What's new

Russia’s formidable S-400 Triumf air defense missile system

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
18,519
Reaction score
13
Country
India
Location
India
http://tass.com/defense/1024655

1204405.jpg


MOSCOW, October 5. /TASS/. Moscow and New Delhi have signed a contract on the supply of S-400 air defense missile systems to India during Russian President Vladimir Putin’s visit.

The S-400 Triumf (NATO reporting name: SA-21 Growler) is a Russian long-and medium-range air defense missile system. It is designed to destroy air attack and reconnaissance means (including stealth aircraft) and any other aerial targets amid intensive counter-fire and jamming.

Development and entry into service


The work on the conceptual design of the point air defense missile system initially designated as the S-300PM3 was launched by the Almaz research and production association (currently the Almaz research and production association named after Academician Alexander Raspletin, Moscow) in the mid-1980s under the supervision of Chief Designer Alexander Lemansky. This work was intensified in the late 1990s and on February 12, 1999 the system was demonstrated for the first time at the Kapustin Yar practice range (the Astrakhan Region) to then-Defense Minister Igor Sergeyev. The trials of the most advanced air defense missile system were carried out in the 2000s.

On April 28, 2007, the S-400 went into service and the first battalion of the newest surface-to-air missile systems assumed combat duty on August 6 that year in the town of Elektrostal (the Moscow Region). Six weeks later, On September 27, 2007, the Triumf’s developer, Alexander Lemansky who saw the launch of his missile system into serial production, died at the Kapustin Yar practice range. The system’s first live-fire exercises were successfully carried out at the Kapustin Yar practice range in 2011.

The S-400 is based on the S-300PMU2 air defense missile complex. It differs from its predecessors by its extended combat range and the capability of using new surface-to-air missile systems. It is capable of detecting and destroying low-observable (stealth) and fast-moving aerial targets.

S-400 system and its integral parts
The S-400 Triumf comprises the following:
  • a combat control post;
  • a three-coordinate jam-resistant phased array radar to detect aerial targets;
  • six-eight air defense missile complexes (with up to 12 transporter-launchers, and also a multifunctional four-coordinate illumination and detection radar);
  • a technical support system;
  • missile transporting vehicles;
  • a training simulator.
The S-400 system can also additionally include an all-altitude radar (detector) and movable towers for an antenna post. All the S-400’s means are mounted on the wheeled all-terrain chassis (produced by the Minsk Wheeled Tractor Factory and the Bryansk Automobile Enterprise) and can be transported by rail, water and air transport.

The S-400 can selectively operate with the use of no less than 5 missile types of various takeoff weights and launch ranges to create a layered air defense zone.

The S-400 is also capable of exercising control of other air defense missile systems (the Tor-M1, the Pantsyr-S1), providing highly effective air defense even amid a mass air attack with the use of electronic warfare means.

Technical characteristics
  • target detection range - up to 600 km;
  • aerodynamic target kill range - from 3 to 250 km;
  • tactical ballistic missile destruction range - from 5 to 60 km;
  • target destruction altitude - from 2 to 27 km;
  • engageable target velocity - up to 17,300 km/h;
  • the number of targets engaged at a time - up to 36 (up to six with one air defense missile complex);
  • the number of simultaneously guided missiles - 72;
  • the time of the system’s deployment from its march position - 5-10 min, the time of making the system combat ready from the deployed position - 3 min;
  • the operational service life of ground-based systems - no less than 20 years, air defense missiles - no less than 15 years;
Russian Aerospace Force Deputy Commander-in-Chief Viktor Gumyonny said on April 8, 2017 that missiles capable of "destroying targets in outer space, at long distances and large speeds" had started arriving for S-400 systems.

S-400 systems on combat duty in the Russian Armed Forces




According to public sources, 19 regiments armed with S-400 complexes were on combat duty in the Russian Armed Forces as of April 2017. Overall, these regiments included a total of 38 battalions and 304 launchers in Elektrostal, Dmitrov, Zvenigorod, Kurilovo (Moscow Region), Nakhodka (the Primorye Territory), Kaliningrad, Novorossiysk (the Krasnodar Territory), Polyarny (the Murmansk Region), Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky (the Kamchatka Territory), Novosibirsk, Vladivostok, Sevastopol and other places.

The state armament program envisages the arrival of 56 S-400 battalions for troops by 2020, which will make it possible to rearm 28 two-battalion air defense missile regiments.

A battalion of Triumf surface-to-air missile systems was deployed on November 25, 2015 from the Moscow Region to Syria’s Hmeymim air base accommodating the Russian air task force. Later on, according to media reports, another S-400 battalion was deployed in the Syrian province of Hama.
 
.
Not that i want to ruin the party here but Pakistan will have plenty of places to work with this system and develop counter measures. China has this and Turkey is also in process to acquire these. Turkey and Pakistan share the same platform F-16s while China and Pakistan share the JF-17s.
But congratulations never the less. It is going to prove a formidable system and will keep PAF on its toes at all times.
 
.
......while China and Pakistan share the JF-17s.


Not to the spoil the party either but the same JF-17s whose night sortie as a Squadron to Mianwali in aftermath of Uri was marred by the runway lights going off and the flight commander swearing away to glory in the ionosphere as the Squadron was in approach? Wonder how that happened?
 
.
Not to the spoil the party either but the same JF-17s whose night sortie as a Squadron to Mianwali in aftermath of Uri was marred by the runway lights going off and the flight commander swearing away to glory in the ionosphere as the Squadron was in approach? Wonder how that happened?
Quite a story you came out with. Are you sure you are talking about JF-17 and not tejas? By the way may i ask the source for this?
@Windjammer Your thoughts?
 
.
Quite a story you came out with. May i ask the source? @Windjammer


Quite a story you came out with. Are you sure you are talking about JF-17 and not tejas? By the way may i ask the source for this?
@Windjammer Your thoughts?

LOL!

Tejas does not fly in a squadron yet .... so can't be it. This is one area where such an instance will take another few decades .... LCA is afterall, "Late Coming Aircraft" and soon I shall christen it Last Century Aircraft!

Like the story? I agree ... pretty interesting I agree. Source? Hmmmm ...... that you will have to ask the PAF as to why the lights went off in the said instance ... am not privy to the reasons ...

Let the member confirm one way or the other the fact of a JF-17 Squadron as a complete squadron flying in for Capability Demonstration into Mianwali in aftermath of Uri and the incident occurring ... it shall, of course, be far fetched for such a confirmation to actually be given ...

But then, when I can laugh at my own side's stupidities ... yours definitely make the cut!
 
.
LOL!

Let the member confirm one way or the other the fact of a JF-17 Squadron as a complete squadron flying in for Capability Demonstration into Mianwali in aftermath of Uri and the incident occurring ... it shall, of course, be far fetched for such a confirmation to actually be given ...

You are making a claim based on some information that we dont have. Naturally the burden of proof lies on you. As for the stupidity, everything we say becomes stupid for an Indian and vice verse with some exceptions. In my case i presented a scenario where both friendly countries to Pakistan and with whom we have military to military relations have or will have this system. So why do you think PAF will not inspect the system and even practice against it?
Secondly isnt this the same thing Indians regularly say about how IAF practice with the Singapore F-16s and how they are stationed in India and India knows everything inside out.
 
.
You are making a claim based on some information that we dont have. Naturally the burden of proof lies on you. As for the stupidity, everything we say becomes stupid for an Indian and vice verse with some exceptions. In my case i presented a scenario where both friendly countries to Pakistan and with whom we have military to military relations have or will have this system. So why do you think PAF will not inspect the system and even practice against it?.


Like you suggested, let the member check the veracity of the - a. move of the said denomination - a JF-17 Squadron (not in home base) made second landing of the day at Mianwali (prior landing at Skardu? Do not recollect exactly) at approximately 2100 hr Pakistan time (- 30 mins/+2 hours as I again do not recall the exact time, been 02 years now as was October 2016) and b. the said incident.

As I very specifically said earlier, it was a capability demonstration but the Flight Commander of the Squadron was not amused by the incident. Of course, it goes without saying, the movement was being watched and tracked by India - hence the information from ELINT intercepts which were not of crucial nature, but amusing for any service personnel as every armed force has such incidents.

My bringing it out is merely to point out that your Radars seem to go 'off' when a foreign nation makes a raid into your territory and eliminates a state 'guest' next to your premiere military academy; then, when you are demonstrating your home grown product in full squadron strength as a capability projection exercise, such incident takes place - these incidents lend one to speculate about your statement "Pakistan will have plenty of places to work with this system and develop counter measures"

As far as your specific point as highlighted in quote above, you are right - you have ample opportunities to check the system. But then, very interesting point to note is, that the capability of a weapon system is always known, especially in this very well connected world and very well integrated information systems' network, but it is the actual integration of weapon's platforms and execution of the said strategies that have an impact on the outcome. It is this execution where I have raised a flag, nothing more.


Secondly isnt this the same thing Indians regularly say about how IAF practice with the Singapore F-16s and how they are stationed in India and India knows everything inside out

That, as you are also aware, is a silly point at best. So best ignored?
 
.
this s-400 obviously is not meant for Pakistan; S-400 for Pakistan is overkill. S-400 is geared more toward a country with an air force like china.
 
.
this s-400 obviously is not meant for Pakistan; S-400 for Pakistan is overkill. S-400 is geared more toward a country with an air force like china.
Weapons are neither kept idle in war nor are they country specific

This weapon system will fill an existing void in the air defences created by the aging fleet of aircraft in the IAF in the short term
 
.
Not that i want to ruin the party here but Pakistan will have plenty of places to work with this system and develop counter measures. China has this and Turkey is also in process to acquire these. Turkey and Pakistan share the same platform F-16s while China and Pakistan share the JF-17s.
But congratulations never the less. It is going to prove a formidable system and will keep PAF on its toes at all times.
What benefit will these countries get by allowing Pakistan to learn it's weakness
 
.
Like you suggested, let the member check the veracity of the - a. move of the said denomination - a JF-17 Squadron (not in home base) made second landing of the day at Mianwali (prior landing at Skardu? Do not recollect exactly) at approximately 2100 hr Pakistan time (- 30 mins/+2 hours as I again do not recall the exact time, been 02 years now as was October 2016) and b. the said incident.

As I very specifically said earlier, it was a capability demonstration but the Flight Commander of the Squadron was not amused by the incident. Of course, it goes without saying, the movement was being watched and tracked by India - hence the information from ELINT intercepts which were not of crucial nature, but amusing for any service personnel as every armed force has such incidents.

My bringing it out is merely to point out that your Radars seem to go 'off' when a foreign nation makes a raid into your territory and eliminates a state 'guest' next to your premiere military academy; then, when you are demonstrating your home grown product in full squadron strength as a capability projection exercise, such incident takes place - these incidents lend one to speculate about your statement "Pakistan will have plenty of places to work with this system and develop counter measures"

As far as your specific point as highlighted in quote above, you are right - you have ample opportunities to check the system. But then, very interesting point to note is, that the capability of a weapon system is always known, especially in this very well connected world and very well integrated information systems' network, but it is the actual integration of weapon's platforms and execution of the said strategies that have an impact on the outcome. It is this execution where I have raised a flag, nothing more.




That, as you are also aware, is a silly point at best. So best ignored?
Utter B.S why won't they would do that at PAF Base Mushaf where CCS is based, and it is more suited for this and such kind of demos always are going on there.
@Windjammer
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
Back
Top Bottom