What's new

Russia claims it has a US Tomahawk cruise missile and will use it to improve its own weapons

ashok321

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
17,942
Reaction score
4
Country
Canada
Location
Malaysia
Russia claims it has a US Tomahawk cruise missile and will use it to improve its own weapons

  • Russia has gotten its hands on a U.S. Tomahawk cruise missile and it's going to study it to improve its own weapon systems, the Defense Ministry said Wednesday.
  • However, the U.S. Department of Defense told CNBC that the claims from Moscow are "absurd."
  • Russia said it would study the Tomahawk and would use it to improve Russian weapon systems.

Russia has gotten its hands on a U.S. Tomahawk cruise missile and it's going to study it to improve its own weapon systems, the Defense Ministry said Wednesday,

However, the U.S. Department of Defense told CNBC that the claims from Moscow are "absurd."

An official within Russia's ministry said that an unexploded Tomahawk cruise missile and one high accuracy air-launched missile that the U.S. and its allies used in their last airstrike in Syria on April 14 has been brought to Moscow, Russian news agency TASS reported.


The chief of the Russian General Staff's main operations directorate, Colonel-General Sergey Rudskoy, told a news briefing on Wednesday that Russian military specialists were already studying the missiles.

"Some of the missiles failed to reach the designated targets apparently due to technical failures, which created the risk of destroying civilian facilities and causing civilian casualties," Rudskoy said.

"Two of them, a cruise missile Tomahawk and a high-accuracy air-launched missile, have been brought to Moscow," he said, adding that Russian specialists were studying them.

"The results of this work will be used to improve Russian weapon systems."

A Pentagon spokesman for the U.S. Department of Defense blasted Russia's claims, telling CNBC that they were an attempt to distract people from its alliance with Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime.

"This is another example of the Russian disinformation campaign to distract attention from their moral complicity to the Assad Regime's atrocities and the civilian carnage in western Syria," Eric Pahon, Pentagon spokesman, told CNBC via email on Wednesday.

"The claims … regarding our target selection are absurd, as is the rest of the (TASS) article. On the Tomahawk, we have seen no proof, other than statements made to Russian state-owned media, that their claims are true. This is likely another smoke screen of propaganda to distract from the real issue at hand — the murder of innocent civilians by a murderous regime propped up by Russian backing," he said.

Tomahawks
Tomahawk missiles are, their maker Raytheon says, "modern, mature, powerful" and can "can circle for hours, shift course instantly on command and beam a picture of its target to controllers halfway around the world before striking with pinpoint accuracy."

Raytheon notes that Tomahawks can be launched from a ship or submarine and can fly into heavily defended airspace more than 1,000 miles away "to conduct precise strikes on high-value targets with minimal collateral damage. Launching the weapon from such a long distance helps to keep sailors out of harm's way."

It notes that the U.S. and allied militaries have used Tomahawk missiles more than 2,000 times in combat, and flight-tested them 500 times. In April 2017, U.S. Navy destroyers launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at targets on a Syrian air base, it said.

A U.S. Department of Defense press briefing on April 14 — the date the U.S. and its allies launched an airstrike on Syrian government bases in retaliation for a suspected chemical weapons attack carried out by the Syrian regime, an ally of Russia – confirmed the use of multiple Tomahawk missiles in the airstrikes.

Pentagon Chief Spokesperson Dana White and Joint Staff Director Lt. Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. said Tomahawk missiles had been deployed to various targets in Syria including the Barzeh Research and Development Center (believed to be involved in chemical weapon research and development) and a chemical weapons storage facility.

What Russia will learn from the Tomahawk missile is uncertain given that it has recently boasted of developing state-of-the-art missiles itself. Only in March, Russian President Vladimir Putin unveiled what he called a state-of-the-art slew of new defense systems. This included a new prototype missile that "can reach any point in the world" and a supersonic weapon that cannot be tracked by anti-missile systems.
 
.
The current US Administration is the best at disinformation and lie!
 
.
well i ws thinking russia is more capable then tomahawk
 
.
It's plausible, if they can land unexploded in Pakistan and be studied same could happen in Syria. Russia already has pretty advanced cruise missile programs but they can get insight on how to jam or remotely disable Tomahawks.

It is widely believed Pakistan used Tomahawk technology to fast track Babur development.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...734-bac8-4c9edb46b3ac/?utm_term=.590b65058176

"
Pakistani scientists and weapons experts are studying components salvaged from an errant American cruise missile that landed last week in southern Pakistan, security sources said today. They expressed optimism that they could unlock technological secrets that will advance Pakistan's missile program.

Officials said experts associated with Pakistan's civilian and military missile programs were inspecting the guidance system, onboard computer and propulsion system of the Tomahawk missile, which was fired Aug. 20 in the U.S. attack on Islamic terrorist camps in Afghanistan but apparently fell short of its target.
"
 
. . .
LOL This always happens to the Yanks. They love to show their muscles, but when caught with their pants down they have face-saving excuses.

100% the Russians got their hands on the missiles. The US face saving attempt is a dead giveaway.
 
.
LOL This always happens to the Yanks. They love to show their muscles, but when caught with their pants down they have face-saving excuses.

100% the Russians got their hands on the missiles. The US face saving attempt is a dead giveaway.


So you think a tomahawk traveling at 500 knots landed intact in Syria?
 
.
So you think a tomahawk traveling at 500 knots landed intact in Syria?

I believe the Chinese/Pakistani cruise missile program was helped by an unexploded cruise missile that was aimed at Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan but landed in Pakistan.

As some wit put it at the time, he thought 'precision guided' meant that at least you hit the right country.
 
.
I believe the Chinese/Pakistani cruise missile program was helped by an unexploded cruise missile that was aimed at Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan but landed in Pakistan.

As some wit put it at the time, he thought 'precision guided' meant that at least you hit the right country.
Well the US has used around 2000 tomahawks in combat. I am sure there are plenty of bits and pieces laying around for the Russians to inspect.


Interesting enough (at least to me) I have read that the cost of copying technology is far from cheap. It runs almost 80 percent vs the cost of developing it yourself.
 
. .
The only American missile comparable to Kh-101 is AGM-158. Russian missiles are second to none.

Kh-101

russiancruisemissile.jpg


AGM-158

Lockheed_Martin_AGM-158_JASSM_%288351604870%29.jpg
 
.
well i ws thinking russia is more capable then tomahawk
Russia disagrees.

LOL This always happens to the Yanks. They love to show their muscles, but when caught with their pants down they have face-saving excuses.

100% the Russians got their hands on the missiles. The US face saving attempt is a dead giveaway.

Not showing an intact shiny missile was a dead giveaway.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom