What's new

Republicans seize Senate, gaining full control of Congress

Aepsilons

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
24,960
Reaction score
118
Country
Japan
Location
United States
Washington (CNN) -- A Republican tide ripped the Senate away from Democrats Tuesday, giving the GOP full control of Congress and the power to pin down President Barack Obama during his last two years in office.

The thumping win upends the balance of power between the White House and Capitol Hill only six years after Obama's Democrats swept to power and marginalized Republicans in a rush to reform health care, Wall Street and pass a huge stimulus package.

Now, it's Democrats who will take the back seat on Capitol Hill, relying mostly on the power of the filibuster to stymie Republicans and keep Obama's legacy intact.

"For too long, this administration has tried to tell the American people what is good for them and then blame somebody else when their policies didn't work out," Mitch McConnell, who is expected to become the next Senate majority leader, said in a victory speech.

In the House, CNN projected the GOP will have at least 246 seats, its largest majority since World War II. Speaker John Boehner, celebrating a widened majority, said he is "humbled by the responsibility the American people have placed with us."

"But this is not a time for celebration," he said. "It's time for government to start getting results and implementing solutions to the challenges facing our country, starting with our still-struggling economy.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who has controlled the Senate since 2007, congratulated Republicans on their victory.

"The message from voters is clear: they want us to work together," Reid said. "I look forward to working with Senator McConnell to get things done for the middle class."

Obama will make a statement Wednesday afternoon on an election many will see as a repudiation of his presidency, and he will host bipartisan leaders Friday to try to chart a way forward.



Democratic losses pile up

Democratic fears of a rout came true, as party candidates struggled to defend seats won in the 2008 Obama wave in conservative territory, and couldn't get out from under an unpopular president limping through his second term. The losses in Colorado and Iowa will sting especially hard, as those two states enjoyed a fabled place in Obama's world, as drivers of the president's unlikely bid for the White House in 2008.

The GOP also piled up wins in Montana, South Dakota, Arkansas, West Virginia and North Carolina — all seats that had been in Democratic hands — to surpass their magic number of six net gains. With seats still to be decided in Virginia, Alaska and Louisiana -- where there will be a runoff in December -- the GOP currently has 52 seats in the Senate.


Republican numbers stood up when the GOP managed to hold on to seats in Kansas and Georgia which had threatened to fall from their grasp and complicate the Senate math.

It was a night of almost unrelenting misery for Democrats:

In Iowa, Iraq war veteran Joni Ernst became the first woman elected to Congress from her state, after turning around her Republican campaign with an ad in which she boasted about castrating hogs.

• In North Carolina, Democrat Kay Hagan was felled by Thom Tillis, who repeatedly pummeled her for standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Obama.

Arkansas Sen. Mark Pryor lost to Tom Cotton, who, like Ernst, is an Iraq war veteran. Pryor's loss comes despite former president Bill Clinton's efforts to save him in his beloved home state.

• Democrats thought they had Colorado, with its mix of young voters, Hispanics and students locked down for a generation. But Sen. Mark Udall tumbled to charismatic challenger Cory Gardner who shook off claims he was anti-women.

• Virginia Democratic Sen. Mark Warner is having a tougher ride than expected against Republican challenger Ed Gillespie in a state Democrats had thought was reliably theirs after Obama won it twice.

A rare ray of hope for Democrats came in New Hampshire, where Sen. Jeanne Shaheen bested challenger Scott Brown. And Pennsylvania's governor's mansion reverted to Democrats when Tom Wolf unseated Republican Gov. Tom Corbett in a marquee race.

Republicans seize Senate, get full control of Congress - CNN.com
 
. .
Washington (CNN) -- A Republican tide ripped the Senate away from Democrats Tuesday, giving the GOP full control of Congress and the power to pin down President Barack Obama during his last two years in office.

The thumping win upends the balance of power between the White House and Capitol Hill only six years after Obama's Democrats swept to power and marginalized Republicans in a rush to reform health care, Wall Street and pass a huge stimulus package.

Now, it's Democrats who will take the back seat on Capitol Hill, relying mostly on the power of the filibuster to stymie Republicans and keep Obama's legacy intact.

"For too long, this administration has tried to tell the American people what is good for them and then blame somebody else when their policies didn't work out," Mitch McConnell, who is expected to become the next Senate majority leader, said in a victory speech.

In the House, CNN projected the GOP will have at least 246 seats, its largest majority since World War II. Speaker John Boehner, celebrating a widened majority, said he is "humbled by the responsibility the American people have placed with us."

"But this is not a time for celebration," he said. "It's time for government to start getting results and implementing solutions to the challenges facing our country, starting with our still-struggling economy.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who has controlled the Senate since 2007, congratulated Republicans on their victory.

"The message from voters is clear: they want us to work together," Reid said. "I look forward to working with Senator McConnell to get things done for the middle class."

Obama will make a statement Wednesday afternoon on an election many will see as a repudiation of his presidency, and he will host bipartisan leaders Friday to try to chart a way forward.



Democratic losses pile up

Democratic fears of a rout came true, as party candidates struggled to defend seats won in the 2008 Obama wave in conservative territory, and couldn't get out from under an unpopular president limping through his second term. The losses in Colorado and Iowa will sting especially hard, as those two states enjoyed a fabled place in Obama's world, as drivers of the president's unlikely bid for the White House in 2008.

The GOP also piled up wins in Montana, South Dakota, Arkansas, West Virginia and North Carolina — all seats that had been in Democratic hands — to surpass their magic number of six net gains. With seats still to be decided in Virginia, Alaska and Louisiana -- where there will be a runoff in December -- the GOP currently has 52 seats in the Senate.


Republican numbers stood up when the GOP managed to hold on to seats in Kansas and Georgia which had threatened to fall from their grasp and complicate the Senate math.

It was a night of almost unrelenting misery for Democrats:

In Iowa, Iraq war veteran Joni Ernst became the first woman elected to Congress from her state, after turning around her Republican campaign with an ad in which she boasted about castrating hogs.

• In North Carolina, Democrat Kay Hagan was felled by Thom Tillis, who repeatedly pummeled her for standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Obama.

Arkansas Sen. Mark Pryor lost to Tom Cotton, who, like Ernst, is an Iraq war veteran. Pryor's loss comes despite former president Bill Clinton's efforts to save him in his beloved home state.

• Democrats thought they had Colorado, with its mix of young voters, Hispanics and students locked down for a generation. But Sen. Mark Udall tumbled to charismatic challenger Cory Gardner who shook off claims he was anti-women.

• Virginia Democratic Sen. Mark Warner is having a tougher ride than expected against Republican challenger Ed Gillespie in a state Democrats had thought was reliably theirs after Obama won it twice.

A rare ray of hope for Democrats came in New Hampshire, where Sen. Jeanne Shaheen bested challenger Scott Brown. And Pennsylvania's governor's mansion reverted to Democrats when Tom Wolf unseated Republican Gov. Tom Corbett in a marquee race.

Republicans seize Senate, get full control of Congress - CNN.com

I'm one of those "vote for the best person" type of voters and avoid party affiliations, but I can't help but think this is both a good and bad thing for the US. On one hand it will probably increase the issues in congress, just weighted more towards Republicans, but for our military having Republicans in charge of major posts and committees is the best possible option. Whether this will be good for the US going forwards is up for debate, and it hasn't been good in the past from a financial, economic and political relations standpoint. But from a procurement and buildup perspective the US should benefit greatly.
 
.
I'm one of those "vote for the best person" type of voters and avoid party affiliations, but I can't help but think this is both a good and bad thing for the US. On one hand it will probably increase the issues in congress, just weighted more towards Republicans, but for our military have Republicans in charge of major posts and committees is the best possible option. Whether this will be good for the US going forwards is up for debate, and it hasn't been good in the past from a financial, economic and political relations standpoint. But from a procurement and buildup perspective the US should benefit greatly.
The president also has the power to block bills from congress and force them to go through the whole process of again, so I think the political standstill will continue.
 
.
I'm one of those "vote for the best person" type of voters and avoid party affiliations, but I can't help but think this is both a good and bad thing for the US. On one hand it will probably increase the issues in congress, just weighted more towards Republicans, but for our military have Republicans in charge of major posts and committees is the best possible option. Whether this will be good for the US going forwards is up for debate, and it hasn't been good in the past from a financial, economic and political relations standpoint. But from a procurement and buildup perspective the US should benefit greatly.
I never understood US two-party system! You guys keep voting for either democrats or republicans over and over again like a loop without getting anything back! Why? Societies need radical reform or they die. Yet you people have no guts to vote for newer parties, or aren't there any new parties in US at all? Low IQ?
The middle class is poorer today than it was in 1989
The economy has gotten bigger, but much of that growth hasn't reached the middle class. Indeed, the top 1 percent grabbed 95 percent of all the gains during the recovery's first three years. And that's not even the most depressing part. Even adjusted for household size, real median incomes haven't increased at all since 1999. That's right: the middle class hasn't gotten a raise in 15 years.
The middle class is poorer today than it was in 1989 - The Washington Post

Seriously? I still cannot understand why you folks vote at all after reading these undeniable facts about your economic state?
 
.
This should sum up the political apathy in the US.


I never understood US two-party system! You guys keep voting for either democrats or republicans over and over again like a loop without getting anything back! Why? Societies need radical reform or they die. Yet you people have no guts to vote for newer parties, or aren't they any new parties in US at all? Low IQ?

The middle class is poorer today than it was in 1989 - The Washington Post

Seriously? I still cannot understand why you folks vote at all after reading these undeniable facts about your economic state?

Reform in the US has always come at the local level and not the Federal level, this is just he way things are. From drug policy, to energy and industry, each state has the power to make changes for themselves. We the citizens, and our businesses make changes that make an impact, the government just sets policies that might not be followed. Radical changes isn't needed for a nation to survive, and sometimes it kills nations too. Just look at the USSR as an example. Change is needed, but the people provide enough of it. Our nation is changing, all nations are and are never done.

The Federal government still says Marijuana is illegal, but the states are making changes to this and Oregon and Alaska have passed measure to decriminalize possession and ok sales. D.C. passed a more limited measure, but even in the capital of our nation local politics and not federal ones are making the changes.

As for the two party system, its just that the larger parties are more organized than the smaller ones. People have just as much capability to vote for a communist government as they do for a Democratic government, one is just more popular.

The president also has the power to block bills from congress and force them to go through the whole process of again, so I think the political standstill will continue.

This is true, but with control of both the House and Senate, the President would be put on an island by the Republican majority. He can block all he wants, but where once people blamed Republicans for the deadlock, by blocking any measures the President would be putting Democrats at risk in the future by rejecting a majority backed bill.
 
Last edited:
.
Reform in the US has always come at the local level and not the Federal level
Actually you guys have an ultimate central planner of all: The Federal Reserve that sets your nation's economic policy in a way that it adjusts overall interest rates on its own:
0% Interest Rates: Not for Average People
While U.S. oil and gas companies have benefitted from near zero percent interest rates for loans, average people have not been so lucky.

A case in point: federal student loans for university students have interest rates ranging from 3.4 percent to 8.5 percent. Another example: credit cards in the U.S. generally have interest rates ranging from 7 percent to 36 percent.

Indeed, an entire activist movement offshoot of Occupy Wall Street started because of the debt crisis faced by average people. That movement coined itself Strike Debt.
Federal Reserve Policy Keeps Fracking Bubble Afloat and That May Change Soon | Steve Horn

You so-called democratic federal government has been hijacked by elitist interests long time ago. Its time to admit that your government is NOT working for the best interests of all or most of its people. They only work for a tiny oligarchy.
 
.
Actually you guys have an ultimate central planner of all: The Federal Reserve that sets your nation's economic policy in a way that it adjusts overall interest rates on its own:

Federal Reserve Policy Keeps Fracking Bubble Afloat and That May Change Soon | Steve Horn

You so-called democratic federal government has been hijacked by elitist interests long time ago. Its time to admit that your government is NOT working for the best interests of all or most of its people. They only work for a tiny oligarchy.

But the economic policy isn't the only policy of the nation. Just look at drug reform. The Federal government still criminalized Marijuana sales and possession, but states are successfully challenging this. Immigration reform and policy is a state issue as well, despite the bickering on Capitol hill. For energy there is no policy and each state has the freedom to pick renewable or fossil fuels or what every fits their need. Economics isn't the only factor that drives our world. And on the economic front, life is good. Life is good for me, my family, my friends, my state, what is there for me to be angry about? I worked for the Federal government for 8 years, this was called military service, and not once did I feel the pull of business or corporate interests. From my perspective, the maligning of business and the thought that the US government has sold out to corporations and rich people is BS. You can have another perspective, I respect this, but from my view on the ground things are good and things are different from what pundits are saying.
 
.
I worked for the Federal government for 8 years, this was called military service, and not once did I feel the pull of business or corporate interests. From my perspective, the maligning of business and the thought that the US government has sold out to corporations and rich people is BS.
Depends on WHAT sector you worked in. I have a relative that works in a BIG pharmaceutical company in Philadelphia and he told me a lot about how private business interests dictate national interests of your nation.
 
.
Jeb Bush will beat Hillary in 2016

(Alec Baldwin will finally move to Canada -- sadly not!)
 
.
I never understood US two-party system! You guys keep voting for either democrats or republicans over and over again like a loop without getting anything back! Why? Societies need radical reform or they die. Yet you people have no guts to vote for newer parties, or aren't there any new parties in US at all? Low IQ?
Low IQ ? Yes, I know Euros love to believe they are smarter and more 'sophisticated' than Americans.

There is nothing mysterious about the two-party political system in the US. In fact, truly smart Euros would NOT have made the comment you made, after all, the two-party political system came from Europe, intellectually and physically.

The two-party system came from the 'first past the post' (FPTP) political system.

First-past-the-post voting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A first-past-the-post (abbreviated FPTP or FPP) election is one that is won by the candidate receiving more votes than any other(s). It is a common, but not universal, feature of electoral systems with single-member legislative districts, and generally results over time in a two-party competition.
There...Was that so painful to find out ?

In other words, there are no laws in the US forbidding the entry of any other party into the electoral process. Did you know that the communist party (CPUSA) is alive in the US ? They once held a party conference in New York City, a capitalist enclave, of all places. But if not the CPUSA, then any party would have to persuade enough Americans to follow. I know that persuasion, which implies choice, is a difficult concept for you to grasp, but do try. So the issue is not guts, but of being naturally hesitant to change, just like any Euro. Keep in mind that it was radical changes that Europe gave the world two hot world wars and one cold one.

Anyway, if enough Americans chose to associate themselves with the Sex, Drugs, and Rock-n-Roll Party (SDR2), for example, then over time, the SDR2 party will replace either the Democrat or Republican party and system will stabilize back to the two-party electoral process again.

Now...Am willing to bet that you do not know how and why do some European countries have multi-party politics. And if you do not know why and how, but this dumbass American do, what does that say about your IQ ?
 
.
I never understood US two-party system! You guys keep voting for either democrats or republicans over and over again like a loop without getting anything back! Why? Societies need radical reform or they die. Yet you people have no guts to vote for newer parties, or aren't there any new parties in US at all? Low IQ?

The middle class is poorer today than it was in 1989 - The Washington Post

Seriously? I still cannot understand why you folks vote at all after reading these undeniable facts about your economic state?


Under estimate the low IQ at your peril---many have tried--.
 
.
But the economic policy isn't the only policy of the nation. Just look at drug reform. The Federal government still criminalized Marijuana sales and possession, but states are successfully challenging this. Immigration reform and policy is a state issue as well, despite the bickering on Capitol hill. For energy there is no policy and each state has the freedom to pick renewable or fossil fuels or what every fits their need. Economics isn't the only factor that drives our world. And on the economic front, life is good. Life is good for me, my family, my friends, my state, what is there for me to be angry about? I worked for the Federal government for 8 years, this was called military service, and not once did I feel the pull of business or corporate interests. From my perspective, the maligning of business and the thought that the US government has sold out to corporations and rich people is BS. You can have another perspective, I respect this, but from my view on the ground things are good and things are different from what pundits are saying.

As a member of a welfare state I find the US rather hard place to live. Don't you think that US should become more welfare oriented?
 
.
As a member of a welfare state I find the US rather hard place to live. Don't you think that US should become more welfare oriented?
No No No No! Stay in Sri Lanka and suck working people there dry.
 
.
No No No No! Stay in Sri Lanka and suck working people there dry.

I don't get what you say. Anyway it seems to me that you people are working pretty hard to make the ends meet.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom