You see Saudi Arabia is the
leader of GCC and Arabs when it suits the narrative. Otherwise, Oman's
homosexual Sultan and Kuwait just... vetoed and overruled Saudi Arabia, the
leader of GCC and Arabs.
Apparently, MBS is fragile and can't speak up infront of a
homosexual Sultan and
naturalized Shia Twelver trash.
I've seen crappy propaganda from
badly paid keyboard warriors but this is just lazy.
This.
How dumb are you?
Three allies (Turkey, China and Malaysia) helped Pakistan thwart off FATF's blacklisting.
KSA is the leader of the GCC by virtue of history, geographic size, population, economy and everything else that is measurable.
HOWEVER that does not mean that GCC had an independent vote (it did NOT as it is not a country) let alone that KSA can overrule 5 other independent countries. Plenty of examples where given, you omitting the current Qatari dispute tells everything that needs to be known.
As for the current Sultan of Oman he is indeed a homosexual. Naturalized foreign Shia Twelver's are by large trash indeed as they are voting and influencing Kuwait with sectarian glasses and would sell their own mother's to the Iranian Mullah regime. Those few 1000 people need to be deported back to Iran or whatever hell they came from as they are fifth columns by large. Can be easily done and would have the majority support of the Kuwaiti people. Nothing about any "propaganda" let alone "paid troll". I don't need that as I come from a very wealthy family. Nor any propaganda unless that means being openly critical of the House of Saud when I feel like it as well. Not part of the plan, I guess, ah?
More moronic nonsense. Kindly show KSA using 1000's of Pakistanis as cannon fodder for their proxy wars and proxy terrorist groups as the Iranian Mullah's are doing in Syria and Iraq. Go ahead.
As most other Pakistani users on this forum (which is not representative for Pakistan or Pakistanis at all) wrote, anyone who doubts that KSA is an old and reliable ally of Pakistan is mentally ill. Good for those countries for having voted due to having an independent vote. Now KSA can do the same since we became a member YESTERDAY. Now if KSA votes against Pakistan, you guys can talk. Until then not so much. End of story.
After Afghanis, if someone has to be termed as namak haram, than it has to be the Pakistanis. Bc, fakiroon Ki tera to bheek mangtey hain every second year Saudis se aur phir be in ko gaaliyaan deytein hain peet pheechey.... Jis din Saudis nay Pakistan Army ko lift kerwana chor do, it won't take much time for Pakistan to get defaulter. So respect Saudis even if they don't vote for you..... We are nobody to bash them. Just be thankful for them if they back this hypocrite, shameless nation at international forums. Do takkey ki aukaat nahi humhari seriously.
IK should get more closer to MBS moving forward now. It's really imperative for Pakistan, not to get blacklisted.
Some of what you wrote is correct the other part of Saudi Arabians (the people) not caring about "third world countries" is simply untrue. Saudi Arabians (individuals) have dominated more money than any other Muslim country to poor countries and I lost track of the countless of Saudi Arabian relief, Islamic, business etc. organizations that are doing grassroots work from Nigeria to Indonesia. Not to mention that Saudi Arabians are very generous people. A well-known trait among Arabians. There is also the historical, religious, cultural, linguistic, ancestral, geographic proximity etc. ties and 50 years of human to human contact on a MASSIVE scale. It would not be any different regardless if KSA was ruled by a monarchy or some form of representative "democracy".
All your sources do not agree with each other so your lie has been exposed. Common sense Pakistan needed at least three votes and Pakistan got them..Gangadesh failed.
NS fell out of favour a long time ago. I think after the death of Abdullah, NS had no supporter in KSA's royal family.
These idiots some of them are sectarian cretins and support Iran because of their sectarian affiliation. These are traitors because they put their sectarian affiliation above Islam & Pakistan.
Your comment will make Iran-India happy and you can collect your check. Your job is done and you did your sectarian duty.
Again trolling ...I know your rants against Pakistan, Pakistan army, Pakistani leadership, people and Pakistan's friends so nothing new..But I'm just letting the other members know who don't know about you.
What gives you the right to rant on KSA not voting for Pakistan while both of your countries (Canada & India) voted against Pakistan? In fact it is Gangadesh who is trying to blacklist Pakistan.
KSA and Pakistan have a very long history of strong relations and it will continue so in the future.
@Al Watan Al Arabi @The SC
Well put brother.
KSA did NOT vote in favor of the black listing. Since you have no idea of the procedure, a recommendation is placed by member(s) which has to be voted for or against, however in matters related to listing of countries the voting is only against placement so NOT voting or abstaining does NOT mean voting in favor of Blacklisting.
P.S. It was China, Turkey and Malaysia (the 3 votes required) to stay out of the blacklist; China voted in our favor.
Exactly but the fact that KSA had no vote until 24 hours ago is not something that people with an open agenda (propaganda) are incapable of understanding even though it is very simple.
In the real world only KSA, UAE and China (as throughout much of history) came to Pakistan's economic aid (real help) when it mattered.
Pakistan does not have 4 votes in fact Saudi Arabia was promised full membership if they ditched Pakistan. This was reported earlier. The interesting thing is HBL USA were fined for exchanges between a Saudi Bank, which was flagged for terror financing and its US branch. The tidbit was that the money also including transfers of Nawaz Sharif. So now Saudi Arabia can proceed with its financing of terror.
Where in the good world do you get your propaganda from? KSA had NO vote until 24 hours ago. KSA WAS ALREADY OFFERED FULL MEMBERSHIP IN 2015 but objections from certain countries (US included!) meant that the state had to take even harsher methods in use. After 4 years of having a solid track record, the countries who were previously against our membership changed their tune.
Nawaz Sharif (when he was in power) was supported by every ally of Pakistan (including the Pakistani military and deep state) until it no longer was the case. KSA withdrew support for him long before he stepped down. Probably why he became angry and used the parliament for the Yemen question. Just like KSA supports Imran Khan. It is not about the individual in power but the deep state, military and Pakistan as a country.
It is interesting. The world community has not talked about any imaginary "terror financing" from KSA for years upon years even the propaganda media. What terrorism are you blabbering about? Can you name some concrete examples? Please don't mention Afghanistan 40-30 years ago. We have been through that and by no means was that terrorism even though I personally would have stayed out if I had power and even had lived back then!
I don't know if you are aware of this but while we speak, the same sources claim that Pakistan supports terrorism. When India makes some bogus accusation of terrorism aimed at you, you don't take it seriously either, do you? So why should I take your unfunded and bogus statement of "terrorism support" seriously? Give me some examples.