Saudi Military Reinforcements Enter Bahrain: Video

[Muhammed45]

Saudi Military Reinforcements Enter Bahrain: Video

8 hours ago May 5, 2017

Saudi milityary vehicles entering Bahrain
Bahrain - Live News - Middle East - News - Top - Videos


Tweet

Saudi troops entered on Friday Bahrain two days before Manama’s court issues verdict against Ayatollah Sheikh Issa Qassem.

The video shows the Saudi vehicles crossing King Fahd bridge which links KSA to Bahrain.


Source: Al-Manar Website
@Malik Alashter , bro, what do we do?

 

[Saif al-Arab]

Saudi Military Reinforcements Enter Bahrain: Video

8 hours ago May 5, 2017

Saudi milityary vehicles entering Bahrain
Bahrain - Live News - Middle East - News - Top - Videos


Tweet

Saudi troops entered on Friday Bahrain two days before Manama’s court issues verdict against Ayatollah Sheikh Issa Qassem.

The video shows the Saudi vehicles crossing King Fahd bridge which links KSA to Bahrain.


Source: Al-Manar Website
@Malik Alashter , bro, what do we do with this mongoose Al-Saud family?

You are not going to do anything, I am afraid. As in previous times.

Beloved Bahrain is an integral part of Arabia and the GCC and major unrest will not be tolerated. KSA is the gatekeeper of Arabia and in Bahrain to keep law and order in place for all Bahrainis under the invitation of the Bahraini government.

Instead of worrying about foreign Arab countries you should worry about the numerous oppressed ethnic groups of Iran and historical regions that they inhabit. It is just a question of time before unrest returns as is already the case in a few of those regions.

Enjoy those old classics:

 

[Malik Alashter]

Saudi Military Reinforcements Enter Bahrain: Video

8 hours ago May 5, 2017

Saudi milityary vehicles entering Bahrain
Bahrain - Live News - Middle East - News - Top - Videos


Tweet

Saudi troops entered on Friday Bahrain two days before Manama’s court issues verdict against Ayatollah Sheikh Issa Qassem.

The video shows the Saudi vehicles crossing King Fahd bridge which links KSA to Bahrain.


Source: Al-Manar Website
@Malik Alashter , bro, what do we do with this mongoose Al-Saud family?

let the bahraini people deal with it we can't do any thing if we want to keep our region away from sectarian war that would engulf the whole region alas.

 

[Muhammed45]

let the bahraini people deal with it we can't do any thing if we want to keep our region away from sectarian war that would engulf the whole region alas.

Unfortunately the tree of Islam still needs blood. Perhaps in this case the blood of our brothers in Bahrain. If they kill Issa Ghassem, Bahrain will rise, and they won't be able to control it.
Muslim countries are supporting monarchs, a bad fact

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

**
In General not having an ability to respect clerics from each other country is an issue that folks need to review for their own communities, instead of bashing each other , really looks poor from an outsider prespective.

​

Shunnis: Respect Prophet and his family and other companions
Shias : Respect Prophet and specially his family (Main thing) , and have own views on companion

So from a neutral prespective (technically I am no neutral as I am Sunni) but I personally do not understand this inner desire , wahabi sect have against the iranians

I just cannot relate to this inner , abracadabra magic that happens in Saudi minds about Shias but from their life prespective Iranains are as normal as any other group in region. And then Iranians also respond with similar abracadabra magic statements

Is there any English document that exist which explains the reason why there is so much mistrust in Saudia against the Shia Clerics so I can better understand the point of difference


Umayyad dynasty / Muawiyyah person was certainly a controversial character who changed the means of transition of power from Muslim vote to succession into a Dynastic transfer of power who came after Caliph Ali.

 

[Saif al-Arab]

I think the idea that house of Saud have anything to do with the conquest or Glory of Old Islamic civilization is a far fetched idea.

The Tribe generally came to prominance in 1700


View attachment 394975

I modern terminology , I believe the word is "Rebel" who works against the estate, kinda like a group that seeks power and then outsiders give them weapon and guns and horses to get into power (sounds familiar doesn't it ) the rabbit hole goes deep very deep down

Just some titbits for some local folks who may not know history of Hashim Family


So "Rebels" would be like how certain rebels exist now , none state party members disrupting official government bodies we have a word for it , I don't want to use it politically incorrect these day

View attachment 394976

So under the agreement between the Ibn Saud / Hashimites / British Monarchy , the idea was support us in war against Turkey and you shall be rewarded, I think some double deal was also done with Hashmite clan (which heads Jordan) he was given all arab land initially untill he started to object to israel concept

Oh trust me I am digging this shit deep from bottom of the grave pitts the history hidden from Muslims



Seems like Arab land was promised to the Hashim clan (Present day Jordan) and then some under the table dealing were also done with Ibn Saud clan

View attachment 394977


After world war 1 Arabs were Shafted by World powers and you were given Israel as gift


This is what is coming next !!

Not fully aware of the revolt that took place between the house of ibn saud and Hashmite clan but seems like folks did not wanted too much power consolidated into hand of one clan



Yea I am sure iran are boogey man


So by now you should know I have enough background on this story , so that is why I am trying to figure out just why so much hate against Iran ? When they never actually came 1 vs 1 battle against Ibn Saudi clan (Saudis)


The only History Ibn Saud clan has so far is a civil war against house of Hashmite (Jordanian Dynasty) and the joint war against Turkish Empire.

That is your history



It is 100% ok to admit your history is not what you thought it was , you were never in any conquest , NEVER


So 100% you can clearly see that Iranian Muslims have no part in your history how you were born or who you revolted against or who gained $$$ or who lost​

Are you OK or just blabbering for the sake of it? In fact I do not think that anyone understands what you are trying to say nor does it seem to me that you are very familiar with history.

So now "House of Saud" equals all past and present Arab rulers. That's an interesting theory. Breaking news for all historians in the world!

Also I am not too surprised that a non-Arab does not understand why most Arabs have a negative view of Iranian Wilayat al-Faqih Mullah's. As if the signs were not clear enough. If you want to "convince" us of the "greatness" of those Mullah's, you have found the wrong public, I am afraid.

What has your, in lack of better words, "interesting" post anything to do with the topic or what has been written? Care to elaborate?

Also I am surprised that there are photographs of people who died in 1792 when the first photographs appeared 35 years later!

Also a map of some utopian "Greater Israel". Very interesting.

Fact of the matter is that Bahrain has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with Iran or the Mullah's ruling it nor do internal Arab affairs for that matter. They have enough to worry about rather than sticking their dirty and ugly noses into matters that do not concern them.

 

[Śakra]

Saudi Arabia had to enter Bahrain to clear up the mess the other country is trying to create there as they did in Yemen. The world's patience with the other country is at a breaking point and soon you will see some sort of action to sort out their nautanki (tamasha as they say in Arabic).

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

How is the Azaan going in India ?, heard you were about to Ban Azaan / Salat in India Don't come meddle around in discussion between two Muslims. Thank you completely derailing a proper thread

Tell Sonu Nigam , the takla head (bald head) looks good he should keep that look

 

[darksider]

Welcome to Saudis

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

By the way I was not blabing this is how the world / historians see Wahabism and modern day formation of Saudia and various "alliances" and deals that took place till Saudia was form and Jordan became what is know Jordan as we known it

And my study is generally to solve the riddle of hate between House of Saud and Iranians becasue reviewing things at high level , the house of Saud was mostly involved with Revolts and other regional conquest (civil war like situations)

The 12 , Imams or leaders unfortunately I am not familiar with that concept as I am not Shia, however I don't see it anything more then just leadership group that may even exist in Sunni house of government. Just traditional Policy makers in government

My guess for African Muslims / Iran relations to be drastically different . Most Iranians are looked up rather normally in other countries (Malasia / Indonesia / world wide other countries)

 

[Malik Alashter]

No offense but that must be the "Shia Twelver" narrative or your, with all due respect brother, ignorance of history.

Arabs were blessed to be ruled by some of the greatest and most progressive rulers in Muslim history. Our leaders and lands were the center of the Islamic Golden Age, Al-Andalus etc. In pre-historic times Arabs/Semites had some of the most famous and accomplished rulers of all time as well. Male as female.

Wallahi bro you either don't know the history or you just trying hide the truth

look take out the first two khalifas and Imam Ali pbuh the rest in general corrupted to the bone if we muslims lost our dominance of the world it's due to those tyrants period.

 

[Saif al-Arab]

Wallahi bro you either don't know the history or you just trying hide the truth

look take out the first two khalifas and Imam Ali pbuh the rest in general corrupted to the bone if we muslims lost our dominance of the world it's due to those tyrants period.

That is your own version/view/interpretation of history. It is not shared by most Arabs, Muslims or objective historians.

I don't consider some of the most if not the most enlightened rulers in Islamic history (and at the time world too) to be tyrants.

Nor do I, like 90% of all Muslims (non-Shias) subscribe to the notion of only a certain lineage being allowed to rule. This is contrary to other teachings of Islam. I am talking about the good ones which there thankfully have been a lot of.

As for bad rulers, as I mentioned, they are inevitable and to believe that only Arabs had bad rulers, is once again utopian blabbering.

I am very proud, as are most Arabs, of our past rulers regardless of their sect (Sunni, Shia or even religion) or whether it was during the Islamic era or pre-Islamic era.

Anyway theology, sect, history, Mullah's etc. has nothing to do with this topic.

 

[Malik Alashter]

That is your own version/view/interpretation of history. It is not shared by most Arabs, Muslims or objective historians.

That's why our nations suffer from the corruption that's ruling and blessed by the religious scholars and the benefiters.

 

[Saif al-Arab]

That's why our nations suffer from the corruption that's ruling and blessed by the religious scholars and the benefiters.

I believe that you are talking about current-day rulers. As I already wrote, yes, the situation is not ideal in this regard but it could be much worse (look no further than within the Muslim world and outside of it) and have in mind that corruption is a phenomenon widespread in most parts of the world as are powerful segments of society (whether clerics or others) being closely aligned with the ruling powers.

I was refering to the past and I proudly, openly and loudly proclaim that I am very, very proud of many of our world famous and admired past Arab rulers (Islamic era) regardless of their sect and similarly I also take pride in similarly admired/known/capable pre-Islamic Arab/Semitic rulers native to our lands. Most Arabs have such views and this is completely understandable. Anything else would be strange.

As for this news, Saudi Arabian soldiers deployed to Bahrain have never killed a single Bahraini brother or sister (regardless of sect) and are solely stationed in Bahrain to prevent a widespread violent conflict that could engulf small beloved Bahrain and potentially turn it into another war-torn country. This will not be allowed and in this case I hail such a decision.

Bahrain is directly connected to KSA. It is naive to think that a possible widespread conflict/unrest there would not impact the nearby Eastern Province. We both know that a certain regime in the region would love this to happen as they love seeing unrest in every part of the Arab world. They benefit from this.

Anyway nothing will happen. It has been 5-6 years and less than 100 people have died. During that same time period many more Bahrainis died in traffic accidents. The GCC cannot be compared, with all due respect, to the neighborhood in general when it comes to instability/terrorism/crime etc.

Let us not forget those cold and obvious facts or try to change the topic of discussion to ignore what this is really about.

Let people living in Bahrain (regardless of sect) tell you what a tiny minority of troublemakers are trying to "achieve" in Bahrain and how little success they have had. Once again the idiotic media has portrayed this unrest as a "sectarian" conflict when Sunnis and Shias in Bahrain, let alone Eastern Arabia as a whole, always lived peacefully together and still do. We are not going to allow that region of Arabia to turn into an Iraq (potentially) where once sect mattered little and where it today defines the politics and almost everything while that should never have been the case. At least on a political level.

This is what ISIS wants, Iranian Mullah's, Israel (Zionists) and sellouts in general who have no morals and who only care about power/controlling potentially as many sheep as possible.

As I wrote some time ago. Sectarianism in the Arab world reached its height in 2014. It's only going to go one way from now on and that is towards the dustbin of history as ALL sane people can see where it took their countries. Even the ultraconservatives within KSA have lately (many) realized that an overly sectarian/partisan standpoint is counterproductive for them and the society.

This chapter in the never-ending book will soon be closed.

 

[I.R.A]

whether it was during the Islamic era or pre-Islamic era.

Jerusalem and Dar ul Salam have the same meaning? I am sorry this has nothing to do with topic just wanted to confirm something that I read in an interesting account.