What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

A.P. Richelieu said:
Once You debunked all the reasons given for terminating the ceasefire with Iraq, you can argue that the invasion 2003 was illegal, otherwise not.

AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002

[107th Congress Public Law 243] [From the U.S. Government Printing Office] [DOCID: f:publ243.107] AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002 Public Law 107-243 107th Congress Joint Resolution To authorize the use of...
defence.pk

If You simply think it was a bad idea, then that document does not matter.
Click to expand...
So where were the weapons of mass destruction?
 
. .
A.P. Richelieu said:
Once You debunked all the reasons for terminating …
And You know you will fail, so You don’t even try.
Click to expand...
Wasn't that the main reason? The main excuse?

Saddam has weapons of mass destruction. Didn't the US and Britain go to war with that slogan? Saddam trains terrorists,Saddam is a threat to the US? Wasn't that the slogan for the 2003 invasion?
 
. .
Foinikas said:
Wasn't that the main reason? The main excuse?

Saddam has weapons of mass destruction. Didn't the US and Britain go to war with that slogan? Saddam trains terrorists,Saddam is a threat to the US? Wasn't that the slogan for the 2003 invasion?
Click to expand...
As I suspected, you fail.
Then You continue arguing.

You also do not understand legal matters.
If someone provides five reasons to goto war and only one is valid, that is enough for the war to be legal.

That four are invalid is of no importance.

Deino said:
@Foinikas & @A.P. Richelieu can you both just stop with this constant back & forth discussions on off-topic stuff? The war against Iraq is totally unrelated to this one and I'm pretty sure you both find better threads to discuss this, but please not here!
Click to expand...
I started a thread on this and the Afghan War for this very reason. Provided links to those threads here.
People keep arguing in this thread any way.
I am perfectly happy to continue the discussions in those threads.
 
.
Is NATO preparing for WW3? They have realised Ukraine will be defeated so they are preparing to attack Russia with 3.5 million force
 
. . . .
Foinikas said:
Wasn't that the main reason? The main excuse?

Saddam has weapons of mass destruction. Didn't the US and Britain go to war with that slogan? Saddam trains terrorists,Saddam is a threat to the US? Wasn't that the slogan for the 2003 invasion?
Click to expand...

It does not matter anymore, legal or not legal, Irak was invaded and millions were killed, this discussion is absurd.

But this war creates a precedence, a bully can unilaterally kill a country for their "reasons"... well, don t say anything against Russia now, or if you do, then act you about that, now.

US has lost all credibility, and only has the stick power, for now and only against weak countries. We will know how it last.
 
. .
Viet said:
Ukraine army advancing towards Tokmak.
Half way to the sea of Asow
571 days into Putin’s special military operation
Russia suffers 500 men dead and wounded on average per day.


View attachment 954223
Click to expand...

At this curent rate of progress - they may be able to getr to Tomak in the next 6-7 weeks, but i do think it is becoming increasingly unlikely. I am hopeful - but the task is quite large and Ukraine will have to find a way of keeping fighting over winter.
 
Last edited:
. .
Ok so let’s put this into prospective

So yes Ukraine is definitely winning

IMG_0356.jpeg
 
.
Mohsin A said:
There is no cake left to eat in the EU. It's gone down the toilet. And now the clown of Kiev is threatening member states. Couldn't make this sh1t up!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1702833430952616083
Click to expand...
Obviously you have not been to an EU country in your life, nor live in it, nor would be ever allowed to be in it. They are spending a $1trillion to do things like energy transition and digitization (forward looking softer areas to improve society). Go to Amsterdam, Stockholm, or Brussels, and the makeup of the cities is very obvious that immigrants have moved enmasse and continue to move, many from whereever you live. So yes, you will never know, but nobody is escaping the EU ,and certainly the best and brightest staying there. Can you say that for the down the drain Russia? Who could leave left, and those who want to leave can't.

Foinikas said:
Wasn't that the main reason? The main excuse?

Saddam has weapons of mass destruction. Didn't the US and Britain go to war with that slogan? Saddam trains terrorists,Saddam is a threat to the US? Wasn't that the slogan for the 2003 invasion?
Click to expand...
Why are you so F*(&* lazy and stupid. Go type a few strokes and start or join a thread on Saddam. Nobody here claims that just because Ukraine is supported, that the Iraq was was justified. There were 100s of messages posted a decade ago about the stupidity in that campaign and lack of justification.

Big powers are masters at making patriotic justifications. Its a skill not just unique to Russians
 
.

Similar threads

H
Rassian Foreign Affairs
Replies
9
Views
288
Akbar26
A
fitpOsitive
Attentions desis of Britain
Replies
0
Views
292
fitpOsitive
fitpOsitive
beijingwalker
Zelensky on Ukraine aid: 'This month is the difficulties'
Replies
1
Views
550
aziqbal
aziqbal
beijingwalker
EU asks China to influence Russia to return to Grain Deal
Replies
0
Views
506
beijingwalker
beijingwalker
A
United States sanctions 19 Indian companies for aiding Russia's war efforts in Ukraine.
Replies
1
Views
208
sidkhan2
S

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom