What's new

Ryukyu pro-independence group quietly gathering momentum

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
n-ryukyus-a-20150127-870x627.jpg

Chosuke Yara (center), leader of the Kariyushi Club, formerly called the Ryukyu Independence Party, and his supporters hold a banner calling for Okinawa's independence from Japan in Naha, Okinawa Prefecture, on Oct. 13. | KYODO
Ryukyu pro-independence group quietly gathering momentum
BY EIICHIRO ISHIYAMA
KYODO


NAHA, OKINAWA PREF. – A tiny but earnest movement is underway to seek independence for Okinawa and the other islands in the Ryukyu Islands chain.

The Association of Comprehensive Studies for Independence of the Lew Chewans, which represents native residents of the islands, said in its charter that “By gaining independence from Japan and removing all military bases from our islands, we Lew Chewans wish to achieve our long sought-after goal of becoming a sovereign island of peace.”

The chain, which belongs mostly to Okinawa Prefecture, was ruled by the Ryukyu Kingdom from the 15th century to the 19th century. The Japanese first invaded the islands in the early 17th century, eventually annexing them in the late 19th century.

The calls issued by Lew Chewans, or Ryukyuan people, to remove U.S. military bases from Okinawa Prefecture have long been ignored by the central government, laments Yasukatsu Matsushima, a professor at Ryukoku University in Kyoto and co-founder of the group.

“If we become independent, we can eliminate the military bases as our own choice,” he said.

Matsushima, 51, founded the group jointly with four other people including Shinako Oyakawa, a 34-year-old lecturer at Meio University in Nago, Okinawa, last May. The group has more than 250 members so far.

Independence for the Ryukyu Islands has largely been downplayed in Japan as “a topic of pub conversations,” Matsushima said.

“We accept that fact, but even pub talk helps the issue move forward,” he added.

The question of Scottish independence from the United Kingdom, for instance, had been a popular topic in pubs among Scots, said Matsushima, who witnessed the referendum on the issue in Scotland last September.

People for and against Scottish independence discussed the issue “on the street in a level-headed manner,” Matsushima recalled.

Many of those in favor of independence called for the removal of the Clyde naval base, home port for the Royal Navy’s nuclear submarines. Matsushima, who wore a “Yes” sign on his chest while in Scotland, said many in the pro-independence camp were aware of the huge U.S. military presence in Okinawa and welcomed his visit.

“I was impressed and encouraged by the mature debate,” he said, even though the Scottish people voted to remain within the United Kingdom.

Matsushima, whose main area of study is economics, said Okinawa is no longer dependent on U.S. military bases to support itself.

American military bases occupy 10 percent of Okinawa’s prefectural land and 18 percent of the island itself. But the bases contribute only an estimated 5 percent of its gross domestic product, while job opportunities and tax revenues in areas since returned by the U.S. military have risen sharply, Matsushima said.

Critics question his group’s movement, saying the central government would never approve independence for the Ryukyu Islands.

“Japan’s approval is unnecessary in the first place,” Matsushima argued.

The U.N. Charter and the International Covenants on Human Rights recognize that all peoples have the right to self-determination. Okinawa can “declare its independence and apply for U.N. membership if the prefectural assembly decides on the motion and wins majority support for it in a referendum,” Matsushima said. “We will then increase the number of countries that recognize us as a nation. That’s all we will have to do, though the process will be slow.”

Born on Ishigaki Island, southwest of Okinawa, Matsushima finished graduate school at Waseda University and worked as a researcher at the Japanese Consulate General in Guam and the embassy in Palau.

Despite having a population of around 20,000 compared with Okinawa’s 1.4 million, Palau was “duly respected” internationally as an independent island nation in the western Pacific Ocean because of its nonnuclear constitution, Matsushima said.

His group envisions creating an unarmed, neutral country, with each island in the arc from Amami to Yonaguni deciding whether to join. It could stand on its own feet economically by becoming a trading base like the ancient Ryukyu Kingdom, he added.

Since its establishment, the group has been criticized from certain quarters. A commentary published in the Chinese media that favored independence for the Ryukyus led to accusations that the association is aiding China’s “attempt to invade” Japan.

Kiyoshi Nakamura, an Okinawa-based author, supports the group’s cause but questions its stance of limiting members to people whose ethnic roots are in the Ryukyus.

“I cannot accept that the Ryukyuans are defined by blood,” he said.

While Matsushima’s group has been growing in popularity, the push for independence itself isn’t new.

In 1970, a political party named the Ryukyu Independence Party was formed in Okinawa but failed to win widespread support from the local people. It changed its name to the Kariyushi Club in 2008 and is still seeking an independent Ryukyu.

Meanwhile Okinawa Gov. Takeshi Onaga maintains he will oppose the plan to move U.S. Marine Corps Air Station Futenma elsewhere in the prefecture “based on Okinawa’s right to self-determination.”

Matsushima has high hopes about Onaga’s stance and said the right to self-determination is not limited to political issues like the Futenma base plan.

***

@Chinese-Dragon , @ChineseTiger1986 , @Shotgunner51 , @Keel , @FairAndUnbiased , @XiaoYaoZi Backup et al.

Sirs, let's discuss academically of a viable independent Ryukyu, which, historically, had a Kingdom and thus experienced self-rule.
 


2015_0529okinawa.jpg

Chosuke Yara, the head of the Ryuku Independence Party, speaks in Naha, Okinawa, Japan, June 21, 2013. Although it accounts for less than one percent of Japanese territory, Okinawa is home to around 24,000 US military personnel. (Ko Sasaki/The New York Times)

When the opportunity comes, that will happen.

That's definitely a viable chip for any able global powers to work with if necessary.
 
Chosuke Yara, the head of the Ryuku Independence Party, speaks in Naha, Okinawa, Japan, June 21, 2013. Although it accounts for less than one percent of Japanese territory, Okinawa is home to around 24,000 US military personnel. (Ko Sasaki/The New York Times)



That's definitely a viable chip for any able global powers to work with if necessary.
琉球人跟福建人没区别.
 
The status of the Ryukyu Islands is yet to be decided。

China questions Okinawa ownership
BLOOMBERG


Two scholars from a Chinese research center suggested re-examining the ownership of the Japanese island chain that includes Okinawa, adding to tensions over the Senkaku territorial dispute.

Agreements reached between the Allies during World War II mean the ownership of the Ryukyu Islands may be in question, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences researchers said in a commentary published Wednesday in the People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s main newspaper. They said Japan’s loss in the war nullified an 1895 treaty in which China ceded territory to Japan.

“It may be time to revisit the unresolved historical issue of the Ryukyu Islands,” Zhang Haipeng and Li Guoqiang wrote in the commentary.

A move to reconsider ownership of the Ryukyus would add to strains as China and Japan each assert their claims over the uninhabited Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea. The central government’s decision last year to purchase three of the islets sparked protests across China.

Tensions were compounded last month when Diet members, including Cabinet ministers, visited Yasukuni Shrine, which is viewed as a symbol of wartime aggression, and Prime Minister Shinzo Abe vowed to protect the Senkaku Islands by force.

“The fact that this view is carried by the People’s Daily signals that Beijing may be upping the ante,” Willy Wo-Lap Lam, an adjunct professor of history at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, wrote in an email. “This is psychological warfare and a classic Chinese negotiation tactic — trying to intimidate the opponent by raising the stakes.”

Okinawa, the largest island in the Ryukyu chain, hosts several U.S. military installations. The scholars’ comments came in an article about China’s claim to the Senkaku Islands.

The Ryukyus unquestionably belong to Japan, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga said Wednesday. The archipelago has a population of about 1.5 million people and its northernmost point sits 30 km from Kyushu.

“It is clear that in terms of history and internationally, it is our nation’s territory,” Suga said at a briefing. “It’s indisputable. If that is being discussed in China, there is absolutely no basis for it.”

China’s imports from Japan plunged 14 percent in the month following the September protests over the Senkaku Islands, according to Chinese customs figures.

The scholars aren’t necessarily saying that the Ryukyus belong to China, said Taylor Fravel, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who studies China’s territorial claims. They are raising the possibility that Japan’s ownership could be disputed because the islands’ rulers in past centuries had tributary relations with imperial China, he said.

“These are perhaps the most serious scholars to date to make this insinuation,” Fravel said.
 
This is too small of a movement to have any significant impact. As long as Japan and US have control of Western Pacific, there is zero chance of Ryukyu splitting from Japan. I just don't see this movement becoming a visible force in the near future.

Before you say China should support it, we got bigger fish to catch. Taiwan must be reunited and South China Sea pacified if China is to gain access to the Pacific.
 
if murica were to be completely kicked out from japan, that's the end of their Independent move. they just want muricans to be in murica's land. but that is for the best. independent japan is so desireable.
 
This is too small of a movement to have any significant impact. As long as Japan and US have control of Western Pacific, there is zero chance of Ryukyu splitting from Japan. I just don't see this movement becoming a visible force in the near future.

Before you say China should support it, we got bigger fish to catch. Taiwan must be reunited and South China Sea pacified if China is to gain access to the Pacific.

That's very much obvious. But, still, there is such a social phenomenon that can be taken advantage of if needed. The end result would not be that important.

As a principle, China recognizes Japan's territorial integrity. But, just as China has done with Vietnam and others' island reclamation, if Japan sought to interfere in Greater China's internal affairs, China would simply respond in kind. In that sense, Ryukyu Independence Movement is a strategic asset.

I agree with you that Mainland's first line of duty is still the little island island I reside in. Personally, it is more than welcome!
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom