What's new

Russia will Launch the First of Six Submarines for the Vietnam Navy

.
Russia sells six Kilo submarines to Vietnam. So what?

1. No Kilo submarine has been delivered.

2. Vietnamese has no experience operating submarines. China has been operating submarines for 50 years.

3. China has 71 submarines and it is constantly building more.

4. China can attack other countries by land or with its 4,000km DH-10 cruise missile.

5. China can use its powerful PLA Air Force to destroy future Vietnamese bases.

6. Chinese AESA radars have far greater range than crappy Third World countries around its periphery.

7. Aside from the U.S., only China is perfecting its true fifth-generation stealth fighter. Don't mention the T-50/Pak-Fa with its exposed metal engines.

8. China can easily replace any of its military losses by manufacturing more weapons. India, Vietnam, and others cannot.

In conclusion, selling an insignificant amount of weaponry to countries that have no experience in using them makes no difference to China. Duh!
 
.
Russia sells six Kilo submarines to Vietnam. So what?

1. No Kilo submarine has been delivered.

2. Vietnamese has no experience operating submarines. China has been operating submarines for 50 years.

3. China has 71 submarines and it is constantly building more.

4. China can attack other countries by land or with its 4,000km DH-10 cruise missile.

5. China can use its powerful PLA Air Force to destroy future Vietnamese bases.

6. Chinese AESA radars have far greater range than crappy Third World countries around its periphery.

7. Aside from the U.S., only China is perfecting its true fifth-generation stealth fighter. Don't mention the T-50/Pak-Fa with its exposed metal engines.

8. China can easily replace any of its military losses by manufacturing more weapons. India, Vietnam, and others cannot.

In conclusion, selling an insignificant amount of weaponry to countries that have no experience in using them makes no difference to China. Duh!

Wow! You instantly turned the thread into a v/s china one! Couldn't you wait for sometime?
 
.
Russia sells six Kilo submarines to Vietnam. So what?

1. No Kilo submarine has been delivered.

2. Vietnamese has no experience operating submarines. China has been operating submarines for 50 years.

3. China has 71 submarines and it is constantly building more.

4. China can attack other countries by land or with its 4,000km DH-10 cruise missile.

5. China can use its powerful PLA Air Force to destroy future Vietnamese bases.

6. Chinese AESA radars have far greater range than crappy Third World countries around its periphery.

7. Aside from the U.S., only China is perfecting its true fifth-generation stealth fighter. Don't mention the T-50/Pak-Fa with its exposed metal engines.

8. China can easily replace any of its military losses by manufacturing more weapons. India, Vietnam, and others cannot.

In conclusion, selling an insignificant amount of weaponry to countries that have no experience in using them makes no difference to China. Duh!

1) China is going to attack Vietnam this year? :rofl:

2) In Vietnam war, they said that "Vietnam has no experience operating missiles" ... and then they said B.52 can't be shot down...

3) Yeah right in China quantity is always better than quality.

4) We have a mutual border so cruise missile is not an advantage :rofl:

5) That's exactly what US had said in Vietnam War

6) So did B.52

7) And then they said that China can produce their own engine for the J-20 :rofl:

8) And then they said that China is very good at economy :rofl:

P/S: And US was/is/will be still much more powerful than China ... :rofl:
 
.
@Martian2:

okay, as you like I will start a thread with a title "How the U.S. sees China!"
Wait some seconds I are going to collect some facts and opinions from the Americans, and how they see the threat from China in the region, how they will response.
 
.
Russia sells six Kilo submarines to Vietnam. So what?

1. No Kilo submarine has been delivered.

2. Vietnamese has no experience operating submarines. China has been operating submarines for 50 years.

3. China has 71 submarines and it is constantly building more.

4. China can attack other countries by land or with its 4,000km DH-10 cruise missile.

5. China can use its powerful PLA Air Force to destroy future Vietnamese bases.

6. Chinese AESA radars have far greater range than crappy Third World countries around its periphery.

7. Aside from the U.S., only China is perfecting its true fifth-generation stealth fighter. Don't mention the T-50/Pak-Fa with its exposed metal engines.

8. China can easily replace any of its military losses by manufacturing more weapons. India, Vietnam, and others cannot.

In conclusion, selling an insignificant amount of weaponry to countries that have no experience in using them makes no difference to China. Duh!

just one point.

1. Topic of this thread is Vietnam's submarine not China. Idiot.
 
. .
First of six ordered by Vietnam diesel-electric submarines of Project 636 will be launched at the shipyard, "Admiralty Shipyards" (St. Petersburg) in August this year,


Can you quote the source pls?
 
.
Who do you think the prospective Vietnamese submarines are intended for? Dumb Indian.
For china's cargo ships and oil tanker in Malacca strait :woot:
On the potential application of the Type 636 attack submarines and Su-30 MK2V multirole fighters in the SCS, Yin replies that the Type 636 attack submarines can be a major threat in the SCS. Yin adds that Vietnam has designated a submarine ambush zone in the Straits of Malacca for its tactical training. Yin says that the Straits of Malacca is a shipping lifeline of many countries including China, the United States, Japan and South Korea. "By designating a submarine ambush zone over there, it is to destroy the means of livelihood for everybody because it [Straits of Malacca] is everybody's lifeline," says Yin.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/chines...eet-6-years-state-media-11.html#ixzz23bQiy4XJ
 
.
For china's cargo ships and oil tanker in Malacca strait :woot:

That's funny. What about the PLA Navy? You think they'll just stand by and watch?

Or do you think the PLA Air Force will bomb your future submarine base straight to hell?
 
.
Can you quote the source pls?
Can you read VNese , bro ??
Nga hạ thủy tàu ngầm Kilo đầu tiên cho Việt Nam
Cập nhật lúc :2:20 PM, 14/08/2012
Tàu ngầm diesel-điện Kilo 636 đầu tiên sẽ được hạ thủy vào ngày 28/8.Sau đó, tàu sẽ trải qua quá trình thử nghiệm trước khi bàn giao cho Việt Nam.
(ĐVO) Trước đó, hôm 14/8, RIA Novosti trích dẫn một nguồn tin trong tổ hợp công nghiệp quốc phòng cho biết, tàu ngầm diesel-điện Project 636 Kilo đầu tiên trong hợp đồng cung cấp 6 tàu ngầm cùng loại cho Việt Nam, được đóng tại nhà máy đóng tàu Admiralty ở St Petersburg sẽ được hạ thủy trong tháng 8/2012.

"Chiếc tàu ngầm đầu tiên trong hợp đồng sẽ được hạ thủy trong tháng 8/2012, sau đó, nó sẽ bắt đầu một chu trình kiểm tra và thử nghiệm", nguồn tin cho biết.

Người này nói thêm, buổi lễ hạ thủy sẽ được tổ chức vào ngày 28/8.
BAODATVIET.VN | Nga h


That's funny. What about the PLA Navy? You think they'll just stand by and watch?

?
Yeah, PLAN is a coward , they don't know how to fight, that's why, we control the largest and the most important part in Spratly until now:P
Or do you think the PLA Air Force will bomb your future submarine base straight to hell
PLAAF is inexperience plus coward , too:P

See what happen to PLAAF in 1979
j6shotdown.jpg

and now .
J-10-1269423429_94991.jpg
 
.
Can you read VNese , bro ??

Yeah, PLAN is a coward , they don't know how to fight, that's why, we control the largest part and most important partin Spratly until now:P

PLAAF is inexperience plus coward , too:P

See what happen to PLAAF in 1979
j6shotdown.jpg

and now .
J-10-1269423429_94991.jpg

Roll eyes. I've seen your pictures like a hundred times now. They are not pertinent.

The PLA Air Force will bomb your future submarine base before Vietnam can conduct its first combat operation. That's just common sense. You guys are wasting your money in buying six Kilos that will be eating PLAAF bombs.
 
. .
off course to kick Chinese a$$ you douche bag, but find some other thread to flatter your arcane capabilities, discuss on the topic here.

What's your problem? You have not participated in this discussion.

Why are you intruding in our conversation?

I don't remember anyone mentioning weakling India in this thread.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom