What's new

Russia, China, India and Turkey condemn Libya strikes.

CardSharp

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Messages
9,355
Reaction score
0
MOSCOW - India and Russia's prime minister hit out Monday at the Western-led air strikes in Libya as the United Nations chief pleaded for international unity on the action against Moamer Gadhafi.

India urged an immediate halt to the strikes spearheaded by French fighter jets Saturday, as Germany said it had "good reasons" for abstaining from Thursday's UN vote on the action and African nations voiced criticism.

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin slammed the UN resolution as a "medieval call to crusade", but was later criticized by President Dmitry Medvedev who gave the action on Gadhafi's forces qualified support.

"The resolution by the Security Council, of course, is defective and flawed," Putin was quoted as saying by Russian news agencies.

"To me, it resembles some sort of medieval call to crusade when someone would appeal to someone to go to a certain place and free someone else," he charged.

Medvedev, in a hastily convened press conference, said using words such as "crusade" in reference to a Muslim country was unacceptable.

"Otherwise, everything may end up much worse compared to what's going on now. Everyone should remember that," Medvedev said.

Russia refrained from using its veto on the UN Security Council resolution and instead abstained because it did not reflect its entire position on what is happening in Libya, he said.

Brazil, China, Germany and China also abstained from the vote, which was backed by 10 nations and allowed use of "all necessary measures" to shield Libyan civilians from a crackdown by Gadhafi forces on a popular revolt.

The international operation has been joined by a host of nations including Britain, France, the United States, Greece, Italy, Spain and notably Qatar.

But India's Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna said the strikes on Libya would lead to more harm to "innocent civilians, foreign nationals and diplomatic missions."

"India calls upon all parties to abjure violence and the use of threat and force to resolve the differences. I think the need of the hour is cessation of armed conflict," he told reporters.

China also expressed regret on Sunday, saying in a foreign ministry statement that it opposed the use of force in international relations.

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said Monday Arab League criticism of alliance action at the weekend showed that Germany had "good reasons" to fear military intervention.

But Chancellor Angela Merkel said despite Germany's abstention, Berlin wanted the military mission to be successful in stopping Gadhafi's forces.

The Arab League's call for the United Nations to impose a no-fly zone was vital to mustering votes to pass the resolution, but on Sunday its secretary general Amr Mussa suggested the air strikes went beyond the resolution.

But he reaffirmed his commitment to the UN-mandated action after talks Monday with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, who called for unity.

"It is important that the international community speak with one voice to implement the second council resolution," the UN chief said, referring to Resolution 1973 passed Thursday.

Turkey Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu was critical of the formation of the coalition leading the action and stressed the objective should be "not to launch a large-scale war".

Iran's Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei charged the Western intervention in Libya was aimed at "getting their hands on its oil", as claimed by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez Sunday.

Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borisov also said Monday the "adventure" was motivated by "petrol and who will exploit Libya's oil fields".

South Africa, among the countries that backed the UN resolution behind Britain, France and the United States, was also wary.

"Operations aimed at enforcing the no-fly zone and protecting civilians should be limited to just that," President Jacob Zuma said, adding South Africa does not support "the regime change doctrine".

Namibian President Hifikepunye Pohamba labelled the strikes an "interference in internal affairs of Africa", backing the 53-nation African Union stance against "any kind of foreign military intervention" in Libya.

African historian and former Mali First Lady Adame Ba Konare called it a "macabre carnival" and called on Africans to defend their "bruised and ridiculed" continent.


Read more: Russia, China, India and Turkey condemn Libya strikes
 
. .
I just watched an interview with the British Defence minister, who referred to the nations currently in the operation against Libya as "the coalition of the willing" but that was probably a mistake.
 
.
where is pakistan?

oh sorry

our politician dnt even knw what is happening in the world..
 
. .
Allied forces need to be taken to task if they are going beyond UN mandate. if not.. then india, china & russia should stop crying foul now! afterall they abstained from voting instead of vetoing it or voting against!! it's all easy to sit in the fence & pass the judgement!!
 
.
i think NATO forces hurried on this. they should have waited for few more days.
 
.
Allied forces need to be taken to task if they are going beyond UN mandate. if not.. then india, china & russia should stop crying foul now! afterall they abstained from voting instead of vetoing it or voting against!! it's all easy to sit in the fence & pass the judgement!!
military speaking it is not enough to put a no fly zone considering the much better weapons Kadhagi got
they need to target some military strategic points and columns of tanks like they did

not supporting this is just supporting Kadhafi keeps going
 
.
I understand all others.....but why would India be against that?

any other reason besides, harm to more innocent people.
 
.
military speaking it is not enough to put a no fly zone considering the much better weapons Kadhagi got
they need to target some military strategic points and columns of tanks like they did

not supporting this is just supporting Kadhafi keeps going

looks like people are interpreting 'no fly zone' in different ways. for some it looks like just safe guarding the sky! for west & america it's pre-empting anything that would cause harm to their flights & mission.. like taking down the missile defence systems, air defence systems.. etc!!
 
.
Condemming attacks is supporting gaddaffi in genocide he is doing against his own people...........

Hey sanctions and verbal orders of unsc didnt worked.......what else could have been done.

Congress is just trying to show that their foreign policy is not run by usa after the wikileaks exposed.

About china.......track is not clean I would say
 
.
I am against my government on this...i think attack on Gaddafi and his forces a right thing to do....he is a mad man and definitely need to be thrown out..preferrably by their own people ..if not, with help from outside forces...
 
.
game_over_nato_2009_bild_600.jpg


BRIC.jpg
 
.
What is the position of their fellow arab countries like saudi,uae etc..?Are they against western intervention?
 
.
What is the position of their fellow arab countries like saudi,uae etc..?Are they against western intervention?

It's in the article. Basically they wanted UN to dictate how the no-fly-zone works but this process now has been carried out almost exclusively within a NATO command, with the US general in charge of Africa Command making the decisions.



In addition there has been conflicting remarks by NATO military leaders versus civilians leaders on whether regime change is one of the goals of the no-fly-zone.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom