What's new

Russia promises 'military response' to any further NATO expansion

Titanium100

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 1, 2019
Messages
7,772
Reaction score
-10
Country
Denmark
Location
Denmark
Russia promises 'military response' to any further NATO expansion
20 Dec, 2021 15:16 / Updated 5 hours ago

61c05e2685f5400a476c8cbe.jpg


By Layla Guest

NATO must be aware that pushing further into Eastern Europe, past Moscow’s declared red lines, will make a military response inevitable, a top Russian diplomat has warned, amid escalating tensions with the US-led bloc.
Speaking to Rossiya 24 TV on Monday, Konstantin Gavrilov, the head of the Russian delegation to the Negotiations on Military Security and Arms Control in Vienna said Washington was obliged to engage in a dialogue with Moscow on security guarantees for the sake of peace on the continent, whether officials wanted it or not.
“The conversation must be serious, and everyone in NATO is well aware, despite all the power and strength, that it is necessary to take concrete political actions, otherwise the alternative is a … military response from Russia,” he explained.



Gavrilov’s comments came shortly after Moscow issued two documents, one for NATO and the other for US officials, requesting a wide range of assurances it said were aimed at enhancing the security of all parties.

The proposal to NATO focuses mainly on the movement of personnel and hardware, and includes the requirement that Kiev’s long-held ambition to join the bloc would not be realized. A separate clause calls for the current members to renounce any military activity on the territory of Ukraine, as well as in Eastern Europe, the South Caucasus, and Central Asia.

In its proposition to Washington, Moscow requested that officials commit to ruling out expansion into former Soviet republics. Concerns over the US-led military bloc’s potential widening into Eastern Europe have been reignited in recent weeks. Speaking via video link earlier this month, Russian President Vladimir Putin told his US counterpart, Joe Biden, his country was “seriously interested” in getting “reliable and firm legal guarantees” that would prohibit NATO’s expansion further eastwards, as well as the deployment of “offensive strike weapons systems” nearby.

Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova warned at the beginning of December that further enlargement of the bloc in the direction of Russia was a red line for Moscow, and that Ukraine’s hopes of joining its ranks were unacceptable. The US was pulling Kiev into the orbit of NATO and turning it into a “bridgehead” of confrontation with Russia, she said, in a move that could destabilize Europe.

 
.
yes with the 22,000 x T72 tanks they certainly have more tanks that UK has ATGM

however they will be easy picking for the RAF because air power alone can stop a entire army

Russian navy is almost non-existent and good luck trying to get passed the Type 45 DDG

Russian Air Force suffers from very poor readiness and their good aircraft are too small in numbers

if Russia wants to rely on Nukes well UK has 4 x Vanguard Class SSBN each one carriers 16 x Trident Missiles each missiles has 5-6 re-entry vehicles
 
.
yes with the 22,000 x T72 tanks they certainly have more tanks that UK has ATGM

however they will be easy picking for the RAF because air power alone can stop a entire army

Russian navy is almost non-existent and good luck trying to get passed the Type 45 DDG

Russian Air Force suffers from very poor readiness and their good aircraft are too small in numbers

if Russia wants to rely on Nukes well UK has 4 x Vanguard Class SSBN each one carriers 16 x Trident Missiles each missiles has 5-6 re-entry vehicles
Spot the stupid again
 
.
yes with the 22,000 x T72 tanks they certainly have more tanks that UK has ATGM

however they will be easy picking for the RAF because air power alone can stop a entire army

Russian navy is almost non-existent and good luck trying to get passed the Type 45 DDG

Russian Air Force suffers from very poor readiness and their good aircraft are too small in numbers

if Russia wants to rely on Nukes well UK has 4 x Vanguard Class SSBN each one carriers 16 x Trident Missiles each missiles has 5-6 re-entry vehicles
:lol:
 
.
yes with the 22,000 x T72 tanks they certainly have more tanks that UK has ATGM

however they will be easy picking for the RAF because air power alone can stop a entire army

Russian navy is almost non-existent and good luck trying to get passed the Type 45 DDG

Russian Air Force suffers from very poor readiness and their good aircraft are too small in numbers

if Russia wants to rely on Nukes well UK has 4 x Vanguard Class SSBN each one carriers 16 x Trident Missiles each missiles has 5-6 re-entry vehicles
Kesy kesy log PDF think tank group ma shamil hain :lol:
 
.
yes with the 22,000 x T72 tanks they certainly have more tanks that UK has ATGM

however they will be easy picking for the RAF because air power alone can stop a entire army

Russian navy is almost non-existent and good luck trying to get passed the Type 45 DDG

Russian Air Force suffers from very poor readiness and their good aircraft are too small in numbers

if Russia wants to rely on Nukes well UK has 4 x Vanguard Class SSBN each one carriers 16 x Trident Missiles each missiles has 5-6 re-entry vehicles
Spot the stupid again
@waz @The Eagle I guess I am too sensible to qualify as a think tank analyst on this forum :lol:
 
.
The US is acting so stupidly that it cannot see that Russia's national security-centered rhetorics are increasing support in domestic politics.

Atlanticist speculators and financial instruments and even institutions are trying to impoverish the Russian economy and thus the Russian people by maybe burning billions of dollars. But as military tensions rise, the consequences of these attacks will remain insignificant for the Russian people.
 
. .
Russia promises 'military response' to any further NATO expansion
20 Dec, 2021 15:16 / Updated 5 hours ago

61c05e2685f5400a476c8cbe.jpg


By Layla Guest

NATO must be aware that pushing further into Eastern Europe, past Moscow’s declared red lines, will make a military response inevitable, a top Russian diplomat has warned, amid escalating tensions with the US-led bloc.
Speaking to Rossiya 24 TV on Monday, Konstantin Gavrilov, the head of the Russian delegation to the Negotiations on Military Security and Arms Control in Vienna said Washington was obliged to engage in a dialogue with Moscow on security guarantees for the sake of peace on the continent, whether officials wanted it or not.
“The conversation must be serious, and everyone in NATO is well aware, despite all the power and strength, that it is necessary to take concrete political actions, otherwise the alternative is a … military response from Russia,” he explained.



Gavrilov’s comments came shortly after Moscow issued two documents, one for NATO and the other for US officials, requesting a wide range of assurances it said were aimed at enhancing the security of all parties.

The proposal to NATO focuses mainly on the movement of personnel and hardware, and includes the requirement that Kiev’s long-held ambition to join the bloc would not be realized. A separate clause calls for the current members to renounce any military activity on the territory of Ukraine, as well as in Eastern Europe, the South Caucasus, and Central Asia.

In its proposition to Washington, Moscow requested that officials commit to ruling out expansion into former Soviet republics. Concerns over the US-led military bloc’s potential widening into Eastern Europe have been reignited in recent weeks. Speaking via video link earlier this month, Russian President Vladimir Putin told his US counterpart, Joe Biden, his country was “seriously interested” in getting “reliable and firm legal guarantees” that would prohibit NATO’s expansion further eastwards, as well as the deployment of “offensive strike weapons systems” nearby.

Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova warned at the beginning of December that further enlargement of the bloc in the direction of Russia was a red line for Moscow, and that Ukraine’s hopes of joining its ranks were unacceptable. The US was pulling Kiev into the orbit of NATO and turning it into a “bridgehead” of confrontation with Russia, she said, in a move that could destabilize Europe.


the old USSR just rolled over. the new Russia can just issue threats. you need boots on the ground to conquer Ukraine. The Russians do not have them.
 
. . .
It would be difficult to expel them specifically from post-1997 territories unless the pressure is upped and they fold..

The priority is the strategic areas in neighbouring regions. It is a Western incursion which will be stopped and pushed back.
 
.
yes with the 22,000 x T72 tanks they certainly have more tanks that UK has ATGM

however they will be easy picking for the RAF because air power alone can stop a entire army

Russian navy is almost non-existent and good luck trying to get passed the Type 45 DDG

Russian Air Force suffers from very poor readiness and their good aircraft are too small in numbers

if Russia wants to rely on Nukes well UK has 4 x Vanguard Class SSBN each one carriers 16 x Trident Missiles each missiles has 5-6 re-entry vehicles
I think you are living in 90s era

Russian armed forces went under massive modernization you are talking T 72 where were u all these days

Russian navy has
Akula
Borei
Yasen
Submarines ready to launch kaliber missiles
Kirov
Sovenmary
Udoly
Gepard
Girgovich
Buyan
To name only fee dozens more in class can oit number entire NATO fleet in power as well

Airforce
Su 57
Su 35
Su30sm
Mig29

These all are very cpavble to yake on rafales euro fighters


Land forces
T 72
T 80 T90
T 14
Iskander Tactical missile

Russia has very potent air defence system imposible to get through

S300
S350 vityaz
S400
Tor
Buk
Pantsir

Nato dont have S 400 iskander Su 57not to forget hypersonic missile
Wake up sid its 2021
 
.
The priority is the strategic areas in neighbouring regions. It is a Western incursion which will be stopped and pushed back.

I agree with you it is an incursion.. Which should be addressed but not sure if they wanna fold back from these areas
 
.
I think you are living in 90s era

Russian armed forces went under massive modernization you are talking T 72 where were u all these days

Russian navy has
Akula
Borei
Yasen
Submarines ready to launch kaliber missiles
Kirov
Sovenmary
Udoly
Gepard
Girgovich
Buyan
To name only fee dozens more in class can oit number entire NATO fleet in power as well

Airforce
Su 57
Su 35
Su30sm
Mig29

These all are very cpavble to yake on rafales euro fighters


Land forces
T 72
T 80 T90
T 14
Iskander Tactical missile

Russia has very potent air defence system imposible to get through

S300
S350 vityaz
S400
Tor
Buk
Pantsir

Nato dont have S 400 iskander Su 57not to forget hypersonic missile
Wake up sid its 2021

Are you being serious in this post.. especially about the S400 and SU-57 if so this is comedic post and redundant
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom