celebrated irrespective of whether the historical events and figures were Muslim/Islamic or not. I used ethnic descriptors for a reason, because those terms are a better and more constant representation of the peoples who inhabit and have inhabited the lands comprising today's Pakistan. It is the people who are the 'constant', not religion and not culture. Islam did not 'come to the sub-continent', people came to the sub-continent and brought religious and cultural values with them, and the locals subsumed both people and the values they brought.

Eventually even those 'ethnic descriptors' will no longer be sufficient either, as the various ethnic groups are subsumed into a larger national identity that is an amalgamation of all of its components, but even then the people will be a 'constant' in that you can trace their lineage and history back through time on the land we call Pakistan, beyond Islam, Sikhism, Hinduism and Buddhism.
 
.
@ranjeet @Oscar @Samandri
Historically the territorial expansion of an empire/kingdom through conquest and occupation by aggressive monarchs and generals was par for the course. Some were more brutal than others (the Mongols for example) and even the so called 'civilized Romans' were only 'civilized' when it came to the elite of the Roman empire.

My earlier point was that Pakistani Punjabi, Pakistani Pashtun, Pakistani Sindhi, Pakistani Balochi etc. history needs to be celebrated irrespective of whether the historical events and figures were Muslim/Islamic or not. I used ethnic descriptors for a reason, because those terms are a better and more constant representation of the peoples who inhabit and have inhabited the lands comprising today's Pakistan. It is the people who are the 'constant', not religion and not culture. Islam did not 'come to the sub-continent', people came to the sub-continent and brought religious and cultural values with them, and the locals subsumed both people and the values they brought.

Eventually even those 'ethnic descriptors' will no longer be sufficient either, as the various ethnic groups are subsumed into a larger national identity that is an amalgamation of all of its components, but even then the people will be a 'constant' in that you can trace their lineage and history back through time on the land we call Pakistan, beyond Islam, Sikhism, Hinduism and Buddhism.

I agree with you Sir, local heroes must be celebrated irrespective of which religion they belonged to. Dulla Bhatti is still praised among Punjabi folks.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom