What's new

Russia delivers nuclear threat to Denmark

flamer84

BANNED
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
9,435
Reaction score
-14
Country
Romania
Location
United Kingdom
Tensions between Denmark and Russia were ratcheted up a notch on Saturday.

Russia’s ambassador to Denmark, Mikhail Vanin, wrote in an opinion piece published by Jyllands-Posten that Denmark has made itself a target of a potential nuclear attack by joining Nato’s missile defence system.

“I don’t think the Danes fully understand the consequences of what will happen if Denmark joins the American-controlled missile defence. If it happens, Danish war ships will become targets for Russian atomic missiles,” Vanin wrote.

Denmark announced in August that it will will contribute at least one frigate to Nato’s defence system. At the time, Defence Minister Nicolai Wammen said that joining the missile defence system was not a move aimed at Russia.

“That Denmark will join the missile defence system with radar capacity on one or more of our frigates is not an action that is targeted against Russia, but rather to protect us against rogues states, terrorist organisations and others that have the capacity to fire missiles at Europe and the US,” Wammen told Jyllands-Posten in August.

Vanin’s op-ed made it clear that Russia doesn’t share that interpretation.

“Denmark will become a part of the threat against Russia. It will be less peaceful and the relationship with Russia will be harmed. It is of course your decision – I want to simply remind you that it will cost you both money and security,” Vanin wrote.

“At the same time, Russia has missiles that are guaranteed to break through future global missile defence systems,” he continued.

Danish Foreign Minister Martin Lidegaard called Vanin’s statements “unacceptable”.

Russia delivers nuclear threat to Denmark - The Local

I wanted to make a Superboy like poll with the question "who do you think is more retarded with its threats lately:Russia or North Koreea?" but i resisted the impulse.
 
. .
If Russia has missiles that can easily break through NATO BMD, why are they so worried about it? Lol

Because it will cost more.

If you make BMD, the traditional logical response is for the other side to make more nuclear missiles.

And upcoming tech such as HGV will cost more too.

Now, does: More nuclear missiles = Higher instability/risk?

Probably, because large numbers of nukes are harder to protect from third party threats.

But that is the logical counter to BMD, and those inducting BMD are well aware of it.
 
. .
Because it will cost more.

If you make BMD, the traditional logical response is for the other side to make more nuclear missiles.

And upcoming tech such as HGV will cost more too.

Now, does: More nuclear missiles = Higher instability/risk?

Probably, because large numbers of nukes are harder to protect from third party threats.

But that is the logical counter to BMD, and those inducting BMD are well aware of it.


Russia allready has some 8000 nukes.It doesn't need more.In Europe France and the UK have some 560 nukes yet they don't scream against S400,S350.S300 like Russia does.Neither does the US.
 
. . . .
You could have said the same thing when they had 1000 nukes.

But they did want more.


They over did it.What now ? You mean 8000 aren't enough,should they go for 15000.Oki doki.As i've said earlier maybe they should loose the S400 before moaning about others if they like naked MAD so much.
 
.
Flamer boy, the U.S. and their vassals are the "retards". Russia and North Korea on the other hand are peaceful countries that are constantly being targeted and threatened and sanctioned by the usual criminal Western imperialist thugs.
 
.
Flamer boy, the U.S. and their vassals are the "retards". Russia and North Korea on the other hand are peaceful countries that are constantly being targeted and threatened and sanctioned by the usual criminal Western imperialist thugs.


Sry but i didn't start the poll so your post is irelevant.Ok Bye.
 
.
They over did it.What now ? You mean 8000 aren't enough,should they go for 15000.Oki doki.As i've said earlier maybe they should loose the S400 before moaning about others if they like naked MAD so much.

I think they are unhappy because they already have a good portion pointed at China and they don't want to shift any of them over to Europe.
 
.
Wtf danmark? BC why?

Danish will be stupid to get in this race. They are most peace loving and prosperous nation. Why step in to dog shit?
 
. .
I think they are unhappy because they already have a good portion pointed at China and they don't want to shift any of them over to Europe.

Divide and conquer, LOL.

Let's face it, America and Europe are sanctioning Russia, while we are conducting trillion dollar energy deals with Russia in order to help them beat the sanctions.

Ask anyone in the world who Russia is most likely to nuke right now.

Russian public think USA is No.1 enemy – poll — RT Russian politics

Russians overwhelmingly chose America as their number 1 enemy.

They also overwhelmingly chose China as their best friend, in the same poll.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom