What's new

Saab Gripen ‘Rips Apart’ Chinese J-11 Fighters In War Games

Joe1351

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 16, 2019
Messages
182
Reaction score
-10
Country
United States
Location
United States
A talk was given at China’s Northwestern Polytechnical University on Dec. 9. The speaker was reported to be Li Zhonghua who is said to have participated in Exercise Falcon Strike 2015 in Thailand. One of the slides showed the score during each day of the exercise and during the first day, the Thais flying the Gripen were beaten 16-0.


Source unknown

Another slide shows that although the Thais did very badly on the first day. These were dogfights and the Gripen fared better in the beyond-visual-range (BVR) arena. With 24 percent of the kills at range beyond 50km.

However, on the following days, as the game shifted to beyond-visual-range engagements, the Gripen armed with AIM-120 medium-range missiles proved to be a far better fighter than the J-11 with its own medium-range missiles, possibly PL-12s.
The Gripens shot down a total of 41 Chinese J-11s at a loss of six fighters. The final tally after the completion of seven days stood in favor of the Swedish fighters as it shot down 42 J-11s at a loss of 34 only.




There were important lessons for the Chinese side. This slide explains that the Chinese pilots had poor situation awareness. Too much focus was on front of the aircraft rather than all round. There was a lack of coordination between the attacking aircraft and its sweeper escorts. The pilots were not experience in avoiding missile shots. Their response were too mechanical and could not judge correctly on the evasive techniques for missiles with different ranges.



In large scale air battles, the Thais were able to score kills while playing the attacker by taking down the Chinese defenders. When the Chinese attack, they had difficulty making it pass the Thai defenders. The only success for the Chinese when attacking is when they were protected by the Gripen, that was a low-level attack.



In 2 vs 2 scenarios, the Chinese found that they are poor in judging the threat and the evasive actions were insufficient. The fire control and weapons integration for the J-11 is still behind the Saab Gripen.



Despite dominating in the dogfight arena, the Chinese still picked up important lessons from the Thai. They found that when dealing with Thai attacks using the Sun as cover, the strategy of the Chinese are simplified. When in an advantageous position, the Chinese were in a rush to score victory and fell into traps put up by the Thais.



 
. .
This is a very old news and we all already know the story behind it. Why pull out such old news and talk about it again?

You shall be aware the J-11A send for exercise are the worst variant with outdated Russian avionics and R-27 missile in PLAAF inventory. Not surprised at the result.

Most of Chinese flanker in service now, are the better J-11B and J-16 with updated Chinese avionics (glass cockpit and digital interface)
 
.
J11A is an imitation of su27sk introduced in 1992. The original Russian radar is still used. In 2003, the J11B, which used all Chinese parts and components, began production. In 2007, the modernized and upgraded J11BS began flight test flight.

In 2015, China dispatched four Su-27s and two J11As to participate in Thai military exercises.None of them have BVR capabilities.

The purpose of this exercise is for China to help the Thai Air Force familiarize themselves with the strength of the Vietnamese Air Force.PAF also has the same exercise.
 
.
J11A is an imitation of su27sk introduced in 1992. The original Russian radar is still used. In 2003, the J11B, which used all Chinese parts and components, began production. In 2007, the modernized and upgraded J11BS began flight test flight.

In 2015, China dispatched four Su-27s and two J11As to participate in Thai military exercises.None of them have BVR capabilities.

The purpose of this exercise is for China to help the Thai Air Force familiarize themselves with the strength of the Vietnamese Air Force.PAF also has the same exercise.
J11A is not an imitation. Its a licensed produced variant from Russian. Its a legal collaboration between China and Russia. The Russian help Chinese setup the production of J11A flanker in the early 2000s and Chinese import the Russian avionics the install in it.

But since Russian avionics are outdated by then. The Chinese discontinued this production and go for domestic upgraded years later.
 
.
J11A is not an imitation. Its a licensed produced variant from Russian. Its a legal collaboration between China and Russia. The Russian help Chinese setup the production of J11A flanker in the early 2000s and Chinese import the Russian avionics the install in it.

But since Russian avionics are outdated by then. The Chinese discontinued this production and go for domestic upgraded years later.
China is gradually replacing the J11A with Parts made in China. Every batch is different. It's really a copycat process.
 
.
This is a very old news and we all already know the story behind it. Why pull out such old news and talk about it again?

You shall be aware the J-11A send for exercise are the worst variant with outdated Russian avionics and R-27 missile in PLAAF inventory. Not surprised at the result.

Most of Chinese flanker in service now, are the better J-11B and J-16 with updated Chinese avionics (glass cockpit and digital interface)
Saab Grippen are still same?
 
.
The backside of the story is that the this stone-age J-11/Su-72 1980 version still dominate the Gripen 16:0 in close combat.

For BVR, it is obvious that Su-27 with its original radar work poorly.

But overall the Thai pilots are quite impressed by the skills of PLA pilots, and told the media that they are better than the best NATO pilots they faced before.

And latterly, when China send J-10A, they dominate the competition, when they sent J-10C, they wipe the floor of Gripen.

But you don't hear any news from our west media on anything below, just the stone-age Gripen defeat J-11 original version with imported 1980 era Russian radar at BVR :rofl:
 
.
A talk was given at China’s Northwestern Polytechnical University on Dec. 9. The speaker was reported to be Li Zhonghua who is said to have participated in Exercise Falcon Strike 2015 in Thailand. One of the slides showed the score during each day of the exercise and during the first day, the Thais flying the Gripen were beaten 16-0.


Source unknown

Another slide shows that although the Thais did very badly on the first day. These were dogfights and the Gripen fared better in the beyond-visual-range (BVR) arena. With 24 percent of the kills at range beyond 50km.

However, on the following days, as the game shifted to beyond-visual-range engagements, the Gripen armed with AIM-120 medium-range missiles proved to be a far better fighter than the J-11 with its own medium-range missiles, possibly PL-12s.
The Gripens shot down a total of 41 Chinese J-11s at a loss of six fighters. The final tally after the completion of seven days stood in favor of the Swedish fighters as it shot down 42 J-11s at a loss of 34 only.




There were important lessons for the Chinese side. This slide explains that the Chinese pilots had poor situation awareness. Too much focus was on front of the aircraft rather than all round. There was a lack of coordination between the attacking aircraft and its sweeper escorts. The pilots were not experience in avoiding missile shots. Their response were too mechanical and could not judge correctly on the evasive techniques for missiles with different ranges.



In large scale air battles, the Thais were able to score kills while playing the attacker by taking down the Chinese defenders. When the Chinese attack, they had difficulty making it pass the Thai defenders. The only success for the Chinese when attacking is when they were protected by the Gripen, that was a low-level attack.



In 2 vs 2 scenarios, the Chinese found that they are poor in judging the threat and the evasive actions were insufficient. The fire control and weapons integration for the J-11 is still behind the Saab Gripen.



Despite dominating in the dogfight arena, the Chinese still picked up important lessons from the Thai. They found that when dealing with Thai attacks using the Sun as cover, the strategy of the Chinese are simplified. When in an advantageous position, the Chinese were in a rush to score victory and fell into traps put up by the Thais.



it's not the missiles, it's the RCS of the aircrafts...J11 being almost twice the size of the gripen will naturally be seen first on the radar of the gripen than the other way around.
 
.
But overall the Thai pilots are quite impressed by the skills of PLA pilots, and told the media that they are better than the best NATO pilots they faced before.

Nice PLA pilots have the Thai 'best of the best' Top Gun accreditation :enjoy:
 
.
Nice PLA pilots have the Thai 'best of the best' Top Gun accreditation :enjoy:

Sadly the best of NATO did not.

But don't worry, they can always have some John HypeKins studies to make themselves feel better:

5e83b9d253101.jpg
 
.
A talk was given at China’s Northwestern Polytechnical University on Dec. 9. The speaker was reported to be Li Zhonghua who is said to have participated in Exercise Falcon Strike 2015 in Thailand. One of the slides showed the score during each day of the exercise and during the first day, the Thais flying the Gripen were beaten 16-0.


Source unknown

Another slide shows that although the Thais did very badly on the first day. These were dogfights and the Gripen fared better in the beyond-visual-range (BVR) arena. With 24 percent of the kills at range beyond 50km.

However, on the following days, as the game shifted to beyond-visual-range engagements, the Gripen armed with AIM-120 medium-range missiles proved to be a far better fighter than the J-11 with its own medium-range missiles, possibly PL-12s.
The Gripens shot down a total of 41 Chinese J-11s at a loss of six fighters. The final tally after the completion of seven days stood in favor of the Swedish fighters as it shot down 42 J-11s at a loss of 34 only.




There were important lessons for the Chinese side. This slide explains that the Chinese pilots had poor situation awareness. Too much focus was on front of the aircraft rather than all round. There was a lack of coordination between the attacking aircraft and its sweeper escorts. The pilots were not experience in avoiding missile shots. Their response were too mechanical and could not judge correctly on the evasive techniques for missiles with different ranges.



In large scale air battles, the Thais were able to score kills while playing the attacker by taking down the Chinese defenders. When the Chinese attack, they had difficulty making it pass the Thai defenders. The only success for the Chinese when attacking is when they were protected by the Gripen, that was a low-level attack.



In 2 vs 2 scenarios, the Chinese found that they are poor in judging the threat and the evasive actions were insufficient. The fire control and weapons integration for the J-11 is still behind the Saab Gripen.



Despite dominating in the dogfight arena, the Chinese still picked up important lessons from the Thai. They found that when dealing with Thai attacks using the Sun as cover, the strategy of the Chinese are simplified. When in an advantageous position, the Chinese were in a rush to score victory and fell into traps put up by the Thais.




Joe the plumber has pulled one from the archives to satisfy his American ego.

How is the war in Afghanistan going? I heard that you are winning.
 
. .
The backside of the story is that the this stone-age J-11/Su-72 1980 version still dominate the Gripen 16:0 in close combat.

For BVR, it is obvious that Su-27 with its original radar work poorly.

But overall the Thai pilots are quite impressed by the skills of PLA pilots, and told the media that they are better than the best NATO pilots they faced before.

And latterly, when China send J-10A, they dominate the competition, when they sent J-10C, they wipe the floor of Gripen.

But you don't hear any news from our west media on anything below, just the stone-age Gripen defeat J-11 original version with imported 1980 era Russian radar at BVR :rofl:
Russian aircraft are the best at dogfighting in general. However, dogfighting is obsolete in the 21st century and everything is about BVR and shooting down enemies before they get close enough to do serious damage.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom