Android
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2011
- Messages
- 4,872
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
New Delhi: In a major setback tothe Centre, the Supreme Court on Tuesday turned down its policy of giving government subsidy to Muslims going on annual Haj pilgrimage.
"We hold that this policy (givingsubsidies to Haj pilgrims) is bestdone away with," the apex court said, while slamming the Centre for politicising the issue of annual Haj pilgrimage.
The apex court, while directing the Centre to eliminate the policy of Haj subsidies over a period of ten years, maintained that the proposal of giving subsidy on pilgrimages to religious shrines is inappropriate and aimed at wooing minorities.
The apex court further stated that it will examine the functioning of the Haj Committee of India and its selection process for sending pilgrims for Haj.
Coming down heavily on the Central government, the apex court also ordered it to slash thenumber of its representatives tobe sent along with Haj delegations.
The Supreme court ruling comesnearly a fortnight after the Centre informed it about its decision to restrict Haj pilgrimage at government subsidy to Muslims only as a"once-in-a-lifetime" affair as against the existing policy of"once in five years".
In an affidavit filed before the apex court, the government saidthe new guidelines have been framed to ensure that priority isgiven to those applicants who have never performed Haj.
"This is a major change introduced for the first time. This will ensure that the Haji will benefit from government subsidy only once in his/her lifetime. It will also ensure that priority is given to those applicants who have never performed Haj," the Centre thensaid.
The government, however, refrained from disclosing the amount of subsidy being incurred by it for 2012 saying,"The exact figure in respect of the travel subsidy to the pilgrims going through Haj Committee of India for 2012 willbe known after the Hajis completed their Haj journey andreturn to India."
In its submission, the centre maintained that priority will be given to those who are in the 70plus category and those who had unsuccessfully applied thrice earlier for the subsidy. The Centre's affidavit came in the backdrop of certain searching questions raised by the apex court on February 24.
A Bench of Justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai had directed the Centre to provide details of subsidy given by it and criteria adopted for allocation of seats to state committees.
The apex court frowned at the practice of sending official delegations to accompany the pilgrims and had asked the Centre to furnish entire details regarding Haj subsidy, as also tothe criteria adopted.
The apex court was hearing an appeal filed by the Centre challenging a Bombay High Court judgement which had directed the Ministry of External Affairs to allow certain private operators to operate the services of 800 of the 11,000 pilgrims earmarked under the VIP quota subsidised by the government.
Earlier, the bench had pulled up the Centre's practice of"politicising" the annual Haj pilgrimage by permitting official delegations to accompany the pilgrims, for which the government offers huge subsidy, saying, "It's a bad religious practice."
SC strikes down Haj subsidy
"We hold that this policy (givingsubsidies to Haj pilgrims) is bestdone away with," the apex court said, while slamming the Centre for politicising the issue of annual Haj pilgrimage.
The apex court, while directing the Centre to eliminate the policy of Haj subsidies over a period of ten years, maintained that the proposal of giving subsidy on pilgrimages to religious shrines is inappropriate and aimed at wooing minorities.
The apex court further stated that it will examine the functioning of the Haj Committee of India and its selection process for sending pilgrims for Haj.
Coming down heavily on the Central government, the apex court also ordered it to slash thenumber of its representatives tobe sent along with Haj delegations.
The Supreme court ruling comesnearly a fortnight after the Centre informed it about its decision to restrict Haj pilgrimage at government subsidy to Muslims only as a"once-in-a-lifetime" affair as against the existing policy of"once in five years".
In an affidavit filed before the apex court, the government saidthe new guidelines have been framed to ensure that priority isgiven to those applicants who have never performed Haj.
"This is a major change introduced for the first time. This will ensure that the Haji will benefit from government subsidy only once in his/her lifetime. It will also ensure that priority is given to those applicants who have never performed Haj," the Centre thensaid.
The government, however, refrained from disclosing the amount of subsidy being incurred by it for 2012 saying,"The exact figure in respect of the travel subsidy to the pilgrims going through Haj Committee of India for 2012 willbe known after the Hajis completed their Haj journey andreturn to India."
In its submission, the centre maintained that priority will be given to those who are in the 70plus category and those who had unsuccessfully applied thrice earlier for the subsidy. The Centre's affidavit came in the backdrop of certain searching questions raised by the apex court on February 24.
A Bench of Justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai had directed the Centre to provide details of subsidy given by it and criteria adopted for allocation of seats to state committees.
The apex court frowned at the practice of sending official delegations to accompany the pilgrims and had asked the Centre to furnish entire details regarding Haj subsidy, as also tothe criteria adopted.
The apex court was hearing an appeal filed by the Centre challenging a Bombay High Court judgement which had directed the Ministry of External Affairs to allow certain private operators to operate the services of 800 of the 11,000 pilgrims earmarked under the VIP quota subsidised by the government.
Earlier, the bench had pulled up the Centre's practice of"politicising" the annual Haj pilgrimage by permitting official delegations to accompany the pilgrims, for which the government offers huge subsidy, saying, "It's a bad religious practice."
SC strikes down Haj subsidy
