What's new

Seleucus Nicator's Invasion of India, c.306-303 BC

A Town

BANNED
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Messages
989
Reaction score
-8
Country
India
Location
United Kingdom
Seleucus I Nicator's invasion of India (c.306-303 BC) was one of a series of obscure campaigns fought by Seleucus in an attempt to gain control of the eastern part of his recently regained kingdom.

Seleucus was appointed Satrap of Babylon in 321 BC, and retained more of an eastern outlook that most of Alexander's successors, remaining married to his Iranian wife. In 315 BC Seleucus was expelled from Babylon by Antigonus, and was forced to flee to Ptolemy in Egypt. Three years later Ptolmey defeated Antigonus's son Demetrius at Gaza, and Seleucus took the chance to return to Babylon, where he regained power. Antigonus attempted to expel him for a second time, but was defeated in a battle somewhere near Babylon (Babylonian War).

In theory Seleucus now had control over the eastern part of the old Persian empire, stretching out to the Indus River, but in reality large parts of that empire had slipped out of Macedonian control during the civil wars. A new empire had risen in India, where Chandragupta Maurya had seized control of Magadha at about the time of Alexander's death, and now controlled most of northern India as far as the Indus (see conquests of the Mauryan Empire).

The events of the war between Seleucus and Chandragupta are obscure. Seleucus crossed the Indus, and may have advanced towards the Ganges. If there were any major battles Chandragupta must have won them, for when the war ended (possibly in 303 BC) the peace was greatly to his advantage. Seleucus abandoned any claims east of the Indus and also transferred the satrapies of the Parapanisadai (around Kabul), Aria (around Heart) and Arachosia (around Kandahar) and possible eastern Gedrosia to Chandragupta. In return he was given 500 war elephants. The treaty was to be ratified by a marriage alliance between the two men.

Seleucus made good use of his elephants, taking them 2,500 miles west to Ipsus, where they played a major part in the defeat and death of Antigonus, a victory that gave Seleucus access to the Mediterranean coast. In India Chandragupta's victory enhanced the strength of the Mauryan Empire, the first in Indian history.

Seleucus Nicator's Invasion of India, c.306-303 BC
 
.
Seleceus Nicator was defeated by the Mauryan empire and he had to cede territories to them.

joppen.jpg
 
. . . . . .
Yeah but we messed up against Turks, Afghans and the British.

Indians weren't united then. When Indians are united, we are a force to be reckoned with. Today, Afghans, brits and turks cannot even imagine conquering one inch of indian land. India's renaissance began in 1947. The modern Indian state, I believe, is a direct successor of the Mauryan Empire. Look at the Ashoka chakra on our flag.
 
.
India was always well known for its armies. Indians are good fighters and far better than the araps who cannot even win a war against israel despite having numerical strength.
Yeah but we messed up against Turks, Afghans and the British.
Civilizations have rise and fall. No one empire or culture can remain dominant forever. There is always a cycle.

When the Turks and Afghans invaded, India as a whole had started its downfall and was divided into many warring kingdoms.

We are today however united again and it is doubtful that any nation can successfully invade India...gives us lessons to learn for the future.
 
. .
The greatest Indian empire to ever exist, nothing will ever compare to that.

The Cholas and Mughals too, I believe

Ain't it a much more wondrous passage that the Greeks were good enough to come all the way till India? A Home match is always easier than an Away match. :D

Still an achievement considering that they were superpower of that time and had conquered a previous superpower- Persia but failed completely in India.
 
.
it was actually raja porus that stopped them in their tracks. sikandar was so shaken his army couldnt fight anyone else after that. they ran back tail between legs and he left these weak commanders/generals in charge of eastern territories. so their occupation would have ended eventually anyway.

that being said, chadragupta and ashoka were amongst the greatest indigenous south asian rulers in history. i would only put tipu sultan, sher shah suri and maybe gupta at similar level. ashoka especially because it was his missionary efforts which made buddhism a world religion. otherwise it would have just flickered and died in india not long after. i guess ideas like egalitarianism, abolition of caste, and pursuit of knowledge didn't have many takers back then. sad :(
 
.
Seleucus I Nicator's invasion of India (c.306-303 BC) was one of a series of obscure campaigns fought by Seleucus in an attempt to gain control of the eastern part of his recently regained kingdom.

Seleucus was appointed Satrap of Babylon in 321 BC, and retained more of an eastern outlook that most of Alexander's successors, remaining married to his Iranian wife. In 315 BC Seleucus was expelled from Babylon by Antigonus, and was forced to flee to Ptolemy in Egypt. Three years later Ptolmey defeated Antigonus's son Demetrius at Gaza, and Seleucus took the chance to return to Babylon, where he regained power. Antigonus attempted to expel him for a second time, but was defeated in a battle somewhere near Babylon (Babylonian War).

In theory Seleucus now had control over the eastern part of the old Persian empire, stretching out to the Indus River, but in reality large parts of that empire had slipped out of Macedonian control during the civil wars. A new empire had risen in India, where Chandragupta Maurya had seized control of Magadha at about the time of Alexander's death, and now controlled most of northern India as far as the Indus (see conquests of the Mauryan Empire).

The events of the war between Seleucus and Chandragupta are obscure. Seleucus crossed the Indus, and may have advanced towards the Ganges. If there were any major battles Chandragupta must have won them, for when the war ended (possibly in 303 BC) the peace was greatly to his advantage. Seleucus abandoned any claims east of the Indus and also transferred the satrapies of the Parapanisadai (around Kabul), Aria (around Heart) and Arachosia (around Kandahar) and possible eastern Gedrosia to Chandragupta. In return he was given 500 war elephants. The treaty was to be ratified by a marriage alliance between the two men.

Seleucus made good use of his elephants, taking them 2,500 miles west to Ipsus, where they played a major part in the defeat and death of Antigonus, a victory that gave Seleucus access to the Mediterranean coast. In India Chandragupta's victory enhanced the strength of the Mauryan Empire, the first in Indian history.

Seleucus Nicator's Invasion of India, c.306-303 BC
WTH??? Marriage alliance between two men??? who writes these stuff??
 
.
Still an achievement considering that they were superpower of that time and had conquered a previous superpower- Persia but failed completely in India
Alot of odds were against them especially because Seleucus was more concerned for his Western front , he could never go into an all out battle against Chandra Gupta , though as well know Chandragupta himself was no joke. :)
 
.
Alot of odds were against them especially because Seleucus was more concerned for his Western front , he could never go into an all out battle against Chandra Gupta , though as well know Chandragupta himself was no joke. :)

That and also Alexander's battle in India , which was as many international historians claim, his toughest. After that battle he and his army were too wary to fight any further and bigger Indian armies.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom