My post serves a purpose. Plus if we can allow cartoons of a certain prophet then we shouldn't have a problem with the free speech exhibited here.
It was aimed at people like you. Allow me to explain.
There were scandals in the UK involving Asian taxi drivers grooming predominantly British girls. I knew a few of the lawyers defending the poor girls.....however it turned into something quite big. It turned into pakistani Muslims grooming our girls. Allot of the girls actually consented to what was happening (albeit many were under 16 so legally they weren't and I'm in no way justifyingwhat happened to them. Many of them were not forced into it. They got money, alcohol and drugs in return for sex.)
People as you say came out of the woodworks and made the whole pakistani community to which these criminals belonged feel the shame. Colleagues of mine started talking about how Islam taught these married Muslim men to do this when in reality their sharia would've awarded them the death penalty.
Papers like the Sun lead with their ethnicities and religion.
My post is shocking. I'm glad you find it inappropriate. Likewise, it is also inappropriate to do this to others. We didn't malign the community/religion of Jimmy Saville, Rolph Harris, Gary Glitter, Prince Andrew, Epstein, Weinstein, Dershowitz etc. Is it a form of privilege that only Caucasians / Jews are awarded?