Russian police detain opposition leader, hundreds of protesters

[A.P. Richelieu]

And such corruption of nepotism is found for EVERY Western leader as well. As we speak, Trump has just created a new ministry so that his son-in-law can run it.

Again, in one form or the other such corruption exists everywhere in the Western word. Otherwise Blair, Cameron, Iceland PM, Sarkozy, Israeli PM and 100s others wouldn't be under investigatoin.

But you making a blatant allegation that Putin takes "10%" of all the corruption sums without any hard evidence is absurd.

Anyone can say anything on the net. I can say, I have friends in the banking sector who have informaiton about Swedish King's bank accounts ...big deal?

The amount Putin collects is certainly absurd.

Libya under " Terrorist - Dictator " Gaddafi 's reign was Switzerland of Africa... Guess what ?? Once you are blamed by America " YOU ARE DICTATOR "... Look at Libya now ...

This thread is not about Ghadaffi.
Putin is blamed by Russians.

 

[Taygibay]

And such corruption of nepotism is found for EVERY Western leader as well. As we speak, Trump has just created a new ministry so that his son-in-law can run it.

That misrepresents the situation badly, mate!

Not all Western leaders had judicial affairs, nor
do all those with affairs concern nepotism. Just
for France, Sarkozy is accused of fiddling with
campaign budgets, Le Pen with using Euro jobs
to pay her party workers, etc.
Trump is a case apart.

However, I can assure you that you can set up a
private company or corporation without anyone
asking for "extra" money. And it is precisely be-
-cause the state machine runs correctly at lower
levels that those at the top trading favours are so
easily identified.

And since there isn't an uninterrupted chain for
money to flow, it is not possible for leaders to
collect a percentage. In present day Russia, it is!

So while I agree with you that the 10% claim is
unfounded in proof so far, if Putin ran a cleaner
less integrated land without Soviet overtones in
government functioning, then off-hand dismissals
as yours would ring much more true?

Have a good day, Tay.

 

[coffee_cup]

The amount Putin collects is certainly absurd.

LOL.

Ok.

That misrepresents the situation badly, mate!

Not all Western leaders had judicial affairs, nor
do all those with affairs concern nepotism. Just
for France, Sarkozy is accused of fiddling with
campaign budgets, Le Pen with using Euro jobs
to pay her party workers, etc.
Trump is a case apart.

However, I can assure you that you can set up a
private company or corporation without anyone
asking for "extra" money. And it is precisely be-
-cause the state machine runs correctly at lower
levels that those at the top trading favours are so
easily identified.

And since there isn't an uninterrupted chain for
money to flow, it is not possible for leaders to
collect a percentage. In present day Russia, it is!

So while I agree with you that the 10% claim is
unfounded in proof so far, if Putin ran a cleaner
less integrated land without Soviet overtones in
government functioning, then off-hand dismissals
as yours would ring much more true?

Have a good day, Tay.

And I can assure you, the corruption in present day Russia is FAR LESS than it used to be in Yelstin era.

And BTW the most corrupt of the corrupt Russians are hiding.... guess where?

Yes, in London and Tel Aviv!

 

[Taygibay]

And I can assure you, the corruption in present day Russia is FAR LESS than it used to be in Yelstin era.

Speaking from first hand experience...

Haven't been there since so I'll take your word for it
for now and acknowledge it as good news, thanks!

Take care, Tay.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

That misrepresents the situation badly, mate!

Not all Western leaders had judicial affairs, nor
do all those with affairs concern nepotism. Just
for France, Sarkozy is accused of fiddling with
campaign budgets, Le Pen with using Euro jobs
to pay her party workers, etc.
Trump is a case apart.

However, I can assure you that you can set up a
private company or corporation without anyone
asking for "extra" money. And it is precisely be-
-cause the state machine runs correctly at lower
levels that those at the top trading favours are so
easily identified.

And since there isn't an uninterrupted chain for
money to flow, it is not possible for leaders to
collect a percentage. In present day Russia, it is!

So while I agree with you that the 10% claim is
unfounded in proof so far, if Putin ran a cleaner
less integrated land without Soviet overtones in
government functioning, then off-hand dismissals
as yours would ring much more true?

Have a good day, Tay.

I said "10% (or so)" which should be interpreted as "some percentage".
It is obvious that Putin does not know about "all" corruption,
but when large affairs like Sochi are beeing awarded to his friends,
anyone expects he does not get a kickback?

 

[RoadRunner401]

Russian Spring has begun!

 

[coffee_cup]

I said "10% (or so)" which should be interpreted as "some percentage".
It is obvious that Putin does not know about "all" corruption,
but when large affairs like Sochi are beeing awarded to his friends,
anyone expects he does not get a kickback?

The burden of evidence is on you. This is you who is accusing Putin of taking kickback without providing any hard proof for that. It is more like a conspiracy theory ...

What are you gonna do if accuser were to take you to the court for maligning his image without any evidence?

 

[vostok]

Russian Spring has begun!

The Russian Spring was in 2014, when there were events in the Crimea. And now it is usual protests of dissatisfied people. There are some dissatisfied in each contry of this planet. In free countries, they can go out and declare their demands. In Russia, they can go out and declare, too, as we see.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

The burden of evidence is on you. This is you who is accusing Putin of taking kickback without providing any hard proof for that. It is more like a conspiracy theory ...

What are you gonna do if accuser were to take you to the court for maligning his image without any evidence?

It has already been presented on Swedish Television by "Uppdrag Granskning" and no, they have not been sued.

 

[coffee_cup]

It has already been presented on Swedish Television by "Uppdrag Granskning" and no, they have not been sued.

I can give you countless reports in different media around the world which are considered "conspiracy theories" and are also not sued...

Doesn't mean they are true though.

 

[Max]

In Russia, they can go out and declare, too, as we see.

if so, why you arrested opposition leader and activists? they should be allowed to protest peacefully..no?

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

I can give you countless reports in different media around the world which are considered "conspiracy theories" and are also not sued...

Doesn't mean they are true though.

Does not mean that they are false either, especially when the journalists have received
several prizes for revealing corruption, both on a National and International arena.

BBC Investigation.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/p...ussian-presidents-secret-wealth-a6834171.html

Adam Szubin, who oversees US Treasury sanctions, has told BBC Panorama that the Russian president is corrupt and that the US government has known this for "many, many years".

He said: "We've seen him enriching his friends, his close allies, and marginalising those who he doesn't view as friends using state assets. Whether that's Russia's energy wealth, whether it's other state contracts, he directs those to whom he believes will serve him and excludes those who don't. To me, that is a picture of corruption."

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35385445

 

[coffee_cup]

Does not mean that they are false either, especially when the journalists have received
several prizes for revealing corruption, both on a National and International arena.

BBC Investigation.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/p...ussian-presidents-secret-wealth-a6834171.html

So in this particular case it is not established that the reports are "true" or "false". They are just "reports". You are leaning towards accepting it as truth, whereas others are not convinced.

And don't start me on journalists receiving prizes...Western media has a very long history of propaganda against those they consider an enemy.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

So in this particular case it is not established that the reports are "true" or "false". They are just "reports". You are leaning towards accepting it as truth, whereas others are not convinced.

And don't start me on journalists receiving prizes...Western media has a very long history of propaganda against those they consider an enemy.

Since You are going to brand all links as propaganda and conspiracy theories,
further discussion is pointless.

If they are correct, You are supporting Grand Theft from the Russian people.
I guess You don't mind that. Now on ignore list.

 

[NakedLunch]

Since You are going to brand all links as propaganda and conspiracy theories,
further discussion is pointless.

If they are correct, You are supporting Grand Theft from the Russian people.
I guess You don't mind that. Now on ignore list.

Disingenuous. The West has approved bailouts of hundreds of billions to prop up certain zionist controlled banks and enterprises in the West. Is that not theft or are you a zionist shill?