Islam didn't adopt anything .......... its message is still pure, the followers couldn't break the age old shackles and somehow felt the need to mold it to satisfy their insecurities.
Bowing to parents in real or not raising any objection to what they say is totally subcontinent thing (out of respect)............. I can quote example from Quran where adopted son of Messenger (Peace be upon him) didn't obey His (Peace be upon him) advice. Islam is about freedom of humans and it doesn't support any action that translates into direct slavery or symbols of being enslaved .... be it words related to a piece of land.
The way you guys do sajdah and hold your hands while praying, across the world, all Muslims, across racial national ethnic lines, is completely Zoroastrian.
It is not limited to only Iranis. But EVERY Muslim.
If it were just Persians moulding Islam (corrupting, per you) to their culture congruent ways, then it would not have spread uniformly around the world as THE de rigeur method of prayer.
Unless it is your contention that once the Arabs converted the Persians, the Persians and only the Persians converted the rest of the Muslim world.
Which is clearly not what history tells us.
Therefore one must surmise it is the original, and originated from the Arabs.
Who were subservient under the Persians for millennia, either under direct rule or vassalship.
So the influence.
This has been written in great detail by many scholars.
Cheers, Doc
Last edited: