What's new

See China changing: A collective call to end China citizen registration system

Communist

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 28, 2008
Messages
3,489
Reaction score
0
Call to end China citizen registration system

By Jamil Anderlini in Beijing
Published: March 1 2010 10:16 | Last updated: March 1 2010 10:16

A group of 13 Chinese newspapers from across the country carried an identical front-page editorial on Monday calling for the abolition of China’s household registration hukou system in a highly unusual co-ordinated critique of government policy.

In language that unmistakably evoked early 20th century Chinese revolutionary movements, the editorial referred to the hukou system as “segregation” and “unconstitutional” and “the heavy invisible fetters placed on all citizens”.

The hukou system was introduced in the 1950s soon after the Communist victory to help manage the planned economy and limit internal migration. Although it has been eroded by economic reforms over the past three decades it still functions as a deterrent for many citizens wanting to migrate from rural to urban areas.

Every person in China is supposed to be registered at birth in their parents’ registered location and is designated as a rural or urban citizen eligible only for social services such as health, education and welfare provided in that location.

Hundreds of millions of rural migrants have flooded the cities in recent decades to work on construction sites, in factories, and the service industries but they often remain second-class citizens in their new homes and are unable to access most social services, including education for their children, because they cannot change their hukou status.

In Beijing alone, about half of the 460,000 children born in the city over the past three years were not eligible for a hukou registration in the city and would be denied proper access to education, according to independent research by Hu Xingdou, an economics professor at the Beijing Institute of Technology, and Li Fangping, an independent lawyer.

“The hukou system perpetuates highly discriminatory policies and social inequality; it violates China’s constitution and should be abolished,” Mr Hu told the Financial Times on Monday.

Monday’s editorial was published on the front page of the Economic Observer, an influential national financial newspaper, and also ran in 12 other regional publications across the country. It was written by the Economic Observer’s deputy editor-in-chief, according to people familiar with the matter.

In language familiar to all students of early Chinese revolutionary literature, the article’s first line declared: “China has suffered under the bitter hukou system for too long!”

It called the system a “hotbed of corruption” because urban registrations can often be bought for exorbitant sums from unscrupulous officials and called on delegates to China’s political consultative committee and rubber stamp parliament to push for its abolition at their annual meetings, which open this week in Beijing.

In recent months the central government has publicly placed reform of the hukou system at the top of its agenda and the issue was already scheduled to be a big discussion topic at the political meetings that begin later this week.

In an online “chat” with internet users on Saturday, Chinese premier Wen Jiabao pledged to push through reform of the hukou system and Chinese political analysts said Monday’s editorial probably had the blessing of senior Communist party officials.

“I’ve never heard of Chinese newspapers jointly publishing an editorial on a specific policy matter like this, it is very unusual,” said Yao Yang, deputy dean of China’s National School of Development at Peking University.

Mr Yao said the government is likely to first liberalise the hukou system in medium-sized and small cities while maintaining tight restrictions on large cities so as to avoid a flood of migrants to the large centres.

In recent years, local governments in some cities, including Shanghai, Shenzhen and Guangzhou, have taken steps to introduce more permanent resident permits for higher-income migrants.

But in some places where the hukou system has been suspended, and social services have been extended to all residents, those services have been paralysed because of soaring demand and an influx of new migrants.

The World Bank and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development have both recommended an overhaul of the hukou system to allow more balanced economic growth and avoid social instability.


FT.com / China / Society & People - Call to end China citizen registration system

:china: DEMOCRACY :china:
 
.
Wen: Only democracy sustains governance
(Xinhua)
Updated: 2010-02-28 09:42

f71af30187923678183012cdaeddbd52.jpg


Democracy


China must and should be able to curb the misuse of public funds and vehicles by promoting democracy and public supervision, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao said here Saturday during an online chat with netizens.

Responding to a netizen's comment on the misuse of public vehicles for personal purposes and public funds for banquets and overseas trips by some government officials, Wen said "only democracy could help the governance sustain."

Curbing the misuse of public funds was part of the country's anti-corruption campaign, Wen said.

The government must make the use of public resources transparent by having all administrative expenditures included in the budget system and known by the public, he said, adding that democracy is vital to anti-graft efforts.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-02/28/content_9514445.htm

Nothing is permanent, you will change, I will change, so will China. :china:
 
.
What are the pros and cons of the registration system?
I used to think its a good system, and even we, in India, should do something like that!
 
.
It denies the rights of the people and is strongly against the basic Human rights as well. It simply means if some one belongs to a small and least developed village wont get the basic services untill and unless his village pops up into some metropolitan city.
 
.
It denies the rights of the people and is strongly against the basic Human rights as well. It simply means if some one belongs to a small and least developed village wont get the basic services untill and unless his village pops up into some metropolitan city.

Exactly thats why the system is going to be abolished. I think this party congress is going to abolish this system.
 
.
It denies the rights of the people and is strongly against the basic Human rights as well. It simply means if some one belongs to a small and least developed village wont get the basic services untill and unless his village pops up into some metropolitan city.

Exactly thats why the system is going to be abolished. I think this party congress is going to abolish this system.

What I used to think was that every person gets registered. Now only those persons will get to enter the cities which have job. So in one way, it prevents burdening on cities, no slums, etc. Also, it would be easier to find a job since if someone needed labor, it would have to look up to registration office.
 
.
I don't think it will change too much in China, now several millions of people live in big city such as Beijing and Shanghai and they are not registered, but if you have job or you are rich enough to buy apartment, there is no big difference between local and this people from another place.

on the other hand , even you are local but can't afford to buy the expensive house, you have to move to somewhere have cheaper apartment.

It's not a problem of registration system, it's a problem of money:coffee:
 
.
I don't think it will change too much in China, now several millions of people live in big city such as Beijing and Shanghai and they are not registered, but if you have job or you are rich enough to buy apartment, there is no big difference between local and this people from another place.

on the other hand , even you are local but can't afford to buy the expensive house, you have to move to somewhere have cheaper apartment.

It's not a problem of registration system, it's a problem of money:coffee:

this is true but people registered at their city will recieve many free services while non registered people will not.

my hukou is registered in a small town (tianmen) but i live in wuhan. but i don't even dare think of buying a house myself, the prices are too high. instead i enjoy free living at a relative's house because i cannot support myself :what:
 
.
What are the pros and cons of the registration system?
I used to think its a good system, and even we, in India, should do something like that!

This system basically restricts benefit to migrant workers. For instance, a city's public schools may only offer placement to children of registered parents.

The purpose of this was to control population flow so cities don't become overburdened. Today it is a bit outdated though because China has reached a stage in which migration is so large and market tend to balance such flow anyway.

For India it actually maybe a good idea because India is still at the early development stage. It will clean the city up and promote rural growth I think.
 
.
Used to be a good system, but now with the economic development, it needs some changes
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom