Featured ‘Shoot all you see’, Myanmar soldiers confess roles in massacre of Rohingya Muslims

[Indos]

Two soldiers who have deserted from Myanmar’s army have claimed in a newly released video that their commanding officers issued deadly orders for them to “shoot all that you see and that you hear” in villages where minority Rohingya Muslims lived in the Buddhist-majority country. The confession videos filmed in July 2020 were released by human rights group Fortify Rights on September 8. Over 700,000 of the stateless Muslim people are believed to have fled from Rakhine state in northwestern Myanmar to neighbouring Bangladesh.

 

[Kompromat]

Rohinga are surrounded by impotent Muslim countries. If they joined hands to protect Rohinga, this would never have gone unpunished. Myanmar would've been squeezed like a lemon.

 

[Song Hong]

The efficiency of Tatmadaw is very low with this "shoot all you see" policy, given that most Rohingyas are still living in peace at Arakan.

 

[Nike]

Rohinga are surrounded by impotent Muslim countries. If they joined hands to protect Rohinga, this would never have gone unpunished. Myanmar would've been squeezed like a lemon.

To press Myanmar too hard is not inline with ASEAN ideals for non-interference policy. The principle of non-interference is the original core foundation upon which regional relations between ASEAN member-states are based. The principle was first lined out in ASEAN’s foundation document, the Bangkok Declaration, issued in 1967. The Bangkok Declaration expressed that the member-states are determined to prevent external interference in order to ensure domestic and regional stability. The non-interference policy was reiterated in the Kuala Lumpur Declaration of 1997. It was further reinforced in the 1976 Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia (TAC), in which the principle of non-interference in members’ internal affairs was explicitly referred to as one of the association’s fundamental principles. To understand ASEAN’s guiding principle of non-interference, it is important to clarify its meaning. While the principle of non-interference is adopted by many organizations throughout the world and is enshrined in the Charter of the UN, what appears to be unique to ASEAN’s conduct of regional relations is therefore not merely the adoption of non-interference as a behavioural norm, but rather its particular understanding and subsequent practices of this norm But in turn this policy create a working and well developed Regional Organizations albeit the very differences in ideology among ASEAN member states. In contrast, we can see how other regional organization like ECOWAS, SARC and among other in which turned into inactive or worse chaotic region.

 

[nahtanbob]

Rohinga are surrounded by impotent Muslim countries. If they joined hands to protect Rohinga, this would never have gone unpunished. Myanmar would've been squeezed like a lemon.

If you believe in non-interference of internal affairs of countries what happened in Myanmar is what you get

You need to take geography lessons - other than Bangladesh, Malaysia all of Myanmar neighbors are not Muslim

 

[nahtanbob]

The efficiency of Tatmadaw is very low with this "shoot all you see" policy, given that most Rohingyas are still living in peace at Arakan.

it is more like an incompetent army

 

[nahtanbob]

To press Myanmar too hard is not inline with ASEAN ideals for non-interference policy. The principle of non-interference is the original core foundation upon which regional relations between ASEAN member-states are based. The principle was first lined out in ASEAN’s foundation document, the Bangkok Declaration, issued in 1967. The Bangkok Declaration expressed that the member-states are determined to prevent external interference in order to ensure domestic and regional stability. The non-interference policy was reiterated in the Kuala Lumpur Declaration of 1997. It was further reinforced in the 1976 Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia (TAC), in which the principle of non-interference in members’ internal affairs was explicitly referred to as one of the association’s fundamental principles. To understand ASEAN’s guiding principle of non-interference, it is important to clarify its meaning. While the principle of non-interference is adopted by many organizations throughout the world and is enshrined in the Charter of the UN, what appears to be unique to ASEAN’s conduct of regional relations is therefore not merely the adoption of non-interference as a behavioural norm, but rather its particular understanding and subsequent practices of this norm But in turn this policy create a working and well developed Regional Organizations albeit the very differences in ideology among ASEAN member states. In contrast, we can see how other regional organization like ECOWAS, SARC and among other in which turned into inactive or worse chaotic region.

Myanmar was protected at UN by China. you won't hear any mention of it from likes of @Horus

 

[Song Hong]

No one killed more Muslims than USA and Jews. I suggest waging Jihad on them.

To press Myanmar too hard is not inline with ASEAN ideals for non-interference policy. The principle of non-interference is the original core foundation upon which regional relations between ASEAN member-states are based. The principle was first lined out in ASEAN’s foundation document, the Bangkok Declaration, issued in 1967. The Bangkok Declaration expressed that the member-states are determined to prevent external interference in order to ensure domestic and regional stability. The non-interference policy was reiterated in the Kuala Lumpur Declaration of 1997. It was further reinforced in the 1976 Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia (TAC), in which the principle of non-interference in members’ internal affairs was explicitly referred to as one of the association’s fundamental principles. To understand ASEAN’s guiding principle of non-interference, it is important to clarify its meaning. While the principle of non-interference is adopted by many organizations throughout the world and is enshrined in the Charter of the UN, what appears to be unique to ASEAN’s conduct of regional relations is therefore not merely the adoption of non-interference as a behavioural norm, but rather its particular understanding and subsequent practices of this norm But in turn this policy create a working and well developed Regional Organizations albeit the very differences in ideology among ASEAN member states. In contrast, we can see how other regional organization like ECOWAS, SARC and among other in which turned into inactive or worse chaotic region.

 

[Super Falcon]

Dont know what happened gto the case in international court where witch suchi was there

 

[Song Hong]

Recently US and Jews are forcing the Gulf state to normalized with Israel, and eventually Saudi will go on board.

Meanwhile Palestinians are being murdered and kick out.

This is worse than Rohingya.

Everyone keep quiet other than Iran.

 

[Place Of Space]

I don't know if Myanmar and Bangladesh ever discussed the possibility of exchanging their Buddhist and Muslims. This is obviously a religion collision. Hi guys, is this exhange possible and a solution to the tragedy?

 

[PradoTLC]

Two soldiers who have deserted from Myanmar’s army have claimed in a newly released video that their commanding officers issued deadly orders for them to “shoot all that you see and that you hear” in villages where minority Rohingya Muslims lived in the Buddhist-majority country. The confession videos filmed in July 2020 were released by human rights group Fortify Rights on September 8. Over 700,000 of the stateless Muslim people are believed to have fled from Rakhine state in northwestern Myanmar to neighbouring Bangladesh.

now where are those indians who claim the massacre of muslims was all false?

 

[nahtanbob]

now where are those indians who claim the massacre of muslims was all false?

Now are you going to stop your sale of JF-17s to Myanmar ?

 

[saif]

I don't know if Myanmar and Bangladesh ever discussed the possibility of exchanging their Buddhist and Muslims. This is obviously a religion collision. Hi guys, is this exhange possible and a solution to the tragedy?

Your proposition is absurd. Unlike the Muslims in Burma, Bangladeshi Buddhits are quite happy with their living condition in Bangladesh. They are not interested in migrating to Burma.