SC acquits Aasia Bibi in blasphemy case

[That Guy]

Some arguments are settled by chopping the head from the torso. Argumentation is an activity without an end, especially where specious arguments are presented. I know which arguments are worth pursuing, and which ones should be settled differently.

Than why continue this conversation? In fact, why participate in this thread at all? If you honestly won't contribute, I can and will start exercising my right as a TTA. Keep in mind, I have given you ample opportunity to participate, instead of just spouting one off comments.

[Edit]: I should point out, as harsh as I was on @Muhammad bin Hamid , and as much as I fundimentally disagree with him, I at least respect him for contributing properly, and trying to make proper argument. If you can't even be bothered to do that, than that's a problem.

 

[saiyan0321]

Investigate. Look at their verdict, and the comments they made.

You're far too extreme in your thought. You're jumping the shark, so to say.

The theory ( in case of extremists the law) that whoever shall defend a blasphemer is an apostate and thus both wajib ul qatal.

It is a very serious situation in pakistan and there is a massive requirement for reforms in our society bcz on many fronts many extremist views and ideals are ingrained into our mindset that not only combats critical thinking and analytical prowess but also stems the coherence and growth of society in general.

The likes of TLP and so many others are proof of this.

The state needs to showcase that they will not back down to extremists. Two different govts have back down in front of extremists. They are emboldened and are becoming stronger and dangerous. This time the govt needs to showcase that they will stand iron with other organs of the state and any form of rebellious attitude will be crushed.

The real WOT was always to be fought not with guns in the mountains of fata but with enlightenment in the mind of the masses. With that in place. How have we done so far is in open display?

 

[That Guy]

I am not going to grant respect to that excuse posed as judgement.



You are a fucking biased person. What do you think every other liberal asshole is 'contributing' to this thread? The only thing they are contributing is one liner farts celebrating yet one more injustice against Islam and Muslims.

And there we go. You've just given me an excuse.

Not only do you not understand how arguments and debates work, you've proven to me that your opinion is worthless. You don't care about injustice against Islam and Muslims, all you want a blood.

 

[Musafir117]

TLP just asked soldiers to rebel against the Pakistan Army...

https://twitter.com/x/status/1057539076159664131

In other words, they want to start a civil war, and are now proven traitors.

It’s right to get rid of this sxit put him and few others in jail the rest ashqeen e blood put their tail between legs and run like........
no mercy straight shots in heads.

 

[SSGcommandoPAK]

Most of the areas in Karachi have been shut down by Religious parties workers,
Rangers should do lathi charge on these idiots.

 

[TheNoob]

I am not going to grant respect to that excuse posed as judgement.



You are a fucking biased person. What do you think every other liberal asshole is 'contributing' to this thread? The only thing they are contributing is one liner farts celebrating yet one more injustice against Islam and Muslims.

You are an utter shame to your Username.

 

[Sheepistanis]

Regardless the verdict the outcry was expected. Pakistan's polarised society is prone to conflicts and the only way to overcome that is to let the system work.

It was wrong of Salman Taseer to politicise a judicial matter, it's all because of the negative publicity he brought to the case that hyena's like Khadim have reared their heads.

To reiterate my own words: Pakistani people have got to strengthen the system and that can only be done if they have faith in it. You cannot cry foul if things don't fly your way.

 

[Crystal-Clear]

isey kehtey hain bilawaja ungal kerna .

 

[That Guy]

It’s right to get rid of this sxit put him and few others in jail the rest ashqeen e blood put their tail between legs and run like........
no mercy straight shots in heads.

Rule of law must remain supreme. They've declared that they seek rebellion, they should all be arrested and tried for armed rebellion against the state.

 

[Zibago]

It’s right to get rid of this sxit put him and few others in jail the rest ashqeen e blood put their tail between legs and run like........
no mercy straight shots in heads.

Article 6 material

 

[PakSword]

I am not going to grant respect to that excuse posed as judgement.

So without even reading it, you are accusing the judges of granting "excuse posed" judgement?

Very Islamic indeed..

 

[Yaseen1]

the law s just but he manipulated law and such incidents happened after this case when u.s army men hit car of motorcyclist but no such diat was paid

Raymond Davis fled using crutch of Qasas and diyat law I dare you to run a campaign against that unjust law

 

[LeGenD]

I am conservative and an ashiq-e-rasool, and I respect the decision of SC.

People have no right to take matters into their own hands and create unrest across the country.

TLP situation getting out of hand, and the state needs to act. No to compromises this time.

 

[That Guy]

Well, I'm going to bed now. @waz if you're not too busy, when you come online, can you police this thread? I feel like I always end up calling on you. Sorry for the trouble.

 

[Yaseen1]

i think if it is regarded true the problem is with judges who declared her culprit and if no evidence why they gave such decision.

@Zibago @Clutch @Muhammad bin Hamid


1 - Asia is saying she has not uttered such remarks and she has high regards for the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and the Holy Quran.

2 - Complainant and Prime Witnesses asked the police to write such remarks in FIR

My question to all members here.. if the case is not proven against Asia.. what should be done to those who wrote/ asked to include those remarks in FIR and later in the statements? Isn't it blasphemy itself?


Can we punish a person if a crime hasn't been proven?